|
|
Post by Gods on May 18, 2015 16:33:45 GMT
Guess the management team can/should/must decide on these 3 players futures right after the final match. All 3 are known to us and 2 are in our direct and immediate control and the other we can either go after or not.
There is no need to prevaricate on any of them, once it is done we can get on with recruitment knowing where we stand.
To start the ball rolling here is my carefully considered input:
Odemwingie - No
Wollscheid - No
Moses - No
|
|
|
|
Post by stokiejoe on May 18, 2015 16:35:03 GMT
Guess the management team can/should/must decide on these 3 players which are all in our own direct control right after the final match. Only once this is done do we really know which positions and what type of player we are in the market for so it wants doing right away. To start the ball rolling here is my recommendation: Odemwingie - No Wollscheid - No Moses - No Odem keep Woll no Moses definitely no |
|
|
|
Post by JetBlack on May 18, 2015 16:35:22 GMT
Odemwingie - Yes
Wollscheid - No
Moses - No
|
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on May 18, 2015 16:36:09 GMT
Yes
No
Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by mosquito on May 18, 2015 16:36:41 GMT
Odemwingie - Yes
Wollscheid - No
Moses - No
|
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on May 18, 2015 16:37:10 GMT
Three months then ?
No
No
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 16:37:39 GMT
Agree with this however it's not so black and white as a yes or no with Moses, depends on the fee completely |
|
|
|
Post by dozintheseventees on May 18, 2015 16:38:18 GMT
1. Yes......can play a part next season (even if from the bench)
2. I'd be looking for better
3. Yes (on loan)
|
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on May 18, 2015 16:38:48 GMT
Odemwingie- Yes, think he has one more season left in him.
Wollscheid- Yes, never easy to move into the Premier League in January.
Moses- No, A little bit too injury prone for such heavy wage consumption, wish him the best however.
|
|
|
|
Post by roylandstoke on May 18, 2015 16:44:32 GMT
Yes- short term contract
No- bring back Huth
Depends totally on price and wages
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 16:46:46 GMT
Yes - deserves it, and great around the dressing room.
No - sorry, we've got to be aiming higher.
No - great player, but waaaaay too injury prone. Even if we get him in on the cheap, we'd need another winger to cover the 5 months he'd miss.
|
|
|
|
Post by thedeadlyshart on May 18, 2015 16:51:17 GMT
Of those three the only one I'd say no to is wollscheid, but I think that might be the one we've already agreed to.
|
|
|
|
Post by scfcno1fan on May 18, 2015 16:53:09 GMT
No x 3 for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on May 18, 2015 16:54:12 GMT
Yes
No
No
And question 4; Huth - Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on May 18, 2015 16:54:36 GMT
Interesting re. Moses. People seem 50/50 on him.
Ability wise it's a yes but can he be consistent enough and play enough games to warrant decent money?
|
|
|
|
Post by theonlywayisstoke on May 18, 2015 16:55:20 GMT
Yes- short term deal
No- can do better
Yes- on loan or if we got him cheap i.e £3 - 4m
|
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on May 18, 2015 17:03:46 GMT
Yes - short term
No - not good enough
No - too injury prone
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 17:04:52 GMT
Interesting re. Moses. People seem 50/50 on him. Ability wise it's a yes but can he be consistent enough and play enough games to warrant decent money? He was exceptional early on, then very hit and miss in some of the more recent games. At Villa, he may have scored and won the pen with his determination, but he was a liability for a large part of the game. Hot and cold player, as someone says, depends a lot on transfer fee and wages, no more than 7m for me, but then again i don't know how much Hughes has to spend. |
|
|
|
Post by Gods on May 18, 2015 17:05:46 GMT
I'll crunch the numbers later when we have a few more in but at the moment it looks like a big "No" for Wolly and a big "Yes" for Odemwingie and a deafening "maybe/depends" for Moses.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on May 18, 2015 17:11:12 GMT
Yes no and yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 18, 2015 17:12:37 GMT
Are people forgetting just how good Moses was for us?
Yes
No
Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by wuzza on May 18, 2015 17:13:55 GMT
No - loads of people voting with heart over head regarding Odem.
Yes - good enough for our squad
Yes - genuine match winner
|
|
|
|
Post by nicholasjalcock on May 18, 2015 17:14:15 GMT
1. Odem yes because the club will want to show they will support every player through a tough patch.
2. Wollscheid. Only if we keep Huth too. I prefer Wolly and Huthy over Wilson at CH.
3. Either on loan or cut price transfer due to injury concerns.
So, one yes, two maybes.
|
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on May 18, 2015 17:15:55 GMT
Moses definitely, Odemwingie- maybe, Stoke will be assessing him since injury, Wollsceid -no.
|
|
|
|
Post by block30row19 on May 18, 2015 17:16:33 GMT
Would people say No to Arnie !!
He's hit and miss.
Moses worth another season loan with view to sign if we like.
|
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on May 18, 2015 17:17:10 GMT
Odom - yes on a 6 month contract to prove his fitness.
Wolf - no. We need someone more dominant.
Moses - yes if he can prove his fitness.
|
|
|
|
Post by burge2u on May 18, 2015 17:19:03 GMT
Odem. I trust Mark Hughes decision process
Wolfie: I trust Mark Hughes decision process
Moses: I trust Mark Hughes decision process.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bera’s Beano on May 18, 2015 17:20:10 GMT
Odem - Yes - On short term and probably reduced rate.
Wollscheid - No - No, no, no, the lad can barely move, if we want a big german centre back... Huth.
Moses - No - He is good when he's on it but hes Injured %50 of the time and not on it for half of the other %50. We'd waste a lot on a player who lets face it, only turns up a quarter of the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by dime on May 18, 2015 17:20:30 GMT
Yes - still has summat to offer
Yes - good/cheap cover
Yes - worth the injury/attitude risk at the right price
|
|
|
|
Post by lancashirelad on May 18, 2015 17:25:41 GMT
Yes 1 year only.
Yes as he would have learnt a lot and will be ok in the long term.
No does not appear to be overly interested in Stoke and sadly injury prone.
|
|
