|
Post by jarhead on Sept 20, 2010 19:49:26 GMT
Fuller does not exsist according to slang and all the points he ALONE has massed up,my god we would be ultra dire and shit to watch and be very lucky to have stayed up!!!
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Sept 20, 2010 19:50:29 GMT
Still waiting...
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Sept 20, 2010 19:52:22 GMT
Double negative question, please re-phrase.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2010 19:53:37 GMT
I could have sworn Fuller had a pretty pivotal part in that first goal with his ball inside to Etherington. And again, before he came on we were heading for a fairly comfortable defeat. It makes sense now though, you just watch us on telly and on match of the day don't you? err no season ticket holder, and I have seen more than enough of him now, we need players who can score goals surely even you can see that? We need ones capable of creating them, unless you think strikers just have to turn up, scratch their arse for a bit, blink and then knock a couple in? We don't create many chances, and a large number of what we do create has been in large part thanks to Fuller. Hence us creating pretty much fuck all when he's not in the team.
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Sept 20, 2010 19:53:41 GMT
Double negative question, please re-phrase. Quite simple. You state Ric isn't an integral part of the team. So how many starts would say he is important?
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Sept 20, 2010 19:54:50 GMT
Pulis is trying to change the way we play, Fuller will be an impact sub for most of the season, I hope so anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Sept 20, 2010 19:56:01 GMT
Pulis is trying to change the way we play, Fuller will be an impact sub for most of the season, I hope so anyway. But how many starts before you would admit his importance to the team?
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Sept 20, 2010 19:58:14 GMT
Pulis is trying to change the way we play, Fuller will be an impact sub for most of the season, I hope so anyway. But how many starts before you would admit his importance to the team? This is a pointless question.
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Sept 20, 2010 20:00:28 GMT
He can't answer what a clown! Classic slang
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Sept 20, 2010 20:00:32 GMT
But how many starts before you would admit his importance to the team? This is a pointless question. Why is it? You say he isn't important but surely there would come a time when he makes enough appearances this season where it cannot be denied how important he is? If you don't want to commit to a figure and show your arse then I understand.
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Sept 20, 2010 20:01:47 GMT
This is a pointless question. Why is it? You say he isn't important but surely there would come a time when he makes enough appearances this season where it cannot be denied how important he is? If you don't want to commit to a figure and show your arse then I understand. What if he was injured? It is a silly question.
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Sept 20, 2010 20:02:25 GMT
Why is it? You say he isn't important but surely there would come a time when he makes enough appearances this season where it cannot be denied how important he is? If you don't want to commit to a figure and show your arse then I understand. What if he was injured? It is a silly question. What if he isn't?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2010 20:06:48 GMT
Walters is a good signing, great for back up on the right, pushing Pennant but come on instead of Ric??? For me, ethers, wilson, whitehead, Pennant/or walters with kenwyne and ric up top.
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Sept 20, 2010 20:06:59 GMT
Your gonna be waiting a long long time jamo.
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Sept 20, 2010 20:08:31 GMT
I'm sure he's got the courage of his convictions and will commit to a figure for us all to digest shortly.
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Sept 20, 2010 20:11:14 GMT
I'm sure he's got the courage of his convictions and will commit to a figure for us all to digest shortly. It is a ridiculous question, what if Jones got injured, completely hypothetical, I don't answer silly questions on principle.
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Sept 20, 2010 20:13:23 GMT
I'm sure he's got the courage of his convictions and will commit to a figure for us all to digest shortly. It is a ridiculous question, what if Jones got injured, completely hypothetical, I don't answer silly questions on principle. So it's hypothetical. Let me make it easy for you. Assuming that nobody gets injured what is the figure? Surely you can answer that? Why wouldn't you?
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Sept 20, 2010 20:16:49 GMT
It is a ridiculous question, what if Jones got injured, completely hypothetical, I don't answer silly questions on principle. So it's hypothetical. Let me make it easy for you. Assuming that nobody gets injured what is the figure? Surely you can answer that? Why wouldn't you? BUT YOU CAN'T ASSUME THAT! I'm not going to answer a silly question, what do you want me to say eleven? What is that going to prove? Fcukall.
|
|
|
Post by sutekh on Sept 20, 2010 20:20:11 GMT
Keep digging agsf and give my regards to the earths core.
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Sept 20, 2010 20:20:37 GMT
Ha ha keep digging!!!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2010 20:21:30 GMT
So it's hypothetical. Let me make it easy for you. Assuming that nobody gets injured what is the figure? Surely you can answer that? Why wouldn't you? BUT YOU CAN'T ASSUME THAT! I'm not going to answer a silly question, what do you want me to say eleven? What is that going to prove? Fcukall. He's wank according to you though isn't he? Not dangerous, no threat at all etc...
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Sept 20, 2010 20:22:11 GMT
Keep digging agsf and give my regards to the earths core. Good job we have these hilarious standard 'jokes' so that some people can feel clever for an all too rare moment. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Sept 20, 2010 20:23:33 GMT
So it's hypothetical. Let me make it easy for you. Assuming that nobody gets injured what is the figure? Surely you can answer that? Why wouldn't you? BUT YOU CAN'T ASSUME THAT! I'm not going to answer a silly question, what do you want me to say eleven? What is that going to prove? Fcukall. Calm down flower. Look if you're really that desperate not to answer a fairly straightforward question I'll leave you to it. You do realise how silly you look by being so determined not to answer? It's not 'official secrets act' stuff you know? Good evening to you then AGSF, I hope you start to appreciate Fuller before it's too late though (perhaps get the DVD of last season to look at the goals from our away victories to cheer you up!)
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Sept 20, 2010 20:24:36 GMT
BUT YOU CAN'T ASSUME THAT! I'm not going to answer a silly question, what do you want me to say eleven? What is that going to prove? Fcukall. Calm down flower. Look if you're really that desperate not to answer a fairly straightforward question I'll leave you to it. You do realise how silly you look by being so determined not to answer? It's not 'official secrets act' stuff you know? Good evening to you then AGSF, I hope you start to appreciate Fuller before it's too late though (perhaps get the DVD of last season to look at the goals from our away victories to cheer you up!) Ok 589, happy now?
|
|
|
Post by Akinbadbuy on Sept 20, 2010 20:27:12 GMT
Jones doesnt work hard enough to get anywhere near 20 goals.
He is decent in the air but is lazy. This is where Tuncay plays a role.
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Sept 20, 2010 20:28:51 GMT
Can you belive slang said this about me on the 2 Faced Pulis thread after his outrageous comments on this thread! ' jizzhead has admitted many times that he is on a wind up, how could you take this shiit seriously? I rest my case
|
|
|
Post by bunnyscfc on Sept 20, 2010 20:31:25 GMT
we all have different opinions folks and we should respect them all.
Unless you think Fuller makes no contribution, whereupon I really do think you know absolutely zilch about football and Stoke City. If you can't see Fuller has carried our attacking play for the last 3 seasons then I pity you, I really do.
All you have to come back with is "3 goals". Talk us through how many chances he missed AGSF. Not many, as we have made very few in the last 2 years. When Ric does score he's often done it all himself, but why let the truth get in the way of someone being contrary for being contrary's sake.
Face it. RF10 is a hero to a whole generation of Stoke fans. We now have the tools to really see just how good he is, yet we refer to fill up a Lamborghini with f****** chip fat, in the form of Walters.
At home, versus West Ham, Ethers, Pennant, RF10 and Jones HAD to play. A no-brainer.
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Sept 20, 2010 20:32:39 GMT
THREE GOALS ! Sorry to bring facts into it!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2010 20:33:52 GMT
THREE GOALS ! Sorry to bring facts into it! So he contributes nothing beyond that? Match of the Day. It's the only explanation. Kudos to you for sticking it out and watching us at the very end though. That's support.
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Sept 20, 2010 20:35:49 GMT
THREE GOALS ! Sorry to bring facts into it! So he contributes nothing beyond that? Match of the Day. It's the only explanation. Kudos to you for sticking it out and watching us at the very end though. That's support. What are you on about here? I've told you I've got a season ticket ffs. We scored very few goals last season, Fuller has to share most of the blame for that seeing as he was supposed to be the main striker, sorry to talk sense and facts rather than hyperbolic nonsense.
|
|