|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 17:31:40 GMT
Thrice no for me.
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on May 18, 2015 17:35:36 GMT
Yes Yes Yes
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 17:37:08 GMT
No Yes Yes
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on May 18, 2015 17:39:57 GMT
maybe no no
|
|
|
Post by southcarolinastokie on May 18, 2015 17:40:17 GMT
Yes to all three
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on May 18, 2015 17:40:39 GMT
No - Done well but I think its time he went to pastures new. No - Wouldn't be overly cheap, and doesn't suit the league. No - Injuries put me off considering the cost.
|
|
|
Post by timbo1988 on May 18, 2015 17:41:04 GMT
Odemwimgie yes as backup Wollschied no Moses yes definitely
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on May 18, 2015 17:48:03 GMT
Yes. No. Yes.
|
|
|
Post by Billybigbollox on May 18, 2015 17:48:03 GMT
Yes No Meh
|
|
|
Post by PerCyfilth ....Captains Log on May 18, 2015 17:51:20 GMT
No ..his injury and his age means he won't feature much..better use his wage on a younger option No ..not good enough..too slow No .. injury prone and would be pricey
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 17:51:53 GMT
No. Yes. No.
|
|
|
Post by basingstokie on May 18, 2015 17:53:28 GMT
Guess the management team can/should/must decide on these 3 players futures right after the final match. All 3 are known to us and 2 are in our direct and immediate control and the other we can either go after or not. There is no need to prevaricate on any of them, once it is done we can get on with recruitment knowing where we stand. To start the ball rolling here is my carefully considered input: Odemwingie - No Wollscheid - No Moses - No Odemwingie - yes Wolly - I'd rather Have Huth Moses - depends on fee
|
|
|
Post by cheeesfreeex on May 18, 2015 17:58:51 GMT
If the question is about permanent contracts then it's three NO's for me. However, things as they stand ain't clear cut.
Odemwingie: extension to cover pre-season, but release in the window if it's apparent he isn't cutting it. Wollscheid: extend the loan until xmas, hoping that we can see more of the 'versus Arsenal and Leicester' version. {Also to see what transpires with Huth and Shawcross} Moses: again, extend the loan until xmas to see if he can produce the goods on the right flank. He seems to have developed the defensive side of his game, and while a threat and a thorn in the opposition side, never quite productive enough goalwise for his potential and the asking price. Too eager to return to Eva and the Chelsea treatment table.
Summer headscratchers indeed.
|
|
|
Post by stokieshazzer on May 18, 2015 17:59:43 GMT
Yes No On our terms only
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 18:00:53 GMT
At first you think 'easy'. Then you sit and think about it.
No. Yes. No.
|
|
|
Post by fortressbritannia on May 18, 2015 18:01:10 GMT
Yes - just about. No Big fat yes
I can't believe some people are actually saying no to getting Moses.
|
|
|
Post by newmarketstokie69 on May 18, 2015 18:15:55 GMT
Yes/ maybe/ ok yes ! Defo no yes
|
|
|
Post by leicspotter on May 18, 2015 18:18:29 GMT
Qualified "yes" to all three:
Odem: If Hughes thinks he can get him fit, then another 12 months is worth a go Wolly: If Hughes thinks he can get him "Premier League" tough then he has the ability to be a good squad member (Bojan needed time too!) Moses: If the price is right (by that I mean commensurate with the expected number of games he will play in)
I would only say "no" if I knew we had better players lined up
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on May 18, 2015 18:23:02 GMT
Odemwingie: Yes, one year deal. Wolly: No! Moses: Yes, but no more than £5-6M.
|
|
|
Post by rednwhite43 on May 18, 2015 18:27:27 GMT
Odemwingie - Yes Wollscheid - No Moses - No Odemwingie -yes wollscheid- no moses- yes yes yes
|
|
|
Post by Binndy on May 18, 2015 18:34:18 GMT
Yes yes and Huth no.
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on May 18, 2015 18:52:45 GMT
Wingie - yes and keep till someone proven to be better
Wolly - errr, shit no, good try but not Prem quality, got thrown in the deep and looked like he could swim to start with but eventually sank for me.
Moses - yes if the price is right and he is keen to join us, but I expect his demands (and possibly Chelsea's) will be excessive, so more likely no.
|
|
|
Post by Sergeant Muttley on May 18, 2015 18:56:58 GMT
Yes Definitely NO Yes if the price is right.
|
|
|
Post by chiefdelilah on May 18, 2015 18:59:14 GMT
No No Yes
|
|
|
Post by mightyone on May 18, 2015 19:05:54 GMT
Yes 12 months, Not for me, Mosses loan only with view to buy should he prove his fitness..
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2015 19:15:47 GMT
Odie no woolshied no Moses yes
|
|
|
Post by foster on May 18, 2015 19:39:19 GMT
Yes No Loan
|
|
|
Post by malteser68 on May 18, 2015 19:44:35 GMT
Yes - still has summat to offer Yes - good/cheap cover Yes - worth the injury/attitude risk at the right price we don't need cover in the CB position - we need improvement
|
|
|
Post by malteser68 on May 18, 2015 19:48:16 GMT
ODem have my doubts if he can get fit and slso concerns about his age - so probably a reluctant No
Wolly a definite NOOOOO - incredibly we have 5 better CBs than him at the club (Ryan, muni, Cameron, huth and yes, even Wilson)
Modes definitely yes if price is right and we get the necessary assurances from the medical team
|
|
|
Post by thehoof on May 18, 2015 19:49:51 GMT
1)Yes more pace and goalscoring ability than SJW- can interchange those two. 2) No 3) No, he has shown no indication at all that he even wants to play for anyone on a regular basis.
|
|