|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Feb 12, 2020 14:31:26 GMT
He won't
He tells everyone on here that they don't know what happened so they're talking bollocks. He also doesn't know what happened but has such a lack of self awareness that he doesn't realise he therefore MUST also be talking bollocks.
Typical copper....knows fuck all yet thinks he can throw his weight around. And people like him wonder why no one has any respect for or trust in the police force anymore. A large proportion of them spend their days sat on their arses doing fuck all, telling people to sort out crimes themselves and then throw their weight around when people question them. they are NOT (and never have been) above the law!
Some of them would do well to remember that they are "Public servants". Nowadays most (well, the few that are actually out there nowadays) are just flat track bullies who think thye're above everyone else.
Franklin....answer ONE simple question:
What do you know that no-one else does that, for you, deems this to be "appropriate force"? If you can't/don't answer then we'll all know that you're just a prick with as little knoweldge as the rest of us haveabout the incident (so therefore your opinion is no more valid). If you do have an answer, don't you think you should be doing more productive with that evidence than spouting unqualified, unevidenced shit on a message board?
You Sir, are pretty much the exact type of policeman that have caused the force to lose so much respect from the people it claims to protect.
You've not read one thing I've said. Is that a fact or are you holding judgement for proof 🤣
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Feb 12, 2020 14:31:58 GMT
Okay. Give me a scenario that could have possibly been happening before the officer waded in with his baton that could justify his action? How many times I could be you would just throw it on my face because that's how you and the other work. The simple answer is I dont know and until I do I wont join the lynch mob. There could be any number of things to impact of this case, everyone keeps going on about he had a baton and if it were me I'd get arrested quite possible however if you picked it up because a person was going to stick a screwdriver in your neck its justified. If anyone is genuinely interested I'll gladly explain but unfortunately nobody gives a shit the result is already in. Read the thread at no point have I denied or found him innocent all I've done is caution to wait until the facts are known. There are laws, legislation that could explain those actions but I repeat nobody gives a toss I'm a bellend. If he's committed a crime then he deserves what he gets but I wont condemn him before hand. If that makes me an idiot or whatever I dont care but I wont bow to ignorance.
People ARE interested and have repeatedly asked you to give reasons, evidence, knowledge that you may have.
You, however have refused to answer, provided nothing of what's been asked for by people and simply say "no-one is interested" (despite pretty much all of the comments on here directed at you showing that assumpion to be completely 100% false).
Go on..go ahead and "explain". The floor is all yours
(cue yet another excuse to get him out of having to actually answer it)
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Feb 12, 2020 14:33:40 GMT
How many times I could be you would just throw it on my face because that's how you and the other work. The simple answer is I dont know and until I do I wont join the lynch mob. There could be any number of things to impact of this case, everyone keeps going on about he had a baton and if it were me I'd get arrested quite possible however if you picked it up because a person was going to stick a screwdriver in your neck its justified. If anyone is genuinely interested I'll gladly explain but unfortunately nobody gives a shit the result is already in. Read the thread at no point have I denied or found him innocent all I've done is caution to wait until the facts are known. There are laws, legislation that could explain those actions but I repeat nobody gives a toss I'm a bellend. If he's committed a crime then he deserves what he gets but I wont condemn him before hand. If that makes me an idiot or whatever I dont care but I wont bow to ignorance.
People ARE interested and have repeatedly asked you to give reasons, evidence, knowledge that you may have.
You, however have refused to answer, provided nothing of what's been asked for by people and simply say "no-one is interested" (despite pretty much all of the comments on here directed at you showing your assumpion to be completely 100% false).
Go on..go ahead and "explain". The floor is all yours
(cue yet another excuse to get him out of having to actually answer it)
Because people like you call me a prick.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Feb 12, 2020 14:35:20 GMT
He won't
He tells everyone on here that they don't know what happened so they're talking bollocks. He also doesn't know what happened but has such a lack of self awareness that he doesn't realise he therefore MUST also be talking bollocks.
Typical copper....knows fuck all yet thinks he can throw his weight around. And people like him wonder why no one has any respect for or trust in the police force anymore. A large proportion of them spend their days sat on their arses doing fuck all, telling people to sort out crimes themselves and then throw their weight around when people question them. they are NOT (and never have been) above the law!
Some of them would do well to remember that they are "Public servants". Nowadays most (well, the few that are actually out there nowadays) are just flat track bullies who think thye're above everyone else.
Franklin....answer ONE simple question:
What do you know that no-one else does that, for you, deems this to be "appropriate force"? If you can't/don't answer then we'll all know that you're just a prick with as little knoweldge as the rest of us haveabout the incident (so therefore your opinion is no more valid). If you do have an answer, don't you think you should be doing more productive with that evidence than spouting unqualified, unevidenced shit on a message board?
You Sir, are pretty much the exact type of policeman that have caused the force to lose so much respect from the people it claims to protect.
You've not read one thing I've said.
You haven't really said anything of subtance, nothing, nada, zilch.
All you've done is basically say "I'm a copper..you lot aren't...therefore i know stuff and you don't" whilst completely refusing to explain or tell us why you are "more right" than everyone else.
You know fuck all about what has gone on in that incident, you have no more knowledge than ANYONE else on this board, yet you shout them down completely because you think "I'm a copper so i can".
Utterly embarrassing, and it IS police officers like you taking exactly that kind of attitude towards the public that have caused a huge loss of respect for your profession across the country.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Feb 12, 2020 14:37:07 GMT
People ARE interested and have repeatedly asked you to give reasons, evidence, knowledge that you may have.
You, however have refused to answer, provided nothing of what's been asked for by people and simply say "no-one is interested" (despite pretty much all of the comments on here directed at you showing your assumpion to be completely 100% false).
Go on..go ahead and "explain". The floor is all yours
(cue yet another excuse to get him out of having to actually answer it)
Because people like you call me a prick.
Boom!!!
There it is!
Can i call "Franklin's had a fucking mare here" bingo for that post?
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Feb 12, 2020 14:37:59 GMT
Because people like you call me a prick.
Boom!!!
There it is!
Can i call "Franklin's had a fucking mare here" bingo for that post?
Not valid enough for you.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Feb 12, 2020 14:38:51 GMT
Boom!!!
There it is!
Can i call "Franklin's had a fucking mare here" bingo for that post?
Not valid enough for you.
Your posting history on this thread clearly shows that you have little knowledge of what is or isn't valid really.
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Feb 12, 2020 14:42:11 GMT
Not valid enough for you.
Your posting history on this thread clearly shows that you have little knowledge of what is or isn't valid really.
If you say so you've made my point though why should I bother.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Feb 12, 2020 14:56:21 GMT
Your posting history on this thread clearly shows that you have little knowledge of what is or isn't valid really.
If you say so you've made my point though why should I bother. No point has been made at all by anyone. That's kind of the point!! You seem to think that the police can just do this and no-one is allowed an opinion on it. If that's what you want from people, then you need to be able to give reasons why they shouldn't have an opinion. Just saying "I'm a copper" isn't going to shut people up. You are supposed to be there to PROTECT the public. That's literally your job; YOU are there for US!! You are not there to shut the public up and the same rules on a public messageboard apply to you as they do to everyone else i.e. have your opinion but if you can't back it up then expect people to disagree, ridicule or ignore you accordingly. You have said you can explain your ideas/reasoning but no-one is interested. People have repeatedly told you that they are interested and asked you to answer certain questions (again, showing their interest) yet you completely ignore them and just carry on saying no-one is interested anyway. Do all police officers instantly lose the ability to read when joining the force, or are you all just so arrogant that you feel you can just ignore everyone and hope that if YOU say something often enough it then becomes true? Simple question....under what circumstances is running 20 feet with a baton in the air TOWARDS a person, then smacking them around the head considered "Self defence" or "Appropriate force"? Once you actually answer, we can take it from there
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Feb 12, 2020 15:04:19 GMT
Typical pick the one bit you like, so we dont need to know what went on before so you agree self defence should be scrapped yes? You agree if you break ribs doing CPR its assault because we dont need to know what went on before. Unbelievable bullshit. Okay. Give me a scenario that could have possibly been happening before the officer waded in with his baton that could justify his action? The lad is clearly ginger doesn't that count anymore ? More seriously I have watched the video many times no doubt he gives him a mighty whack and hits him on the head after running at what looks like 2 guys fighting who are also scuffling with a pc or wpc (cant make out if it is him in the scuffle) or if they were punched in the fight. No doubt he is angry but the way they are fighting and moving around can you be absolutely certain he is aiming for his head and not his back and the lad just moves in that split second, whatever he has used his baton at least recklessly, negligently and with more force than seems necessary so he will rightly face disciplinary and legal action.
|
|
|
Post by scfc75 on Feb 12, 2020 15:05:39 GMT
Franklin, the biggest issue here isn’t that you have an opinion. Everybody is entitled to one. It’s the fact that you haven’t simply said ‘i’m reserving judgement until he’s found guilty’, you’ve come on here calling everybody who has an opinion opposing yours numpties, a lynch mob, idiots etc.
You shouldn’t be surprised that people are having a go, you’ve done exactly what you’re accusing the posters on this thread of - tarred us with the same brush.
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Feb 12, 2020 15:35:34 GMT
If you say so you've made my point though why should I bother. No point has been made at all by anyone. That's kind of the point!! You seek to think that the poluce can just do this and no-one is allowed an opinion on it. If that's what you want from oeople, then you need to be avle to give reasons wht they shouldn't have an opinion. Just saying "I'm a copper" isn't going to shut people up. You are supposed to be there to PROTECT the public. That's literally your job; YOU are there for US!! You are not there to shut the public up and the same rules on a public messageboard apply to you sd tgey do everyone else i.e. have your opinion but if you can't back it up then exoect people to disagree, ridicule or ignoee you accordingly. You have said you can explain your ideas/reasoning but no-one is interested. People have repeatedly told you that they are interested and asked you to answer certain questions (again, showing their interest) yet you completely ignore them and just carry on saying no-one is interested anyway. Do all police officers instantly lose the ability to read when joining the force, or are you all just so arrogant that you feel you can just ignore everyone and hope that if YOU say something often enough it then becomes true? Simple question....under what circumstances is running 20 feet with a baton in the air TOWARDS a person, then smacking them around the head considered "Self defence" or "Appropriate force"? Once you actually answer, we can take it from there What a load of sanctimonious crap, forgive me if I've missed something but virtually all of the posts have him guilty of assault with no justification and he should go jail, sacked or both attempted murder or GBH. Like I said you've read fuck all and jumped on the bullshit bandwagon. People have said let's have an investigation but it dunna matter nothing can justify what has done. Not one single person had cautioned to wait and see, I've mentioned it and what laws and legislation he has and that he has to justify his actions or face the consequences. Read section 76 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act, read Common law, read PACE. Then when you've read that together with the officers statement and all the others and the CCTV, phone footage and what impact factors were at play then come back and judge. Has he got some explaining to do yes he has, is he in the shit yes he is, could he face criminal changes yes he could. BUT if he can justify his actions based on those then fair enough if not then tough shit and he should face the consequences. By all means keep asking hypothetically questions about justification and the honest answer is I dont know, I can give examples and try to justify it but that's up to him not me. On a personal note you know fuck all about me to judge so keep you bias bollocks to your bitter self you're clearly one of the anti Police stokers I've highlighted. Other than that if you have any genuinely interesting questions to ask about this matter feel free and I'll give an honest answer.
|
|
|
Post by danceswithclams on Feb 12, 2020 15:41:47 GMT
What's a stoker?
Why do you keep saying stoker?
I don't know what a stoker is (should I know what a stoker is?)
I'm confused.
Stokers.
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Feb 12, 2020 15:43:11 GMT
Franklin, the biggest issue here isn’t that you have an opinion. Everybody is entitled to one. It’s the fact that you haven’t simply said ‘i’m reserving judgement until he’s found guilty’, you’ve come on here calling everybody who has an opinion opposing yours numpties, a lynch mob, idiots etc. You shouldn’t be surprised that people are having a go, you’ve done exactly what you’re accusing the posters on this thread of - tarred us with the same brush. No I haven't what I've done wrong is sticking up for a cop nothing more than that. They are a lynch mob no fairness ALL guilty now if that's your idea of justice then fine. All hypothetical questions that are impossible to answer to the satisfaction on the people in here. I'm more than willing to answer questions but I dont want to get into a spat just because my answer might be controversial and against the grain. Find one person who has not stated the cop is guilty or that he can not justify his actions no matter what.
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Feb 12, 2020 15:44:05 GMT
What's a stoker? Why do you keep saying stoker? I don't know what a stoker is (should I know what a stoker is?) I'm confused. Stokers. It's a term of endearment given to close friends honest 😁
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Feb 12, 2020 15:45:22 GMT
I assume there has been a whole tranche of posts deleted from this thread. Any reason? Where’ve you been mate? Missed your bit of humour around the swamp I got sick of the nonsense mate. What tipped me over the edge were the cretins writing O’Neil off before he’d barely started. So I thought I’d have a bit of a holiday from the asylum. Apart from a condolence message for Trickydicky. It’s a bit ironic that my first couple of posts back on this thread were deleted.
|
|
|
Post by mickmillslovechild on Feb 12, 2020 16:03:39 GMT
No point has been made at all by anyone. That's kind of the point!! You seek to think that the poluce can just do this and no-one is allowed an opinion on it. If that's what you want from oeople, then you need to be avle to give reasons wht they shouldn't have an opinion. Just saying "I'm a copper" isn't going to shut people up. You are supposed to be there to PROTECT the public. That's literally your job; YOU are there for US!! You are not there to shut the public up and the same rules on a public messageboard apply to you sd tgey do everyone else i.e. have your opinion but if you can't back it up then exoect people to disagree, ridicule or ignoee you accordingly. You have said you can explain your ideas/reasoning but no-one is interested. People have repeatedly told you that they are interested and asked you to answer certain questions (again, showing their interest) yet you completely ignore them and just carry on saying no-one is interested anyway. Do all police officers instantly lose the ability to read when joining the force, or are you all just so arrogant that you feel you can just ignore everyone and hope that if YOU say something often enough it then becomes true? Simple question....under what circumstances is running 20 feet with a baton in the air TOWARDS a person, then smacking them around the head considered "Self defence" or "Appropriate force"? Once you actually answer, we can take it from there What a load of sanctimonious crap, forgive me if I've missed something but virtually all of the posts have him guilty of assault with no justification and he should go jail, sacked or both attempted murder or GBH. Like I said you've read fuck all and jumped on the bullshit bandwagon. People have said let's have an investigation but it dunna matter nothing can justify what has done. Not one single person had cautioned to wait and see, I've mentioned it and what laws and legislation he has and that he has to justify his actions or face the consequences. Read section 76 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act, read Common law, read PACE. Then when you've read that together with the officers statement and all the others and the CCTV, phone footage and what impact factors were at play then come back and judge. Has he got some explaining to do yes he has, is he in the shit yes he is, could he face criminal changes yes he could. BUT if he can justify his actions based on those then fair enough if not then tough shit and he should face the consequences. By all means keep asking hypothetically questions about justification and the honest answer is I dont know, I can give examples and try to justify it but that's up to him not me. On a personal note you know fuck all about me to judge so keep you bias bollocks to your bitter self you're clearly one of the anti Police stokers I've highlighted. Other than that if you have any genuinely interesting questions to ask about this matter feel free and I'll give an honest answer.
As has been pointed out...if you DON'T want people to be "anti police stokers" (by the way, incredibly and ridiculously childish of you to label people as that for doing nothing other than question you on your equally complete lack of knowledge of the case. How old are you, 5? Are you going to make up other accusations for those who simply disagree with you? ), then it really is simple. Try speaking to people on here as equals rather than the ridiculously arrogant, self-superior tone you use and you may find people are more friendly towards you. That's something that's been rightly levelled at me before, and it applies equally to you whether you're in the police or not. You (i.e. the police) are NOT better than anyone else and are not exempt from public criticism or opinion.
You've come on here with no more knowledge than anyone else, and YOU HAVE NOT just said you will reserve judgment until facts are known. You've proceeded to then insult, patronise and label people (whilst having no knowledge of them as people) simply to deflect from the fact that you cannot answer any of the questions you've been asked.
The people that stoke anti police sentiment are the police themselves, no-one else. Their unbelievable arrogance of "I am the Police so therefore you'll just all shut up and listen" is breathtaking and an attitude you have used constantly on this thread. You keep burying your head in the sand and believing it's everyone else's fault though. People don't lose respect for them because of comments on a messageboard, they lose respect for them because of their frequent bully boy tactics, their self-superior attitude and belief that they cannot and should not be questioned on anything they do by the public.
As members of the public that YOU serve, we have every single right (and indeed, a duty) to question the actions and motives of the Police. We're allowed opinions on it (and your opinion on this particular matter is no more educated than ours, unless you've been assigned to this particular matter of course..in which case i'd suspect you were breaking the law by commenting about it on a message board, so we'll take it that you haven't been assigned) and if you try to shut people down summarily and arbitrarily and then insult them and label them simply because they won't toe your line or agree with you when you haven't answered one single question anyone has asked or been able to back up anything you've said, then you'll be treated with the same disdain as i would be (and frequently am) on here.
People gave their opinions, you gave yours. Fine, no issue with that. You then started trying to shut people down and started labelling them (despite the fact you know "fuck all about" them) simply for asking you questions which you refused to answer. Maybe YOU need to take a look in the mirror before telling people to fuck off and saying they have a bias. Your complete lack of self-awareness is astonishing!
Your bias and astounding arrogance is there and clear for all to see.
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Feb 12, 2020 16:28:03 GMT
What a load of sanctimonious crap, forgive me if I've missed something but virtually all of the posts have him guilty of assault with no justification and he should go jail, sacked or both attempted murder or GBH. Like I said you've read fuck all and jumped on the bullshit bandwagon. People have said let's have an investigation but it dunna matter nothing can justify what has done. Not one single person had cautioned to wait and see, I've mentioned it and what laws and legislation he has and that he has to justify his actions or face the consequences. Read section 76 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act, read Common law, read PACE. Then when you've read that together with the officers statement and all the others and the CCTV, phone footage and what impact factors were at play then come back and judge. Has he got some explaining to do yes he has, is he in the shit yes he is, could he face criminal changes yes he could. BUT if he can justify his actions based on those then fair enough if not then tough shit and he should face the consequences. By all means keep asking hypothetically questions about justification and the honest answer is I dont know, I can give examples and try to justify it but that's up to him not me. On a personal note you know fuck all about me to judge so keep you bias bollocks to your bitter self you're clearly one of the anti Police stokers I've highlighted. Other than that if you have any genuinely interesting questions to ask about this matter feel free and I'll give an honest answer.
As has been pointed out...if you DON'T want people to be "anti police stokers" (by the way, incredibly and ridiculously childish of you to label people as that for doing nothing other than question you on your equally complete lack of knowledge of the case. How old are you, 5? Are you going to make up other accusations for those who simply disagree with you? ), then it really is simple. Try speaking to people on here as equals rather than the ridiculously arrogant, self-superior tone you use and you may find people are more friendly towards you. That's something that's been rightly levelled at me before, and it applies equally to you whether you're in the police or not. You (i.e. the police) are NOT better than anyone else and are not exempt from public criticism or opinion.
You've come on here with no more knowledge than anyone else, and YOU HAVE NOT just said you will reserve judgment until facts are known. You've proceeded to then insult, patronise and label people (whilst having no knowledge of them as people) simply to deflect from the fact that you cannot answer any of the questions you've been asked.
The people that stoke anti police sentiment are the police themselves, no-one else. Their unbelievable arrogance of "I am the Police so therefore you'll just all shut up and listen" is breathtaking and an attitude you have used constantly on this thread. You keep burying your head in the sand and believing it's everyone else's fault though. People don't lose respect for them because of comments on a messageboard, they lose respect for them because of their frequent bully boy tactics, their self-superior attitude and belief that they cannot and should not be questioned on anything they do by the public.
As members of the public that YOU serve, we have every single right (and indeed, a duty) to question the actions and motives of the Police. We're allowed opinions on it (and your opinion on this particular matter is no more educated than ours, unless you've been assigned to this particular matter of course..in which case i'd suspect you were breaking the law by commenting about it on a message board, so we'll take it that you haven't been assigned) and if you try to shut people down summarily and arbitrarily and then insult them and label them simply because they won't toe your line or agree with you when you haven't answered one single question anyone has asked or been able to back up anything you've said, then you'll be treated with the same disdain as i would be (and frequently am) on here.
People gave their opinions, you gave yours. Fine, no issue with that. You then started trying to shut people down and started labelling them (despite the fact you know "fuck all about" them) simply for asking you questions which you refused to answer. Maybe YOU need to take a look in the mirror before telling people to fuck off and saying they have a bias. Your complete lack of self-awareness is astonishing!
Your bias and astounding arrogance is there and clear for all to see.
I reply in kind, I do ignore some questions but thats the person on all subjects not just this. Anyway the the umpteenth time I'll leave it to you guys I must learn to mind my own business and not get involved. However Mick if you genuinely want to explore this PM me and I'll genuinely answer if not enjoy the thread.
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Feb 12, 2020 16:30:27 GMT
Is there such a thing as an online/virtual restraining order 😊
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Feb 12, 2020 16:34:35 GMT
I hope the boy is recovering
|
|
|
Post by heyzeus on Feb 12, 2020 18:54:27 GMT
As has been pointed out...if you DON'T want people to be "anti police stokers" (by the way, incredibly and ridiculously childish of you to label people as that for doing nothing other than question you on your equally complete lack of knowledge of the case. How old are you, 5? Are you going to make up other accusations for those who simply disagree with you? ), then it really is simple. Try speaking to people on here as equals rather than the ridiculously arrogant, self-superior tone you use and you may find people are more friendly towards you. That's something that's been rightly levelled at me before, and it applies equally to you whether you're in the police or not. You (i.e. the police) are NOT better than anyone else and are not exempt from public criticism or opinion.
You've come on here with no more knowledge than anyone else, and YOU HAVE NOT just said you will reserve judgment until facts are known. You've proceeded to then insult, patronise and label people (whilst having no knowledge of them as people) simply to deflect from the fact that you cannot answer any of the questions you've been asked.
The people that stoke anti police sentiment are the police themselves, no-one else. Their unbelievable arrogance of "I am the Police so therefore you'll just all shut up and listen" is breathtaking and an attitude you have used constantly on this thread. You keep burying your head in the sand and believing it's everyone else's fault though. People don't lose respect for them because of comments on a messageboard, they lose respect for them because of their frequent bully boy tactics, their self-superior attitude and belief that they cannot and should not be questioned on anything they do by the public.
As members of the public that YOU serve, we have every single right (and indeed, a duty) to question the actions and motives of the Police. We're allowed opinions on it (and your opinion on this particular matter is no more educated than ours, unless you've been assigned to this particular matter of course..in which case i'd suspect you were breaking the law by commenting about it on a message board, so we'll take it that you haven't been assigned) and if you try to shut people down summarily and arbitrarily and then insult them and label them simply because they won't toe your line or agree with you when you haven't answered one single question anyone has asked or been able to back up anything you've said, then you'll be treated with the same disdain as i would be (and frequently am) on here.
People gave their opinions, you gave yours. Fine, no issue with that. You then started trying to shut people down and started labelling them (despite the fact you know "fuck all about" them) simply for asking you questions which you refused to answer. Maybe YOU need to take a look in the mirror before telling people to fuck off and saying they have a bias. Your complete lack of self-awareness is astonishing!
Your bias and astounding arrogance is there and clear for all to see.
I reply in kind, I do ignore some questions but thats the person on all subjects not just this. Anyway the the umpteenth time I'll leave it to you guys I must learn to mind my own business and not get involved. However Mick if you genuinely want to explore this PM me and I'll genuinely answer if not enjoy the thread. What's your favourite bit about being a copper Franco mate? Talking down to someone about how you "could have saved their life" when you pull them for doing 31 in a 30, or telling them you'll come out to check the scene of a burglary then fucking off to Nando's to make sure there's no chicken violations? How about misusing terror legislation when someone isn't quite subservient enough for your liking?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2020 19:56:30 GMT
It seems to me that the copper who launched this attack is going to be dealt with more seriously than would be "normal". The vid has gone viral.
Apart from the possibility that the copper was a complete loon - what else could have provoked such a heavy handed attack? The only thing that I can think of is that "intel" reported a "man down". In such cases the law do respond quickly and heavily. Even in that situation, surely this assault is total above and beyond .......
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Feb 12, 2020 20:16:24 GMT
I reply in kind, I do ignore some questions but thats the person on all subjects not just this. Anyway the the umpteenth time I'll leave it to you guys I must learn to mind my own business and not get involved. However Mick if you genuinely want to explore this PM me and I'll genuinely answer if not enjoy the thread. What's your favourite bit about being a copper Franco mate? Talking down to someone about how you "could have saved their life" when you pull them for doing 31 in a 30, or telling them you'll come out to check the scene of a burglary then fucking off to Nando's to make sure there's no chicken violations? How about misusing terror legislation when someone isn't quite subservient enough for your liking? Free stripteases?
|
|