YouGov always seem to have the Tories well on top, but Survation make it much closer.
Survation do seem to be a bit of an outlier though.
The thing is, of course, the size of the popular vote may not be as important as usual with local tactical voting being more important. So all these polls need taking with a pinch of salt.
I wonder why yougov always have the tories on top perhaps its because they are OWNED BY TORIE SUPPORTERS!!!!!!!!
If you do nothing else this election campaign watch this car crash. Was it written by Armand Iannucci?! The Clash, the fucking Cash I hope Joe Strummer haunts the cunt!
What's up with it? He seems like a normal bloke, fish and chips on the beach, steak and chips for tea, makes his own tea, Likes The Clash and Rolling Stones. Just a good humoured, natural bloke. Slightly disturbing he likes marmite!
What's up with it? He seems like a normal bloke, fish and chips on the beach, steak and chips for tea, makes his own tea, Likes The Clash and Rolling Stones. Just a good humoured, natural bloke. Slightly disturbing he likes marmite!
P.S. he even makes his own tea!
David Brent is trending!
He shouldn't have said Thai curry, just curry, to show all are welcome!
YouGov always seem to have the Tories well on top, but Survation make it much closer.
Survation do seem to be a bit of an outlier though.
The thing is, of course, the size of the popular vote may not be as important as usual with local tactical voting being more important. So all these polls need taking with a pinch of salt.
I wonder why yougov always have the tories on top perhaps its because they are OWNED BY TORIE SUPPORTERS!!!!!!!!
You really will believe any conspiracy bollocks, these companies are all regulated and make their money from providing accurate polling data you really are mad if you think an owner or former owner could just put out fake polls.
For those of you who don't understand economics and also government finances
! the government can print any amount of money that they so wish this will have some effects on the economy however with a devaluing of the pound. however there are plusses and minuses in this.
by investing in infrastructure at low interest rates not only do you pump money into the economy you create what is called a multiplier effect can be 20 or more times the amount invested. quick explanation company 1 pays workers they spend in company 2 then 2 to 3 etc etc this is a way to grow an economy and create more income and jobs etc.
we then have labours proposals
1 nationalise railways net cost 0 how will it be done? by not renewing contracts for individual companies like virgin, south west trains providing the services but taking it back in house the money that at the moment go's to these companies and there profits instead of going to shareholders will go to government for projects or to re invest in the railways
2 nationalisation of energy, water, etc this again allows profits to go back to the government this would service the debt and also start paying it back buying back the government bonds that would pay for the initial expenditure remember this is at the lowest rate and people are interested in buying these bonds on international markets again we have the multiplier effect in play and the stopping of profits going out of the business in forms of dividends and them either going to the government or to reinvest and the same as above.
the setting up of a generic drugs company this would allow the government to produce drugs cheaper and stop the drugs being charged to the nhs a lot cheaper a lot of general drugs are out of patent and can be replicated cheaper just look at the branded or not drugs you get from the chemist. net benefit the nhs.
investment in nhs, other public services see multiplier effect also think about the boost these things will do for the economy.
we then look at another policy de centralising of department this has a few effects by regionalising them and moving department out of London you have a number of effects 1 stimulating local economies 2 putting money where it is needed and being more cost effective .3 making it cheaper to run
If you look behind the basic headline figures you actually see that it is quite a forward thinking proposal that will have beneficial benefits for future generations not only in a better infrastructure that can generate additional revenue and stimulate an economy it could also have a benefit on things like fuel poverty and job creation and lets not forget that the money invested is not being squandered its gaining the government assets that create revenue that will more than cover the initial expenditure on the initial loans etc.
For those of you who don't understand economics and also government finances
! the government can print any amount of money that they so wish this will have some effects on the economy however with a devaluing of the pound. however there are plusses and minuses in this.
by investing in infrastructure at low interest rates not only do you pump money into the economy you create what is called a multiplier effect can be 20 or more times the amount invested. quick explanation company 1 pays workers they spend in company 2 then 2 to 3 etc etc this is a way to grow an economy and create more income and jobs etc.
we then have labours proposals
1 nationalise railways net cost 0 how will it be done? by not renewing contracts for individual companies like virgin, south west trains providing the services but taking it back in house the money that at the moment go's to these companies and there profits instead of going to shareholders will go to government for projects or to re invest in the railways
2 nationalisation of energy, water, etc this again allows profits to go back to the government this would service the debt and also start paying it back buying back the government bonds that would pay for the initial expenditure remember this is at the lowest rate and people are interested in buying these bonds on international markets again we have the multiplier effect in play and the stopping of profits going out of the business in forms of dividends and them either going to the government or to reinvest and the same as above.
the setting up of a generic drugs company this would allow the government to produce drugs cheaper and stop the drugs being charged to the nhs a lot cheaper a lot of general drugs are out of patent and can be replicated cheaper just look at the branded or not drugs you get from the chemist. net benefit the nhs.
investment in nhs, other public services see multiplier effect also think about the boost these things will do for the economy.
we then look at another policy de centralising of department this has a few effects by regionalising them and moving department out of London you have a number of effects 1 stimulating local economies 2 putting money where it is needed and being more cost effective .3 making it cheaper to run
If you look behind the basic headline figures you actually see that it is quite a forward thinking proposal that will have beneficial benefits for future generations not only in a better infrastructure that can generate additional revenue and stimulate an economy it could also have a benefit on things like fuel poverty and job creation and lets not forget that the money invested is not being squandered its gaining the government assets that create revenue that will more than cover the initial expenditure on the initial loans etc.
James Hacker is alive and well and living in Essex.
Sir Humphrey would be shaking his head in disbelief.
I wonder why yougov always have the tories on top perhaps its because they are OWNED BY TORIE SUPPORTERS!!!!!!!!
You really will believe any conspiracy bollocks, these companies are all regulated and make their money from providing accurate polling data you really are mad if you think an owner or former owner could just put out fake polls.
actually you are incorrect here im posting a link to an explanation on polls link
If you do nothing else this election campaign watch this car crash. Was it written by Armand Iannucci?! The Clash, the fucking Cash I hope Joe Strummer haunts the cunt!
The Clash were the first group I ever saw live.Johnson can just fuck right off.
If you do nothing else this election campaign watch this car crash. Was it written by Armand Iannucci?! The Clash, the fucking Cash I hope Joe Strummer haunts the cunt!
The Clash were the first group I ever saw live.Johnson can just fuck right off.
Dont worry, he's never listened to the Clash in his life....he's a serial liar, its part of his condition...can't help himself.
I think Labour could be in danger of not just losing, but of being mortally wounded at this election, they're going to lose some northern support with their brexit stance and some of the remoaner, pro EU lot are going to vote liberal democrats, many lefty remoaners think Corbyn is a brexiteer. There doesn't seem to be the same enthusiasm about Corbyns labour in 2019 as there was in 2017 because of their brexit stance, imo labour needed to come out as a solidly remain party.
Labours roots, policies etc smack of anti eu. They should have always been the party of leave.
You don’t need the EU to protect rights etc and all the stuff labour love. A strong labour government should be enshrining this into UK law.
I believe Corbin will ultimately lose. Labours flirt with the hard left will be over because they can’t have a leader with two GE defeats on his CV.
It will then be the return of the moderate left. Blairite or slightly left of. Quite a few candidates will come forward. I bet they are already planning. Benn, Thornberry and Starmer will be all over this. I do t like that fucker Starmer. He’s a right slimy bastard and Blair is pulling his strings. He will be front running
They tried to cash in on the woke vote.
If they had just stuck to their promise to honour the referendum then no-one could have complained.
For those of you who don't understand economics and also government finances
! the government can print any amount of money that they so wish this will have some effects on the economy however with a devaluing of the pound. however there are plusses and minuses in this.
by investing in infrastructure at low interest rates not only do you pump money into the economy you create what is called a multiplier effect can be 20 or more times the amount invested. quick explanation company 1 pays workers they spend in company 2 then 2 to 3 etc etc this is a way to grow an economy and create more income and jobs etc.
we then have labours proposals
1 nationalise railways net cost 0 how will it be done? by not renewing contracts for individual companies like virgin, south west trains providing the services but taking it back in house the money that at the moment go's to these companies and there profits instead of going to shareholders will go to government for projects or to re invest in the railways
2 nationalisation of energy, water, etc this again allows profits to go back to the government this would service the debt and also start paying it back buying back the government bonds that would pay for the initial expenditure remember this is at the lowest rate and people are interested in buying these bonds on international markets again we have the multiplier effect in play and the stopping of profits going out of the business in forms of dividends and them either going to the government or to reinvest and the same as above.
the setting up of a generic drugs company this would allow the government to produce drugs cheaper and stop the drugs being charged to the nhs a lot cheaper a lot of general drugs are out of patent and can be replicated cheaper just look at the branded or not drugs you get from the chemist. net benefit the nhs.
investment in nhs, other public services see multiplier effect also think about the boost these things will do for the economy.
we then look at another policy de centralising of department this has a few effects by regionalising them and moving department out of London you have a number of effects 1 stimulating local economies 2 putting money where it is needed and being more cost effective .3 making it cheaper to run
If you look behind the basic headline figures you actually see that it is quite a forward thinking proposal that will have beneficial benefits for future generations not only in a better infrastructure that can generate additional revenue and stimulate an economy it could also have a benefit on things like fuel poverty and job creation and lets not forget that the money invested is not being squandered its gaining the government assets that create revenue that will more than cover the initial expenditure on the initial loans etc.
Congratulations on one of the daftest posts seen on the Oatcake for a long time.
I can’t be arsed correcting the litany of fantasy economics you’ve concocted but I will make one point - are you aware of “The Fourth Rail Package of 2016”. Basically it means you cannot do what you are proposing if you are a member of the EU.
You really will believe any conspiracy bollocks, these companies are all regulated and make their money from providing accurate polling data you really are mad if you think an owner or former owner could just put out fake polls.
actually you are incorrect here im posting a link to an explanation on polls link
How does the information on that link support your argument?
For those of you who don't understand economics and also government finances
! the government can print any amount of money that they so wish this will have some effects on the economy however with a devaluing of the pound. however there are plusses and minuses in this.
by investing in infrastructure at low interest rates not only do you pump money into the economy you create what is called a multiplier effect can be 20 or more times the amount invested. quick explanation company 1 pays workers they spend in company 2 then 2 to 3 etc etc this is a way to grow an economy and create more income and jobs etc.
we then have labours proposals
1 nationalise railways net cost 0 how will it be done? by not renewing contracts for individual companies like virgin, south west trains providing the services but taking it back in house the money that at the moment go's to these companies and there profits instead of going to shareholders will go to government for projects or to re invest in the railways
2 nationalisation of energy, water, etc this again allows profits to go back to the government this would service the debt and also start paying it back buying back the government bonds that would pay for the initial expenditure remember this is at the lowest rate and people are interested in buying these bonds on international markets again we have the multiplier effect in play and the stopping of profits going out of the business in forms of dividends and them either going to the government or to reinvest and the same as above.
the setting up of a generic drugs company this would allow the government to produce drugs cheaper and stop the drugs being charged to the nhs a lot cheaper a lot of general drugs are out of patent and can be replicated cheaper just look at the branded or not drugs you get from the chemist. net benefit the nhs.
investment in nhs, other public services see multiplier effect also think about the boost these things will do for the economy.
we then look at another policy de centralising of department this has a few effects by regionalising them and moving department out of London you have a number of effects 1 stimulating local economies 2 putting money where it is needed and being more cost effective .3 making it cheaper to run
If you look behind the basic headline figures you actually see that it is quite a forward thinking proposal that will have beneficial benefits for future generations not only in a better infrastructure that can generate additional revenue and stimulate an economy it could also have a benefit on things like fuel poverty and job creation and lets not forget that the money invested is not being squandered its gaining the government assets that create revenue that will more than cover the initial expenditure on the initial loans etc.
Well it worked like a dream last time it was tried didn't it , the losses incurred by the then governments of Wilson , Callaghan and Heath saw us begging the IMF to bale us out . all of the nationalised industries lost fortunes and were a shambles due to lack of investment and poor management
We've had the conversation of our little bastards winding us up many times but wishing a Corbyn government on him...c'mon
😆 👍
My wife being a teacher too, wed prob be better off......for a few years... then the whole country ends up like Greece.
I dont need need much to live, I’m happy to live in shit like a pig
I had this conversation with a friend a few days back. If it was the last 5 years of your life, you wanted to put your feet up and live off the state, you wanted your kids and grandkids to pick up the tab then it's a Corbyn administration all the way
My wife being a teacher too, wed prob be better off......for a few years... then the whole country ends up like Greece.
I dont need need much to live, I’m happy to live in shit like a pig
I had this conversation with a friend a few days back. If it was the last 5 years 6 months of your life, you wanted to put your feet up and live off the state, you wanted your kids and grandkids to pick up the tab then it's a Corbyn administration all the way
Just corrected that for you.
Corbyn’s spending spree wouldn’t last 5 years before he ran out of cash. I’d give him 6 months before he bankrupts the country.
On a serious note does anyone actually believe anything that comes out of Johnson mouth? Seriously, after his latest admission that his favorite groups are The Clash and the Rolling Stones two of the most anti-establishments groups. Beggars belief it truly does.
On a serious note does anyone actually believe anything that comes out of Johnson mouth? Seriously, after his latest admission that his favorite groups are The Clash and the Rolling Stones two of the most anti-establishments groups. Beggars belief it truly does.
There’s nothing more anti-establishment than Brexit.
I had this conversation with a friend a few days back. If it was the last 5 years 6 months of your life, you wanted to put your feet up and live off the state, you wanted your kids and grandkids to pick up the tab then it's a Corbyn administration all the way
Just corrected that for you.
Corbyn’s spending spree wouldn’t last 5 years before he ran out of cash. I’d give him 6 months before he bankrupts the country.
Best stick to austerity then.Stoke-On-Trent will basically cease to function as a city with five more years of this government,its on its last legs now.
On a serious note does anyone actually believe anything that comes out of Johnson mouth? Seriously, after his latest admission that his favorite groups are The Clash and the Rolling Stones two of the most anti-establishments groups. Beggars belief it truly does.
There’s nothing more anti-establishment than Brexit.
So maybe Boris is a punk rocker.
There’s nothing more anti-establishment than Brexit. You have led a sheltered life fella,get out more.
So maybe Boris is a punk rocker.I wished id seen him down the mosh pit at The Clash gigs
For those of you who don't understand economics and also government finances
! the government can print any amount of money that they so wish this will have some effects on the economy however with a devaluing of the pound. however there are plusses and minuses in this.
by investing in infrastructure at low interest rates not only do you pump money into the economy you create what is called a multiplier effect can be 20 or more times the amount invested. quick explanation company 1 pays workers they spend in company 2 then 2 to 3 etc etc this is a way to grow an economy and create more income and jobs etc.
we then have labours proposals
1 nationalise railways net cost 0 how will it be done? by not renewing contracts for individual companies like virgin, south west trains providing the services but taking it back in house the money that at the moment go's to these companies and there profits instead of going to shareholders will go to government for projects or to re invest in the railways
2 nationalisation of energy, water, etc this again allows profits to go back to the government this would service the debt and also start paying it back buying back the government bonds that would pay for the initial expenditure remember this is at the lowest rate and people are interested in buying these bonds on international markets again we have the multiplier effect in play and the stopping of profits going out of the business in forms of dividends and them either going to the government or to reinvest and the same as above.
the setting up of a generic drugs company this would allow the government to produce drugs cheaper and stop the drugs being charged to the nhs a lot cheaper a lot of general drugs are out of patent and can be replicated cheaper just look at the branded or not drugs you get from the chemist. net benefit the nhs.
investment in nhs, other public services see multiplier effect also think about the boost these things will do for the economy.
we then look at another policy de centralising of department this has a few effects by regionalising them and moving department out of London you have a number of effects 1 stimulating local economies 2 putting money where it is needed and being more cost effective .3 making it cheaper to run
If you look behind the basic headline figures you actually see that it is quite a forward thinking proposal that will have beneficial benefits for future generations not only in a better infrastructure that can generate additional revenue and stimulate an economy it could also have a benefit on things like fuel poverty and job creation and lets not forget that the money invested is not being squandered its gaining the government assets that create revenue that will more than cover the initial expenditure on the initial loans etc.
Essex
Why would any shareholder or maybe even your or my pension fund want there share portfolio replaced by what after five years of McDonnells stewardship would be worthless government bonds
Or maybe you just believe the labour government should compulsory nationalises the utility’s Stealing millions off the citizens of this couny
Corbyn’s spending spree wouldn’t last 5 years before he ran out of cash. I’d give him 6 months before he bankrupts the country.
Best stick to austerity then.Stoke-On-Trent will basically cease to function as a city with five more years of this government,its on its last legs now.
Thanks for that I’d almost forgot how the streets ran with milk and honey when labour ran the place
I had this conversation with a friend a few days back. If it was the last 5 years 6 months of your life, you wanted to put your feet up and live off the state, you wanted your kids and grandkids to pick up the tab then it's a Corbyn administration all the way
Just corrected that for you.
Corbyn’s spending spree wouldn’t last 5 years before he ran out of cash. I’d give him 6 months before he bankrupts the country.
I was of course referring to the ginormous borrowing that would take place to fund the lack of taxes available to him the super rich decide that incomes not for them if they're not going to see any of it. He could however do as the greens are advocating and charge a tax on property and land values. It'll take absolutely desperate measures to fund a Corbyn administration. Retail is squeaking at the seems and it only needs a few more employment taxes to tip it over the edge and then we'll be paying unemployment benefits.
Best stick to austerity then.Stoke-On-Trent will basically cease to function as a city with five more years of this government,its on its last legs now.
Thanks for that I’d almost forgot how the streets ran with milk and honey when labour ran the place
You most probably have.Since when has this become normal life?The people are suffering and when someone says they want to help ,all you do is diss them ,brainwashed and manipulated.
My wife being a teacher too, wed prob be better off......for a few years... then the whole country ends up like Greece.
I dont need need much to live, I’m happy to live in shit like a pig
I had this conversation with a friend a few days back. If it was the last 5 years of your life, you wanted to put your feet up and live off the state, you wanted your kids and grandkids to pick up the tab then it's a Corbyn administration all the way
I agree it's mad....my lad would love me for it tho 🙈
No mosh pits. Ok . 
