|
Post by manmarking on May 14, 2017 20:15:43 GMT
I'm not sure you've ever told me that before, mate. It's pretty unfair to lump youngsters confused about their gender in with paedophiles. Just like it's unfair to lump them in with nazis. In fact I'll go one further; it's downright unpleasant. And I can categorically say that I won't ever defend paedophilia either - that's a pretty poor use of hyperbole to try to win an argument you know you're losing I thought it was you I talked about this with before? It might have been Biblical And I'm not (Lets get some of those sexy italics in play) lumping youngsters in with paedophiles. I'm quite clearly saying how it's a race to the bottom for these SJW types, and as far as I can see paedophilia is the bottom rung of the ladder. Give it time & they'll be pushing for it to be normalised as just a 'sexual preference'... Infact, I'll chuck in shagging horses/goats/sheep/or whatever the fuck else these people with clear problems get upto. Give it time & they'll all become normalised, and it'll be 'you' (the un-believer) who is in the wrong... And the next generation of Manmarking's, RipRoaringPotters etc... will be on here shouting down anyone who doesn't agree as a paedoist/goatist/whatever the fuck they'd be called. You're making a logical error here, mate. You're assuming that we're on some sort of preordained linear path to hell in a handcart, the culmination of which will be the legalisation of paedophilia. In fact, sexual preferences have been criminalised and decriminalised throughout the ages. It ebbs and flows (so to speak ) Homosexuality, transsexualism, incest, paedophilia, bestiality, sex outside marriage, you name it. They've all been both legal and illegal at different times. So how do we arrive at what's right and what's wrong? Well, I think it's pretty obvious to anyone with an ounce of common sense that some of these preferences are harmless to others (homosexuality, transsexualism, sex outside marriage etc), while some are harmful (paedophilia, bestiality, incest etc). It's about taking each one on its own merits. That's why, broadly speaking, the harmful ones have remained illegal and the harmless ones haven't. It isn't some sort of grand SJW conspiracy - it's just about tolerating others if what they're doing isn't doing you any harm I'm confident when I say that there's literally no move afoot to legalise paedophilia - and nor will there be as part of some mad politically correct crusade. If you have any evidence that there is, please share. I'll do everything I can to oppose it
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 14, 2017 19:03:24 GMT
Chill out, mate. Yours isn't such a great reply either There's a huge difference the Holocaust and boys wearing skirts ffs! I agree about chipping away and the need to speak out early about dangerous things. I just fail to see what dark and terrifying place the odd trannie might take us, that's all In fact I'd be more concerned about the government imposing rules on what children are and aren't allowed to wear in a private institution. Very anti-libertarian I've told you previously where I believe it's all heading, it's a race to the bottom of 'normalising' everything. Give it 20-odd years & you'd better be a fully paid-up member of the paedophilia train, otherwise you'll have the future versions of yourself telling you what a disgusting paedoist you are with your paedophobe outlook. ...Of course you wont believe it untill it's already happened though, and of course by then it'll be seen as the 'correct' opinion to have, so you'll happily defend it. I'm not sure you've ever told me that before, mate. It's pretty unfair to lump youngsters confused about their gender in with paedophiles. Just like it's unfair to lump them in with nazis. In fact I'll go one further; it's downright unpleasant. And I can categorically say that I won't ever defend paedophilia either - that's a pretty poor use of hyperbole to try to win an argument you know you're losing
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 14, 2017 18:39:08 GMT
Does the uniform policy of a private school in Highgate actually affect you in any way, mate? Shit reply, mate. Just because something doesn't affect me directly at this very moment, doesn't mean that as it creeps every further into our way of life that it wont affect me, or you, in the future. What's that old saying your ilk like to use when talking about the Tories or The Don etc... Summat about first they came for the socialists, then they came for the trade unionists... Doesn't the same apply here? Slowly chipping away but ah it doesn't matter, it's just one University, it's just one school, it's just one city... Chill out, mate. Yours isn't such a great reply either There's a huge difference the Holocaust and boys wearing skirts ffs! I agree about chipping away and the need to speak out early about dangerous things. I just fail to see what dark and terrifying place the odd trannie might take us, that's all In fact I'd be more concerned about the government imposing rules on what children are and aren't allowed to wear in a private institution. Very anti-libertarian
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 14, 2017 17:36:31 GMT
Girls wear trousers when it's cold, boys wear shorts when it's hot. Now girls wear trousers 'cos of feminism fighting the evil patriarchy, and boys wear skirts 'cos of transphobia. Does the uniform policy of a private school in Highgate actually affect you in any way, mate?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 14, 2017 17:32:25 GMT
Who's Mark, haemorrvoid? According to the email addy on your profile....you, you daft fucker. Oh, that You shouldn't believe everything you read online, haemorrvoid
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 13, 2017 21:05:51 GMT
Me and whoever you and the rest of the thickos have decided is ************** I guess, yer soppy twat Who said anything about **************, Mark? Who's Mark, haemorrvoid?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 13, 2017 13:09:59 GMT
Just being a cunt, mate. Same as you but with eminently more imagination and literacy If you're so bothered by the very real questions raised in David's post, why not answer them? Come on, we're all on tenterhooks I'm not that fussed, I just wanted to call you a cunt again, mate. Who's 'we' by the way? Me and whoever you and the rest of the thickos have decided is ************** I guess, yer soppy twat
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 13, 2017 6:48:59 GMT
God knows quite frankly, mate. You're best off starting a thread on that subject if it's bothering you. Or better still writing to the Landlords' Association or your MP. As opposed to randomly responding to an unrelated post on a thread about something else Are you now Admin or are you just being a cunt as usual? Just being a cunt, mate. Same as you but with eminently more imagination and literacy If you're so bothered by the very real questions raised in David's post, why not answer them? Come on, we're all on tenterhooks
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 13, 2017 6:43:12 GMT
Without knowing all the details, it seems that it was just. In the end it seems widely considered that the intervention saved lives overall. I'd like an interviewer yo go through one by one the conflicts Britain has been involved in and list lives and say if it was unjust or not... Korea Northern Ireland Falklands First Gulf War Afghanistan Second Gulf War Etc etc. Some of those are fair to describe as unjust, others certainly not. I'd also like to know what he'd have done in those circumstances - whether or not he'd invoke military action. While we're at it, could we get the same interviewer to go through carps' CV with him and draw up a definitive one? "1984-85: Astronaut, first moon landing..." etc etc
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 12, 2017 16:44:13 GMT
Just saying that whatever government is in power the problem is always there pal. The problem is always there but it increases/reduces in severity depending on different policies
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 12, 2017 15:26:50 GMT
Divide and rule mate. Alienating the poor from the even-more-poor is one of many ways these shitbags do that. A person wants to better himself (which is apparently a crime) and buys a second home for rental purposes, they advertise and applications come in, the applicants finances check out and they can afford it or THE STATE PAYS THEIR RENT TO THEM FOR THE EXPRESS REASON OF HOUSING THEM. In 95% of eviction cases the landlord receives very little money because the tenants know their rights and as a result remain in the property long after they have defaulted. Not only does the landlord lose the rental income they INCUR MORTGAGE PAYMENTS THEMSELF AND ASSOSIATED COSTS to reclaim their own property, the average amount of time it takes to this is 11 months, the average loss to a landlord with costs is £8,800. Before a High Court Writ is issued the defendant will have received numerous letters telling them the serious nature of their default and warning them of the consequences. Explain why a person who has either had the money paid to them BY THE STATE for their rent and spent the cash elsewhere or failed to pay rent they agreed in good faith should feel justified to remain in that property. Do you think everyone should just be given a place to live for free, does nobody have to work for a living to get the finer things in life, is it the states responsibility to house and feed you just because you were born here? And what do you have to say to the landlord who is now massively out of pocket while still having a mortgage and their own kids to feed. God knows quite frankly, mate. You're best off starting a thread on that subject if it's bothering you. Or better still writing to the Landlords' Association or your MP. As opposed to randomly responding to an unrelated post on a thread about something else
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 12, 2017 6:44:48 GMT
It was the days we sat in the dark,the cold, the days we drove around bin bags in the streets, the days we couldn't get to work Ecause public transport wasn't moving, the days we were queuing for bread etc etc etc all so your wages could keep going up Had this very discussion in the office just the other day. Pitch black villages so we could keep our industries running for a few days a week. The good old days when we had strong unions and nationalised industries. Funny how when bad things happen economically, it's only ever Labour's fault. It can never be other things going on in the world. Yet when the Tories fail to sort out the deficit, it's other things going on in the world, obvs
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 11, 2017 22:01:17 GMT
Yes I'm sure Corbyn will end homelessness and poverty like previous labour governments did! No one mentioned Corbyn or said he would "end homelessness". Try reading what people actually write before responding, mate
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 11, 2017 21:57:04 GMT
Homelessness would be significantly reduced if everyone manages to avoid voting Conservative next month theres more chance of seeing imbula in the side than conservatives not winning I agree. But if homelessness is a real concern for people then they shouldn't vote Tory. At least then their consciences can be clean
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 11, 2017 21:34:58 GMT
When did poverty porn become such a huge TV attraction? It seems every day (usually on channel 5), some massively misinformed show is poking fun at a family of under privileged people (I reiterate, people, not dirt) who quite evidently aren't aware that the show is not helping them, but rather, it's ridiculing them. Divide and rule mate. Alienating the poor from the even-more-poor is one of many ways these shitbags do that.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 11, 2017 21:31:24 GMT
Homelessness would be significantly reduced if everyone manages to avoid voting Conservative next month
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 11, 2017 21:27:06 GMT
It was fortunate for him Dim Dianne was not in the vehicle, he would have ended up with a foot like a scrubber divers flipper. Ever thought of posting anything that makes any sense, mate? You should try it sometime
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 11, 2017 15:51:30 GMT
I could only read half that. What are they doing? Inventing money? Why don't you try learning to read better then, sloppy? Instead of having your opinions made for you on a football forum, like
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 11, 2017 15:07:09 GMT
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush Yet you have to speculate to accumulate. Are "sayings" dying out amongst the young? Depends what yer bird's bush is like, John
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 11, 2017 9:42:00 GMT
Still no sign of your safe space being created, fella Maybe get in touch with admin?!
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 11, 2017 8:21:01 GMT
Funny how you bang on about wanting to restore democracy and traditional values, and moan about snowflakes. Yet when some amiable wacko comes along exercising his democratic right to spout a load of traditional bible chatter, you want a safe space creating by having his thread removed One name at a tiiiiiiiiiiime sweet Jesus is all I'm asking from you Not even God knows what you're on if you think me and zeus are the same person, you plum Cut down on the pills, mate. They're not working
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 11, 2017 6:38:50 GMT
Funny how you bang on about wanting to restore democracy and traditional values, and moan about snowflakes. Yet when some amiable wacko comes along exercising his democratic right to spout a load of traditional bible chatter, you want a safe space creating by having his thread removed
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 9, 2017 21:21:39 GMT
Yes, because manbarking's amiable with people with a different viewpoint isn't he? He's the left's version of carps. A bigot's a bigot, doesn't matter what colour rosette you stick on or news app you download. Yeah, I mean haemorrvoid is all about the amiable chat int'he A bigot's a bigot as you say
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 9, 2017 21:16:26 GMT
Well, look what the cat dragged in, thrashing and flapping and gasping for air on the parquet Hardly Mr Popular to be fair, are you, carps? Even the racists find you embarrassing I really cannot understand Crapslinger. He has mentioned on other threads being part of a family, even saying that he has "made provision" for them. A proper little Mr Protector/Provider (allegedly). So, when he hurls insults at other posters why does he never think "How would I feel if a member of my family was insulted in that way when they went online?" He's an odd one for sure mate Even the most ardent right wingers on here rarely even acknowledge his posts because they recognise (correctly) that he critically undermines their argument. Here they are, trying to sell the acceptable face of fascism and carps - bless him - keeps on inconveniently reminding us that it's all a facade Supported by the most hideously unintelligent grunts imaginable. With literally no grasp of the facts. I imagine the right wingers want him gone more than the lefties for that very reason
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 8, 2017 20:51:34 GMT
So Health, Education, Policing, workers rights, benefits, etc. are not important just getting out of Europe you must be joking you and your tory Brexitears are like the old Nag who needs blinkers to win a race because they cant concentrate on anything else only one thing. That is the sign of a weak party a weak leader. Its time for you and chicken May to go and never return. £1 million + to become a mayor with a salary of 100,000 as yourself why what's the kick back oh yes they can give contracts to there mates Lets not forget May is being investigated for insider dealing with her Husband for his job in the city. The Tory party corrupt and only looking after number one sod to the rest of you we have money and can buy our way out of social injustice. Don't let the Tories con you!! You seem very certain on these allegations, in one you are alleging future illegality you must have a good crystal ball. You are also alleging May is under investigation for insider dealing which is a lie too, Stop reading all left websites and swallowing it hook line and simmer. What's hook line and simmer, bud? Some sort of right wing hotpot?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 8, 2017 17:37:03 GMT
Au contraire mate. Unlike you, I'll admit it when I'm wrong - and have done Anyway, sorry to hear about your ankle, fella Let me know if you want any frozen peas or ready meals for one bringing round. I'm only up the road I'm good for shopping thanks the missus has a large family locally, I feel bad thinking of you and your ready meals though. Next family BBQ I'll grab you some leftovers Not hugely inspiring stuff, mate. 4/10. Could do better Check out Todge's dildo jibe to me on the Knives out thread - much stronger
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 8, 2017 15:59:09 GMT
Coming from you - priceless Coming from you worthless as always Au contraire mate. Unlike you, I'll admit it when I'm wrong - and have done Anyway, sorry to hear about your ankle, fella Let me know if you want any frozen peas or ready meals for one bringing round. I'm only up the road
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 8, 2017 15:09:58 GMT
What I am doing is pointing out you Tories will be saying one thing on here but campaigning completely differently. I see your dishonesty as a form of corruption. All I've said is that the Tory candidate should be honest about who he is. Let's have none of this he's in the Newcastle mainstream? It's gross dishonest rubbish and you know it? I know the first rule of the internet is never apologise, the second rule is to stop digging which you'd do well to remember. Coming from you - priceless
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 8, 2017 12:58:17 GMT
Murder someone out in 10 years Rob a bank and the key is chucked away. Money > someone's life. Scandalous. That's how it has always been. Didn't Union Carbide give something like a thousand US dollars per death when they poisoned half of fucking Bhopal? A thousand dollars.... adjusted for inflation, that comes to a piss taking $2,346.50 or £1800 roughly in modern day money. 1800 quid..... that doesn't even buy you a half decent second hand Volkswagen Golf. Money has always been more important than life.... just as protecting the establishment is equally more important than the lives of those who are often lost through complacency and freemasonry. Excellent post There is of course a scale of human worth for these sorts of corporations and elites. Indians, Africans etc are generally worth less than white people but yes, we're all worth fuck all to them in the grand scheme of things.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 8, 2017 11:41:32 GMT
I dont follow foreign politics, is she the equivalent to bnp or ukip? Depends who you believe Social Justice Warrior/snowflake/virtue signaller types like me would have you believe she's the friendly face of fascism. She's only one step removed from the party founder, who's an undisputed anti-semite and nazi sympathiser. Social Injustice Warrior/shitflake/vice signaller types like rogerjonesisnotgod and carpslayer would have you believe she's completely rid the party of all its former racism and she represents tough common sense policies. And that there's an establishment conspiracy afoot to discredit her. Hope that helps
|
|