|
Post by manmarking on May 6, 2017 13:36:40 GMT
With pleasure, you let me know how Jean Francois Jalkh's goes in his efforts to repudiate claims he challenged the use of zyklon B in the Holocaust. Yeah, you've been hood winked. Good luck "National Front supporter accuses others of being hoodwinked"
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 5, 2017 14:46:51 GMT
We simply have to wait for the younger generation to become the majority because figures suggest that Labour is streets ahead in the under 40 populous and don't swallow the BS as easily as the older folk who are sadly out of touch. I think you're in for a shock. People my age (late 20s) tend to be quite left-wing but the sub-generation below, basically kids born around or after the millennium, are becoming increasingly conservative and right-wing. Kids are attracted to what's cool, at some points in history it's cool to be left but right now the far-left are as faggoty as can be whereas the right are coming across (rightly or wrongly) as the cool option. The only time the right wing has ever been the cool option was when Hugo Boss designed SS uniforms, mate And a cursory glance around the usual right-wing suspects on here would suggest that's unlikely to change anytime soon. They're more B&M than Boss
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 30, 2017 15:46:24 GMT
"What is a Civil Servant? Civil Servants are those who are employed by the Crown, excluding those employed by the Monarch herself. The UK Civil Service therefore does not include those who are employed by Parliament, nor does it include those public servants employed by other public bodies. Only 1 in 12 UK public servants are therefore classed as civil servants. This note accordingly looks in some detail at the various types of public body and considers whether they employ civil servants. As you will see from the following notes, there are many different types of public body. It is easy to see why some fall into one category or another, but others could easily have been created, and so categorised, in a different way, and their status owes more to historical accident than clever design. Follow this link for an analysis of the numbers of civil servants both over time and as a proportion of the wider public service.'" My mother worked for the old nationalised C.E.G.B. and she was not a civil servant. As BR was a nationalised industry I very much doubt you were ever a civil servant. Is there any subject in which you actually know what you are talking about or can we all assume like the other Tory boys you're making false claims, telling lies and are totally unreliable! Whatever it is you are not it .......Civil is the last thing you could be described as . Again, nor could you. "Hypocritical", "pompous", "dull" perhaps, but hardly civil
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 30, 2017 15:44:13 GMT
"What is a Civil Servant? Civil Servants are those who are employed by the Crown, excluding those employed by the Monarch herself. The UK Civil Service therefore does not include those who are employed by Parliament, nor does it include those public servants employed by other public bodies. Only 1 in 12 UK public servants are therefore classed as civil servants. This note accordingly looks in some detail at the various types of public body and considers whether they employ civil servants. As you will see from the following notes, there are many different types of public body. It is easy to see why some fall into one category or another, but others could easily have been created, and so categorised, in a different way, and their status owes more to historical accident than clever design. Follow this link for an analysis of the numbers of civil servants both over time and as a proportion of the wider public service.'" My mother worked for the old nationalised C.E.G.B. and she was not a civil servant. As BR was a nationalised industry I very much doubt you were ever a civil servant. Is there any subject in which you actually know what you are talking about or can we all assume like the other Tory boys you're making false claims, telling lies and are totally unreliable! It's really not good to call people you have no knowledge about liars all the time ......in fact it's pretty silly That's exactly what you do, you weapon
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 29, 2017 11:48:36 GMT
You know more about playgrounds than most on here as an ex teacher Paul, I don't require help or benefits thanks , as for responding to questions asinine or not you have shown your arse on here tonight you are a coward who does not have the balls to back up your socialist rhetoric, grow a pair man will comrade Corbyn be our next PM ? off to bed with your copy of Mao's little red book for company. The Oatcake's biggest weapon, exploding with rage again Open question to the board: is there anyone on here thicker than carpslayer? Just curious, like. I can't think of one Anyone? No? Earth calling "Woodstein": you'd have stuck up for your little lapdog back in the day. Sad to see loyalty die
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 29, 2017 10:30:56 GMT
Thanks for that Guardian soundbite Nicholas Surely, Q4 growth isn't compared to Q1 growth is it? The prediction for Q1 was 0.4% it was 0.3%. The prediction for Q4 2016 was 0.5%. You like the Guardian so how about this one..... "UK GDP FIGURES RELEASED: Breaking: Britain’s economy expanded by 0.6% in the final three months of 2016. That’s stronger than the 0.5% expected by City economists. It matches the growth in the July-September, and shows little sign of any Brexit impact on the UK economy." - The Guardian 26th January 2017. Bish, Bish, Look! It's another one donning the italics. What'st recon!?! You can only be ************** if you disagree with them, mate
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 29, 2017 8:39:25 GMT
Wild Turkey 101 is a lot of fun Have you tried the Wild Turkey Rare Breed? Absolutely lovely stuff, 116 Barrel Proof strength (i.e. 56% ABV). I've never had something that can be so firey but so smooth and comforting at the same time. Absolutely lovely stuff. I've really got into my Bourbons over the last twelve months and can highly recommend the following: Eagle Rare - around £30, absolutely gorgeous Buffalo Trace - great bargain at £20 in Tesco Woodford Reserve - great spice and depth for £25 Knob Creek - slightly more expensive but packs an almighty punch. I got some 120 proof single barrel from the US and it is absolutely deadly Four Roses Single Barrel - Around £35 and smooth as silk This is a really good video for anyone interested in learning a bit more about Bourbon and its historical links to Scotch: I haven't mate, no - thanks for the recommendation! And thanks, the video looks good, I'll give it a watch I'm more of a single malt kinda guy if I'm honest. But my local shop sells the 101 stuff quite cheap and I've been really impressed. Fiery but smooth and comforting as you say - if the 116 is even more so then I'm in I'll give some of those others a go too - always good to have a bottle of summat sweet and smooth knocking about to give a bit of contrast to the Ardbeg
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 28, 2017 22:22:57 GMT
To be honest, I think you need help or the playground. And I won't be responding to your asinine questions again. You know more about playgrounds than most on here as an ex teacher Paul, I don't require help or benefits thanks , as for responding to questions asinine or not you have shown your arse on here tonight you are a coward who does not have the balls to back up your socialist rhetoric, grow a pair man will comrade Corbyn be our next PM ? off to bed with your copy of Mao's little red book for company. The Oatcake's biggest weapon, exploding with rage again Open question to the board: is there anyone on here thicker than carpslayer? Just curious, like. I can't think of one
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 28, 2017 22:16:03 GMT
Same old drivel for years It's not the amount of cash it's the management with in So if Conté was our manager, we'd automatically win the league? Horseshit as usual
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 28, 2017 21:06:44 GMT
Hogwash! Tory hogwash. Get the £70billion of unpaid taxes, so far this year, in for starters. Oh hang on, maybe the Tories don't want to do this? "Sorry don't fancy collecting that one in chaps...i've got £7mill in the Cayman Islands from my equity stake in my Local Hospital's new A&E Private Security Firm...and Roger's got a 15% Stake in G4S's new Privatised Prison setup...let's take it off the disabled instead, be a lot easier" I knew it wouldn't be long before the italics made an appearance ...... You lot are off your boxes
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 28, 2017 15:29:29 GMT
Dunno mate, did your mum? Hell no, she's intelligent. That's probably why she banged me
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 28, 2017 15:00:29 GMT
You've really swallowed the artificially sweetened easily digestible morsels from the Mail et al haven't you, dave. I imagine they taste like those energy bars that lycra-clad middle aged cyclists guzzle when they have no time for anything more substantial The less easily palatable stuff - like actual facts and that - evidently got rejected by your fragile constitution. Because all you're doing here is regurgitating the top line contents of Tory leaflets. No substance, no attempt to reason with what's put to you Did your dad vote Labour ? Dunno mate, did your mum?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 28, 2017 12:47:54 GMT
No! The stability was created by Gordon Brown as has been acknowledged by the HoC Treasury sub committee! The Tories de-regulated The City and wanted more de-regulation of the banks than ever Gordon Brown introduced! Fact! You live in a world of your own don't you, with Ric, RRP, Momo et al admittedly, Brown inherited that economy, he didn't do anything to create it but he did however destroy it. The futures bright, the futures Tory. You've really swallowed the artificially sweetened easily digestible morsels from the Mail et al haven't you, dave. I imagine they taste like those energy bars that lycra-clad middle aged cyclists guzzle when they have no time for anything more substantial The less easily palatable stuff - like actual facts and that - evidently got rejected by your fragile constitution. Because all you're doing here is regurgitating the top line contents of Tory leaflets. No substance, no attempt to reason with what's put to you
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 27, 2017 10:50:10 GMT
Which bit of "I really couldn't give a fuck what sort of time delusional old men like you and bish and carps are having" gave you the impression I'm remotely concerned about you, bish? The "delusional" bit, evidently I'll reiterate just in case: I don't care what you think, say or do about me. Why would I? You still don't even know who I am or why I'm here - nearly two years after I arrived And again mate, you engaged me on this thread. If you want to ignore each other, put the sniper's rifle away Otherwise I'll answer back. Pretty simple really, and not unreasonable I don't think Quite happy with either option anyhow - your call I think you pretty well started this foolishness last week when you referred to me as a " Boring knob head. " for no apparent reason . Nothing more to say about it or to you so I'll leave it at that . Yep - because you sniped at me Trigger warning: I may reply if you do that
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 27, 2017 10:21:19 GMT
It's a wonderful time for me, todge. I really couldn't give a fuck what sort of time delusional old men like you and bish and carps are having I've explained the situation completely truthfully here. Still you're so pig-headed that you won't listen to views which don't support your perception of reality. It's exactly the same as discussing politics with you. And still you come out with personal abuse having complained about receiving it. If that's the sort of person you are then fair enough. On with the show I'm having marvellous time , I'm not so sure why you are concerned about me and my " delusional " views ? Just ignore me and I'll ignore you ....that seems pretty straightforward to me ? Which bit of "I really couldn't give a fuck what sort of time delusional old men like you and bish and carps are having" gave you the impression I'm remotely concerned about you, bish? The "delusional" bit, evidently I'll reiterate just in case: I don't care what you think, say or do about me. Why would I? You still don't even know who I am or why I'm here - nearly two years after I arrived And again mate, you engaged me on this thread. If you want to ignore each other, put the sniper's rifle away Otherwise I'll answer back. Pretty simple really, and not unreasonable I don't think Quite happy with either option anyhow - your call
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 27, 2017 6:22:27 GMT
There's this one and, err, that's it for me. Besides, I'm having a wonderful time. Not misery at all You're not very good at giving straight answers are you, mate? Care to name names? In your own time... The world of multiple **************'s is not a wonderful time. Trust me. I can help. I know about multiple personalities. I'm a Gemini :-) Let's sort out your psychosis. PM me. I'll help you through this. It's a wonderful time for me, todge. I really couldn't give a fuck what sort of time delusional old men like you and bish and carps are having I've explained the situation completely truthfully here. Still you're so pig-headed that you won't listen to views which don't support your perception of reality. It's exactly the same as discussing politics with you. And still you come out with personal abuse having complained about receiving it. If that's the sort of person you are then fair enough. On with the show
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 27, 2017 6:08:03 GMT
Do you have any evidence bish? Names of all "my" accounts? Or will you be deflecting too? Any evidence of anything that occurs on the board ........is on the board for all to see , others should make their own observations from what they see and draw their own conclusions , it's not difficult . The names of all those " other " accounts that you mention would be far to numerous for anybody to recall in detail . Thought not
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 26, 2017 20:53:40 GMT
Just delete them all mate. Put yourself out of your misery. That could take some time . Do you have any evidence bish? Names of all "my" accounts? Or will you be deflecting too?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 26, 2017 20:52:12 GMT
You are a silly sausage Okay mate, genuine question. Still no abuse here - I won't rise to yours. Which other accounts on top of this one do you believe ************** is operating? Just delete them all mate. Put yourself out of your misery. There's this one and, err, that's it for me. Besides, I'm having a wonderful time. Not misery at all You're not very good at giving straight answers are you, mate? Care to name names? In your own time...
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 26, 2017 18:48:25 GMT
Fair dos mate. No evidence, no argument, no issue with National Front anti-semitism. Didn't think so And still triggered by italics. Fuck me, I've done an even better job on you lot than I dared dream possible Tell you what mate, just for you: I might adopt another poster's writing style soon for a laugh. And just to show that you can't judge a book by its cover. Might be mumf, might be carps... might be ukyestoney for fuck's sake Watch this space No. Just for me, delete all your accounts and just post as yourself. There is no "laugh" in your nonsense behaviour. You think you're clever and amusing but people just think you're a dick for having multiple accounts. You are a silly sausage Okay mate, genuine question. Still no abuse here - I won't rise to yours. Which other accounts on top of this one do you believe ************** is operating?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 26, 2017 12:50:36 GMT
The evidence is that anyone I've accused of being ************** always asks for evidence, usually in italics, always mentions someone called mumf and always descends to circular strawman arguments. You misleadingly quote Jean-Marie Le Pen when the topic is Marine Le Pen. You just couldn't help being triggered by that surname could you. Now you try to spin the conversation to include Livingstone. Boring stuff mate. Here's an idea. Why don't you delete all your users. Open TheReal************** account and post what you really think. Once. Individually. Join the discussion don't take the piss out of it. People don't take you seriously because you play this queer game of attention seeking displaying many symptoms of Histrionic Personality Disorder.Fair dos mate. No evidence, no argument, no issue with National Front anti-semitism. Didn't think so And still triggered by italics. Fuck me, I've done an even better job on you lot than I dared dream possible Tell you what mate, just for you: I might adopt another poster's writing style soon for a laugh. And just to show that you can't judge a book by its cover. Might be mumf, might be carps... might be ukyestoney for fuck's sake Watch this space
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 26, 2017 11:38:45 GMT
I have said, and I repeat, at the risk of appearing sacrilegious, that the gas chambers are a detail of the history of the Second World War. … If you take a book of a thousand pages on the Second World War, in which 50 million people died, the concentration camps occupy two pages and the gas chambers ten or 15 lines, and that's what's called a detail.
------
He complained it was because he was Jewish he was thrown out. You couldn't tell by looking at his identity card, nor at his noseEtc etc etc etc etc etc etc. Honorary President and Founder of the FN, and Marine's old man. Enjoy that legacy, Todge. And remember not to complain about anti-semitism again from now on; you're on the side of it now Anyway, we can insult each other all we like; it won't get either of us anywhere. At the end of the day, you're a National Front supporter and I'm not. I'm confident history will prove me correct that they can't be trusted. If she's elected, I sincerely hope I'm proved wrong And just for the record, I didn't say Marine Le Pen has the same policies as Hitler. That would be facile ( definition for you here if unsure : en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/facile ) I pointed out that your logic for supporting her - she has policies and is consistent - could be applied to any number of unsavoury causes. Yes, including Hitler. Related, your enemy's enemy is not necessarily your friend. A bit of bedtime thinking for you in return. Not that you seem to do any of that EDIT: just clocked, you think I'm liquidlen and heyzeus too now? Liquidlol! Well if you've bothered to google Le Detail then you'll also know that Marine challenged Jean-Marie over this and many other policies that she didn't agree with. She won the party leadership and kicked him out. She's also estranged as a a daughter. But I guess those facts don't fit your cliched postings. I'm interested in anyone who challenges the EU political idea of a superstate and has a proactive concern about forced multiculturalism that isn't working and will only create serious problems in the future. If that stance had been adopted by Fillon, for example then I would have listened to him and you wouldn't get your knickers in a twist over some knee jerk student reaction to the words Front National. As for insults not getting us anywhere, that's the only reason your characters are invented. A sad mechanism to disagree on many levels from different points of view. So parties can be absolved of their legacies? Labour will be delighted to know you've forgiven them the 2008 crash, the Iraq War and so on, since they too have now elected a leader who's distanced himself from previous administrations Or does this principle, perchance, only apply to parties you want to support? The rest in brief: Jean Marie hasn't been kicked out; he's honorary president. Cf. your moral outrage at Ken Livingstone. If you think anti-semitism is a "knee-jerk student" thing to worry about then fine; that speaks volumes It's hypocritical for you of all people to criticise insults. Insulting is all you do on here, mate. Then, like mumf, you get all upset if you're ever expected to take what you give out. NB. I haven't used any insults in this post As for the hackneyed old multiple accounts claim... A you're not living in the real world, B you're using it as a placebo to con yourself into thinking only one person could ever disagree with you, purely to troll you, and/or C it's deliberate fake news to mask your lack of argument. Which is it? Any evidence to back up the allegation?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 26, 2017 9:27:27 GMT
Errrrr, that quality of life for the average worker should never be allowed to improve beyond pre-Wall Street Crash levels? That money is more important than people? Any more? I thought you were of the opinion that Britain was at its best in the 1800s when we were still fighting the fuzzies. You're getting me confused with mumf, hotlips And you're strawmanning; any chance you could clarify your position on any of the questions I've asked?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 26, 2017 9:21:22 GMT
Except of course they're not socialists. But apart from that, yes Neil Kinnock would argue that he is and always has been boyo . Neil Kinnock can say whatever he wants, it doesn't make it fact does it? If he said he was a lovely bloke and a great use of taxpayers' money, would he automatically be one? If he said he was a box of Ricicles, or a Cadbury's Mini Roll, would he automatically be one? Since when did people's own self-appraisal count as unbiased fact? Oh, that's right; whenever it fits your agenda
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 26, 2017 3:23:23 GMT
"Vote Tory if you want more of this.... Michael Fallon......Job: far too many to mention..... MP Salary: £64,766 (part time) Total second home claims 2004-05: £16,825 2005-06: £16,882 2006-07: £22,110 2007-08: £22,853 He then bought another flat in Westminster for £728,000. Soon after moving in, he claimed £1,795 for a bed, £1,500 for curtains and almost £1,000 for a freezer, washer-dryer and deep cleaner. The claim for the bed was reduced to £1,000. He then began claiming the interest on the mortgage for his new flat, which came to about £2,100 per month — almost three times as much as at his previous property. Mr Fallon also shares a large house in his Kent constituency with his wife, Wendy. The house, which the couple bought in 1997, is about 28 miles away from Westminster. It is not mortgaged. Mr Fallon is also paid as a director of three companies. His salary from one, a money broker, is reportedly £45,000. He also pays his wife from his taxpayer-funded office expenses to work as his secretary. Don't you just love the Tories." For an alternative insight into the make up of how a socialist family runs ......Check out the Kinnock family ....serving the people . Except of course they're not socialists. But apart from that, yes
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 25, 2017 22:32:32 GMT
Your answer demonstrates the depth of your understanding, todgey. ie the square root of fuck all. Hitler was consistent and had policies. You're just another knee-jerk anti-semitic nazi. If you want to support the National Front then that's your decision. You'll regret it in 20 years' time. Hell, you might even admit you were wrong... Actually, come to think of it you probably won't. You'll probably just blame your decision on whatever ethnics happen to be bothering you at that point Hackneyed mate. It's just blah blah blah from you nowadays. Sad really. Too busy with liquidlen and jeazus or whatever to settle down and read one of those proper clever books of yours. If you think that Le Pen has the same policies as Hitler you're dense. If you pretend to know what we'll regret in 20 years time your deluded. Then again if you haven't got much between your ears then you'll have little to be deluded about. So every cloud and all that Anyway, I thought the square root of fuck all was undefined A bit of bedtime thinking for you. I have said, and I repeat, at the risk of appearing sacrilegious, that the gas chambers are a detail of the history of the Second World War. … If you take a book of a thousand pages on the Second World War, in which 50 million people died, the concentration camps occupy two pages and the gas chambers ten or 15 lines, and that's what's called a detail.
------
He complained it was because he was Jewish he was thrown out. You couldn't tell by looking at his identity card, nor at his noseEtc etc etc etc etc etc etc. Honorary President and Founder of the FN, and Marine's old man. Enjoy that legacy, Todge. And remember not to complain about anti-semitism again from now on; you're on the side of it now Anyway, we can insult each other all we like; it won't get either of us anywhere. At the end of the day, you're a National Front supporter and I'm not. I'm confident history will prove me correct that they can't be trusted. If she's elected, I sincerely hope I'm proved wrong And just for the record, I didn't say Marine Le Pen has the same policies as Hitler. That would be facile ( definition for you here if unsure : en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/facile ) I pointed out that your logic for supporting her - she has policies and is consistent - could be applied to any number of unsavoury causes. Yes, including Hitler. Related, your enemy's enemy is not necessarily your friend. A bit of bedtime thinking for you in return. Not that you seem to do any of that EDIT: just clocked, you think I'm liquidlen and heyzeus too now? Liquidlol!
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 25, 2017 22:03:16 GMT
No it's not. Wow............ you're even more ignorant than I thought......... which is saying something......... ************** get's confused easily, not surprising when he has soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo many aliases and sooooooooooooooooooooooooo few friends anymore. You're another one of the braindead illiterate grunts that nazis use when they realise they need to rebrand. Keep marching to the tune, little fish. Soon you'll be able to go ethnic-bashing with pride again. Just don't think too hard about what any of it really means for you. Then again, you hardly need a reminder to not think about stuff
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 25, 2017 21:15:07 GMT
It's an even greater mistake to assume that just because someone is consistent and has policies, they're worth voting for. If you're seriously endorsing The National Front, then your crocodile tears over Labour anti-semitism are even more absurd now than they were at the time. No it's not. Wow............ you're even more ignorant than I thought......... which is saying something......... Your answer demonstrates the depth of your understanding, todgey. ie the square root of fuck all. Hitler was consistent and had policies. You're just another knee-jerk anti-semitic nazi. If you want to support the National Front then that's your decision. You'll regret it in 20 years' time. Hell, you might even admit you were wrong... Actually, come to think of it you probably won't. You'll probably just blame your decision on whatever ethnics happen to be bothering you at that point
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 25, 2017 21:02:44 GMT
No mate, I merely pointed out that it's not as black and white as you portrayed it to be. You can't be a traitor to the Tory party because you're pro-EU when you spent your formative years in politics obediently helping the Tory party to take us into the EU Jc And sharing a stage with Blair and mandleson ? Stabbing Maggie in the back? And major Let's face it he's a traitor to his party and his country He's a massive europhile ....like many in the Labour and liberal Party I hope he dies slowly of gout the fucking snorting fat bloated pig. "A traitor to his country"? Jesus wept, fraise, you need to calm the fuck down. We live in a democracy. At least until you have your way, anyhow... How about Farage sharing stages with all manner of far-right nut jobs of the sort that we fought a world war against? Or the euro-sceptics that John Major himself labelled "bastards" because they undermined him so frequently and, errr, treacherously? Are they all traitors too? Or are they (yet again) okay because they agree with you?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Apr 25, 2017 20:20:31 GMT
SHEs no longer fighting as the NF candidate. Saying she is for all France Smart move This smart move will presumably only con the very stupidest in society
|
|