|
Post by davejohnno1 on Oct 31, 2016 22:35:02 GMT
Early on taylor goes through back of Shaq with what is a booking all day long even in the old days. No booking just a talking to. 5 minutes later Shaq departs injured.
Arnie wins ball cleanly in his only tackle of the game. Oliver is no more than 2 yards away. Foul and a booking. Arnie suspended for west ham.
What is it with this incompetent wanker? Fucking Oliver. I wanted to kill him for a few minutes.
Wonder if geoff123 can defend that?
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Oct 31, 2016 22:36:12 GMT
he is a total fookin weasel
|
|
|
Post by Boothen on Oct 31, 2016 22:39:26 GMT
They should just sack all the referees and clone Howard Webb. Maybe fuck around with the DNA too and give him four arms, six legs and eyes in the back of his head.
|
|
|
Post by CalgaryPotter on Oct 31, 2016 22:39:48 GMT
Nothing more than a dog's pizzle.
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Oct 31, 2016 22:40:29 GMT
Early on taylor goes through back of Shaq with what is a booking all day long even in the old days. No booking just a talking to. 5 minutes later Shaq departs injured. Arnie wins ball cleanly in his only tackle of the game. Oliver is no more than 2 yards away. Foul and a booking. Arnie suspended for west ham. What is it with this incompetent wanker? Fucking Oliver. I wanted to kill him for a few minutes. Wonder if geoff123 can defend that? For me he's one of the worst refs in the PL yet the media seem to love him. He's just got that really smarmy way about him.
|
|
|
Post by jerrythesaint on Oct 31, 2016 22:42:03 GMT
Completely agree, however tonight he had one saving grace...
At least he was consistently wank.
There were times I couldn't believe he hadn't given a foul against us, namely when Eric wrestled that chap to the floor in the first half and when Charlie basically caught the ball right in front of him.
So yes I agree he was crap, but at least crap for both sides!
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Oct 31, 2016 22:42:18 GMT
He wanted so much to give them that penalty! I guess he was very disappointed with his linesman too!
|
|
|
Post by chiefdelilah on Oct 31, 2016 22:42:33 GMT
They should just sack all the referees and clone Howard Webb. Maybe fuck around with the DNA too and give him four arms, six legs and eyes in the back of his head. I think they literally tried that with Anthony Taylor, it's just he got deflated somewhere along the cloning process.
|
|
|
Post by Fred Merger on Oct 31, 2016 22:42:33 GMT
I'm sure he must be Reg Hollis's lovechild from the bill!
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Oct 31, 2016 22:44:29 GMT
Complete cunt.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Oct 31, 2016 22:44:38 GMT
He wanted so much to give them that penalty! I guess he was very disappointed with his linesman too! He did give the penalty. He pointed to the spot instantly. Only the intervention of the linesman saw the correct decision given.
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Oct 31, 2016 22:46:38 GMT
He wanted so much to give them that penalty! I guess he was very disappointed with his linesman too! He did give the penalty. He pointed to the spot instantly. Only the intervention of the linesman saw the correct decision given. I noticed that too! Silly decision by Pieters anyway, could have cleared the ball early!
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Oct 31, 2016 22:47:32 GMT
He did give the penalty. He pointed to the spot instantly. Only the intervention of the linesman saw the correct decision given. I noticed that too! Silly decision by Pieters anyway, could have cleared the ball early! Indeed. Grant could and should have claimed the ball even before that.
|
|
|
Post by chiefdelilah on Oct 31, 2016 22:56:43 GMT
He wanted so much to give them that penalty! I guess he was very disappointed with his linesman too! By the letter of the law he should have given it I think?
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Oct 31, 2016 22:59:49 GMT
He wanted so much to give them that penalty! I guess he was very disappointed with his linesman too! By the letter of the law he should have given it I think? He did give it. Instantly and without a moments hesitation. Only the intervention of the linesman ensured that the correct decision was made.
|
|
|
Post by mattador78 on Oct 31, 2016 23:00:38 GMT
He wanted so much to give them that penalty! I guess he was very disappointed with his linesman too! By the letter of the law he should have given it I think? Not if the linesman is the one who flagged for the foul he would go from where the linesman called the offence
|
|
sevvy
Youth Player
Posts: 341
|
Post by sevvy on Oct 31, 2016 23:02:53 GMT
He wanted so much to give them that penalty! I guess he was very disappointed with his linesman too! By the letter of the law he should have given it I think? Not being awkward here Chief, but what is the letter of the law then? I always thought the fould was given at the point where it first occurred, not where it ended?
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Oct 31, 2016 23:03:09 GMT
He wanted so much to give them that penalty! I guess he was very disappointed with his linesman too! By the letter of the law he should have given it I think? You might be right, but when he didn't give a yellow for the challenge on Bards it really can be discussed. They also stopped two of our counter attacks with the hand in the second half without anything being given so maybe it was our turn with a decision?
|
|
|
Post by chiefdelilah on Oct 31, 2016 23:04:49 GMT
By the letter of the law he should have given it I think? Not if the linesman is the one who flagged for the foul he would go from where the linesman called the offence True, we don't know at what point the linesman started wave his flag. He'd have had to have been lighting to do it before it got into the box though!
|
|
|
Post by chiefdelilah on Oct 31, 2016 23:05:18 GMT
By the letter of the law he should have given it I think? Not being awkward here Chief, but what is the letter of the law then? I always thought the fould was given at the point where it first occurred, not where it ended? If an offence starts outside the area and carries on into it it's a penalty isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by Squeekster on Oct 31, 2016 23:06:05 GMT
He wanted so much to give them that penalty! I guess he was very disappointed with his linesman too! He did give the penalty. He pointed to the spot instantly. Only the intervention of the linesman saw the correct decision given. The linesman seem to flag and give us the free kick he defiantly flagged toward the boothen end as if giving the free kick our way. Again though never a yellow for Arnie but both him and Ryan walking a tight rope and I'd rather have Arnie at home for Bournemouth than West ham away.
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Oct 31, 2016 23:06:27 GMT
I don't often (!) moan about refs but he was soooo far off it tonight, pathetic.
|
|
sevvy
Youth Player
Posts: 341
|
Post by sevvy on Oct 31, 2016 23:07:38 GMT
Not being awkward here Chief, but what is the letter of the law then? I always thought the fould was given at the point where it first occurred, not where it ended? If an offence starts outside the area and carries on into it it's a penalty isn't it? That's what I'm asking you I always thought it was at the point of the first part of the foul is where the free kick/pen is given
|
|
|
Post by no1972 on Oct 31, 2016 23:07:45 GMT
Arnies booking was shit,the only reason I think he booked him was he warned him earlier when he jumped in twice and missed.If there fullback had pulled a Stoke player back in the same position and Oliver changed his decision this board would be in meltdown.And Taylor went through Bardesley .At least Arnie will have a rest till after the international break.
|
|
|
Post by chiefdelilah on Oct 31, 2016 23:09:54 GMT
If an offence starts outside the area and carries on into it it's a penalty isn't it? That's what I'm asking you I always thought it was at the point of the first part of the foul is where the free kick/pen is given 'If a defender starts holding an attacker outside the penalty area but continues holding inside the penalty area, the referee shall award a penalty kick.'
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Oct 31, 2016 23:14:14 GMT
Not being awkward here Chief, but what is the letter of the law then? I always thought the fould was given at the point where it first occurred, not where it ended? If an offence starts outside the area and carries on into it it's a penalty isn't it? I actually opened this thread to say this. Some may recall our 2-1 win over Liverpool in 2011 where Suarez won a penalty in the first few minutes. Ryan started to pull his shirt outside the box, and continued to do so as he burst into the box. Webb gave the penalty because the law says that if a foul starts outside the penalty area but continues into the area, it's a penalty. Oliver should have stuck to his guns, and actually made the right decision for once.
|
|
sevvy
Youth Player
Posts: 341
|
Post by sevvy on Oct 31, 2016 23:16:09 GMT
That's what I'm asking you I always thought it was at the point of the first part of the foul is where the free kick/pen is given 'If a defender starts holding an attacker outside the penalty area but continues holding inside the penalty area, the referee shall award a penalty kick.'[/quot You learn something every day, thanks Chief, but In that case I can't see why he hasn't overruled the lino then? Because that is exactly what happened isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by chiefdelilah on Oct 31, 2016 23:17:19 GMT
'If a defender starts holding an attacker outside the penalty area but continues holding inside the penalty area, the referee shall award a penalty kick.'[/quot You learn something every day, thanks Chief, but In that case I can't see why he hasn't overruled the lino then? Because that is exactly what happened isn't it? Because he's a complete spanner mate. About time we benefited from that!
|
|
sevvy
Youth Player
Posts: 341
|
Post by sevvy on Oct 31, 2016 23:23:27 GMT
Because he's a complete spanner mate. About time we benefited from that! True!
|
|
|
Post by werrington on Oct 31, 2016 23:25:55 GMT
We won easily 3:1
That was the moment Hughes should of nailed him in his post match interview as it could not be a sour grapes gripe
|
|