|
Post by Gary Hackett on Jul 17, 2018 18:56:17 GMT
Why do certain people on here still claim that Rowett's done nothing? are these the people that say Poch at Spurs isn't any good because he hasn't won a trophy?! What's he done?
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Jul 17, 2018 18:57:45 GMT
Why do certain people on here still claim that Rowett's done nothing? are these the people that say Poch at Spurs isn't any good because he hasn't won a trophy?! What's he done? I've been over this with you before and I'm not doing it again. If you wanna carry on and act like we've gone some shit manager I'm not stopping you.
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Jul 17, 2018 19:04:21 GMT
I've been over this with you before and I'm not doing it again. If you wanna carry on and act like we've gone some shit manager I'm not stopping you. I'm not saying he's shit, I'm saying he's achieved nothing and we could have done better. Lambert has achieved more.
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Jul 17, 2018 19:10:08 GMT
I've been over this with you before and I'm not doing it again. If you wanna carry on and act like we've gone some shit manager I'm not stopping you. General to be fair it was your mate who said he’s won nothing which is a bit like your new boss in a pot bank saying he has never made a pot , totally unnecessary and you have to ask what motivated it
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Jul 17, 2018 19:16:12 GMT
I've been over this with you before and I'm not doing it again. If you wanna carry on and act like we've gone some shit manager I'm not stopping you. General to be fair it was your mate who said he’s won nothing which is a bit like your new boss in a pot bank saying he has never made a pot , totally unnecessary and you have to ask what motivated it "Won nothing" is totally different to being a good manager or not.
|
|
|
Post by Absolution on Jul 17, 2018 19:20:01 GMT
I've been over this with you before and I'm not doing it again. If you wanna carry on and act like we've gone some shit manager I'm not stopping you. General to be fair it was your mate who said he’s won nothing which is a bit like your new boss in a pot bank saying he has never made a pot , totally unnecessary and you have to ask what motivated it I'd be more interested in the context. What had he been asked? What did he say directly before and directly after the statement? Without that it's meaningless, and not worth the constant repetition.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2018 19:23:06 GMT
General to be fair it was your mate who said he’s won nothing which is a bit like your new boss in a pot bank saying he has never made a pot , totally unnecessary and you have to ask what motivated it "Won nothing" is totally different to being a good manager or not. Why ?
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Jul 17, 2018 19:24:32 GMT
"Won nothing" is totally different to being a good manager or not. Why ? Is Poch a good manager?!
|
|
|
Post by Ex-term-oat-cake on Jul 17, 2018 19:26:34 GMT
Liverpool want Shaq. Stoke want Wilson. Liverpool get Shaq. Stoke don’t get Wilson. Worse, he goes to a promotion rival.
Well done transfer team. Twats.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2018 19:27:15 GMT
Why don’t you tell us what you think
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Jul 17, 2018 19:28:26 GMT
Why don’t you tell us what you think Of course he is. Now tell me what you think?!... I have a feeling you're going to disagree with me because you know the point I'm making.
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Jul 17, 2018 19:29:00 GMT
Liverpool want Shaq. Stoke want Wilson. Liverpool get Shaq. Stoke don’t get Wilson. Worse, he goes to a promotion rival. Well done transfer team. Twats. What should they have done that they didn't though? If the player prefers Derby you can't force him to sign for someone else?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2018 19:29:20 GMT
Liverpool want Shaq. Stoke want Wilson. Liverpool get Shaq. Stoke don’t get Wilson. Worse, he goes to a promotion rival. Well done transfer team. Twats. Shaq had a release clause. The end.
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Jul 17, 2018 19:29:24 GMT
Liverpool want Shaq. Stoke want Wilson. Liverpool get Shaq. Stoke don’t get Wilson. Worse, he goes to a promotion rival. Well done transfer team. Twats. Shaq had a release clause therefore we couldn't negotiate... Nothing like doing an agenda.
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on Jul 17, 2018 19:46:16 GMT
Why don’t you tell us what you think Why don't you tell us your previous username.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2018 19:55:57 GMT
Why don’t you tell us what you think Of course he is. Now tell me what you think?!... I have a feeling you're going to disagree with me because you know the point I'm making. I completely agree with you, pouch I think is a excellent manager who has transformed Spurs from a occasional cup winning team to regular champions league contenders. It is also to his credit that this rapid change in fortune has been achieved for little financial outlays. My only concern is that at what cost the new stadium will have on his team, will they become a selling club ? Also has he outgrown Spurs or will he become the new Wenger ?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2018 20:02:33 GMT
Why don’t you tell us what you think Why don't you tell us your previous username. Sorry I’ve made you wait just been listening about Stoke on talksports, now I have never had a previous username, and so can I just ask why have you questioned me about this ?
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Jul 17, 2018 20:08:15 GMT
Of course he is. Now tell me what you think?!... I have a feeling you're going to disagree with me because you know the point I'm making. I completely agree with you, pouch I think is a excellent manager who has transformed Spurs from a occasional cup winning team to regular champions league contenders. It is also to his credit that this rapid change in fortune has been achieved for little financial outlays. My only concern is that at what cost the new stadium will have on his team, will they become a selling club ? Also has he outgrown Spurs or will he become the new Wenger ? I doubt they'll be a selling club with the new deal they've given Kane.
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Jul 17, 2018 20:42:13 GMT
General to be fair it was your mate who said he’s won nothing which is a bit like your new boss in a pot bank saying he has never made a pot , totally unnecessary and you have to ask what motivated it I'd be more interested in the context. What had he been asked? What did he say directly before and directly after the statement? Without that it's meaningless, and not worth the constant repetition. Full quote was on here last night , it was an absolutely stupid thing to say at best or deliberately under mining at worst .
|
|
|
Post by Absolution on Jul 17, 2018 20:52:06 GMT
I'd be more interested in the context. What had he been asked? What did he say directly before and directly after the statement? Without that it's meaningless, and not worth the constant repetition. Full quote was on here last night , it was an absolutely stupid thing to say at best or deliberately under mining at worst . On this thread? Did you post it? What time (roughly), so I can find it. C’mon benji, help me out here.
|
|
|
Post by professorplump on Jul 17, 2018 21:01:40 GMT
Liverpool want Shaq. Stoke want Wilson. Liverpool get Shaq. Stoke don’t get Wilson. Worse, he goes to a promotion rival. Well done transfer team. Twats. 11 other clubs missed out on him also. I guess they must have poor transfer teams as well.
|
|
|
Post by tony1234 on Jul 17, 2018 21:06:28 GMT
Liverpool want Shaq. Stoke want Wilson. Liverpool get Shaq. Stoke don’t get Wilson. Worse, he goes to a promotion rival. Well done transfer team. Twats. They were too busy prioritising Vydra, Gayle or Forestieri.
|
|
|
Post by pyrus on Jul 17, 2018 21:11:20 GMT
Isn’t this the point where we all agree he was shit anyway, then abandon this thread allowing it to tumble off the home page while we all go over to the vlad chiriches thread and discuss how foolish it looks after our adventures with other ex Spurs defenders ....Wimmer, Palacios and Woodgate
|
|
|
Post by JurgenVandeurzen on Jul 17, 2018 21:13:10 GMT
Isn’t this the point where we all agree he was shit anyway, then abandon this thread allowing it to tumble off the home page while we all go over to the vlad chiriches thread and discuss how foolish it looks after our adventures with other ex Spurs defenders ....Wimmer, Palacios and Woodgate If only it was...
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Jul 17, 2018 21:14:45 GMT
Full quote was on here last night , it was an absolutely stupid thing to say at best or deliberately under mining at worst . On this thread? Did you post it? What time (roughly), so I can find it. C’mon benji, help me out here. Page 8 on this thread by the onlooker 👍
|
|
|
Post by Absolution on Jul 17, 2018 22:14:17 GMT
On this thread? Did you post it? What time (roughly), so I can find it. C’mon benji, help me out here. Page 8 on this thread by the onlooker 👍 Got it. Cheers. It does look an odd thing to come out with, but I’ve still only seen the quote rather than what the full context was. I mean maybe he was asked why they’d appointed a manager who’d not won anything, so felt it necessary to refer to his record in that way. If he’s just decided to drop it in for the hell of it then it does look a tad antagonistic. Maybe Rowett reminds him just a little too much of a previous manager.
|
|
|
Post by derbyfan91 on Jul 17, 2018 22:27:36 GMT
Hi all,
I thought I'd come on here and stick my 2 cent in on the whole Wilson debate - as well as your interest in McClean.
Rowett loaned Palmer from Chelsea last season, yet despite showing a ton of ability & potential he never trusted him from the start. He was nothing more than an impact player. It was frustrating to watch, especially as we seemed to stick with Weimann who was miles away in ability. I've mentioned it before, though, Rowett will treat footballers like functional objects. No doubt he's one of the best managers in the league when it comes to organising a team without the ball, but his style is so very pragmatic. I imagine that it's not exactly the most exciting thought when young players are thinking of spending a year out to express themselves.
McClean would be a good signing for you under Rowett, absolutely no doubt about that. McClean, beliefs aside, is a hardworker and he has a bit of pace and will be like an upgrade on Weimann. He's not the most technical gifted player in the world, but you'll see that doesn't matter once Rowett implements his system & style. Simply, I feel Wilson will be better for us & McClean will be better for you. Wilson is no doubt technically more gifted, but I doubt Rowett would trust him to do the off-the-ball work that is significant to his tactics.
FWIW.
|
|
|
Post by pottarius on Jul 18, 2018 0:12:53 GMT
Hi all, I thought I'd come on here and stick my 2 cent in on the whole Wilson debate - as well as your interest in McClean. Rowett loaned Palmer from Chelsea last season, yet despite showing a ton of ability & potential he never trusted him from the start. He was nothing more than an impact player. It was frustrating to watch, especially as we seemed to stick with Weimann who was miles away in ability. I've mentioned it before, though, Rowett will treat footballers like functional objects. No doubt he's one of the best managers in the league when it comes to organising a team without the ball, but his style is so very pragmatic. I imagine that it's not exactly the most exciting thought when young players are thinking of spending a year out to express themselves. McClean would be a good signing for you under Rowett, absolutely no doubt about that. McClean, beliefs aside, is a hardworker and he has a bit of pace and will be like an upgrade on Weimann. He's not the most technical gifted player in the world, but you'll see that doesn't matter once Rowett implements his system & style. Simply, I feel Wilson will be better for us & McClean will be better for you. Wilson is no doubt technically more gifted, but I doubt Rowett would trust him to do the off-the-ball work that is significant to his tactics. FWIW. You're most likely right - the fact Wilson did not consider Stoke is likely the style of play and no guarantee of playing time. I would not be surprised if "not fat but I'll still call him fat" Frank had help from FA convincing him that playing chase ball at the b365 is not ideal for his chances in the next international squad
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Jul 18, 2018 6:48:31 GMT
Hi all, I thought I'd come on here and stick my 2 cent in on the whole Wilson debate - as well as your interest in McClean. Rowett loaned Palmer from Chelsea last season, yet despite showing a ton of ability & potential he never trusted him from the start. He was nothing more than an impact player. It was frustrating to watch, especially as we seemed to stick with Weimann who was miles away in ability. I've mentioned it before, though, Rowett will treat footballers like functional objects. No doubt he's one of the best managers in the league when it comes to organising a team without the ball, but his style is so very pragmatic. I imagine that it's not exactly the most exciting thought when young players are thinking of spending a year out to express themselves. McClean would be a good signing for you under Rowett, absolutely no doubt about that. McClean, beliefs aside, is a hardworker and he has a bit of pace and will be like an upgrade on Weimann. He's not the most technical gifted player in the world, but you'll see that doesn't matter once Rowett implements his system & style. Simply, I feel Wilson will be better for us & McClean will be better for you. Wilson is no doubt technically more gifted, but I doubt Rowett would trust him to do the off-the-ball work that is significant to his tactics. FWIW. This would be an excellent post if we’d signed him. I’ll be interested to know the style Lampards going to play.
|
|
|
Post by cooper67 on Jul 18, 2018 8:53:53 GMT
Hi all, I thought I'd come on here and stick my 2 cent in on the whole Wilson debate - as well as your interest in McClean. Rowett loaned Palmer from Chelsea last season, yet despite showing a ton of ability & potential he never trusted him from the start. He was nothing more than an impact player. It was frustrating to watch, especially as we seemed to stick with Weimann who was miles away in ability. I've mentioned it before, though, Rowett will treat footballers like functional objects. No doubt he's one of the best managers in the league when it comes to organising a team without the ball, but his style is so very pragmatic. I imagine that it's not exactly the most exciting thought when young players are thinking of spending a year out to express themselves. McClean would be a good signing for you under Rowett, absolutely no doubt about that. McClean, beliefs aside, is a hardworker and he has a bit of pace and will be like an upgrade on Weimann. He's not the most technical gifted player in the world, but you'll see that doesn't matter once Rowett implements his system & style. Simply, I feel Wilson will be better for us & McClean will be better for you. Wilson is no doubt technically more gifted, but I doubt Rowett would trust him to do the off-the-ball work that is significant to his tactics. FWIW. You're most likely right - the fact Wilson did not consider Stoke is likely the style of play and no guarantee of playing time. I would not be surprised if "not fat but I'll still call him fat" Frank had help from FA convincing him that playing chase ball at the b365 is not ideal for his chances in the next international squad Why would the FA have anything to do with it-when he's Welsh?
|
|