|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2024 10:51:33 GMT
I hate the concept of inverted full back. There are more places on the pitch than a congested central midfield. Overload the flanks. Junior will look fine when you do. "Football is a simple game complicated by idiots" Agreed. Imagine going into relegation form because you decide on a tactic that the squad isn’t suited to, then going into playoff form after removing it. Then, imagine deciding that you would try the tactic again. It’s just stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2024 10:52:37 GMT
"Football is a simple game complicated by idiots" Agreed. Imagine going into relegation form because you decide on a tactic that the squad isn’t suited to, then going into playoff form after removing it. Then, imagine deciding that you would try the tactic again. It’s just stupid. That's a fair point on Schumacher and certainly a question that needs asking of him in the upcoming fans forum.
|
|
|
Post by werrington on Jul 25, 2024 11:10:36 GMT
Agreed. Imagine going into relegation form because you decide on a tactic that the squad isn’t suited to, then going into playoff form after removing it. Then, imagine deciding that you would try the tactic again. It’s just stupid. That's a fair point on Schumacher and certainly a question that needs asking of him in the upcoming fans forum. You just don’t like him do you mate
|
|
|
Post by Caerwrangonpotter on Jul 25, 2024 11:10:46 GMT
Tchamadeu - extremely poor against a left winger who has struggled in league 2.
Tchamadeu trying that inverted business at Cardiff last season was horrific. Got caught out big time with the second goal, and subsequently injured
It's a concern & half that he still hasn't got to grips with this new role yet.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jul 25, 2024 11:11:36 GMT
Tchamadeu - extremely poor against a left winger who has struggled in league 2. Tchamadeu trying that inverted business at Cardiff last season was horrific. Got caught out big time with the second goal, and subsequently injured It's a concern & half that he still hasn't got to grips with this new role yet. Not really. It’s stupid he’s been asked to do it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2024 11:12:21 GMT
Tchamadeu - extremely poor against a left winger who has struggled in league 2. Tchamadeu trying that inverted business at Cardiff last season was horrific. Got caught out big time with the second goal, and subsequently injured It's a concern & half that he still hasn't got to grips with this new role yet. Just take away the stupid role that is a detriment to the team. They stopped doing it with Hoever. It’s crap. Overload the flanks instead of trying to add yet more people into the middle of the park. All he needs to do is charge down the flank and give Million some space to either lay the ball off to him or to cut inside. Football isn’t hard. Just play players to their strengths.
|
|
|
Post by Caerwrangonpotter on Jul 25, 2024 11:15:00 GMT
Tchamadeu - extremely poor against a left winger who has struggled in league 2. Tchamadeu trying that inverted business at Cardiff last season was horrific. Got caught out big time with the second goal, and subsequently injured It's a concern & half that he still hasn't got to grips with this new role yet. Not really. It’s stupid he’s been asked to do it. Totally agree. ![(thumbsup)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/q4Mqf5MqRwT9PY8UitYa.gif)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2024 11:17:13 GMT
That's a fair point on Schumacher and certainly a question that needs asking of him in the upcoming fans forum. You just don’t like him do you mate Yes I do actually, but I think that's a fair point to make and a good question to ask.
|
|
|
Post by baconburger on Jul 26, 2024 18:37:35 GMT
"Football is a simple game complicated by idiots" Agreed. Imagine going into relegation form because you decide on a tactic that the squad isn’t suited to, then going into playoff form after removing it. Then, imagine deciding that you would try the tactic again. It’s just stupid. If that means what I think it means you’re completely wrong pre Plymouth H was nothing like play off form. It only extrapolates to play off form when you add in the last 3 games when he reverted to what he believes in. Continuing to play risk adverse percentage football in them could easily have seen us relegated. Draw the last 3 you’re level on points with Birmingham, draw 2 lose one and you’re relegated instead of them.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2024 21:20:36 GMT
Agreed. Imagine going into relegation form because you decide on a tactic that the squad isn’t suited to, then going into playoff form after removing it. Then, imagine deciding that you would try the tactic again. It’s just stupid. If that means what I think it means you’re completely wrong pre Plymouth H was nothing like play off form. It only extrapolates to play off form when you add in the last 3 games when he reverted to what he believes in. Continuing to play risk adverse percentage football in them could easily have seen us relegated. Draw the last 3 you’re level on points with Birmingham, draw 2 lose one and you’re relegated instead of them. In the last 12 games, we won 6, drew 3, lost 3 (21 pts). 46/12 = 3.83. 3.83*21 = 80.5 pts. So, playoff form. We started transitioning away from inverted fullbacks around the Leicester debacle, which was a few games prior.
|
|
|
Post by jesusmcmuffin on Jul 26, 2024 21:34:50 GMT
If that means what I think it means you’re completely wrong pre Plymouth H was nothing like play off form. It only extrapolates to play off form when you add in the last 3 games when he reverted to what he believes in. Continuing to play risk adverse percentage football in them could easily have seen us relegated. Draw the last 3 you’re level on points with Birmingham, draw 2 lose one and you’re relegated instead of them. In the last 12 games, we won 6, drew 3, lost 3 (21 pts). 46/12 = 3.83. 3.83*21 = 80.5 pts. So, playoff form. We started transitioning away from inverted fullbacks around the Leicester debacle, which was a few games prior. Think we were 5/6th in the last 1/4 of the season a table showed and some impressive performances and wins. Started to win at home as well. Real transition from the rubbish and excuses that Neil served up. Took SS a while to get going as well but got us playing nice stuff. We were pretty much capable of beating anyone towards the end. Won at Soton, played very well at Leeds
|
|
|
Post by baconburger on Jul 26, 2024 22:00:52 GMT
If that means what I think it means you’re completely wrong pre Plymouth H was nothing like play off form. It only extrapolates to play off form when you add in the last 3 games when he reverted to what he believes in. Continuing to play risk adverse percentage football in them could easily have seen us relegated. Draw the last 3 you’re level on points with Birmingham, draw 2 lose one and you’re relegated instead of them. In the last 12 games, we won 6, drew 3, lost 3 (21 pts). 46/12 = 3.83. 3.83*21 = 80.5 pts. So, playoff form. We started transitioning away from inverted fullbacks around the Leicester debacle, which was a few games prior. There was no common style over the last 12 games. 9 of them were playing very risk adverse percentage football that Schu is on record as saying he hated. The last 3 games. He reverted to his favoured brand of football. Played 3 won 3 scored 8 conceded none. You as others have done have tried to stipulate this 12 game yardstick because it suits the argument you wish to present. Some that a more pragmatic brand of football produced playoff form, it didn't. You because you're over focusing on the role of inverted FB's and trying to say ceasing it resulted in play off form, it didn't. I'll choose the last 3 games as my sample size 46/3 138 pts champions, invincible, never to be equalled record season. monarchy abolished Schu for President See what you can do when you get to dictate the sample size?? Complete bullshit isn't it??
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2024 22:51:26 GMT
In the last 12 games, we won 6, drew 3, lost 3 (21 pts). 46/12 = 3.83. 3.83*21 = 80.5 pts. So, playoff form. We started transitioning away from inverted fullbacks around the Leicester debacle, which was a few games prior. There was no common style over the last 12 games. 9 of them were playing very risk adverse percentage football that Schu is on record as saying he hated. The last 3 games. He reverted to his favoured brand of football. Played 3 won 3 scored 8 conceded none. You as others have done have tried to stipulate this 12 game yardstick because it suits the argument you wish to present. Some that a more pragmatic brand of football produced playoff form, it didn't. You because you're over focusing on the role of inverted FB's and trying to say ceasing it resulted in play off form, it didn't. I'll choose the last 3 games as my sample size 46/3 138 pts champions, invincible, never to be equalled record season. monarchy abolished Schu for President See what you can do when you get to dictate the sample size?? Complete bullshit isn't it?? When you take a more reasonable sample size, interpretation of form is more reliable. That’s not particularly hard to follow. I chose 12 games because it falls in line with when he stopped trying to use an approach that wasn’t remotely suited to the squad. That’s not particularly hard to follow either. Carry on bacon. I’ve said my piece on this and I have no more interest in the discussion.
|
|
|
Post by baconburger on Jul 27, 2024 7:17:12 GMT
There was no common style over the last 12 games. 9 of them were playing very risk adverse percentage football that Schu is on record as saying he hated. The last 3 games. He reverted to his favoured brand of football. Played 3 won 3 scored 8 conceded none. You as others have done have tried to stipulate this 12 game yardstick because it suits the argument you wish to present. Some that a more pragmatic brand of football produced playoff form, it didn't. You because you're over focusing on the role of inverted FB's and trying to say ceasing it resulted in play off form, it didn't. I'll choose the last 3 games as my sample size 46/3 138 pts champions, invincible, never to be equalled record season. monarchy abolished Schu for President See what you can do when you get to dictate the sample size?? Complete bullshit isn't it?? When you take a more reasonable sample size, interpretation of form is more reliable. That’s not particularly hard to follow. I chose 12 games because it falls in line with when he stopped trying to use an approach that wasn’t remotely suited to the squad. That’s not particularly hard to follow either. Carry on bacon. I’ve said my piece on this and I have no more interest in the discussion. In this case it’s like having 9 apples and 3 bananas and trying to convince people they’re all apples because you get to choose.
|
|