|
Post by RAF on Oct 12, 2018 15:20:58 GMT
I'm pretty sure I just said I would cut Pulis exactly the same slack I did Peter Coates over one episode. Now I'm going to cut you some because I know you don't have an argument which is why you've had to make one up. So you don't hate him for Preston but you do hate him for Preston and Paul Scally and you don't hate Hughes for Chelsea at all! All seems very consistent! :) In Hughes's defence he thought throwing the Chelsea game was going to help him and us out in the next game the fucking mental twat. Pulis on the other hand was and still is an underhand nefarious character. H
|
|
|
Post by owdestokie2 on Oct 12, 2018 15:35:28 GMT
So you don't hate him for Preston but you do hate him for Preston and Paul Scally and you don't hate Hughes for Chelsea at all! All seems very consistent! In Hughes's defence he thought throwing the Chelsea game was going to help him and us out in the next game the fucking mental twat. Pulis on the other hand was and still is an underhand nefarious character. H Not that I fully agree with your comment on Pulis, everyone to their own. But your description is much better than using the dispicable term c**t. Perhaps yourself and others could run a Latin or English course on the Oatie for some who prefer or know no better than gutter language
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Oct 12, 2018 15:50:23 GMT
In Hughes's defence he thought throwing the Chelsea game was going to help him and us out in the next game the fucking mental twat. Pulis on the other hand was and still is an underhand nefarious character. H Not that I fully agree with your comment on Pulis, everyone to their own. But your description is much better than using the dispicable term c**t. Perhaps yourself and others could run a Latin or English course on the Oatie for some who prefer or know no better than gutter language Would you accept any characterisation of Pulis short of him being beatified, Owde, out of interest?
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Oct 12, 2018 15:54:30 GMT
Look. You've failed and are now resorting to putting words in my mouth. Maybe next time, try another way. wiki.c2.com/?FallaciousArgumentThere's also a really good book called The Art of Being Right by Arthur Schopenhauer which offers all sorts of tips about this sort of thing. Or maybe try being honest and admitting that Pulis is a cunt. Once you've said it, all that cognitive dissonance will just slip away. Now do one All are entitled to an opinion, that’s what debate is abouthowever; Isn’t social media great. Anyone can describe someone as a c***t and a crook without fear of retribution. By the way using the term c***t in any conversation/argument is probably the most dispicable word that can be used. I've got worse than that, I can assure you. I can also make comments without fear of retribution: a) Because calling somebody a cunt is an opinion so is just fair comment and not libellous or slanderous. b) Because calling a crook a crook is just stating a fact. He could sue me for that if it wasn't true.
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Oct 12, 2018 15:58:15 GMT
I thought you were going to do it then but you couldn't bring yourself to do it. The answer is yes by the way. Read the court transcript. In answer to your question, I think he almost certainly was based on what we know. In answer to your next question, I've already answered it. See above. When you refer to the court transcript could you just clarify do you the mean the one where the judge called him a liar over the payments he was trying to extort claiming from Gillingham or the one where the judge called him a liar over the payments he dishonestly received from Crystal Palace Take your pick.
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Oct 12, 2018 16:11:25 GMT
In Hughes's defence he thought throwing the Chelsea game was going to help him and us out in the next game the fucking mental twat. Pulis on the other hand was and still is an underhand nefarious character. H Not that I fully agree with your comment on Pulis, everyone to their own. But your description is much better than using the dispicable term c**t. Perhaps yourself and others could run a Latin or English course on the Oatie for some who prefer or know no better than gutter language Out of interest, how would 'a course' change anything for those of us who prefer to use the 'dispicable' term?
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Oct 12, 2018 17:15:06 GMT
Not that I fully agree with your comment on Pulis, everyone to their own. But your description is much better than using the dispicable term c**t. Perhaps yourself and others could run a Latin or English course on the Oatie for some who prefer or know no better than gutter language Out of interest, how would 'a course' change anything for those of us who prefer to use the 'dispicable' term? I'd run the course. I'm a professional writer and Fellow of the RSA. Lesson one - why cunt is the mot juste for describing a cunt.
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Oct 12, 2018 17:17:58 GMT
In Hughes's defence he thought throwing the Chelsea game was going to help him and us out in the next game the fucking mental twat. Pulis on the other hand was and still is an underhand nefarious character. H Not that I fully agree with your comment on Pulis, everyone to their own. But your description is much better than using the dispicable term c**t. Perhaps yourself and others could run a Latin or English course on the Oatie for some who prefer or know no better than gutter language I don't know why you are bothered mate, it's not only fans who think he is one, people within the game do.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Oct 12, 2018 17:44:31 GMT
This wankstain reunion is ever so beautiful. They still come back for a walloping even though their cunt made absolute cunts of them for a decade. Daft cunts.
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Oct 12, 2018 17:56:09 GMT
This wankstain reunion is ever so beautiful. They still come back for a walloping even though their cunt made absolute cunts of them for a decade. Daft cunts. B)
|
|
|
Post by owdestokie2 on Oct 12, 2018 19:09:07 GMT
Not that I fully agree with your comment on Pulis, everyone to their own. But your description is much better than using the dispicable term c**t. Perhaps yourself and others could run a Latin or English course on the Oatie for some who prefer or know no better than gutter language Would you accept any characterisation of Pulis short of him being beatified, Owde, out of interest? Posters have their right to an opinion........no argument!!!! My point is that this board (it’s posters) do not need to use such a dispicable expletive as c**t” to get their point across. IMHO using such a word shows (1) a lack of intelligence or (2) a lack of class for those who supposedly have the intelligence. Perhaps I’m from the wrong generation, but I don’t think I am. Im not interested in the Pulis debate because there will not be any winners
|
|
|
Post by owdestokie2 on Oct 12, 2018 19:45:45 GMT
Out of interest, how would 'a course' change anything for those of us who prefer to use the 'dispicable' term? I'd run the course. I'm a professional writer and Fellow of the RSA. Lesson one - why cunt is the mot juste for describing a cunt. Professional writer, fellow of the RSA, whoopee. I take it your mentors and peers would approve of you using gutter language to reflect your personal opinions on a social media platform. Academic qualifications are are meaningless when judging “life skills and experience” I hope you are not a supposed role model for children, your own or those of other parents. At that I’ll sign off by wishing you a good night.
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Oct 12, 2018 20:00:47 GMT
Would you accept any characterisation of Pulis short of him being beatified, Owde, out of interest? Posters have their right to an opinion........no argument!!!! My point is that this board (it’s posters) do not need to use such a dispicable expletive as c**t” to get their point across. IMHO using such a word shows (1) a lack of intelligence or (2) a lack of class for those who supposedly have the intelligence. Perhaps I’m from the wrong generation, but I don’t think I am. Im not interested in the Pulis debate because there will not be any winners I hate going all grammar nazi but if you're going to continue to use the word 'despicable' in every post would please try to spell it wright? It's getting right on my tits Ta
|
|
|
Post by owdestokie2 on Oct 12, 2018 20:06:31 GMT
Posters have their right to an opinion........no argument!!!! My point is that this board (it’s posters) do not need to use such a dispicable expletive as c**t” to get their point across. IMHO using such a word shows (1) a lack of intelligence or (2) a lack of class for those who supposedly have the intelligence. Perhaps I’m from the wrong generation, but I don’t think I am. Im not interested in the Pulis debate because there will not be any winners I hate going all grammar nazi but if you're going to continue to use the word 'despicable' in every post would please try to spell it wright? It's getting right on my tits Ta Getting on your tits, excellent. Ta
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Oct 12, 2018 20:14:49 GMT
Would you accept any characterisation of Pulis short of him being beatified, Owde, out of interest? Posters have their right to an opinion........no argument!!!! My point is that this board (it’s posters) do not need to use such a dispicable expletive as c**t” to get their point across. IMHO using such a word shows (1) a lack of intelligence or (2) a lack of class for those who supposedly have the intelligence. Perhaps I’m from the wrong generation, but I don’t think I am. Im not interested in the Pulis debate because there will not be any winners And you’d be similarly outraged about, say, Mark Hughes being referred to thusly, I assume? You’d be moved to similarly jump to decry such a description in his case?
|
|
|
Post by swampmongrel on Oct 12, 2018 20:22:12 GMT
There’s few football managers or football fans* who aren’t a bit cuntish.
*myself included.
|
|
|
Post by owdestokie2 on Oct 12, 2018 20:36:17 GMT
Posters have their right to an opinion........no argument!!!! My point is that this board (it’s posters) do not need to use such a dispicable expletive as c**t” to get their point across. IMHO using such a word shows (1) a lack of intelligence or (2) a lack of class for those who supposedly have the intelligence. Perhaps I’m from the wrong generation, but I don’t think I am. Im not interested in the Pulis debate because there will not be any winners And you’d be similarly outraged about, say, Mark Hughes being referred to thusly, I assume? You’d be moved to similarly jump to decry such a description in his case? Absolutely, and there’s no bigger critical of Mark Hughes
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Oct 12, 2018 21:03:44 GMT
I hate going all grammar nazi but if you're going to continue to use the word 'despicable' in every post would please try to spell it wright? It's getting right on my tits Ta Getting on your tits, excellent. Ta Is that a yes?
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Oct 12, 2018 21:07:23 GMT
To be fair to owdestokie, i actually agree about the point he's making re: the "C" word. I swear a lot in my everyday speech but i'm not a fan of that particular word. It's vulgar and just sounds nasty, dirty and unnecessary. It's actually a benefit to use it very sparingly as well, adds extra weight to it if you actually do use it then. Because of that there are very few exceptions i save it for...and ironically for this thread, Tone's pretty high on my list of those exceptions Didn't deserve to be attacked by a tangoed nutcase, especially after what he did for us as a club but it doesn't change the fact the man's a cunt.
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Oct 13, 2018 6:21:18 GMT
I'd run the course. I'm a professional writer and Fellow of the RSA. Lesson one - why cunt is the mot juste for describing a cunt. Professional writer, fellow of the RSA, whoopee. I take it your mentors and peers would approve of you using gutter language to reflect your personal opinions on a social media platform. Academic qualifications are are meaningless when judging “life skills and experience” I hope you are not a supposed role model for children, your own or those of other parents. At that I’ll sign off by wishing you a good night. I'm capable of far worse. It's all about context my friend. This is a football club's messageboard. It's not social media and it's not my front room or a kindergarten. As I said before, no other word will do quite as well to get across my opinion. Twat might work at a push. Arsehole isn't quite right. Bastard would work for some aspects of his behaviour. He's not thick or bad at his job, so knobhead or fucker won't do. So cunt it is. www.sciencealert.com/swearing-is-a-sign-of-more-intelligence-not-less-say-scientists
|
|