|
|
Post by iancransonsknees on Nov 8, 2024 22:00:30 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by middleoftheboothen on Nov 8, 2024 22:04:23 GMT
No you are still wrong. The discussion is NOT about examples of Trump wanting to END wars, it is about thete being examples of Trump striving for peace, this point has been repeated over and over, since the discussion began. Examples of Trump wanting to end wars are NOT incontrovertible examples of Trump striving for peace. Great. Dario G has reverted back to the "I'm right, you're wrong" gaslighting form that's now synonymous with him. Peculiarly strange when in the next breath he finally acknowledges that he wasn't arguing about the existence of facts at all - but differences of opinion about what he believes the motivations behind those facts are. Well at least you've managed to nail in a single sentence, what this whole discussion (maybe confusion?) is actually about. And I completely and totally disagree with you. Just because somebody wants to end a war, doesn't then necessarily mean they actually care one jot about peace being a result of it ending. You think it does and that's why you think you've given examples of Trump striving for peace and I don't think it does and that's why I don't think that you HAVE given examples of him doing so. It's a fundamental difference in opinion and has absolutely nothing to do with not giving Trump 'credit'. I guess we have no other option but to agree to disagree. Needless to say Dario G would be fucking useless in a political theory seminar. Carnaval de Paris! You aren't the only one who's on to Spencer's narcissistic personality then. I thought it was me going crazy at first but alas I'm not the only one who thinks that. |
|
|
|
Post by musik on Nov 8, 2024 23:00:13 GMT
Eehhh ... Doesn't it all come down to where you put the starting point on the timeline? If the older guy in that video really wanted that piece on Earth to belong to who was there first, well he should get out as fast as he could and give it to the Indians. And that's why I don't for a second believe people who claim "we were here first" as an argument anywhere, any place, on this Earth. It all depends on how you draw the timeline; where do you count from? And more importantly, why? Why did you pick a specific starting point? So I don't think he's honest at all. Or maybe just lacking of knowledge. It would be more honest to say, I want it to be like it was a hundred years ago - or whatever - since that's what he really means. I totally agree. š |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Nov 8, 2024 23:19:57 GMT
No you are still wrong. The discussion is NOT about examples of Trump wanting to END wars, it is about thete being examples of Trump striving for peace, this point has been repeated over and over, since the discussion began. Examples of Trump wanting to end wars are NOT incontrovertible examples of Trump striving for peace. Great. Dario G has reverted back to the "I'm right, you're wrong" gaslighting form that's now synonymous with him. Peculiarly strange when in the next breath he finally acknowledges that he wasn't arguing about the existence of facts at all - but differences of opinion about what he believes the motivations behind those facts are. Well at least you've managed to nail in a single sentence, what this whole discussion (maybe confusion?) is actually about. And I completely and totally disagree with you. Just because somebody wants to end a war, doesn't then necessarily mean they actually care one jot about peace being a result of it ending. You think it does and that's why you think you've given examples of Trump striving for peace and I don't think it does and that's why I don't think that you HAVE given examples of him doing so. It's a fundamental difference in opinion and has absolutely nothing to do with not giving Trump 'credit'. I guess we have no other option but to agree to disagree. Needless to say Dario G would be fucking useless in a political theory seminar. Carnaval de Paris! Blimey you can be so petty and immature at times. And they still are NOT facts, no matter how many times you try to claim that they are. |
|
|
|
Post by middleoftheboothen on Nov 8, 2024 23:59:03 GMT
Great. Dario G has reverted back to the "I'm right, you're wrong" gaslighting form that's now synonymous with him. Peculiarly strange when in the next breath he finally acknowledges that he wasn't arguing about the existence of facts at all - but differences of opinion about what he believes the motivations behind those facts are. Needless to say Dario G would be fucking useless in a political theory seminar. Carnaval de Paris! Blimey you can be so petty and immature at times. And they still are NOT facts, no matter how many times you try to claim that they are. Shit band and a shit poster š No chance they would have played with world of twist, they were wank. |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Nov 9, 2024 0:44:11 GMT
Ariel MantoCan you please lay off with the Dario G stuff, I've politely asked you now several times. In over 25 years of posting on this board you are the ONLY person to have ever felt the need to resort to such tactics. The other Paul died only a few weeks ago and your persistent taunts completely lack any respect for him and sadly, they have now begun to draw other people (as you can see above) in to making similar crass comments. Thank you
|
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Manto on Nov 9, 2024 10:07:43 GMT
Ariel Manto Can you please lay off with the Dario G stuff, I've politely asked you now several times. In over 25 years of posting on this board you are the ONLY person to have ever felt the need to resort to such tactics. The other Paul died only a few weeks ago and your persistent taunts completely lack any respect for him and sadly, they have now begun to draw other people (as you can see above) in to making similar crass comments. Thank you Grow up. Some of us have been on here for 20+ years too. Iāve made no reference to anyone dying and said nothing about anyone elseās character other than your own. Iāve certainly not said anything crass. Iām mocking your narcissistic tendency to have to wiggle any debate around to you insisting on being right and someone else (whomever it is) having to be wrong. Two things. If itās your real name then youāre more of an idiot than I currently think you are. Secondly, if youāve borrowed someone elseās identity (name) and are subsequently upset at people referencing the fact you named yourself after Dario G, then you probably should have thought that through a bit before you borrowed their identity and became narcissistic with it. |
|
|
|
Post by iancransonsknees on Nov 9, 2024 19:55:21 GMT
I know it's a parody account but I wonder if they will make that mistake again š¤·
|
|
