|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 9, 2017 16:43:37 GMT
It affects Brexit in practical terms. All else is positioning and bluster As a nation we will now go into the negotiations in a piss weak position with a laughing stock, lame duck leader. It is unnecessary and it is entirely the fault of an arrogant, complacent, self-serving and incompetent Tory Party, yet again putting Party interests before those of the Country by calling an opportunistic election. Let the scales start to drop from your eyes now and consider Larry, Curly and Moe at the Brexit Ministry in the cold light of today. An intellectual lightweight, a buffoon and a swivel-eyed idealogue. Does anyone seriously have confidence in these comedians? REALLY ?????? Gina Miller, Keir Starmer's 137 urgent questions, SNP blocking any Brexit legislation, 114 MP's voting against A50, The Lords rejecting the initial act, Juncker shit stirring to the German press, Barnier plucking a 100 billion Euro 'divorce' bill out of the air, Clegg and Mandelson, Blair reappearing, the Lib Dems writing a second EU ref into their manifesto etc, etc. Ever since the referendum result there has been nothing but many, many groups both in the UK and the EU trying to disrupt and stop Brexit. Maybe just maybe, if those in this country had really, genuinely, actually accepted the vote and backed the UK, May wouldn't have felt the need to call this election to strengthen her hand.
|
|
|
Post by numpty40 on Jun 9, 2017 16:58:40 GMT
There are some on here positively creaming their pants at the prospect of the EU shafting us. It really is quite unbelievable.
|
|
|
Post by mtrstudent on Jun 9, 2017 17:09:32 GMT
48% voted remain, I bet most of us would take a soft brexit deal. There's no way all who voted leave want a hard brexit either, so soft is fair.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jun 9, 2017 17:31:01 GMT
Brexit is dead. Or the Brexit that people wanted(massive cuts in immigration) is. Gina Miller has just been on and she's positively orgasmic. Everything has been done to scupper it since the result, the media love this because they hated it, too. Get used to ridiculous levels of immigration and getting bummed by the EU forever. Yay! Gina Miller... there's more to her than meets the eye I bet you. She's got a dick ?
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jun 9, 2017 17:32:03 GMT
48% voted remain, I bet most of us would take a soft brexit deal. There's no way all who voted leave want a hard brexit either, so soft is fair. Soft and fluffy like a snowflake
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Jun 9, 2017 17:48:33 GMT
48% voted remain, I bet most of us would take a soft brexit deal. There's no way all who voted leave want a hard brexit either, so soft is fair. Its the pre conditions that will determine what sort of Brexit we are offered . The EU have already said no tariff free deal without the 4 freedoms .
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2017 17:52:17 GMT
48% voted remain, I bet most of us would take a soft brexit deal. There's no way all who voted leave want a hard brexit either, so soft is fair. Hard brexit/soft brexit, would somebody care to tell me who come up with these phrases which were not touted around before or during the debate? I specifically voted for brexit, no hard no soft just BREXIT. If by soft brexit you mean that you want to remain in the single market then that in my opinion makes the whole point of the the referendum null and void. We will have the supposed four freedoms of movement forced upon us along with the EU courts still dictating our rules regulations and laws. Which leaves me begging the question what was the point in me voting in the first place. I want out,and out means out, but if it came to a supposed soft brexit then we may aswell all swallow our pride and remain in the Damn institution. At least then we'd have a slight say in what is forced upon us.
|
|
|
Post by yeokel on Jun 9, 2017 17:59:16 GMT
48% voted remain, I bet most of us would take a soft brexit deal. There's no way all who voted leave want a hard brexit either, so soft is fair. Hard brexit/soft brexit, would somebody care to tell me who come up with these phrases which were not touted around before or during the debate? I specifically voted for brexit, no hard no soft just BREXIT. If by soft brexit you mean that you want to remain in the single market then that in my opinion makes the whole point of the the referendum null and void. We will have the supposed four freedoms of movement forced upon us along with the EU courts still dictating our rules regulations and laws. Which leaves me begging the question what was the point in me voting in the first place. I want out,and out means out, but if it came to a supposed soft brexit then we may aswell all swallow our pride and remain in the Damn institution. At least then we'd have a slight say in what is forced upon us. No, fuck swallowing our pride and remaining in. We voted to leave and that is what we MUST do. There may well be a few painful years ahead for us, but in the long run we will be much better off (in many ways) than remaining in. We are one of the greatest countries in the world. We CAN make it on our own. Let's get out as quickly as possible and start putting the Great back in to Great Britain.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2017 18:27:29 GMT
Hard brexit/soft brexit, would somebody care to tell me who come up with these phrases which were not touted around before or during the debate? I specifically voted for brexit, no hard no soft just BREXIT. If by soft brexit you mean that you want to remain in the single market then that in my opinion makes the whole point of the the referendum null and void. We will have the supposed four freedoms of movement forced upon us along with the EU courts still dictating our rules regulations and laws. Which leaves me begging the question what was the point in me voting in the first place. I want out,and out means out, but if it came to a supposed soft brexit then we may aswell all swallow our pride and remain in the Damn institution. At least then we'd have a slight say in what is forced upon us. No, fuck swallowing our pride and remaining in. We voted to leave and that is what we MUST do. There may well be a few painful years ahead for us, but in the long run we will be much better off (in many ways) than remaining in. We are one of the greatest countries in the world. We CAN make it on our own. Let's get out as quickly as possible and start putting the Great back in to Great Britain. I'm 100% with you, but there are many forces standing in our way, the election result is now another potential obstacle which will be taken advantage of and spun to the remainers advantage. Anybody who voted for brexit and meant it but then voted for Jezza you have possibly fucked it up for the country. My point initially was I'd prefer no deal than a bad deal, but if they settle for their soft brexit where we remain apart of the free trade deal we may as well have just voted remain.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2017 18:29:35 GMT
48% voted remain, I bet most of us would take a soft brexit deal. There's no way all who voted leave want a hard brexit either, so soft is fair. Hard brexit/soft brexit, would somebody care to tell me who come up with these phrases which were not touted around before or during the debate? I specifically voted for brexit, no hard no soft just BREXIT. If by soft brexit you mean that you want to remain in the single market then that in my opinion makes the whole point of the the referendum null and void. We will have the supposed four freedoms of movement forced upon us along with the EU courts still dictating our rules regulations and laws. Which leaves me begging the question what was the point in me voting in the first place. I want out,and out means out, but if it came to a supposed soft brexit then we may aswell all swallow our pride and remain in the Damn institution. At least then we'd have a slight say in what is forced upon us. WELL SAID THAT MAN!!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2017 18:33:00 GMT
48% voted remain, I bet most of us would take a soft brexit deal. There's no way all who voted leave want a hard brexit either, so soft is fair. Hard brexit/soft brexit, would somebody care to tell me who come up with these phrases which were not touted around before or during the debate? I specifically voted for brexit, no hard no soft just BREXIT. If by soft brexit you mean that you want to remain in the single market then that in my opinion makes the whole point of the the referendum null and void. We will have the supposed four freedoms of movement forced upon us along with the EU courts still dictating our rules regulations and laws. Which leaves me begging the question what was the point in me voting in the first place. I want out,and out means out, but if it came to a supposed soft brexit then we may aswell all swallow our pride and remain in the Damn institution. At least then we'd have a slight say in what is forced upon us. It's a bit like someone saying that they have given up smoking ..... ..apart from the one in the morning with coffee ... oh, and the one after every meal.... .. and one before bed... They haven't really given up smoking have they? I love Europe. I hate that organisation that is called the EU.
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Jun 9, 2017 20:30:36 GMT
It affects Brexit in practical terms. All else is positioning and bluster As a nation we will now go into the negotiations in a piss weak position with a laughing stock, lame duck leader. It is unnecessary and it is entirely the fault of an arrogant, complacent, self-serving and incompetent Tory Party, yet again putting Party interests before those of the Country by calling an opportunistic election. Let the scales start to drop from your eyes now and consider Larry, Curly and Moe at the Brexit Ministry in the cold light of today. An intellectual lightweight, a buffoon and a swivel-eyed idealogue. Does anyone seriously have confidence in these comedians? REALLY ?????? Gina Miller, Keir Starmer's 137 urgent questions, SNP blocking any Brexit legislation, 114 MP's voting against A50, The Lords rejecting the initial act, Juncker shit stirring to the German press, Barnier plucking a 100 billion Euro 'divorce' bill out of the air, Clegg and Mandelson, Blair reappearing, the Lib Dems writing a second EU ref into their manifesto etc, etc. Ever since the referendum result there has been nothing but many, many groups both in the UK and the EU trying to disrupt and stop Brexit. Maybe just maybe, if those in this country had really, genuinely, actually accepted the vote and backed the UK, May wouldn't have felt the need to call this election to strengthen her hand. All the things you mention are completely negated because A50 passed through parliament relatively untroubled. There was a few requested amendments here and there but, much like everyone who wasn't a frothing-at-the-mouth Brexit-paranoid maniac knew it would, it breezed through parliament with a very healthy majority. This idea of people trying to stop Brexit has been absolute fucking bollocks since about a week after the referendum - there was an initial reaction, but since then people have been questioning, but not blocking, Brexit. Such is the paranoia of the Brexiteers, the prime minister ended up calling an election that wasn't needed and putting Brexit more in doubt than it ever was with a majority Tory government. But as usual, it's everyone else's fault. The level of paranoia is getting to dangerous, medically-concerning levels.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2017 20:33:04 GMT
Gina Miller, Keir Starmer's 137 urgent questions, SNP blocking any Brexit legislation, 114 MP's voting against A50, The Lords rejecting the initial act, Juncker shit stirring to the German press, Barnier plucking a 100 billion Euro 'divorce' bill out of the air, Clegg and Mandelson, Blair reappearing, the Lib Dems writing a second EU ref into their manifesto etc, etc. Ever since the referendum result there has been nothing but many, many groups both in the UK and the EU trying to disrupt and stop Brexit. Maybe just maybe, if those in this country had really, genuinely, actually accepted the vote and backed the UK, May wouldn't have felt the need to call this election to strengthen her hand. All the things you mention are completely negated because A50 passed through parliament relatively untroubled. There was a few requested amendments here and there but, much like everyone who wasn't a frothing-at-the-mouth Brexit-paranoid maniac knew it would, it breezed through parliament with a very healthy majority. This idea of people trying to stop Brexit has been absolute fucking bollocks since about a week after the referendum - there was an initial reaction, but since then people have been questioning, but not blocking, Brexit. Such is the paranoia of the Brexiteers, the prime minister ended up calling an election that wasn't needed and putting Brexit more in doubt than it ever was with a majority Tory government. But as usual, it's everyone else's fault. The level of paranoia is getting to dangerous, medically-concerning levels. So you are prepared to guarantee that Blair will not come up with some plan/scheme/party, if another election comes along soon?
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 9, 2017 20:53:07 GMT
Gina Miller, Keir Starmer's 137 urgent questions, SNP blocking any Brexit legislation, 114 MP's voting against A50, The Lords rejecting the initial act, Juncker shit stirring to the German press, Barnier plucking a 100 billion Euro 'divorce' bill out of the air, Clegg and Mandelson, Blair reappearing, the Lib Dems writing a second EU ref into their manifesto etc, etc. Ever since the referendum result there has been nothing but many, many groups both in the UK and the EU trying to disrupt and stop Brexit. Maybe just maybe, if those in this country had really, genuinely, actually accepted the vote and backed the UK, May wouldn't have felt the need to call this election to strengthen her hand. All the things you mention are completely negated because A50 passed through parliament relatively untroubled. There was a few requested amendments here and there but, much like everyone who wasn't a frothing-at-the-mouth Brexit-paranoid maniac knew it would, it breezed through parliament with a very healthy majority. This idea of people trying to stop Brexit has been absolute fucking bollocks since about a week after the referendum - there was an initial reaction, but since then people have been questioning, but not blocking, Brexit. Such is the paranoia of the Brexiteers, the prime minister ended up calling an election that wasn't needed and putting Brexit more in doubt than it ever was with a majority Tory government. But as usual, it's everyone else's fault. The level of paranoia is getting to dangerous, medically-concerning levels. Nonsense. Sturgeon was still saying today that she will block any Tory attempt to govern. Juncker will still shit stir and Barnier hasn't withdrawn his idea of a 100 billion euro bill has he?
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Jun 9, 2017 21:13:04 GMT
All the things you mention are completely negated because A50 passed through parliament relatively untroubled. There was a few requested amendments here and there but, much like everyone who wasn't a frothing-at-the-mouth Brexit-paranoid maniac knew it would, it breezed through parliament with a very healthy majority. This idea of people trying to stop Brexit has been absolute fucking bollocks since about a week after the referendum - there was an initial reaction, but since then people have been questioning, but not blocking, Brexit. Such is the paranoia of the Brexiteers, the prime minister ended up calling an election that wasn't needed and putting Brexit more in doubt than it ever was with a majority Tory government. But as usual, it's everyone else's fault. The level of paranoia is getting to dangerous, medically-concerning levels. Nonsense. Sturgeon was still saying today that she will block any Tory attempt to govern. Juncker will still shit stir and Barnier hasn't withdrawn his idea of a 100 billion euro bill has he? You're getting pissed of at people for negotiating. The mind boggles.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 9, 2017 21:29:16 GMT
Nonsense. Sturgeon was still saying today that she will block any Tory attempt to govern. Juncker will still shit stir and Barnier hasn't withdrawn his idea of a 100 billion euro bill has he? You're getting pissed of at people for negotiating. The mind boggles. No, I'm just pointing that you saying "All the things you mention are completely negated" was bollocks. Juncker isn't "negotiating" he's pissed up and chatting shit to the German press. Has anyone seen a breakdown of Barnier's 100 billion? No. Again, it's not negotiating it's just shit talk.
|
|
|
Post by capto on Jun 9, 2017 21:40:23 GMT
It affects Brexit in practical terms. All else is positioning and bluster As a nation we will now go into the negotiations in a piss weak position with a laughing stock, lame duck leader. It is unnecessary and it is entirely the fault of an arrogant, complacent, self-serving and incompetent Tory Party, yet again putting Party interests before those of the Country by calling an opportunistic election. Let the scales start to drop from your eyes now and consider Larry, Curly and Moe at the Brexit Ministry in the cold light of today. An intellectual lightweight, a buffoon and a swivel-eyed idealogue. Does anyone seriously have confidence in these comedians? REALLY ?????? Gina Miller, Keir Starmer's 137 urgent questions, SNP blocking any Brexit legislation, 114 MP's voting against A50, The Lords rejecting the initial act, Juncker shit stirring to the German press, Barnier plucking a 100 billion Euro 'divorce' bill out of the air, Clegg and Mandelson, Blair reappearing, the Lib Dems writing a second EU ref into their manifesto etc, etc. Ever since the referendum result there has been nothing but many, many groups both in the UK and the EU trying to disrupt and stop Brexit. Maybe just maybe, if those in this country had really, genuinely, actually accepted the vote and backed the UK, May wouldn't have felt the need to call this election to strengthen her hand. None of them had any power - the Tories had the majority and the mandate - its no-ones fault but the Tories. They were greedy for the five years of austerity for the poor and giving all the tax breaks to their financial supporters - five years because it gave them more time to get over any bad economic news after brexit - again, only the Tories to blame. Maybe next time you'll be honest - but you 're Tories , so that's not possible.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 9, 2017 21:58:11 GMT
Gina Miller, Keir Starmer's 137 urgent questions, SNP blocking any Brexit legislation, 114 MP's voting against A50, The Lords rejecting the initial act, Juncker shit stirring to the German press, Barnier plucking a 100 billion Euro 'divorce' bill out of the air, Clegg and Mandelson, Blair reappearing, the Lib Dems writing a second EU ref into their manifesto etc, etc. Ever since the referendum result there has been nothing but many, many groups both in the UK and the EU trying to disrupt and stop Brexit. Maybe just maybe, if those in this country had really, genuinely, actually accepted the vote and backed the UK, May wouldn't have felt the need to call this election to strengthen her hand. None of them had any power - the Tories had the majority and the mandate - its no-ones fault but the Tories. They were greedy for the five years of austerity for the poor and giving all the tax breaks to their financial supporters - five years because it gave them more time to get over any bad economic news after brexit - again, only the Tories to blame. Maybe next time you'll be honest - but you 're Tories , so that's not possible. No power? Are you pissed? Gina Miller had enough power to take the Government to court and was interviewed by Andrew Neil on the BBC this morning still taking about Brexit. Keir Starmer is still the Brexit shadow minister for your precious Labour party. The SNP are still the biggest party in the Scotland and Sturgeon is still the leader and still saying today that she'll try and stop the Conservative's governing. Juncker is still the President of the European Commission and Barnier is still the EU's chief negotiator. Yeah, you're right mate, it's all the mean Tory's fault. They just wanted another 5 years to sell everyone's babies to the child catcher. Talk about paranoia!
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Jun 10, 2017 5:30:14 GMT
None of them had any power - the Tories had the majority and the mandate - its no-ones fault but the Tories. They were greedy for the five years of austerity for the poor and giving all the tax breaks to their financial supporters - five years because it gave them more time to get over any bad economic news after brexit - again, only the Tories to blame. Maybe next time you'll be honest - but you 're Tories , so that's not possible. No power? Are you pissed? Gina Miller had enough power to take the Government to court and was interviewed by Andrew Neil on the BBC this morning still taking about Brexit. Keir Starmer is still the Brexit shadow minister for your precious Labour party. The SNP are still the biggest party in the Scotland and Sturgeon is still the leader and still saying today that she'll try and stop the Conservative's governing. Juncker is still the President of the European Commission and Barnier is still the EU's chief negotiator. Yeah, you're right mate, it's all the mean Tory's fault. They just wanted another 5 years to sell everyone's babies the the child catcher. Talk about paranoia! Now it's a bit clearer. You're pissed off that: - A (albeit very wealthy) member of the public has the power to take the government court. - The main opposition party dare to have a shadow Brexit minister - Scotland's democratically-elected largest party will provide some opposition to their traditional rivals - The EU have had the gall to employ people to negiotiate against us. Makes me wonder how you thought Brexit was going to pan out. - Vote Leave - The next day 48.1% of the population instantly realise how wrong they were - All oppostition parties agree to disband and start working for the Conservatives - The Prime Minister goes to the EU, who agree to every one of her demands - The Tories receive 99% of the vote in the 2020 election - it would've been 100% as all other parties have disbanded, but Mr Buckethead didn't get the memo and stood against them
|
|
|
Post by Timmypotter on Jun 10, 2017 7:57:00 GMT
Both labour and tory manifestos committed to end freedom of movement of people. That requires leaving the single market. That means 90% of the electorate voted for parties who essentially support leaving the single market. I don't see how this election has changed anything.
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Jun 10, 2017 8:45:10 GMT
What next for Brexit?
A piss weak Tory minority govt will have to try to sort out the Brexit mess a previous Tory government got us into. Let's hope everyone remembers that when the EU rolls all over us!
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Jun 10, 2017 8:53:14 GMT
There are some on here positively creaming their pants at the prospect of the EU shafting us. It really is quite unbelievable. Why is it unbelievable? You might think its unpatriotic. Its nothing of the sort. An alternative view is that it might bring home a dose of reality to those who've been living in a deluded Brexit dreamland for the last year. You know, the kind of people who've convinced themselves we hold all the negotiating aces and that the EU needs us more than we need them! They don't seem to be shitting themselves do they? Good bluffers maybe!! If we do manage to avoid the kind of Brexit you want you'll probably never realise just how lucky you've been!
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 10, 2017 16:20:22 GMT
No power? Are you pissed? Gina Miller had enough power to take the Government to court and was interviewed by Andrew Neil on the BBC this morning still taking about Brexit. Keir Starmer is still the Brexit shadow minister for your precious Labour party. The SNP are still the biggest party in the Scotland and Sturgeon is still the leader and still saying today that she'll try and stop the Conservative's governing. Juncker is still the President of the European Commission and Barnier is still the EU's chief negotiator. Yeah, you're right mate, it's all the mean Tory's fault. They just wanted another 5 years to sell everyone's babies the the child catcher. Talk about paranoia! Now it's a bit clearer. You're pissed off that: - A (albeit very wealthy) member of the public has the power to take the government court. - The main opposition party dare to have a shadow Brexit minister - Scotland's democratically-elected largest party will provide some opposition to their traditional rivals - The EU have had the gall to employ people to negiotiate against us. Makes me wonder how you thought Brexit was going to pan out. - Vote Leave - The next day 48.1% of the population instantly realise how wrong they were - All oppostition parties agree to disband and start working for the Conservatives - The Prime Minister goes to the EU, who agree to every one of her demands - The Tories receive 99% of the vote in the 2020 election - it would've been 100% as all other parties have disbanded, but Mr Buckethead didn't get the memo and stood against them You don't half talk some bollocks mate. I get it, you don't support Brexit, you're happy if the EU gossip to the press or or just come across as bullying and disrespectful, neither of which are negotiating traits in the real world and you don't like the Conservatives. All boringly predictable stuff. Anyway, I'm really not doing these childish circular arguments for the next two years so enjoy
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 10, 2017 16:21:47 GMT
What next for Brexit? A piss weak Tory minority govt will have to try to sort out the Brexit mess a previous Tory government got us into. Let's hope everyone remembers that when the EU rolls all over us! Did you just vote Conservative?
|
|
|
Post by capto on Jun 10, 2017 16:29:20 GMT
Now it's a bit clearer. You're pissed off that: - A (albeit very wealthy) member of the public has the power to take the government court. - The main opposition party dare to have a shadow Brexit minister - Scotland's democratically-elected largest party will provide some opposition to their traditional rivals - The EU have had the gall to employ people to negiotiate against us. Makes me wonder how you thought Brexit was going to pan out. - Vote Leave - The next day 48.1% of the population instantly realise how wrong they were - All oppostition parties agree to disband and start working for the Conservatives - The Prime Minister goes to the EU, who agree to every one of her demands - The Tories receive 99% of the vote in the 2020 election - it would've been 100% as all other parties have disbanded, but Mr Buckethead didn't get the memo and stood against them You don't half talk some bollocks mate. I get it, you don't support Brexit, you're happy if the EU gossip to the press or or just come across as bullying and disrespectful, neither of which are negotiating traits in the real world and you don't like the Conservatives. All boringly predictable stuff. Anyway, I'm really not doing these childish circular arguments for the next two years so enjoy The tories wanted to hold the negotiations in secret. Why - if they're representing 'the people'? the EU said no, it's going to be transparent. You tell me who I should trust? Rhetorical - as you're leaving, close t'door on way out.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 10, 2017 16:54:41 GMT
You don't half talk some bollocks mate. I get it, you don't support Brexit, you're happy if the EU gossip to the press or or just come across as bullying and disrespectful, neither of which are negotiating traits in the real world and you don't like the Conservatives. All boringly predictable stuff. Anyway, I'm really not doing these childish circular arguments for the next two years so enjoy The tories wanted to hold the negotiations in secret. Why - if they're representing 'the people'? the EU said no, it's going to be transparent. You tell me who I should trust? Rhetorical - as you're leaving, close t'door on way out.
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Jun 11, 2017 12:12:10 GMT
What next for Brexit? A piss weak Tory minority govt will have to try to sort out the Brexit mess a previous Tory government got us into. Let's hope everyone remembers that when the EU rolls all over us! Did you just vote Conservative? Hahaha, brilliant
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 11, 2017 12:44:45 GMT
Did you just vote Conservative? Hahaha, brilliant You don't have the mental capacity do you? I know you didn't vote Conservative. If you just voted anything but Conservative you can't give it the "piss weak minority going into Brexit" bollocks. It was because of your vote we now have a piss weak Brexit hand. You can celebrate weakening May's position that would be genuine but you can't blame May because your vote was part of the causation of her position.
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Jun 11, 2017 13:04:55 GMT
Hahaha, brilliant You don't have the mental capacity do you? I know you didn't vote Conservative. If you just voted anything but Conservative you can't give it the "piss weak minority going into Brexit" bollocks. It was because of your vote we now have a piss weak Brexit hand. You can celebrate weakening May's position that would be genuine but you can't blame May because your vote was part of the causation of her position. Which was the idea from the start. You are right, people on here and Sky, The Beeb, Channel 4 have battered away at Brexit for a year. Virtually no news item on Brexit was positively reported, and we were painted as racist thickos for voting for it. Corbyn and the left have galvanized the young to vote(or was it social media?)in their droves and the racist thickos have turned to a man who prior to the referendum wanted no upper limit to immigration. A manifesto pledge will mean nothing, he didn't want the fight in the first place. I have said for ages that this is a put up job. The politicians and media were shitting it from the moment the referendum result was announced. As someone mentioned earlier, people are taking pride in the EU shitting on us. They've bullied others into remaining in their mafia; I thought we were made of stronger stuff. Apparently not.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 11, 2017 13:19:44 GMT
You don't have the mental capacity do you? I know you didn't vote Conservative. If you just voted anything but Conservative you can't give it the "piss weak minority going into Brexit" bollocks. It was because of your vote we now have a piss weak Brexit hand. You can celebrate weakening May's position that would be genuine but you can't blame May because your vote was part of the causation of her position. Which was the idea from the start. You are right, people on here and Sky, The Beeb, Channel 4 have battered away at Brexit for a year. Virtually no news item on Brexit was positively reported, and we were painted as racist thickos for voting for it. Corbyn and the left have galvanized the young to vote(or was it social media?)in their droves and the racist thickos have turned to a man who prior to the referendum wanted no upper limit to immigration. A manifesto pledge will mean nothing, he didn't want the fight in the first place. I have said for ages that this is a put up job. The politicians and media were shitting it from the moment the referendum result was announced. As someone mentioned earlier, people are taking pride in the EU shitting on us. They've bullied others into remaining in their mafia; I thought we were made of stronger stuff. Apparently not. It's a joke mate. May was slated for saying this GE was all about Brexit. Labour told us it was about school meals and nationalising the railways. Now everyone is talking about Brexit. The Westminster bubble, remoaners on here and yes the MSM...
|
|