|
|
Post by greyman on Nov 30, 2016 19:29:56 GMT
Watford manager refuses to shake hands. Momo says he's a 'prick' Jurgen Klopp criticises Sunderland for being overly defensive. Momo says he's an 'orrible twat' Jose Mourinho gets a new job. Momo says he's a 'classless cunt'. Tony Pulis defrauds a club out of £2 million. Momo doesn't 'give two shits'. *cough Watford Manager never done a fucking thing for Stoke City Jurgen Klopp never done a fucking thing for Stoke City Jose Mourinho never done a fucking thing for Stoke City Tony Pulis one of the best managers in Stoke’s history Guess which one the ‘prince of the wankstains’ Greyman hates with every nerve and sinew in his body? *cough splutter cough Only one of us has ever been asked directly by the ceo of Stoke City whether Pulis should be sacked. Only one of us said no. Hardly the answer of somebody who hates him. The fact is I've always been right about Pulis. Good manager. Terrible man. Whereas you're only half right. |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 30, 2016 19:35:59 GMT
Watford Manager never done a fucking thing for Stoke City Jurgen Klopp never done a fucking thing for Stoke City Jose Mourinho never done a fucking thing for Stoke City Tony Pulis one of the best managers in Stoke’s history Guess which one the ‘prince of the wankstains’ Greyman hates with every nerve and sinew in his body? *cough splutter cough Only one of us has ever been asked directly by the ceo of Stoke City whether Pulis should be sacked. Only one of us said no. Hardly the answer of somebody who hates him. The fact is I've always been right about Pulis. Good manager. Terrible man. Whereas you're only half right. The fact that you spend time with a ceo that would even pose that question publicly, opens up an entirely different question about which 'terrible men' still remain at the club. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Nov 30, 2016 19:50:23 GMT
Well you'd better take it up with all the fans that were there that day including the editors of the Oatcake. Clue about the CEO - it wasn't Tony Scholes who, by the way, is an employee of the club who has been in charge during the one of the best periods in the club's history and gets dog's abuse from you and yet has never been shown up as a fraud and blackmailer in court. Admit it, you think Pulis is bigger than the club which is why you won't apply the same rules to him as you do everybody else. I bet you were outraged that Mourinho kicked a bottle of water and Tony Scholes ate some pizza but fraud is just MEH.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 30, 2016 20:02:27 GMT
Well you'd better take it up with all the fans that were there that day including the editors of the Oatcake. Clue about the CEO - it wasn't Tony Scholes who, by the way, is an employee of the club who has been in charge during the one of the best periods in the club's history and gets dog's abuse from you and yet has never been shown up as a fraud and blackmailer in court. Admit it, you think Pulis is bigger than the club. Oh yeah I remember now. The absentee greengrocers. Scholes got a different chap off here to undermine the manager. Interesting you approve of such practices. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Nov 30, 2016 20:06:06 GMT
No. What I disapprove of is a man who behaves like Tony Pulis has throughout his career. We were just lucky that Tony Pulis's interests coincided with Stoke City's for most of the time he was here (but not always). Look at what happens whenever Pulis decides that his interests lie elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnfarmersmum on Nov 30, 2016 20:08:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 30, 2016 20:09:21 GMT
No. What I disapprove of is a man who behaves like Tony Pulis has throughout his career. We were just lucky that Tony Pulis's interests coincided with Stoke City's for most of the time he was here (but not always). Look at what happens whenever Pulis decides that his interests lie elsewhere. No. You openly approve of two CEO's openly undermining a Stoke City manager. Sorry correction. You openly approve of two CEO's openly undermining Tony Pulis. |
|
|
|
Post by foxysgloves on Nov 30, 2016 21:01:33 GMT
Gillingham and chairman Paul Scally fined £75,000 for ‘race victimisation’ • FA rule striker Mark McCammon was unfairly dismissed in 2011 • Club and Scally ‘shocked, stunned and angered’ and say they will appeal  That Paul Scally? |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 30, 2016 21:20:55 GMT
Gillingham and chairman Paul Scally fined £75,000 for ‘race victimisation’ • FA rule striker Mark McCammon was unfairly dismissed in 2011 • Club and Scally ‘shocked, stunned and angered’ and say they will appeal  That Paul Scally? Think that's him. The one with wife in jail for drugs, the one who received a record fine for backing his own team to lose, the one who had to tear half his own ground down for planning irregularities. the one who banned the chairman of his own clubs supporter club and the local newspaper. The one who Stoke fans with no agenda at all have championed over Pulis for 14 years. |
|
|
|
Post by foxysgloves on Nov 30, 2016 21:27:41 GMT
Gillingham and chairman Paul Scally fined £75,000 for ‘race victimisation’ • FA rule striker Mark McCammon was unfairly dismissed in 2011 • Club and Scally ‘shocked, stunned and angered’ and say they will appeal  That Paul Scally? Think that's him. The one with wife in jail for drugs, the one who received a record fine for backing his own team to lose, the one who had to tear half his own ground down for planning irregularities. the one who banned the chairman of his own clubs supporter club and the local newspaper. The one who Stoke fans with no agenda at all have championed over Pulis for 14 years. Thought it was that one! Amazing how those who leap to hammer Pulis for any misdemeanor can turn a blind eye to the apparent first class twattishness of his nemesis. But predictable. |
|
|
|
Post by roylandstoke on Nov 30, 2016 21:48:09 GMT
Pulis did a good job at Stoke and was well paid for his efforts. I really couldn't give a toss about his dealings with CPFC or any other club. That's like a man who once looked after your child getting convicted of paedophilia. "I don't care as long as he didn't touch my son". Or, maybe a guy that you once employed being found guilty of stealing thousands of pounds from his current employer. "So what, he didn't steal from us" It is an extremely shortsighted view to take. Take football out of this matter and imagine it as a relatable 'real life' scenario. The guy is a fucking slithery, backstabbing, fraudulent crook and should rightfully lose all respect in the footballing community. Tosser! I'm not really sure it's fair to equate theft(essentially Pulis' crime is theft) of a sum of money from a very wealthy man or business, with paedophilia. Pulis did steal money and has been subjected to legal process. I have no problem with thieves and frauds being brought to justice. If CPFC feel they should persue criminal prosecution of Pulis then I say good for them. The laws of the land should be applied equally to all. I don't feel sorry for CPFC, had Pulis stolen from someone other than a multi million pound concern then I may have some sympathy for the victim, As it stands I really couldn't give a toss about the outcome. The law will move on in this case regardless of my feelings and I am quite happy for it to do so. I actually find it distasteful that paedophilia could be compared to a contractual dispute. |
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Nov 30, 2016 22:54:16 GMT
Scaly and Pulis should have a get together for old times sake and discuss each others crime sheets......
Both deserve each other- snide bastards
|
|
|
|
Post by foxysgloves on Nov 30, 2016 23:06:42 GMT
That's like a man who once looked after your child getting convicted of paedophilia. "I don't care as long as he didn't touch my son". Or, maybe a guy that you once employed being found guilty of stealing thousands of pounds from his current employer. "So what, he didn't steal from us" It is an extremely shortsighted view to take. Take football out of this matter and imagine it as a relatable 'real life' scenario. The guy is a fucking slithery, backstabbing, fraudulent crook and should rightfully lose all respect in the footballing community. Tosser! I'm not really sure it's fair to equate theft(essentially Pulis' crime is theft) of a sum of money from a very wealthy man or business, with paedophilia. Pulis did steal money and has been subjected to legal process. I have no problem with thieves and frauds being brought to justice. If CPFC feel they should persue criminal prosecution of Pulis then I say good for them. The laws of the land should be applied equally to all. I don't feel sorry for CPFC, had Pulis stolen from someone other than a multi million pound concern then I may have some sympathy for the victim, As it stands I really couldn't give a toss about the outcome. The law will move on in this case regardless of my feelings and I am quite happy for it to do so. I actually find it distasteful that paedophilia could be compared to a contractual dispute. You're dead fucking right. It's a scandalous post and it would want removing fast. |
|
|
|
Post by foxysgloves on Nov 30, 2016 23:09:50 GMT
Pulis did a good job at Stoke and was well paid for his efforts. I really couldn't give a toss about his dealings with CPFC or any other club. That's like a man who once looked after your child getting convicted of paedophilia. "I don't care as long as he didn't touch my son". Or, maybe a guy that you once employed being found guilty of stealing thousands of pounds from his current employer. "So what, he didn't steal from us" It is an extremely shortsighted view to take. Take football out of this matter and imagine it as a relatable 'real life' scenario. The guy is a fucking slithery, backstabbing, fraudulent crook and should rightfully lose all respect in the footballing community. Tosser! That's fucking scandalous. Bringing the most horrific crime imaginable into this debate, however tenuously, is so off the scale it's not funny. Pathetic. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Nov 30, 2016 23:27:57 GMT
Gillingham and chairman Paul Scally fined £75,000 for ‘race victimisation’ • FA rule striker Mark McCammon was unfairly dismissed in 2011 • Club and Scally ‘shocked, stunned and angered’ and say they will appeal  That Paul Scally? Think that's him. The one with wife in jail for drugs, the one who received a record fine for backing his own team to lose, the one who had to tear half his own ground down for planning irregularities. the one who banned the chairman of his own clubs supporter club and the local newspaper. The one who Stoke fans with no agenda at all have championed over Pulis for 14 years. Gonna provide any proof that Stoke fans have 'championed' Scally over Pulis for 14 years? Or simply admit you've made it up...... I can wait. |
|
|
|
Post by peterthornesboots on Dec 1, 2016 0:18:29 GMT
I love (or loved? Past tense?) TP and I'll be forever greatful for what he did for this football club ...
... but, Christ this Palace debarkle is scandalous and dodgy as!
|
|
|
|
Post by shinosbro on Dec 1, 2016 0:32:09 GMT
Think that's him. The one with wife in jail for drugs, the one who received a record fine for backing his own team to lose, the one who had to tear half his own ground down for planning irregularities. the one who banned the chairman of his own clubs supporter club and the local newspaper. The one who Stoke fans with no agenda at all have championed over Pulis for 14 years. Thought it was that one! Amazing how those who leap to hammer Pulis for any misdemeanor can turn a blind eye to the apparent first class twattishness of his nemesis. But predictable. His nemesis turned out to be Steve Parish though, not the Gillingham bloke |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Dec 1, 2016 6:49:18 GMT
Think that's him. The one with wife in jail for drugs, the one who received a record fine for backing his own team to lose, the one who had to tear half his own ground down for planning irregularities. the one who banned the chairman of his own clubs supporter club and the local newspaper. The one who Stoke fans with no agenda at all have championed over Pulis for 14 years. Gonna provide any proof that Stoke fans have 'championed' Scally over Pulis for 14 years? Or simply admit you've made it up...... I can wait. I suppose the Stoke 'fan' who had the transcript of the Gillingham court case on his website when we hired Pulis is a good starting place. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Dec 1, 2016 7:15:45 GMT
Gonna provide any proof that Stoke fans have 'championed' Scally over Pulis for 14 years? Or simply admit you've made it up...... I can wait. I suppose the Stoke 'fan' who had the transcript of the Gillingham court case on his website when we hired Pulis is a good starting place. I don't know who you mean but that doesn't mean anybody has 'championed' Scally. You don't have to take sides when two twats go to war with each other. You can see them both for what they are - twats. I just wonder what Pulis would have to do for you to criticise him. We know major fraud and lying to his employers isn't enough for you to raise an eyebrow. How about killing your mum? Or would that be OK because he managed to keep us in the Premier League? |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Dec 1, 2016 8:35:28 GMT
I suppose the Stoke 'fan' who had the transcript of the Gillingham court case on his website when we hired Pulis is a good starting place. I don't know who you mean but that doesn't mean anybody has 'championed' Scally. You don't have to take sides when two twats go to war with each other. You can see them both for what they are - twats. I just wonder what Pulis would have to do for you to criticise him. We know major fraud and lying to his employers isn't enough for you to raise an eyebrow. How about killing your mum? Or would that be OK because he managed to keep us in the Premier League? Convenient that you don't remember! Show me where I've defended him on this matter once, it just doesn't sully his time at Stoke one iota for me and it certainly doesn't justify the self congratulatory game of soggy biscuit you and the usual suspects have been indulging in on this thread. Your activities 2002-2013 remain what they have always been. Tawdry and anti Stoke. |
|
|
|
Post by Titan Uranus on Dec 1, 2016 9:04:32 GMT
Thought it was that one! Amazing how those who leap to hammer Pulis for any misdemeanor can turn a blind eye to the apparent first class twattishness of his nemesis. But predictable. His nemesis turned out to be Steve Parish though, not the Gillingham bloke Oh yeh. Steve Parish is a really nice bloke who has never screwed anybody over or bankrupt a few companies or been involved in some mega dodgy business deals. |
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Dec 1, 2016 9:14:24 GMT
His nemesis turned out to be Steve Parish though, not the Gillingham bloke Oh yeh. Steve Parish is a really nice bloke who has never screwed anybody over or bankrupt a few companies or been involved in some mega dodgy business deals. Being a nemesis isn't an endorsement of character it just means being the agent of someone's downfall. Sort of fits in this context. Doesn't mean Parish is a nice guy or a bad yin. |
|
|
|
Post by Titan Uranus on Dec 1, 2016 9:24:16 GMT
Oh yeh. Steve Parish is a really nice bloke who has never screwed anybody over or bankrupt a few companies or been involved in some mega dodgy business deals. Being a nemesis isn't an endorsement of character it just means being the agent of someone's downfall. Sort of fits in this context. Doesn't mean Parish is a nice guy or a bad yin. Yes I know. Just trying to make the point (rather badly) that in the league table of crooks and scoundrels in football, Parish is quite near to the top. Not making excuses for Pulis at all .... but just get the feeling that there is another chapter in this story. He (Pulis) is obviously a very greedy man who has behaved disgracefully by the sound of it. I didn't have him down for stupid though. |
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Dec 1, 2016 9:34:12 GMT
Pulis was an integral component in Stokes revival and a fantastic manager for most of his tenure here.
He's also a greedy and conniving twat.
Both of those statements are subjective and that's the issue.
There also seems to be an element of schadenfreude on here for Pulis that seems a little disproportionate
|
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Dec 1, 2016 9:47:12 GMT
Scaly and Pulis should have a get cell together for old times sake and discuss each others crime sheets...... Both deserve each other- snide bastards Corrected your typo mate. |
|
|
|
Post by Titan Uranus on Dec 1, 2016 10:01:57 GMT
Pulis was an integral component in Stokes revival and a fantastic manager for most of his tenure here. He's also a greedy and conniving twat. Both of those statements are subjective and that's the issue. There also seems to be an element of schadenfreude on here for Pulis that seems a little disproportionate Good post |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Dec 1, 2016 10:40:42 GMT
I don't know who you mean but that doesn't mean anybody has 'championed' Scally. You don't have to take sides when two twats go to war with each other. You can see them both for what they are - twats. I just wonder what Pulis would have to do for you to criticise him. We know major fraud and lying to his employers isn't enough for you to raise an eyebrow. How about killing your mum? Or would that be OK because he managed to keep us in the Premier League? Convenient that you don't remember! Show me where I've defended him on this matter once, it just doesn't sully his time at Stoke one iota for me and it certainly doesn't justify the self congratulatory game of soggy biscuit you and the usual suspects have been indulging in on this thread. Your activities 2002-2013 remain what they have always been. Tawdry and anti Stoke. Sure. Sure. I never once called for his head and have supported the club throughout. As I said before you're just floundering around because I've been right about him and you've only ever been half right. So while other people and managers are tawdry, pricks, cunts, arseholes and wankers for having an opinion, you don't give a shit that one manager is guilty of a major fraud. And if anybody points your hypocrisy out, you just start making stuff up. Shows where your loyalties lie. |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Dec 1, 2016 11:03:32 GMT
Convenient that you don't remember! Show me where I've defended him on this matter once, it just doesn't sully his time at Stoke one iota for me and it certainly doesn't justify the self congratulatory game of soggy biscuit you and the usual suspects have been indulging in on this thread. Your activities 2002-2013 remain what they have always been. Tawdry and anti Stoke. Sure. Sure. I never once called for his head and have supported the club throughout. As I said before you're just floundering around because I've been right about him and you've only ever been half right. So while other people and managers are tawdry, pricks, cunts, arseholes and wankers for having an opinion, you don't give a shit that one manager is guilty of a major fraud. And if anybody points your hypocrisy out, you just start making stuff up. Shows where your loyalties lie. I can understand why you're ashamed of your previous actions, that makes perfect sense to anyone who read your decade long campaign of transparent hate that you tried (and failed) to mask as fair comment. Anyway I'm no cock blocker, you and your pals gather back around the biscuit and start enjoying yourselves again! |
|
|
|
Post by bringmesunshine on Dec 1, 2016 12:23:50 GMT
Convenient that you don't remember! Show me where I've defended him on this matter once, it just doesn't sully his time at Stoke one iota for me and it certainly doesn't justify the self congratulatory game of soggy biscuit you and the usual suspects have been indulging in on this thread. Your activities 2002-2013 remain what they have always been. Tawdry and anti Stoke. Sure. Sure. I never once called for his head and have supported the club throughout. As I said before you're just floundering around because I've been right about him and you've only ever been half right. So while other people and managers are tawdry, pricks, cunts, arseholes and wankers for having an opinion, you don't give a shit that one manager is guilty of a major fraud. And if anybody points your hypocrisy out, you just start making stuff up. Shows where your loyalties lie. Its a classic momo tactic, if you start winning the argument with logic and reason he either goes into full on cornered ferret mode with a large dose of outrage thrown in, shifts the conversation wildly off topic in an attempt to deflect from his own obvious deficiencies or his last resort when all else has failed is to just make something up and run with it, this last tactic is generally speaking his ultimate fall back position, some might call it being fucking delusional. The range of topics he usually goes ferret on include Pulis bashing, Scholes, the transfer team, The Royal Family, the Tory Government, perceived social injustices the list goes on and on and on. He pretends not to be Rimmerati but like a wolf in sheep's clothing he just can't stop himself whenever a thread like this gets started, he will have been reading all the negative comments and slowly getting more and more angry until he couldn't stop himself and after 6 pages BOOM, Momo strikes back. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Dec 1, 2016 12:33:34 GMT
Sure. Sure. I never once called for his head and have supported the club throughout. As I said before you're just floundering around because I've been right about him and you've only ever been half right. So while other people and managers are tawdry, pricks, cunts, arseholes and wankers for having an opinion, you don't give a shit that one manager is guilty of a major fraud. And if anybody points your hypocrisy out, you just start making stuff up. Shows where your loyalties lie. I can understand why you're ashamed of your previous actions, that makes perfect sense to anyone who read your decade long campaign of transparent hate that you tried (and failed) to mask as fair comment. Anyway I'm no cock blocker, you and your pals gather back around the biscuit and start enjoying yourselves again! My actions. My transparent hate. As I keep reminding you, I was asked directly by the club's CEO whether he should be sacked and said no. That's the only action you need to concern yourself with. My attitude has always been the same. Good manager. Absolute twat. So well done on getting it 50 percent correct but don't turn it on me when the facts prove you wrong on the other 50 percent. |
|
