|
|
Post by greyman on May 7, 2015 0:50:58 GMT
I understand that Malcolm and I know you are a man of integrity and the FSF is damned whatever it does in this case because of the decisions of other people. Nevertheless a byproduct of what the FSF did is a tacit acceptance that this club has a place in the League. It doesn't. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on May 6, 2015 16:54:04 GMT
Malcolm The problem is that many Milton Keynes fans still claim the history of Wimbledon, regardless of what you managed to negotiate with them. A friend of mine is a fan and he clings to the belief that they won the FA Cup in 1988 and Dean Lewington joined them at the age of 13. It's a subject we avoid like religion and politics because it genuinely makes me angry. While they have fans who cling to the lie that they didn't steal a League place but are a continuation of Wimbeldon, they don't deserve the respect of 'the football family' and I for one would love to see them disappear completely or at least start where they should have started. The shame is they are a well run club otherwise justice could be served. From what I know, I wouldn't say "many", greyman, I'd say "a few". The official MKD Supporters Club signed the agreement, thus surrendering the history which your friend still claims, and as a result of it, the replica FA Cup which is kept by all winners, now resides in south London, not MKD, along with all the rest of the pre-MKD history. Ask your friend where he thinks that replica cup now is ! The Wimbledon fans organisations signed it too, thus accepting the reality that MKD are not going to disappear or start at the bottom of the pyramid. That's all you can do, apart from ensuring that something like that never happens again. It most definitely shouldn't have happened but it did. Like all "peace accords", each "side" gave a lot to gain things which were very important to them: in MKD's case, acceptance; in AFCW's case, getting back their history. I think you'd be surprised. I think the FSF is a fantastic organisation but you should have had nothing to do with Milton Keynes. This is a popular piece of merchandise at this abomination of a club  |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on May 5, 2015 23:13:56 GMT
Malcolm
The problem is that many Milton Keynes fans still claim the history of Wimbledon, regardless of what you managed to negotiate with them. A friend of mine is a fan and he clings to the belief that they won the FA Cup in 1988 and Dean Lewington joined them at the age of 13. It's a subject we avoid like religion and politics because it genuinely makes me angry.
While they have fans who cling to the lie that they didn't steal a League place but are a continuation of Wimbeldon, they don't deserve the respect of 'the football family' and I for one would love to see them disappear completely or at least start where they should have started. The shame is they are a well run club otherwise justice could be served.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Apr 14, 2015 19:27:04 GMT
A friend of mine is involved with this campaign. It's a great idea and very imaginative.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Apr 14, 2015 11:45:53 GMT
Given that football has a high percentage of unruly arrogant cunts, if you took the fourth official away the managers would either run on the pitch and confront the ref or run down the touchline to harangue the linesman. The only thing I'd change about the fourth official is to bring in a rule that they have to be at least six foot seven inches, and be trained to the top level in at least three martial arts. So if the cunts in the dugout would say anything then. I know people like the idea of intermediate cards and sin bins and whatever but I'd give officials the ability to dole out a series of playground punishments for the usual cuntery. Head shaking - wet willy in the ear Wagging a finger at an official - finger bent back until the player is on their knees Sarcastic clapping - chinese burn Verbal abuse - wedgie Going face to face with the ref - linesman runs up behind and crouches down, ref pushes player over Being Mourinho / pretending to be Mourinho - rabbit punch to the kidney Waving imaginary cards - ralgex in shorts |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Apr 13, 2015 20:03:08 GMT
The fundamental question is what the hell 4th officials do in the first place. It seems as if their main job is to be a verbal punch bag for the coaches and so become the flashpoint for all sorts of problems. The only job they would be useful for is to sit on a chair somewhere and watch replays on a monitor to advise the ref on key decisions.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Apr 9, 2015 8:45:46 GMT
I'm really really glad that we have recognised fullbacks playing in their recognised positions. It's massively better than having converted centre-backs there, but I still think they should be better than they are. I'm far from being a Hughes Hating Wankstain, in fact I'd rim last Friday's vindaloo residue from his hole, but I don't know why. Neither Pieters or Bardsley have done anything particularly wrong but I'd still prefer Muniesa (CB I know) and Cameron (whatever position you think, I know) at those respective Left / Right roles. I dunno if I'm just a stickler for character or if I'm being a dick or if I'm actually right. If I'm being a dick, can anyone explain to me why I prefer these two? I'm not being a dick for the sake of it! Point of order. There's this myth that under Pulis we played with 'converted centre backs' at full back. This wasn't often true because usually we just played with four centre backs. I'm not saying it's right or wrong because it obviously was effective, as it has been for him at Palace and Brazil, but let's forget this idea that he's ever been all that interested in putting players in a traditional full back role. He's done it but he's not all that bothered about it. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Mar 19, 2015 11:36:49 GMT
It would be good to see others considered for similar charges, including Norman Bettison.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Mar 17, 2015 22:44:56 GMT
You might be right, but life is short and these people have already suffered for 26 years of this short life. They will never get this time back and no doubt there are still many years to go before anything is solved (if it ever is).The poor dead will never be brought back no matter how hard they campaign. If someone has committed a criminal act which has led to a death or deaths, they should not escape justice because the events happened a long time ago or because you think the victims families need closure ahead of justice. The victims' families' feelings are important but they are not all important. The best way to ensure that people in public life are less likely to fail to do their jobs properly in future is to bring to justice those who committed criminal acts of commission and omission even though it was 26 years ago. As it happens the families seem as eager as the rest of us to see some convictions. What are you going to call for next? Do you want the current enquiries into paedophile rings relating to MPs, Judges and Senior police in London 20 years or more ago be terminated AGAIN on the grounds that it was all a long time ago and the victims must be tired of waiting for justice? Won't you be pleased when senior politicians or Police officers have their day in court and, hopefully a spell behind bars? I think the point bexhillpotter is making is that we should shut down the criminal justice system with regard to killing other people because it won't bring anybody back. I'm not sure he's thought through the consequences of the state approved killing of other people, but let's see where he goes with the idea. Or maybe he thinks there should be a time limit so you can get away with it if you keep the corpses hidden for long enough. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Mar 17, 2015 18:23:14 GMT
Amazing. It's taken 26 years for the families of the dead to finally get some proper answers and idiots like this want them to 'get over it'.
Just remarkable.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Mar 17, 2015 15:11:55 GMT
I'm only doing this to watch people desperately try to shore up their already discredited 'opinions'. But yet again, the direct cause of the Hillsborough disaster is.... www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31928476 |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Mar 13, 2015 12:39:04 GMT
Amazing that whenever this topic comes up, the same drivel comes out.
You're wasting your time here Dave (and everybody else). Facts have no power in the face of some people's opinions.
It's heartbreaking what's coming out today about this absolute cunt Duckenfield. While fans are dying, he's calling for police dog units and more coppers rather than ambulances and firemen. He's also obviously still out to save his own filthy skin from what happens next. Just look at his selective memory about events.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Mar 6, 2015 13:00:32 GMT
Is singing bum bum bum bum sexist? Everyone has their onions, mine are different from the man sitting next to me, he might not like bumming doz - here's a case in point. With any luck Bob is maybe 11 and is posting this in his lunch break at school, but I reckon he might be a grown man. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Mar 6, 2015 11:06:59 GMT
We can all have opinions but what really matters is the opinions of those on the receiving end. If THEY find it offensive and unacceptable then that is exactly what it is. Agree with it or not, people should accept that. Absolutely right. Apart from that, it's all a bit pathetic. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Mar 4, 2015 15:23:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Mar 2, 2015 10:05:03 GMT
It's a farcical defence but the only one he can come up with. His actions were not those of somebody concerned about overcrowding and there was plenty of room on that carriage. You should see the London underground when it's busy.
He's just trying to weasel his way out of it because his career is screwed.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Feb 11, 2015 20:46:38 GMT
Right, I'll get a book goin. MarkW 6/4 Other Mark 7/4 Sal 7/2 Davef 33/1 Smudge 33/1 Same odds apply on the Who killed Lucy Beale market. Three of those five names are the same two people. It must be Smudge because he's made so much money from this website and the fanzine that his footman attends games on his behalf. And when his footman's on holiday he sends his Keeper of the Stool, if he's not too busy attending to his day to day duties. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Feb 8, 2015 16:03:54 GMT
It doesn't have to be dangerous to be a booking you know? Look at our bookings in the first half. There was no way they were bookings. I just get pissed off 'cause it seems impossible to go back from the pussification of the game. Maybe but even back in the day, that would have been a booking. Quite simply, the ref and linesman bottled it. What I hate is crowds now baying for yellow cards with every foul. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Feb 3, 2015 12:53:00 GMT
albion
You've got that formation wrong
-----------------Wisdom Dawson McCauley Pocognoli
Mcmanaman----------------Fletcher Yacob-----------------Brunt
Anichebe
Berahino
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Feb 3, 2015 11:49:55 GMT
\o/
Just wait until he really gets his teeth stuck in.
Some things you can look forward to if things don't go to plan (or even if they do) include: him lashing out in all directions, buggering about with the club, attacking supporters, whinging endlessly about budgets, 'managing your expectations', team selections and tactics to make his point rather than win games, making stuff up, freezing out players (especially if the club bought them rather than him), ignoring the youth setup, undermining the youth set up, attacking the youth setup and threats. There's more but you'll see for yourself. He'll get you results but you'll all be at each others throats within months.
Enjoy.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Feb 2, 2015 15:21:57 GMT
Quote from a Baggie fan.. "I'm not sure if he has genuinely lost the plot or his he trying to force JP's hand by playing Lescott at left back? Lescott looked uncomfortable last week end he looked even more so this afternoon, if we can see that why can't Pulls?" .. ahhhhhh I've missed this  Bless. They still think he plays full backs. If anybody from West Brom is reading this - it's four centre backs. That is all. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Jan 31, 2015 14:39:52 GMT
And if a anybody thinks that's harsh, I also believe anyone caught calling Ronaldo CR7 should be eaten alive by wild pigs
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Jan 31, 2015 14:33:44 GMT
Anybody who uses GCam should be banned from football for life.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Jan 26, 2015 10:53:20 GMT
Sorry to appear priggish but anyone who thinks that that is awesome or worthy of imitation, rather than completely sick and twisted needs to grow up, or re-set their moral compass. Thanks god for your divine guidance  Society has missed your omniscient presence over the past few thousand years. People say far worse on this forum every day about various people, because it wasn't an actual threat and no one actually tried to behead Defour. Or does the amount of material involved somehow make it more 'evil' or more 'sinister'? I don't know whether it's offensive or just pathetic. Either way, it has no place. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Jan 22, 2015 15:35:22 GMT
Shocking really, complaining to the telegraph about them is pointless. What's the press ombudsman? Don't complain. Mock. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Jan 22, 2015 14:21:17 GMT
Anyone else notice the fingers? It's almost like somebody is suggesting he's got wanker's hands |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Jan 22, 2015 13:37:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Jan 21, 2015 12:22:48 GMT
Post a link to his profile on here. Some one might know im Seeing as he's already being tried for it, what would be the point? Wait and see what happens. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Jan 20, 2015 22:21:16 GMT
Guilty or not, you have to ask what the bloody hell he was doing in The Family Stand. I've seen his Facebook page and the guy's a complete tool.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Jan 18, 2015 22:43:23 GMT
The guy's an absolute plank. This is his Facebook page. www.facebook.com/matthew.judge.3927 years old and it's no surprise if he's done something to a three year old. |
|
Society has missed your omniscient presence over the past few thousand years. 
