|
Post by mrcoke on Apr 1, 2023 10:15:51 GMT
There has to be a "postcode lottery" when it comes to treatment on the NHS. Here under Plymouth NHS Trust over the last 14 years I’ve had 2 hip replacements and been treated for duodenal cancer which included timely surgery and chemotherapy. I’m still under surveillance and will have 2 more CT scans before I’m discharged. My Mrs is Type 1 diabetic and has been looked after exemplary over nearly 50 years and has always been given the latest in technology to help her to live more easily with the disease. My daughter suffered a horrific leg break after falling from a horse 8 years ago and had her knee rebuilt by Peninsular NHS Trust in Cornwall. Don’t get me wrong I’m not judging the whole NHS system by my own experiences but you can see why people might do so without looking at "the bigger picture". My own experiences recently haven't been bad at all once I've been able to get to see or speak to the Doctor, I booked a phone appointment recently for 3 weeks time with the musculoskeletal clinic and getting an x-ray was very easy. On the flip side I've found it a bit of a nightmare to get to see a Doctor, on the new Patch system thing all the appointments had gone in less than 12 minutes! None of this entitles me to make sweeping statements regarding the efficiency or otherwise of the NHS when faced with a public survey that clearly indicates deterioration under this government. I endorse your experience. I have lots of complaints and use the health service a lot. I find I get excellent service and the people are wonderful. There is clearly a funding issue because of decade plus of underspending. There is clearly mismanagement foe example I went for a hearing test and was then told I could not have new hearing aids as I was not in the catchment area ( wrong postcode). So now I have to have another test in another health area. Why couldn't they just email the result of my test to each other? For those who think Brexit is contributory please watch this: www.euronews.com/2023/01/06/emmanuel-macron-unveils-new-plan-to-stop-endless-crisis-in-french-healthcare
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Apr 1, 2023 10:31:49 GMT
Oh don't worry MrCoke I fully hold the tory party over the last 13 years responsible for the NHS, not brexit. The service has been disgraceful for the last decade.
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Apr 1, 2023 10:45:19 GMT
Oh don't worry MrCoke I fully hold the tory party over the last 13 years responsible for the NHS, not brexit. The service has been disgraceful for the last decade. Spot on. Note that these are all pre-pandemic figures that show precisely what the Tory decade before Covid has done to the health service.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 2, 2023 6:57:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by oggyoggy on Apr 2, 2023 7:11:58 GMT
Oh don't worry MrCoke I fully hold the tory party over the last 13 years responsible for the NHS, not brexit. The service has been disgraceful for the last decade. Agreed, although brexit is certainly partially responsible for the staffing crisis. That’s according to the Nuffield Trust, the Royal College of Nursing, the Nursing and Midwifery Council, the British Medical Association and even Jeremy Hunt has admitted some negative impact on staffing. Incredibly, Mr Coke knows more than all of the above! He really is a genius. He has other explanations for the fact 9,389 nurses and midwives who had trained in the EU came to work in Britain in 2015-16, but only 663 did so in 2021-22, but they are so clever he has yet to share them with us mortals. It certainly is not Brexit though. Absolutely nothing to do with Brexit.
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Apr 2, 2023 8:14:48 GMT
Braverman on Lausra Kuenssburg now, why she's bothered I've no idea, she's yet to answer a straight question.
Edit - what a repulsive individual, no wonder they don't wheel her out often.
She's now trying to deny (or more likely avoid) what's actually in an agreement she's signed 🤦
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Apr 2, 2023 8:32:07 GMT
Braverman on Lausra Kuenssburg now, why she's bothered I've no idea, she's yet to answer a straight question. Edit - what a repulsive individual, no wonder they don't wheel her out often. She's now trying to deny (or more likely avoid) what's actually in an agreement she's signed 🤦 Section 16 of that MOU doesn't appeal to the racism she is peddling. The worst bit is wheeling out rape of white girls by "Pakistani gangs". When white men routinely rape white women and less than 1% make it to court. She is vile.
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Apr 2, 2023 8:34:27 GMT
Braverman on Lausra Kuenssburg now, why she's bothered I've no idea, she's yet to answer a straight question. Edit - what a repulsive individual, no wonder they don't wheel her out often. She's now trying to deny (or more likely avoid) what's actually in an agreement she's signed 🤦 Section 16 of that MOU doesn't appeal to the racism she is peddling. The worst bit is wheeling out rape of white girls by "Pakistani gangs". When white men routinely rape white women and less than 1% make it to court. She is vile. She's basically Gullis in a dress.
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Apr 2, 2023 9:39:38 GMT
Braverman on Lausra Kuenssburg now, why she's bothered I've no idea, she's yet to answer a straight question. Edit - what a repulsive individual, no wonder they don't wheel her out often. She's now trying to deny (or more likely avoid) what's actually in an agreement she's signed 🤦 Section 16 of that MOU doesn't appeal to the racism she is peddling. The worst bit is wheeling out rape of white girls by "Pakistani gangs". When white men routinely rape white women and less than 1% make it to court. She is vile. Nasty Party in appeal to nasty people. Is anyone really surprised? It's all they've got left.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Apr 2, 2023 11:17:55 GMT
Braverman on Lausra Kuenssburg now, why she's bothered I've no idea, she's yet to answer a straight question. Edit - what a repulsive individual, no wonder they don't wheel her out often. She's now trying to deny (or more likely avoid) what's actually in an agreement she's signed 🤦 She is a lying piece of shit and as thick as mince as well. When she says that she "isn't aware of that case" that is code for she "doesn't CARE about that case" ... And although it is actually Patel that Cooper is addressing, there is no possible way that Braverman couldn't be aware of what happened.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 2, 2023 11:31:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Apr 2, 2023 11:41:59 GMT
Isn't that an utterly shocking response? LK has just provided her with verified evidence that just 5 years ago, Rwanda shot dead 12 refugees and then Braverman essentially says ... "yeah, fuck 'em!"
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Apr 2, 2023 11:51:04 GMT
How does Braverman think this type of answer to the question is acceptable (personally I think LK let's her off lightly).
Under this agreement, we could potentially end up taking more refugees from Rwanda than we actually send to them!
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Apr 2, 2023 12:07:05 GMT
A despicable and highly dangerous liar ...
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Apr 2, 2023 13:14:22 GMT
Braverman on Lausra Kuenssburg now, why she's bothered I've no idea, she's yet to answer a straight question. Edit - what a repulsive individual, no wonder they don't wheel her out often. She's now trying to deny (or more likely avoid) what's actually in an agreement she's signed 🤦 She is a lying piece of shit and as thick as mince as well. When she says that she "isn't aware of that case" that is code for she "doesn't CARE about that case" ... And although it is actually Patel that Cooper is addressing, there is no possible way that Braverman couldn't be aware of what happened. Indeed so mate, it's a very sorry state of affairs when a home secretary would rather claim to be incompetent than answer a simple question.
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Apr 2, 2023 18:04:24 GMT
A despicable and highly dangerous liar ... Made me feel really sick this morning Paul. Why the BBC and LK let her get away with it is beyond me. Take a look at these stats and tell me that this is about Pakistani gangs. I'm apoplectic that she subverted the agenda on something so important and that the Tories have such an appalling record on. Then she decided to blame two Labour councils for turning a blind eye. rapecrisis.org.uk/get-informed/statistics-sexual-violence/Even worse than that her own Home Office found in 2020 thar was there was no evidence to suggest Muslim men were disproportionately responsible for grooming gangs. Rather the majority of grooming gangs were white males under the age of 30. How is a Home Secretary allowed to perpetuate a right wing trope disproven by her own office? www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/grooming-gangs-review-race-religion-home-office-b1774161.html
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 2, 2023 18:47:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by toppercorner on Apr 2, 2023 18:54:02 GMT
please let it be gullis
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Apr 2, 2023 18:59:33 GMT
It says 'senior' so not him😞
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Apr 2, 2023 19:01:02 GMT
It says 'senior' so not him😞 Scrap that, I've read it wrong a Tory MP rang a senior one, so it could be Gullis👍
|
|
|
Post by Veritas on Apr 2, 2023 19:06:03 GMT
It says 'senior' so not him😞 Scrap that, I've read it wrong a Tory MP rang a senior one, so it could be Gullis👍 Please, please, please.
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Apr 2, 2023 19:13:06 GMT
It says 'senior' so not him😞 Scrap that, I've read it wrong a Tory MP rang a senior one, so it could be Gullis👍 If it's in the Tory Express I suggest it has been leaked to get at someone who has been too moderate recently, rather than the incubus that is Gullis.
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Apr 2, 2023 19:15:00 GMT
Scrap that, I've read it wrong a Tory MP rang a senior one, so it could be Gullis👍 If it's in the Tory Express I suggest it has been leaked to get at someone who has been too moderate recently, rather than the incubus that is Gullis. Probably
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 2, 2023 21:07:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Apr 2, 2023 22:29:17 GMT
A despicable and highly dangerous liar ... Made me feel really sick this morning Paul. Why the BBC and LK let her get away with it is beyond me. Take a look at these stats and tell me that this is about Pakistani gangs. I'm apoplectic that she subverted the agenda on something so important and that the Tories have such an appalling record on. Then she decided to blame two Labour councils for turning a blind eye. rapecrisis.org.uk/get-informed/statistics-sexual-violence/Even worse than that her own Home Office found in 2020 thar was there was no evidence to suggest Muslim men were disproportionately responsible for grooming gangs. Rather the majority of grooming gangs were white males under the age of 30. How is a Home Secretary allowed to perpetuate a right wing trope disproven by her own office?www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/grooming-gangs-review-race-religion-home-office-b1774161.html
Me too Andy, me too.
I feel sick to the pit of my stomach, that we have such a racist, liar as Home Secretary, how did it ever come to this?
How can we continue to allow the UK's reputation to be dragged into the gutter on the international stage by such a vile human being?
She is absolute poison.
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Apr 2, 2023 23:07:13 GMT
Scrap that, I've read it wrong a Tory MP rang a senior one, so it could be Gullis👍 If it's in the Tory Express I suggest it has been leaked to get at someone who has been too moderate recently, rather than the incubus that is Gullis. I suspect its an attempt by the Tory’s to completely distance themselves from Julian Knight even though the Express and the Fail on Sunday where the story originated don't name him directly Never mind the Coffin Dodging, Brexiteer Readers will still believe it would be worse under Labour and of course don't forget The War.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 3, 2023 5:52:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 3, 2023 5:56:46 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 3, 2023 6:26:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Apr 3, 2023 6:30:19 GMT
|
|