|
Post by AlliG on Aug 5, 2022 11:23:24 GMT
I've just noticed the page number of this thread. Is there a subliminal message there?
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Aug 5, 2022 11:30:27 GMT
The snake openly admitting he takes money from urban areas that need it (Stoke for example), to fund wealthy little towns the sooner this con artist, this absolute charlatan, the man who hates the self-employed, the man who lit the fuse on the 2008 financial crisis (The Times words, not mine), and the man who is responsible for where we are now, is exposed for what he is the better. the tories hate people from stoke, they laugh at them, they will never help us. It bends my head to think people from North Staffs will still doff their cap at crooks like him. Couldn't have put it better myself ...
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Aug 5, 2022 11:34:20 GMT
That video should be played at every general election for years...
The reality of voting Conservative. Well-off areas get the money, poorer ones can fuck right off.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Aug 5, 2022 11:39:37 GMT
That video should be played at every general election for years... The reality of voting Conservative. Well-off areas get the money, poorer ones can fuck right off. It's going to haunt The Tories and Sunak especially, for years to come.
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Aug 5, 2022 11:44:09 GMT
That video should be played at every general election for years... The reality of voting Conservative. Well-off areas get the money, poorer ones can fuck right off. It's going to haunt The Tories and Sunak especially, for years to come. It should do, but we have a very unbalanced (ho ho!) Tory dominated press which will gloss over it. Contrast that with how often they mention the Treasury note that stated that there was no money left... I suspect Sunak might well quit politics if he loses the leadership election sooner rather than later. So that would be a convenient way to pretend it doesn't really reflect Tory views, when we all know it very much does.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Aug 5, 2022 11:47:25 GMT
It's going to haunt The Tories and Sunak especially, for years to come. It should do, but we have a very unbalanced (ho ho!) Tory dominated press which will gloss over it. Contrast that with how often they mention the Treasury note that stated that there was no money left... I suspect Sunak might well quit politics if he loses the leadership election sooner rather than later. So that would be a convenient way to pretend it doesn't really reflect Tory views, when we all know it very much does. Yes extremely likely you would have thought. And I think it's more a case of 'when' rather than 'if' he loses.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Aug 5, 2022 12:29:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Aug 5, 2022 12:32:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Aug 5, 2022 13:29:34 GMT
That video should be played at every general election for years... The reality of voting Conservative. Well-off areas get the money, poorer ones can fuck right off. The often quoted "If you are not a Liberal at 25, you have no Heart. If you are not a Conservative by 35 you have no Brain" or variations thereof still prevail With a Hard-core of "I'm alright Jack" (understandably) Conservative Voters subliminally and sometimes not so subtlety endorsed by a prejudiced Media The Labour Voting Pool is rather limited Then just to add a little icing to the cake the Media build a campaign of disinformation against whoever the Labour Leader is. Brown was singlehandedly responsible for the 2008 Financial Crash, Milliband was unable to eat a bacon sandwich so was therefore untrustworthy, Corbyn was a lunatic card carrying Communist and Starmer is just too boring and didn't prosecute Jimmy Saville The fact that none of this is true is irrelevant as the seed has unconsciously been planted. In an era where Personality and "Likes" have become much more important to an inattentive electorate obsessed with Facebook and "Influencers" in a Presidential style contest Labour needs to be more careful in its selection of leader. Looking at Labour's core Demografic Young, Woman, BAME, Left leaning (I have deliberately left out Working Class and Union Members as Labour's has lost its way here) Step forward Lisa Nandy If Labour doesn't get its shit together with an aging population it will find itself doomed to opposition permanently It cannot count on the incompetence of this present shower to dig them out of a hole.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Aug 5, 2022 14:10:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Aug 5, 2022 14:55:26 GMT
What is the relevance of that, which heinous crime has she done, failed to submit paperwork on time ? Put some substance to it please.
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Aug 5, 2022 14:59:20 GMT
This page is totally dedicated to this incompetent and shambles of a government and the corrupt inept Tory party and its members think if you look at the page number you will understand
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Aug 5, 2022 15:22:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Aug 5, 2022 16:17:57 GMT
What is the relevance of that, which heinous crime has she done, failed to submit paperwork on time ? Put some substance to it please. 15 years too late for him to start doing that.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Aug 5, 2022 16:22:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by thewonderstuff on Aug 5, 2022 16:37:42 GMT
What did IDS do when Gorgeous George announced a four year benefit freeze and plunge half a million people into extreme poverty in that very same budget? Take his shirt off and do a circuit of the commons?
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Aug 5, 2022 16:58:59 GMT
To be fair Public School Boys have always had longer School Holidays
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Aug 5, 2022 17:38:01 GMT
To be fair Public School Boys have always had longer School Holidays Yes extra 2 in summer extra 2 at Christmas extra 2 at Easter as far as I remember
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Aug 5, 2022 17:59:17 GMT
To be fair Public School Boys have always had longer School Holidays Yes extra 2 in summer extra 2 at Christmas extra 2 at Easter as far as I remember Blimey, didn't have you down as ex public school, mate.
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Aug 5, 2022 20:11:00 GMT
Yes extra 2 in summer extra 2 at Christmas extra 2 at Easter as far as I remember Blimey, didn't have you down as ex public school, mate. No a mate teaches at one lol
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Aug 5, 2022 23:03:46 GMT
Blimey, didn't have you down as ex public school, mate. No a mate teaches at one lol
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Aug 6, 2022 7:25:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by toppercorner on Aug 7, 2022 19:27:44 GMT
Govt preparing to cover their backs, ready for the day it all falls apart and they're exposed for the criminals they really are: "Dominic Raab is planning to curb judges’ powers in a move likely to make it harder to bring successful legal challenges against the government in England and Wales, according to a leaked document seen by the Guardian. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) paper suggests the justice secretary, who is also deputy prime minister, is considering changes that would have the effect of limiting ministers’ accountability in judicial reviews brought by claimants concerned about the way decisions have been taken by public bodies" They know they've fucked it and broken the law untold times. www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/aug/07/leaked-report-suggests-dominic-raab-trying-to-curb-judges-powers
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Aug 7, 2022 20:04:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Aug 7, 2022 20:43:58 GMT
It is impracticable to stop sewage discharge into rivers. It happens every time there is heavy rain and will continue to do so for decades to come. So it is silly to pass a law banning something that cannot be avoided and probably never will be in the lifetime of anyone alive today. In fact it is probable that incidents will increase in the short term due to increased weather extremes. www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/31/sewage-released-into-english-rivers-for-27m-hours-last-year-by-water-firmsIt will be necessary to spend £billions for decades to come. We will do well to halve the number of incidents by 2050 whatever government is in power. There is a major project in London to significantly reduce the number of overflows into the river Thames. Most river pollution is from agriculture run off due to the Common Agricultural Policy that we are now phasing out and salt/oil/rubber etc from roads. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thames_Tideway_Scheme
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Aug 7, 2022 20:54:06 GMT
It is impracticable to stop sewage discharge into rivers. It happens every time there is heavy rain and will continue to do so for decades to come. So it is silly to pass a law banning something that cannot be avoided and probably never will be in the lifetime of anyone alive today. In fact it is probable that incidents will increase in the short term due to increased weather extremes. www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/31/sewage-released-into-english-rivers-for-27m-hours-last-year-by-water-firmsIt will be necessary to spend £billions for decades to come. We will do well to halve the number of incidents by 2050 whatever government is in power. There is a major project in London to significantly reduce the number of overflows into the river Thames. Most river pollution is from agriculture run off due to the Common Agricultural Policy that we are now phasing out and salt/oil/rubber etc from roads. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thames_Tideway_SchemeDon’t expect anything rational, intelligent or sensible from Fuddy.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Aug 7, 2022 20:57:40 GMT
It is impracticable to stop sewage discharge into rivers. It happens every time there is heavy rain and will continue to do so for decades to come. So it is silly to pass a law banning something that cannot be avoided and probably never will be in the lifetime of anyone alive today. In fact it is probable that incidents will increase in the short term due to increased weather extremes. www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/31/sewage-released-into-english-rivers-for-27m-hours-last-year-by-water-firmsIt will be necessary to spend £billions for decades to come. We will do well to halve the number of incidents by 2050 whatever government is in power. There is a major project in London to significantly reduce the number of overflows into the river Thames. Most river pollution is from agriculture run off due to the Common Agricultural Policy that we are now phasing out and salt/oil/rubber etc from roads. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thames_Tideway_SchemeWhile water is run for profit you are indeed correct.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Aug 7, 2022 20:58:27 GMT
It is impracticable to stop sewage discharge into rivers. It happens every time there is heavy rain and will continue to do so for decades to come. So it is silly to pass a law banning something that cannot be avoided and probably never will be in the lifetime of anyone alive today. In fact it is probable that incidents will increase in the short term due to increased weather extremes. www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/31/sewage-released-into-english-rivers-for-27m-hours-last-year-by-water-firmsIt will be necessary to spend £billions for decades to come. We will do well to halve the number of incidents by 2050 whatever government is in power. There is a major project in London to significantly reduce the number of overflows into the river Thames. Most river pollution is from agriculture run off due to the Common Agricultural Policy that we are now phasing out and salt/oil/rubber etc from roads. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thames_Tideway_SchemeDon’t expect anything rational, intelligent or sensible from Fuddy. Irony klaxon alert....again.
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Aug 7, 2022 21:00:43 GMT
It is impracticable to stop sewage discharge into rivers. It happens every time there is heavy rain and will continue to do so for decades to come. So it is silly to pass a law banning something that cannot be avoided and probably never will be in the lifetime of anyone alive today. In fact it is probable that incidents will increase in the short term due to increased weather extremes. www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/31/sewage-released-into-english-rivers-for-27m-hours-last-year-by-water-firmsIt will be necessary to spend £billions for decades to come. We will do well to halve the number of incidents by 2050 whatever government is in power. There is a major project in London to significantly reduce the number of overflows into the river Thames. Most river pollution is from agriculture run off due to the Common Agricultural Policy that we are now phasing out and salt/oil/rubber etc from roads. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thames_Tideway_SchemeDon’t expect anything rational, intelligent or sensible from Fuddy. I know. I was just giving a heads up to others on how massive the problem is. I can add that even the £billions spent in London on the Tideway scheme does not solve the issue: www.wired.co.uk/article/sewage-environment-climate-change-londonLondon is lucky some cities are having nothing done such as my local York which relies on the overloaded Victorian drains and it would be a monumental task to sort the sewers out in York.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2022 21:18:38 GMT
It's so cringe when tories try so desperately to convince the public that they're just normal ordinary humans. Ironically it achieves the opposite.
|
|