|
Post by tejstokie on Jan 1, 2024 17:46:55 GMT
Only one to save a goal and another from a shot on target as both came from poor CB play. Not surprised you of all "don't remember" Josef. So countless = more than one then? Just because the stats say two doesn't mean there weren't more, the same "stats" said we had 8 on target... my ass we did. The stats also say our CBs had countless errors lol If one of those "saves" goes in we get the bonham is our biggest issue thread up and going eh Bursy? I enjoy you and Bayern being dead wrong on the kid and now it pains you when he's not the main issue to losing a match.
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on Jan 2, 2024 14:28:20 GMT
Travers on loan is not a good idea, especially if there is a similar recall clause. Absolutely yes, if it's on a permanent and if not, we have to look elsewhere. If we can get a first choice keeper on a permanent deal that would be great but very unlikely in January so to improve on what we have we will be looking at a loan and pretty much all loans have a recall clause. If Travers is an option it would be daft not to consider it.
|
|
|
Post by baconburger on Jan 2, 2024 15:28:23 GMT
Travers on loan is not a good idea, especially if there is a similar recall clause. Absolutely yes, if it's on a permanent and if not, we have to look elsewhere. If we can get a first choice keeper on a permanent deal that would be great but very unlikely in January so to improve on what we have we will be looking at a loan and pretty much all loans have a recall clause. If Travers is an option it would be daft not to consider it. There was no recall clause in the Travers loan his parent club had to go to the Premier League to grant the recall. The situation would be the same with loaning a keeper from any Premier League club. It's not something that happens on an even a semi regular basis, it should not dominate our thinking.
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Jan 2, 2024 15:33:20 GMT
I'd say that's down to Bonham. Neither of those two. He had countless saves today, again. According to the stats he had 2 and I don’t remember them. Don't be harsh, maybe he isn't very good at counting 😂
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Jan 4, 2024 23:10:23 GMT
Deal already agreed to return. Still think it’ll happen?
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Jan 5, 2024 8:58:05 GMT
Deal already agreed to return. Still think it’ll happen? Perhaps we’re signing both Travers and Iverson🤷♂️
|
|
|
Post by monkeycat on Jan 5, 2024 14:36:47 GMT
Deal already agreed to return. Errrr
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Jan 5, 2024 14:48:16 GMT
Deal already agreed to return. Errrr maybe a deal was agreed deal agreed & deal done are not the same thing who knows?
|
|
|
Post by monkeycat on Jan 5, 2024 14:49:14 GMT
maybe a deal was agreed deal agreed & deal done are not the same thing who knows? People assume Travers wanted to come back
|
|
|
Post by nottsover60 on Jan 5, 2024 14:54:22 GMT
maybe a deal was agreed deal agreed & deal done are not the same thing who knows? The rumor was going around at the Ipswich match and I thought then that it had probably been started by someone who thought it was a good bet to try and look like he was in the know. I'm sure that when he was recalled we probably told him we'd look at again in January. Different manager and perhaps the transfer people didn't appreciate being messed about by Bournemouth and don't want to help them out of a situation of their own making.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Jan 5, 2024 14:58:07 GMT
maybe a deal was agreed deal agreed & deal done are not the same thing who knows? People assume Travers wanted to come back He probably didn't when Neil was here.
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Jan 5, 2024 18:26:23 GMT
A deal was agreed but like all deals if someone better comes available you take it.
Same happened in the summer with Sarkic.
|
|
|
Post by baconburger on Jan 5, 2024 18:34:06 GMT
A deal was agreed but like all deals if someone better comes available you take it. Same happened in the summer with Sarkic. I don’t know which was better. I liked aspects of both for me Travers exuded a calmness that Sarkic or Bonham don’t but then he didn’t save many I wouldn’t expect most keepers to.
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Jan 5, 2024 19:22:16 GMT
A deal was agreed but like all deals if someone better comes available you take it. Same happened in the summer with Sarkic. I don’t know which was better. I liked aspects of both for me Travers exuded a calmness that Sarkic or Bonham don’t but then he didn’t save many I wouldn’t expect most keepers to. I don't know much about Iverson but imo Travers was just starting to show what a good keeper he is.
|
|