|
Post by phileetin on Nov 21, 2023 9:28:37 GMT
and liebore might've lost the terrorist voters now as well. What's a terrorist voter mate? People who support this
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 21, 2023 9:45:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 21, 2023 9:46:33 GMT
What's a terrorist voter mate? People who support this Well no mate, you were implying that all British Muslims who are elligible to vote are terrorists. Pretty despicable that to be fair.
|
|
|
Post by phileetin on Nov 21, 2023 9:55:39 GMT
and liebore might've lost the terrorist voters now as well. What's a terrorist voter mate? somebody who supports this
|
|
|
Post by phileetin on Nov 21, 2023 10:00:36 GMT
Well no mate, you were implying that all British Muslims who are elligible to vote are terrorists. Pretty despicable that to be fair. i've never mentioned muslims .
you can check if you want ?
i said people , that could even include you and gawa if you support what i quoted in the article.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 21, 2023 10:06:45 GMT
Well no mate, you were implying that all British Muslims who are elligible to vote are terrorists. Pretty despicable that to be fair. i've never mentioned muslims . you can check if you want ? i said people , that could even include you and gawa if you support what i quoted in the article.
Go back to what you posted yesterday, both Gawa and myself challenged you on it.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 21, 2023 10:07:37 GMT
and liebore might've lost the terrorist voters now as well. This.....just this.
|
|
|
Post by phileetin on Nov 21, 2023 10:13:03 GMT
and liebore might've lost the terrorist voters now as well. This.....just this.
and where does it say muslim ?
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Nov 21, 2023 10:28:30 GMT
Well no mate, you were implying that all British Muslims who are elligible to vote are terrorists. Pretty despicable that to be fair. i've never mentioned muslims .
you can check if you want ?
i said people , that could even include you and gawa if you support what i quoted in the article.
Who supports that or said they supported it? It's like me posting saying "tories will lose the racist vote if Rwanda deal isn't sorted". It's deeply inappropriate and exactly the type of post which Badger, Ian and others have been calling out.
|
|
|
Post by phileetin on Nov 21, 2023 11:16:43 GMT
i didn't say what you imply .
|
|
|
Post by henry on Nov 21, 2023 11:23:18 GMT
Tax cuts incoming, who doesn’t like a few more quid in their arse pocket. Santa Sunak. 👍
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 21, 2023 11:38:07 GMT
and where does it say muslim ?
So what exactly do you MEAN by "terrorist voters" then please? Try not to imply, say what you mean by making this statement.
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Nov 21, 2023 11:42:45 GMT
Cant be too hard on Boris for not knowing about science as most politicians dont "Patrick Vallance says that the prime minister acknowledges himself that he gave up science when he was 15. He notes this was not an issue unique to Boris Johnson, and recalls a meeting of science advisers from across Europe, where an adviser from one country said "the leader of that country had enormous problems with exponential curves” - something which raised a laugh in the meeting, as all the leaders had that issue." Vallance is being asked about how he was required to provide scientific advise to key decision makers. He said earlier that only 10% of the civil servants hired as part of the government's graduate intake programme had a science, maths or engineering degree, with 90% coming from a humanities and social science background. "It means that the routine consideration of science in policy formulation was not where it needed to be," he told the inquiry earlier today. Earlier witnesses, including the No 10 adviser Dr Ben Warner, have raised similar concerns, saying they were worried about the lack of scientific skills in key government departments. Vallance says the government now has a target for 50% of all fast track recruits to have a science or mathematics background by 2024. He adds he will "look with interest from the sidelines to see whether it's achieved". Johnson's mental capacity reminds me of another Tory PM: www.ft.com/content/540e6c14-36c6-4de2-be14-934072dbd427
|
|
|
Post by Eggybread on Nov 21, 2023 11:44:56 GMT
and where does it say muslim ?
So what exactly do you MEAN by "terrorist voters" then please? Try not to imply, say what you mean by making this statement. Just ignore the wind up up merchant. He knows full well what he means and so do we, its just that he's too chicken shit to say it.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 21, 2023 11:54:22 GMT
So what exactly do you MEAN by "terrorist voters" then please? Try not to imply, say what you mean by making this statement. Just ignore the wind up up merchant. He knows full well what he means and so do we, its just that he's too chicken shit to say it. Indeed and there's a fair few on here just the same.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2023 11:58:34 GMT
and liebore might've lost the terrorist voters now as well. What's a terrorist voter mate? At a guess, someone who voted for the destruction of the English way of life. I.e., a Tory, who willfully vote for the destruction of the NHS, the destruction of public services (in general), the continued destruction of a relatively high standard of living and the destruction of individual freedoms.
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Nov 21, 2023 12:09:37 GMT
i didn't say what you imply . That's how it read, the implication was taken If that's not what you meant then fine but tbh it's really hard to se how that isn't what you meant
|
|
|
Post by knype on Nov 21, 2023 12:14:29 GMT
More dross, The Eat Out to help out scheme made no difference to the spread, the same as the crazy things they introduced to stop it like masks and distancing Sometimes, there is absolutely no beginning to your intelligence is there? Wow, another attempted insult , please show me the true data that shows it affected the spread of covid? From what I had read and heard, it made no difference.
|
|
|
Post by knype on Nov 21, 2023 12:15:06 GMT
and where does it say muslim ?
So what exactly do you MEAN by "terrorist voters" then please? Try not to imply, say what you mean by making this statement. Pot, Kettle, Black...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2023 12:21:22 GMT
Sometimes, there is absolutely no beginning to your intelligence is there? Wow, another attempted insult , please show me the true data that shows it affected the spread of covid? From what I had read and heard, it made no difference. What would the mechanism be for it not contributing? A virus needs proximity, the more people in a group, the more likely it will spread if one person has it. Any scheme to increase numbers congregating would surely do that? In my opinion, each country was perfectly right to shut down the first time around while they ascertained the level of threat. It gave them time to figure out what was going on and make decisions moving forward without cases spiraling. The UK’s frequent lockdowns thereafter were more to do with the fact that the NHS couldn’t cope than anything else and only highlighted how ill-prepared Tories were to deal with anything (hardly shocking when you gut healthcare).
|
|
|
Post by knype on Nov 21, 2023 12:30:51 GMT
Just ignore the wind up up merchant. He knows full well what he means and so do we, its just that he's too chicken shit to say it. Indeed and there's a fair few on here just the same. Again, Pot, Kettle, Black
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Nov 21, 2023 12:49:07 GMT
Indeed and there's a fair few on here just the same. Again, Pot, Kettle, Black Don't rise to it knype by giving a reaction. I think you should also be taking the time to call out philiteens deeply inappropriate comment too which implied individuals are terrorists and supporters of rape. I'm sure you wouldn't like it if a woke leftie was calling you a racist or supporter of discrimination. We need to apply the same standards to friends and foes or else we become complicit of double standards and lacking authenticity. Do you think philiteens comments were appropriate? If so, why haven't you called them out?
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 21, 2023 13:03:29 GMT
Wow, another attempted insult , please show me the true data that shows it affected the spread of covid? From what I had read and heard, it made no difference. What would the mechanism be for it not contributing? A virus needs proximity, the more people in a group, the more likely it will spread if one person has it. Any scheme to increase numbers congregating would surely do that? In my opinion, each country was perfectly right to shut down the first time around while they ascertained the level of threat. It gave them time to figure out what was going on and make decisions moving forward without cases spiraling. The UK’s frequent lockdowns thereafter were more to do with the fact that the NHS couldn’t cope than anything else and only highlighted how ill-prepared Tories were to deal with anything (hardly shocking when you gut healthcare). Ignore him...yet another idiotic WUM.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 21, 2023 13:04:26 GMT
Again, Pot, Kettle, Black Don't rise to it knype by giving a reaction. I think you should also be taking the time to call out philiteens deeply inappropriate comment too which implied individuals are terrorists and supporters of rape. I'm sure you wouldn't like it if a woke leftie was calling you a racist or supporter of discrimination. We need to apply the same standards to friends and foes or else we become complicit of double standards and lacking authenticity. Do you think philiteens comments were appropriate? If so, why haven't you called them out? Best wishes with that mate.
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Nov 21, 2023 13:50:31 GMT
Sometimes, there is absolutely no beginning to your intelligence is there? Wow, another attempted insult , please show me the true data that shows it affected the spread of covid? From what I had read and heard, it made no difference. You naughty boy you haven't been reading your Bible lately Rishi Sunak's Eat Out To Help Out scheme likely cost lives, the Government's top pandemic scientist has told the Covid Inquiry. The then-Chancellor launched the flagship offer in August 2020. Brits were given discounts for dining in restaurants in a bid to kickstart the hospitality industry that suffered heavily because of lockdowns. Sir Patrick Vallance, No10's ex-chief scientific adviser, today said it is 'highly likely' that people died because of the policy. He added that all ministers were aware that such schemes were risky, despite PM Mr Sunak telling the probe he didn't recall any pushback over the offer. Meanwhile, an extract taken from Sir Patrick's pandemic diary, which has only been shared with the inquiry, alleged Mr Sunak believed it was 'okay' to just 'let people die' to avoid another lockdown. www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12771739/Highly-likely-Eat-Help-cost-lives-claims-Sir-Patrick-Vallance-Rishi-Sunak-accused-saying-Government-just-let-people-die-avoid-lockdown.htmlThese are the recollections, views and observations of Britain's Top Scientific Advisor during Covid Pandemic Of course if you don't share his views do please share your Scientific Qualifications as the basis for your dissent
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 21, 2023 14:08:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2023 15:17:57 GMT
Wow, another attempted insult , please show me the true data that shows it affected the spread of covid? From what I had read and heard, it made no difference. You naughty boy you haven't been reading your Bible lately Rishi Sunak's Eat Out To Help Out scheme likely cost lives, the Government's top pandemic scientist has told the Covid Inquiry. The then-Chancellor launched the flagship offer in August 2020. Brits were given discounts for dining in restaurants in a bid to kickstart the hospitality industry that suffered heavily because of lockdowns. Sir Patrick Vallance, No10's ex-chief scientific adviser, today said it is 'highly likely' that people died because of the policy. He added that all ministers were aware that such schemes were risky, despite PM Mr Sunak telling the probe he didn't recall any pushback over the offer. Meanwhile, an extract taken from Sir Patrick's pandemic diary, which has only been shared with the inquiry, alleged Mr Sunak believed it was 'okay' to just 'let people die' to avoid another lockdown. www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12771739/Highly-likely-Eat-Help-cost-lives-claims-Sir-Patrick-Vallance-Rishi-Sunak-accused-saying-Government-just-let-people-die-avoid-lockdown.htmlThese are the recollections, views and observations of Britain's Top Scientific Advisor during Covid Pandemic Of course if you don't share his views do please share your Scientific Qualifications as the basis for your dissent I have a PhD in molecular biology. Vallance is still way more qualified to comment on this topic than I. However, I do feel that this govt had the hardest task of any UK govt in modern history. Keeping people healthy is but one factor (unfortunately) in their duty. They also have a duty to the economy and to education, which will keep people healthy in the short and long term. They failed with their preparedness and that should be highlighted over and over again. There should be consequences. They failed by ignoring their own policies and that should be highlighted over and over again. There should be consequences. The rest of it however, seems almost impossible to balance. How do you weight the life of some people over the economy or over childhood education? What is the cost of a life? We’re already seeing what is happening with education now. Disparities are ever increasing between wealthy and poor. Where does that leave kids who are often truant? They are more likely to get into crime and more likely to be a drain on the system in the future. With eating out to help out, it’s my understanding that the food industry is one of the UK’s chief economic drivers. How many businesses went defunct in Covid? What happens to those people, their livelihoods and their chances to make something of themselves? I think that the decisions that the govt (all govts) made in the time are highly nuanced. It sounds callous to accept that there will be a certain number of deaths but isn’t that something that happens with every major decision? In my personal field, colorectal cancer, it has been proven over and over again that colonoscopies detect cancers sooner (saves lives) and help to prevent cancer by removing polyps (saves lives). In the US, we do them every 5-10 years now from the age of 45. That’s a standard medical practice here. Colon cancer occurs in about 1 in 23 males and 1 in 26 females. It’s a legitimate public health concern. The UK doesn’t follow this because it’s expensive. They’ve made a decision that the cost of lives is less than the cost of preventive screens. It’s something that unfortunately happens all the time.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Nov 21, 2023 16:01:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by atillathehoneybee on Nov 21, 2023 16:06:58 GMT
i didn't say what you imply . Apologists mate...WOKE Libtards....
|
|
|
Post by henry on Nov 21, 2023 17:28:30 GMT
Minimum wage up by a quid. Party for the working class.
|
|