|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 23, 2024 14:48:29 GMT
Now I'm no fan of Starmer and I don't know whether his plan is going to actually work but did you seriously expect him to resolve this in just a few weeks? In just under 2 weeks time he’s been prime minister for 3 months and he’s done absolutely jackshit to deter illegal migrants crossing the channel.I understand it’s not an an easy thing to solve but there’s no sign of him doing anything whilst young man after young man continue to flood into the country As I say, I've no idea if his plan is going to work (or even know what it actually is) but 3 months is no time at all. The Tory's spent years not solving it. I'd think you'd have to give him at least a year, surely. |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Sept 23, 2024 14:49:58 GMT
In just under 2 weeks time he’s been prime minister for 3 months and he’s done absolutely jackshit to deter illegal migrants crossing the channel.I understand it’s not an an easy thing to solve but there’s no sign of him doing anything whilst young man after young man continue to flood into the country As I say, I've no idea if his plan is going to work (or even know what it actually is) but 3 months is no time at all. The Tory's spent years not solving it. I'd think you'd have to give him at least a year, surely. What is his plan then Paul? |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 23, 2024 14:52:31 GMT
As I say, I've no idea if his plan is going to work (or even know what it actually is) but 3 months is no time at all. The Tory's spent years not solving it. I'd think you'd have to give him at least a year, surely. What is his plan then Paul? I literally said in the post you've quoted ... "I've no idea if his plan is going to work or even know what it actually is" |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Sept 23, 2024 14:53:34 GMT
What is his plan then Paul? I literally said in the post you've quoted ... "I've no idea if his plan is going to work or even know what it actually is" Thats the issue though isn’t it,no plan,no deterrent 🤷♂️ |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 23, 2024 14:55:19 GMT
I literally said in the post you've quoted ... "I've no idea if his plan is going to work or even know what it actually is" Thats the issue though isn’t it,no plan,no deterrent 🤷♂️ I don't know how many times I can say that I don't know mate. 😁 |
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Manto on Sept 23, 2024 14:58:00 GMT
Now I'm no fan of Starmer and I don't know whether his plan is going to actually work but did you seriously expect him to resolve this in just a few weeks? In just under 2 weeks time he’s been prime minister for 3 months and he’s done absolutely jackshit to deter illegal migrants crossing the channel.I understand it’s not an an easy thing to solve but there’s no sign of him doing anything whilst young man after young man continue to flood into the country Were you seriously expecting the answer to a problem the Conservatives both couldn't solve and exacerbated in 14 years to be derived at within 3 months? I don't know what the right wing mania about "the boats" is: the ISSUE is the processing of asylum claims and the fact that individuals cannot claim asylum in the UK from overseas. In the year ending June 2024, almost all small boat arrivals (99%) had an asylum claim recorded either as a main applicant or dependant (as of 16 July 2024). However, almost all (96%) of the asylum applications from small boat arrivals made in the year ending June 2024 were still undecided at the end of June 2024. For all small boat asylum applications since 2018, 31% (33,224) are STILL awaiting a decision. In the year ending June 2024, there were 38,784 detected irregular arrivals, 26 % fewer than in the year ending June 2023, and 81% of these arrived by small boats. Of the 105,966 asylum applications from small boat arrivals since 2018, 49,912 had received a substantive decision (as of 16 July 2024). Of these, 35,398 had been granted asylum or some other protection status, and 14,514 were refused or not considered on third country grounds (an asylum grant rate of 71%). The vast majority (71%) of those coming over in small boats are granted asylum as they are genuine asylum seekers - the other 29% are removed |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Sept 23, 2024 15:00:54 GMT
In just under 2 weeks time he’s been prime minister for 3 months and he’s done absolutely jackshit to deter illegal migrants crossing the channel.I understand it’s not an an easy thing to solve but there’s no sign of him doing anything whilst young man after young man continue to flood into the country Were you seriously expecting the answer to a problem the Conservatives both couldn't solve and exacerbated in 14 years to be derived at within 3 months? I don't know what the right wing mania about "the boats" is: the ISSUE is the processing of asylum claims and the fact that individuals cannot claim asylum in the UK from overseas. In the year ending June 2024, almost all small boat arrivals (99%) had an asylum claim recorded either as a main applicant or dependant (as of 16 July 2024). However, almost all (96%) of the asylum applications from small boat arrivals made in the year ending June 2024 were still undecided at the end of June 2024. For all small boat asylum applications since 2018, 31% (33,224) are STILL awaiting a decision. In the year ending June 2024, there were 38,784 detected irregular arrivals, 26 % fewer than in the year ending June 2023, and 81% of these arrived by small boats. Of the 105,966 asylum applications from small boat arrivals since 2018, 49,912 had received a substantive decision (as of 16 July 2024). Of these, 35,398 had been granted asylum or some other protection status, and 14,514 were refused or not considered on third country grounds (an asylum grant rate of 71%). The vast majority (71%) of those coming over in small boats are granted asylum as they are genuine asylum seekers - the other 29% are removed Genuine. asylum seekers 😂😂 Yes these young men on the boats look genuine as they lob their credentials into the sea🙄laughable mate |
|
|
|
Post by AlliG on Sept 23, 2024 15:02:29 GMT
In just under 2 weeks time he’s been prime minister for 3 months and he’s done absolutely jackshit to deter illegal migrants crossing the channel.I understand it’s not an an easy thing to solve but there’s no sign of him doing anything whilst young man after young man continue to flood into the country As I say, I've no idea if his plan is going to work (or even know what it actually is) but 3 months is no time at all. The Tory's spent years not solving it. I'd think you'd have to give him at least a year, surely. Two weeks ago the Mail on Sunday (of all people) had a leader article stating that they thought Labour were doing a better job of trying to stop the small boats than the Tories had. Surprised the our local tories didn't post a link to that article!  My excuse for seeing the article is that I was visiting relatives.  |
|
|
|
Post by phileetin on Sept 23, 2024 15:06:38 GMT
In just under 2 weeks time he’s been prime minister for 3 months and he’s done absolutely jackshit to deter illegal migrants crossing the channel.I understand it’s not an an easy thing to solve but there’s no sign of him doing anything whilst young man after young man continue to flood into the country Were you seriously expecting the answer to a problem the Conservatives both couldn't solve and exacerbated in 14 years to be derived at within 3 months? I don't know what the right wing mania about "the boats" is: the ISSUE is the processing of asylum claims and the fact that individuals cannot claim asylum in the UK from overseas. In the year ending June 2024, almost all small boat arrivals (99%) had an asylum claim recorded either as a main applicant or dependant (as of 16 July 2024). However, almost all (96%) of the asylum applications from small boat arrivals made in the year ending June 2024 were still undecided at the end of June 2024. For all small boat asylum applications since 2018, 31% (33,224) are STILL awaiting a decision. In the year ending June 2024, there were 38,784 detected irregular arrivals, 26 % fewer than in the year ending June 2023, and 81% of these arrived by small boats. Of the 105,966 asylum applications from small boat arrivals since 2018, 49,912 had received a substantive decision (as of 16 July 2024). Of these, 35,398 had been granted asylum or some other protection status, and 14,514 were refused or not considered on third country grounds (an asylum grant rate of 71%). The vast majority (71%) of those coming over in small boats are granted asylum as they are genuine asylum seekers - the other 29% are removed
is that because they pretend that they are gay , trans or christian and would be persecuted if they were sent back ?
i always wonder why a lot of them seem to lose their passports .
|
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Sept 23, 2024 15:23:25 GMT
As I say, I've no idea if his plan is going to work (or even know what it actually is) but 3 months is no time at all. The Tory's spent years not solving it. I'd think you'd have to give him at least a year, surely. Two weeks ago the Mail on Sunday (of all people) had a leader article stating that they thought Labour were doing a better job of trying to stop the small boats than the Tories had. Surprised the our local tories didn't post a link to that article! My excuse for seeing the article is that I was visiting relatives. Surprised our resident Dail Mail and Express rep missed that one 🤔 |
|
|
|
Post by 4372 on Sept 23, 2024 17:01:27 GMT
Don't worry about it. You will be off on your own holiday soon, and you won't be travelling in conditions like they endure. Where does it stop though? There has to be some control over who’s coming in. No problem with imigration if it’s managed properly and we know about the background of those coming in. It just appears to be total chaos and that can’t carry on. I’m not going to pretend to know the answer but the countries creaking at the moment and we just don’t have the room for people coming in that can’t contribute anything but expect to be homed and receive benefits when there simply aren’t enough homes for those already living here. If they can offer something and are trained or want to be trained that’s a different matter. There just has to be some control. It’s great to support those who genuinly need it but you can’t support everyone. I was referring to the politicians and posters who think this is a simple problem, which can be easily solved. As you, and several others indicate, it is a complex, multi-causal issue. I have no time for those who try to fool us into thinking that this problem has an easy solution. It's not your fault, or mine, that Sunak, Jenrick, etc seemed to demonise individuals for the sake of political gain, and I am glad that their moves backfired in the Election. |
|
|
|
Post by Ariel Manto on Sept 23, 2024 17:51:13 GMT
Where does it stop though? There has to be some control over who’s coming in. No problem with imigration if it’s managed properly and we know about the background of those coming in. It just appears to be total chaos and that can’t carry on. I’m not going to pretend to know the answer but the countries creaking at the moment and we just don’t have the room for people coming in that can’t contribute anything but expect to be homed and receive benefits when there simply aren’t enough homes for those already living here. If they can offer something and are trained or want to be trained that’s a different matter. There just has to be some control. It’s great to support those who genuinly need it but you can’t support everyone. I was referring to the politicians and posters who think this is a simple problem, which can be easily solved. As you, and several others indicate, it is a complex, multi-causal issue. I have no time for those who try to fool us into thinking that this problem has an easy solution. It's not your fault, or mine, that Sunak, Jenrick, etc seemed to demonise individuals for the sake of political gain, and I am glad that their moves backfired in the Election. Illegal immigration is the medication of idiots; and they swallow the hyperbole each and every time. For example; I've not given an opinion but merely provided facts. However, right wing zealots often conflate their racist and homophobic opinions with having intellectual credence. In the UK, from April to June 2024 there were 1.7 million people born outside of the country who were either unemployed or ‘economically inactive’, not including students. Of these, 1.25 million people aged 16 to 64 were ‘economically inactive’ (not including students), and 441,000 aged 16 or over were unemployed. There were 5.6 million people born in the UK recorded as economically inactive in the same period, not including students. Asylum seekers are not eligible for mainstream benefits, and can only receive a set amount of statutory support. They are also generally not allowed to work. The Home Office has a statutory duty to provide accommodation for asylum seekers who do not have the means to obtain it themselves or cannot meet their essential living needs. But asylum seekers are not able to choose where they are based or the type of accommodation they are placed in. Asylum seekers currently receive £49.18 per week if they are living in accommodation where meals are not provided. When meals are provided, the cash allowance falls to £8.86 per person per week. Asylum seekers are not eligible to apply for social housing or for housing or any other mainstream benefits. The ONS says that around 1.2 million long-term immigrants arrived in the UK in 2023. In 2023, emigration from the UK totalled an estimated 532,000, meaning net migration to the UK was estimated to be 685,000. This represents a 10% fall compared to 2022, when net migration to the UK was the highest on record at 764,000. But net migration in 2023 was still nearly four times higher than in 2019, when the Conservative party said in its manifesto it would bring down “overall numbers”. In 2023, the vast majority of people who migrated to the UK (85%) were non-EU nationals. Ten percent were EU nationals, with the remaining 5% British nationals. The top-five non-EU countries of origin were India (250,000 migrants), Nigeria (141,000), China (90,000), Pakistan (83,000) and Zimbabwe (36,000). |
|
|
|
Post by OldStokie on Sept 23, 2024 18:22:41 GMT
I was referring to the politicians and posters who think this is a simple problem, which can be easily solved. As you, and several others indicate, it is a complex, multi-causal issue. I have no time for those who try to fool us into thinking that this problem has an easy solution. It's not your fault, or mine, that Sunak, Jenrick, etc seemed to demonise individuals for the sake of political gain, and I am glad that their moves backfired in the Election. Illegal immigration is the medication of idiots; and they swallow the hyperbole each and every time. For example; I've not given an opinion but merely provided facts. However, right wing zealots often conflate their racist and homophobic opinions with having intellectual credence. In the UK, from April to June 2024 there were 1.7 million people born outside of the country who were either unemployed or ‘economically inactive’, not including students. Of these, 1.25 million people aged 16 to 64 were ‘economically inactive’ (not including students), and 441,000 aged 16 or over were unemployed. There were 5.6 million people born in the UK recorded as economically inactive in the same period, not including students.Asylum seekers are not eligible for mainstream benefits, and can only receive a set amount of statutory support. They are also generally not allowed to work. The Home Office has a statutory duty to provide accommodation for asylum seekers who do not have the means to obtain it themselves or cannot meet their essential living needs. But asylum seekers are not able to choose where they are based or the type of accommodation they are placed in. Asylum seekers currently receive £49.18 per week if they are living in accommodation where meals are not provided. When meals are provided, the cash allowance falls to £8.86 per person per week. Asylum seekers are not eligible to apply for social housing or for housing or any other mainstream benefits. The ONS says that around 1.2 million long-term immigrants arrived in the UK in 2023. In 2023, emigration from the UK totalled an estimated 532,000, meaning net migration to the UK was estimated to be 685,000. This represents a 10% fall compared to 2022, when net migration to the UK was the highest on record at 764,000. But net migration in 2023 was still nearly four times higher than in 2019, when the Conservative party said in its manifesto it would bring down “overall numbers”. In 2023, the vast majority of people who migrated to the UK (85%) were non-EU nationals. Ten percent were EU nationals, with the remaining 5% British nationals. The top-five non-EU countries of origin were India (250,000 migrants), Nigeria (141,000), China (90,000), Pakistan (83,000) and Zimbabwe (36,000). I don't profess to be au fait with all the goings on regarding unemployed and economically inactive but perhaps much of that is down to a cultural thing. For instance, many/most? Asian women when they're married stay at home to bring up the kids. Given the amount of families of Pakistani descent, that could be quite a large number of those economically inactive. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I won't be offended because, as I say, many people are far more educated in these things than I am. OS. |
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Sept 23, 2024 18:35:31 GMT
Illegal immigration is the medication of idiots; and they swallow the hyperbole each and every time. For example; I've not given an opinion but merely provided facts. However, right wing zealots often conflate their racist and homophobic opinions with having intellectual credence. In the UK, from April to June 2024 there were 1.7 million people born outside of the country who were either unemployed or ‘economically inactive’, not including students. Of these, 1.25 million people aged 16 to 64 were ‘economically inactive’ (not including students), and 441,000 aged 16 or over were unemployed. There were 5.6 million people born in the UK recorded as economically inactive in the same period, not including students.Asylum seekers are not eligible for mainstream benefits, and can only receive a set amount of statutory support. They are also generally not allowed to work. The Home Office has a statutory duty to provide accommodation for asylum seekers who do not have the means to obtain it themselves or cannot meet their essential living needs. But asylum seekers are not able to choose where they are based or the type of accommodation they are placed in. Asylum seekers currently receive £49.18 per week if they are living in accommodation where meals are not provided. When meals are provided, the cash allowance falls to £8.86 per person per week. Asylum seekers are not eligible to apply for social housing or for housing or any other mainstream benefits. The ONS says that around 1.2 million long-term immigrants arrived in the UK in 2023. In 2023, emigration from the UK totalled an estimated 532,000, meaning net migration to the UK was estimated to be 685,000. This represents a 10% fall compared to 2022, when net migration to the UK was the highest on record at 764,000. But net migration in 2023 was still nearly four times higher than in 2019, when the Conservative party said in its manifesto it would bring down “overall numbers”. In 2023, the vast majority of people who migrated to the UK (85%) were non-EU nationals. Ten percent were EU nationals, with the remaining 5% British nationals. The top-five non-EU countries of origin were India (250,000 migrants), Nigeria (141,000), China (90,000), Pakistan (83,000) and Zimbabwe (36,000). I don't profess to be au fait with all the goings on regarding unemployed and economically inactive but perhaps much of that is down to a cultural thing. For instance, many/most? Asian women when they're married stay at home to bring up the kids. Given the amount of families of Pakistani descent, that could be quite a large number of those economically inactive. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I won't be offended because, as I say, many people are far more educated in these things than I am. OS. Yeh, essentially those “official” figures are total hogwash. Anyone with a brain can see that. Maybe these people defending successive governments and their blind eye philosophies don’t have to put up with the negative effects of immigration |
|
|
|
Post by iancransonsknees on Sept 23, 2024 19:18:56 GMT
Illegal immigration is the medication of idiots; and they swallow the hyperbole each and every time. For example; I've not given an opinion but merely provided facts. However, right wing zealots often conflate their racist and homophobic opinions with having intellectual credence. In the UK, from April to June 2024 there were 1.7 million people born outside of the country who were either unemployed or ‘economically inactive’, not including students. Of these, 1.25 million people aged 16 to 64 were ‘economically inactive’ (not including students), and 441,000 aged 16 or over were unemployed. There were 5.6 million people born in the UK recorded as economically inactive in the same period, not including students.Asylum seekers are not eligible for mainstream benefits, and can only receive a set amount of statutory support. They are also generally not allowed to work. The Home Office has a statutory duty to provide accommodation for asylum seekers who do not have the means to obtain it themselves or cannot meet their essential living needs. But asylum seekers are not able to choose where they are based or the type of accommodation they are placed in. Asylum seekers currently receive £49.18 per week if they are living in accommodation where meals are not provided. When meals are provided, the cash allowance falls to £8.86 per person per week. Asylum seekers are not eligible to apply for social housing or for housing or any other mainstream benefits. The ONS says that around 1.2 million long-term immigrants arrived in the UK in 2023. In 2023, emigration from the UK totalled an estimated 532,000, meaning net migration to the UK was estimated to be 685,000. This represents a 10% fall compared to 2022, when net migration to the UK was the highest on record at 764,000. But net migration in 2023 was still nearly four times higher than in 2019, when the Conservative party said in its manifesto it would bring down “overall numbers”. In 2023, the vast majority of people who migrated to the UK (85%) were non-EU nationals. Ten percent were EU nationals, with the remaining 5% British nationals. The top-five non-EU countries of origin were India (250,000 migrants), Nigeria (141,000), China (90,000), Pakistan (83,000) and Zimbabwe (36,000). I don't profess to be au fait with all the goings on regarding unemployed and economically inactive but perhaps much of that is down to a cultural thing. For instance, many/most? Asian women when they're married stay at home to bring up the kids. Given the amount of families of Pakistani descent, that could be quite a large number of those economically inactive. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I won't be offended because, as I say, many people are far more educated in these things than I am. OS. In my experience the Mrs Bibi's don't work but JSA was always one of the passporting benefits they'd claim. I'd imagine that's still the case. |
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Sept 23, 2024 19:24:26 GMT
Now I'm no fan of Starmer and I don't know whether his plan is going to actually work but did you seriously expect him to resolve this in just a few weeks? In just under 2 weeks time he’s been prime minister for 3 months and he’s done absolutely jackshit to deter illegal migrants crossing the channel.I understand it’s not an an easy thing to solve but there’s no sign of him doing anything whilst young man after young man continue to flood into the country He's been to Italy to see how to do it. www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/over-1-000-migrants-arrived-on-italys-southern-coast-over-weekend-report/3338766 |
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on Sept 23, 2024 19:27:22 GMT
I don't profess to be au fait with all the goings on regarding unemployed and economically inactive but perhaps much of that is down to a cultural thing. For instance, many/most? Asian women when they're married stay at home to bring up the kids. Given the amount of families of Pakistani descent, that could be quite a large number of those economically inactive. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I won't be offended because, as I say, many people are far more educated in these things than I am. OS. Yeh, essentially those “official” figures are total hogwash. Anyone with a brain can see that. Maybe these people defending successive governments and their blind eye philosophies don’t have to put up with the negative effects of immigration So what negative impacts of immigration have you personally experienced? I live in a city where over 50% of the population are not white British. My near neighbours include a Polish family, a couple who are from the West Indies and Africa, a Muslim family, a Hindu family and a Romanian family. I live near a road that has been identified as having the most ethnically diverse set of businesses in the world. I have played sport with people from all over the world - including India, Sri Lanka, Japan, Malaysia the US and most of Europe and my place of work pretty was pretty representative of the ethnic mix of the city. In addition the city takes more than it's fair share of asylum seekers and has a long and proud history of welcoming people from all over the world persecuted in their own country. In all the time I have lived here I have never been negatively affected by an encounter with people who have emigrated to this country. I'm either incredibly lucky or these negative effects of immigration are so subtle I'm way too insensitive to process them. Either that or it's just fear mongering bullshit pedalled by people with a political agenda and/or shit scared of their own shadow. |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Sept 23, 2024 20:05:54 GMT
Yes I noticed he’d been to see the right wing Italian in charge,so I take it Albania will be the new Rwanda then🤔 |
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Sept 23, 2024 20:16:01 GMT
I don't profess to be au fait with all the goings on regarding unemployed and economically inactive but perhaps much of that is down to a cultural thing. For instance, many/most? Asian women when they're married stay at home to bring up the kids. Given the amount of families of Pakistani descent, that could be quite a large number of those economically inactive. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I won't be offended because, as I say, many people are far more educated in these things than I am. OS. Yeh, essentially those “official” figures are total hogwash. Anyone with a brain can see that. Maybe these people defending successive governments and their blind eye philosophies don’t have to put up with the negative effects of immigration There are no negative effects of immigration. Everyone of us is an immigrant or descended from an immigrant, who have been coming for thousands of years. It is immigration that makes us such a talented country. Would you have an objection to all the millions of descendants of people who have left these islands to every corner of the world down the years returning? The vast majority of immigrants coming to this country today, have a right such as HongKongers and relatives of people here, or come to fill jobs UK residents do not want to do (eg seasonal workers), or required to do jobs such as health service, or to study. These islands have always had the compassion to accept refugees, some are remembered like Jews and Hugenauts, and some forgotten. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgian_refugees_in_Britain_during_the_First_World_War |
|
|
|
Post by Chewbacca the Wookie on Sept 23, 2024 20:49:49 GMT
I don't profess to be au fait with all the goings on regarding unemployed and economically inactive but perhaps much of that is down to a cultural thing. For instance, many/most? Asian women when they're married stay at home to bring up the kids. Given the amount of families of Pakistani descent, that could be quite a large number of those economically inactive. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I won't be offended because, as I say, many people are far more educated in these things than I am. OS. Yeh, essentially those “official” figures are total hogwash. Anyone with a brain can see that. Maybe these people defending successive governments and their blind eye philosophies don’t have to put up with the negative effects of immigration It’s a great thing to use as a stick to beat people with though. |
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Sept 23, 2024 21:15:49 GMT
Thats the issue though isn’t it,no plan,no deterrent 🤷♂️ I don't know how many times I can say that I don't know mate. 😁 You can't argue with stupid mate... |
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on Sept 24, 2024 7:22:03 GMT
Yeh, essentially those “official” figures are total hogwash. Anyone with a brain can see that. Maybe these people defending successive governments and their blind eye philosophies don’t have to put up with the negative effects of immigration It’s a great thing to use as a stick to beat people with though. OK that's one negative aspect of immigration suffered by the indigenous population - being brutally beaten by immigration statistics. It's a start...anything else? |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Sept 24, 2024 10:04:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Sept 24, 2024 12:43:28 GMT
And they're going to eat your cats and dogs, your pets, they're going to eat your pets! |
|
|
|
Post by phileetin on Sept 24, 2024 15:36:16 GMT
or serve them up in a curry , or is it just rats in those ?
|
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Sept 24, 2024 20:43:34 GMT
or serve them up in a curry , or is it just rats in those ? Not in any country I've visited 🤷 Seen spiders, crickets, frogs fallopian tubes and many other strange things on the menu but never rats. Are you getting confused with Prisoner of War films? Easily done.. |
|
|
|
Post by 4372 on Sept 24, 2024 21:14:50 GMT
707 illegal migrants arrived yesterday in 11 boats It’s getting worse not better Smash the gangs my arse 113 migrants in 2 boats yesterday. It's getting better now. Even Better News Update. Yesterday there were no migrants and no small boats crossed the Channel. FANTASTIC NEWS. ( Except it also happened 3 days in a row last week) |
|
|
|
Post by 4372 on Sept 26, 2024 9:20:13 GMT
Yesterday, (25/09/24.) just 20 immigrants and 1 small boat crossed the channel. Excellent news Sir Keir, in difficult circumstances created and nurtured by the Tories.
|
|
|
|
Post by phileetin on Sept 26, 2024 10:43:12 GMT
or serve them up in a curry , or is it just rats in those ? Not in any country I've visited 🤷 Seen spiders, crickets, frogs fallopian tubes and many other strange things on the menu but never rats. Are you getting confused with Prisoner of War films? Easily done.. i think that curry place by cauldon college got done for it ( the one either side of the bridge .... that was closed) . not the one a bit further up the road which i understand currently has a good reputation.
and i think a place in longton and possibly draycott did as well .
|
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Sept 26, 2024 10:45:20 GMT
Not in any country I've visited 🤷 Seen spiders, crickets, frogs fallopian tubes and many other strange things on the menu but never rats. Are you getting confused with Prisoner of War films? Easily done.. i think that curry place by cauldon college got done for it ( the one either side of the bridge .... that was closed) . not the one a bit further up the road which i understand currently has a good reputation.
and i think a place in longton and possibly draycott did as well .
First I've heard of it tbh, when were these happening? |
|
