|
|
Post by fca47 on Aug 18, 2018 18:32:36 GMT
2- I'm sorry but anyone who starts with that midfield doesn't know what he is doing.
|
|
|
|
Post by loosestools on Aug 18, 2018 18:33:39 GMT
2 I reiterate - he is a fraud,
|
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Aug 18, 2018 18:34:20 GMT
Much better, finally felt like we were seeing a bit of future today - there's a long way to go, we're leaving acres of space at the back still and making too many unforced errors, but we had the character and quality to come back from behind twice and whatever Gary said at HT did a job.
I guess I'm also saying, realistically this is the first time we're truly rating Rowett rather than a man still trying to harness what was left from last season's shambled. So, my mark includes a bonus point for getting today's performance out of the lads after such a demoralising first two games:
8 from me
add * if you were there please
|
|
|
|
Post by Caerwrangonpotter on Aug 18, 2018 18:34:48 GMT
3...feeling generous
|
|
|
|
Post by takeshikovacs on Aug 18, 2018 18:36:40 GMT
5 - I think that team at least competed better than the previous 2 set-ups. His substitution worked almost immediately with Crouch getting the goal, so his substitutions made a positive impact.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stoke711 on Aug 18, 2018 18:36:45 GMT
0 - Fletcher?? No organisation, can't defend and can't attack, less said about the midfield the better. We just lump it and hope for the best.
|
|
|
|
Post by steakandchips on Aug 18, 2018 18:37:03 GMT
2. No identity, no game plan, no midfield runners, slow build up play with no end product. Glaring holes in the team and he wastes a loan on a RB.
|
|
|
|
Post by cdlstoke on Aug 18, 2018 18:37:49 GMT
1 worst stoke side for years.
|
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Aug 18, 2018 18:38:01 GMT
2
Fucking wank again!
H
|
|
|
|
Post by Clem Fandango on Aug 18, 2018 18:38:57 GMT
1- wtf was the plan?
|
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Aug 18, 2018 18:39:37 GMT
Why is Fletcher still playing?
Can't even be bothered to think of a number right now
|
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Aug 18, 2018 18:40:17 GMT
Either that was two different games we watched or there are some serious anger issues going on here....  |
|
|
|
Post by redrob on Aug 18, 2018 18:41:04 GMT
1 could go into a long an detailed analysis of why for the 3rd game in a row we were just god awful but's lets just leave it a one word. Fletcher
|
|
|
|
Post by krypto88 on Aug 18, 2018 18:42:05 GMT
6 - Subs are definitely questionable, but Crouch scored when he came on, yet GR leaves Fletcher on.
|
|
|
|
Post by wuzza on Aug 18, 2018 18:43:44 GMT
4 - acceptable result, fairly miserable performance.
|
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Aug 18, 2018 18:43:47 GMT
3 *
1 for berahino
1 for crouch
1 for finding the ground.
|
|
|
|
Post by cheadlepotter on Aug 18, 2018 18:45:12 GMT
3. We didn’t lose so it would be harsh to give him less but the selection of Fletcher and the substitution of Afobe was shocking. M
|
|
|
|
Post by viewfromthecrowsnest on Aug 18, 2018 18:45:30 GMT
3 for the first 60 mins
7 after putting Crouchie on.
Back to 3 taking Afobe off.
Overall 5
Still a lomg way off an 8 or 9
|
|
|
|
Post by GrahamHyde on Aug 18, 2018 18:46:13 GMT
1 worst stoke side for years. Obviously. How is that Rowett's fault? |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 18, 2018 18:47:54 GMT
Set up was a little iffy, the midfield lacks a lot of legs, but his changes changed the team around and we actually looked the better team for a little bit.
As we're rating the manager and not the players I'll go with a 6
|
|
|
|
Post by an348398 on Aug 18, 2018 18:48:39 GMT
4 -
Negatives - tactics muddled, persisting with Fletcher ahead of Etebo or Bojan is perplexing
Positives - Subs made a difference, finally giving Berahino a chance
|
|
|
|
Post by fortressbritannia on Aug 18, 2018 18:50:01 GMT
7
Midfield is still a massive issue however I feel like he made positive subs by bringing on Crouch and Diouf.
Still needs to find a proper DCM
|
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Aug 18, 2018 18:50:35 GMT
I am going to give him my highest mark of the season.
3.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2018 18:51:38 GMT
5
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr_DaftBurger on Aug 18, 2018 18:52:05 GMT
5 - I think that team at least competed better than the previous 2 set-ups. His substitution worked almost immediately with Crouch getting the goal, so his substitutions made a positive impact. A positive and then negative impact! 3 |
|
stokierich
Academy Starlet
"The Golden One"
Posts: 209 
|
Post by stokierich on Aug 18, 2018 18:55:00 GMT
2- You can see why Derby fans wanted rid of him. Doesn't seem any better than Lambert but have to give him till Christmas.
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 18, 2018 18:55:49 GMT
4 - Negatives - tactics muddled, persisting with Fletcher ahead of Etebo or Bojan is perplexing Positives - Subs made a difference, finally giving Berahino a chance Bojan wouldn't work in a midfield 2, I expect Clucas to be in there when fit. |
|
|
|
Post by 1982stokie on Aug 18, 2018 18:56:28 GMT
3 better than last two games but not good enough ,
Fletcher was absolutely awful again he offers nothing
Whatever. McLean is a very poor player but is at least mobile. At the moment promotion is out of the question
|
|
|
|
Post by pavel on Aug 18, 2018 18:59:25 GMT
2 - I’m to pissed off to go into detail but that was turgid, shapeless, clueless, tactically inept woefull hoof ball and done badly to boot.
|
|
|
|
Post by claytonscrubs on Aug 18, 2018 18:59:39 GMT
4
90 mins of Fletcher -2
= A very generous 2
|
|
