|
|
Post by jwhpotter on Feb 3, 2022 15:52:43 GMT
Bursik
Smith Wilmott Moore Tymon
Allen Thompson (but he’ll probably play Clucas)
Powell
Campbell Maja Wright Phillips
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Feb 3, 2022 15:54:59 GMT
Is Bursik fit?
Is Moore cuptied?
|
|
|
|
Post by 19notbeaten72 on Feb 3, 2022 15:56:41 GMT
I thought Moore was cup tied having played for Reading in the 3rd round.
|
|
|
|
Post by Veritas on Feb 3, 2022 15:57:00 GMT
Jags is cup-tied
|
|
|
|
Post by cvillestokie on Feb 3, 2022 15:57:10 GMT
Bursik Smith Wilmott Moore Tymon Allen Thompson (but he’ll probably play Clucas) Powell Campbell Maja Wright Phillips I’m not sure if I would start Powell personally. I’d rather wrap him up in cotton wool for the league and have him start the game after. I’d also like to see Forrester in the side and one or two of the U23s on the bench as well. Fox should probably start instead of Tymon so he can stay match fit. |
|
|
|
Post by jwhpotter on Feb 3, 2022 15:57:14 GMT
Bursik Smith Wilmott Moore Tymon Allen Thompson (but he’ll probably play Clucas) Powell Campbell Maja Wright Phillips I think you're right except Wilmot at RB with Jags next to Moore and Bidace instead of DWP Jags and Bidace are cup tied |
|
|
|
Post by cvillestokie on Feb 3, 2022 15:57:52 GMT
JPB is also cup tied I believe.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Feb 3, 2022 15:58:03 GMT
I think you're right except Wilmot at RB with Jags next to Moore and Bidace instead of DWP Jags is cup tied Forgot it was a cup tie 😅 |
|
|
|
Post by jwhpotter on Feb 3, 2022 15:58:31 GMT
Forgot it was a cup tie 😅 😂😂 |
|
|
|
Post by potter1989 on Feb 3, 2022 16:11:13 GMT
Bursik
Smith Moore THB Fox
Allen Thompson
Campbell vrancic dmag
Maja
|
|
|
|
Post by jokker on Feb 3, 2022 16:35:22 GMT
Is Bursik fit? Is Moore cuptied? I don't think he played in the 3rd round, as Reading already knew that he would have to be sold - which he wasn't, but we bit when he was offered as a loan deal with Ince going there |
|
|
|
Post by bolders on Feb 3, 2022 16:35:28 GMT
I thought Moore was cup tied having played for Reading in the 3rd round. He wasn’t in the squad |
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Feb 3, 2022 16:45:51 GMT
I think you're right except Wilmot at RB with Jags next to Moore and Bidace instead of DWP Jags and Bidace are cup tied and Baker |
|
|
|
Post by apb1 on Feb 3, 2022 16:50:15 GMT
Bursik
Smith
THB
Moore
Fox
Clucas
Thompson
Powell
DWP
Maja
Campbell
|
|
|
|
Post by callas12 on Feb 3, 2022 17:08:19 GMT
The Cup Tied rule needs scrapping, its so outdated & doesn't really serve a purpose. At a push I understand it if a players on loan as that could be deemed a disadvantage of sorts, but if a players permanently signed for a new club who happen to still be in a cup competition he may have previously played in, for a previous club I really dont see the harm in it, why punish the player for moving clubs?
|
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Feb 3, 2022 17:13:53 GMT
So to clarify Jagielka, Baker and Philogene-Bidace are cup tied but Moore is available? In which case......
Bonham
Smith
Moore
Harwood-Bellis
Fox
Allen
Thompson
Clucas
Wright-Phillips
Maja
Campbell
Subs: Fielding, Wilmott, Chester, Tymon, Powell, Fletcher, Brown.
|
|
|
|
Post by scfcno1fan on Feb 3, 2022 17:29:40 GMT
The Cup Tied rule needs scrapping, its so outdated & doesn't really serve a purpose. At a push I understand it if a players on loan as that could be deemed a disadvantage of sorts, but if a players permanently signed for a new club who happen to still be in a cup competition he may have previously played in, for a previous club I really dont see the harm in it, why punish the player for moving clubs? It makes completely no sense doesn’t it? We signed Moore from Reading, he’s already played in the championship for reading this season, so by the cup tied rule, he shouldn’t be able to play for us in the league. It’s ridiculous and needs scrapping. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2022 17:32:01 GMT
The Cup Tied rule needs scrapping, its so outdated & doesn't really serve a purpose. At a push I understand it if a players on loan as that could be deemed a disadvantage of sorts, but if a players permanently signed for a new club who happen to still be in a cup competition he may have previously played in, for a previous club I really dont see the harm in it, why punish the player for moving clubs? It makes completely no sense doesn’t it? We signed Moore from Reading, he’s already played in the championship for reading this season, so by the cup tied rule, he shouldn’t be able to play for us in the league. It’s ridiculous and needs scrapping. Don't agree. Think it serves its purpose and we already have a 3 team season rule |
|
|
|
Post by scfcno1fan on Feb 3, 2022 17:39:56 GMT
It makes completely no sense doesn’t it? We signed Moore from Reading, he’s already played in the championship for reading this season, so by the cup tied rule, he shouldn’t be able to play for us in the league. It’s ridiculous and needs scrapping. Don't agree. Think it serves its purpose and we already have a 3 team season rule What’s the difference between the cup and the league? Why make the distinctions for the cup? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2022 17:41:52 GMT
Don't agree. Think it serves its purpose and we already have a 3 team season rule What’s the difference between the cup and the league? Why make the distinctions for the cup? The difference is obvious. We're involved in a play off race and have zero chance of winning the cup. We have a glut of games coming up in the league and need our best 11 . |
|
|
|
Post by Veritas on Feb 3, 2022 18:01:06 GMT
The Cup Tied rule needs scrapping, its so outdated & doesn't really serve a purpose. At a push I understand it if a players on loan as that could be deemed a disadvantage of sorts, but if a players permanently signed for a new club who happen to still be in a cup competition he may have previously played in, for a previous club I really dont see the harm in it, why punish the player for moving clubs? It makes completely no sense doesn’t it? We signed Moore from Reading, he’s already played in the championship for reading this season, so by the cup tied rule, he shouldn’t be able to play for us in the league. It’s ridiculous and needs scrapping. I agree and think the introduction of the transfer windows make it even more nonsensical. Before that I suppose the rule stopped a club going out to buy players to bolster their chances if they had a good cup run but that is no longer the case. |
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Feb 3, 2022 18:09:53 GMT
Bursik
Smith
Wilmott
Bellis
Fox
Thompson
Clucas
Vrancic
DWP
Campbell
Fletcher
|
|
|
|
Post by jwhpotter on Feb 3, 2022 20:31:29 GMT
So to clarify Jagielka, Baker and Philogene-Bidace are cup tied but Moore is available? In which case...... Bonham Smith Moore Harwood-Bellis Fox Allen Thompson Clucas Wright-Phillips Maja Campbell Subs: Fielding, Wilmott, Chester, Tymon, Powell, Fletcher, Brown. We can’t play that midfield 3 surely- even against Wigan!….. he probably will though 🙈 |
|
|
|
Post by cvillestokie on Feb 3, 2022 22:01:26 GMT
It makes completely no sense doesn’t it? We signed Moore from Reading, he’s already played in the championship for reading this season, so by the cup tied rule, he shouldn’t be able to play for us in the league. It’s ridiculous and needs scrapping. Don't agree. Think it serves its purpose and we already have a 3 team season rule What purpose does it serve? I also see no real point for the 3 team season rule either, especially not for young players or players who have been out because of injury. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2022 22:09:57 GMT
Don't agree. Think it serves its purpose and we already have a 3 team season rule What purpose does it serve? I also see no real point for the 3 team season rule either, especially not for young players or players who have been out because of injury. The obvious one. Obviously with the window it doesn't happen as much , teams getting to say a semi and loaning players etc but was an incident in the CL where a high profile player was released and not able to play for his new club in the semi which would have been unfair as his ex club eliminated. May have been Ronaldo mk 1 |
|
|
|
Post by kjpt140v on Feb 3, 2022 22:31:50 GMT
Bursik Smith Wilmott Moore Tymon Allen Thompson (but he’ll probably play Clucas) Powell Campbell Maja Wright Phillips Jeez, do your homework. |
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Feb 3, 2022 22:35:29 GMT
So to clarify Jagielka, Baker and Philogene-Bidace are cup tied but Moore is available? In which case...... Bonham Smith Moore Harwood-Bellis Fox Allen Thompson Clucas Wright-Phillips Maja Campbell Subs: Fielding, Wilmott, Chester, Tymon, Powell, Fletcher, Brown. Loving that front three. |
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Feb 3, 2022 23:39:39 GMT
Don't agree. Think it serves its purpose and we already have a 3 team season rule What’s the difference between the cup and the league? Why make the distinctions for the cup? I guess the logic is that in the cup you’ve been eliminated from the competition as a player and you shouldn’t be allowed to re-enter it with another team. To give an extreme example, imagine if Stoke beat Leeds in the cup, then Newcastle buy Leeds’ three best players and we have to play Newcastle in the next round. Is it fair we have to face them again? Or alternatively players haven’t been eliminated and are on a good run with a smallish team, but another team with a lot of resources fancies winning the cup, so buy up the talent from their potential knockout rivals. [admittedly the transfer window system negates a lot of this] It’s different for the league just because it works differently - you never get “eliminated” from the league. |
|
|
|
Post by hyaduck on Feb 4, 2022 2:04:54 GMT
Chester will be nailed on to start!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by cvillestokie on Feb 4, 2022 2:08:58 GMT
What purpose does it serve? I also see no real point for the 3 team season rule either, especially not for young players or players who have been out because of injury. The obvious one. Obviously with the window it doesn't happen as much , teams getting to say a semi and loaning players etc but was an incident in the CL where a high profile player was released and not able to play for his new club in the semi which would have been unfair as his ex club eliminated. May have been Ronaldo mk 1 The thing is, with young players etc, the advantage shouldn’t be as high. For example, say if we play Forrester now for one game because of suspensions, he won’t be able to go anywhere until next season. That’s just stupid. I don’t think there should be restrictions on players under a certain age/those who have played less than a certain amount of games/those who have come back from injury. Everyone wants clubs to be more sustainable, so limiting the number of restrictions on youth player travel should be a priority. |
|
