|
Post by sheikhmomo on Dec 10, 2015 0:27:24 GMT
Still dodging the point? I promise you no one will argue with you that your support for Pulis was unblemished by a single word of criticism and your tolerance of any suggestion by anyone that every single minute of his tenure was anything less than a glorious success story was absolutely zero. Yet a story recommending a bet on Stoke for relegation that is at complete odds with anything else in print regarding the outlook for the club and it is you starting a thread and not offering a word against it. Your only observation was to inform us that the author is a jolly decent chap. I look forward to your view of the next transfer window. I imagine that's your next hope to put the boot into the club. If only it was the Icelanders controlling the purse strings you could have a field day Mr Stoke City I posted it precisely because it was preposterous and his reasoning was preposterous. You are the only one who has made this spurious association because you are a) an agenda ridden mentalist or b) just a bit thick. And again I was the first by a day to post that wonderful Guardian article so you are lying. Again.
|
|
|
Post by crownmeking on Dec 10, 2015 0:32:08 GMT
If you say I did I have no doubt I did. If it offends you so much why have you made it your standard method of operating on this message board to hurl foul mouthed abuse at anyone who has a different opinion to you or dares to point out your wildly inconsistent and irrational stance. Just like you have above. I was simply gobsmacked that you would start this thread and have no word of criticism for the content or author. As I said you would never have tolerated such a view previously! And you fucking know it! You're a fucking hypocrite who deserted your football club. You abuse people constantly and also ban people. You know a bit like a hypocrite. I can say without fear of contradiction and with a full posting history as proof that I loved Pulis and he did a great job for Stoke City and I love Hughes and he's doing a great job for Stoke City. You cant say the same because you're mired in decade long agendas but still preach from the pulpit like a blazing hypocrite. I'll take my history on this board over yours any day of the fucking week. Yours is shameful. I have called you a cunt once or twice and have never been banned, funny that
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Dec 10, 2015 0:38:34 GMT
Still dodging the point? I promise you no one will argue with you that your support for Pulis was unblemished by a single word of criticism and your tolerance of any suggestion by anyone that every single minute of his tenure was anything less than a glorious success story was absolutely zero. Yet a story recommending a bet on Stoke for relegation that is at complete odds with anything else in print regarding the outlook for the club and it is you starting a thread and not offering a word against it. Your only observation was to inform us that the author is a jolly decent chap. I look forward to your view of the next transfer window. I imagine that's your next hope to put the boot into the club. If only it was the Icelanders controlling the purse strings you could have a field day Mr Stoke City I posted it precisely because it was preposterous and his reasoning was preposterous. You are the only one who has made this spurious association because you are a) an agenda ridden mentalist or b) just a bit thick. And again I was the first by a day to post that wonderful Guardian article so you are lying. Again. I must be a bit thick because I missed the bit where you branded it as preposterous? I spotted your defence of the author as soon as people clamoured to rubbish and pour scorn all over the proposition you had brought to everyone's attention. Are you sure it's me with the agenda? Perhaps I'm still being a bit thick.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Dec 10, 2015 0:44:10 GMT
I posted it precisely because it was preposterous and his reasoning was preposterous. You are the only one who has made this spurious association because you are a) an agenda ridden mentalist or b) just a bit thick. And again I was the first by a day to post that wonderful Guardian article so you are lying. Again. I must be a bit thick because I missed the bit where you branded it as preposterous? I spotted your defence of the author as soon as people clamoured to rubbish and pour scorn all over the proposition you had brought to everyone's attention. Are you sure it's me with the agenda? Perhaps I'm still being a bit thick. Yeah, you're just being as thick as pigshit. Think that's been more than clearly established,
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Dec 10, 2015 0:45:13 GMT
You're a fucking hypocrite who deserted your football club. You abuse people constantly and also ban people. You know a bit like a hypocrite. I can say without fear of contradiction and with a full posting history as proof that I loved Pulis and he did a great job for Stoke City and I love Hughes and he's doing a great job for Stoke City. You cant say the same because you're mired in decade long agendas but still preach from the pulpit like a blazing hypocrite. I'll take my history on this board over yours any day of the fucking week. Yours is shameful. I have called you a cunt once or twice and have never been banned, funny that That's because I am Contrary to mardarses claim I can't actually remember the last time I did anymore than suspend anyone for a day or two. Christ knows how long ago that was! I'm a serial thread merger though. Perhaps I've merged Sheikhs thread from the Guardian into the several versions already posted by others!!! How careless!
|
|
|
Post by crownmeking on Dec 10, 2015 1:12:38 GMT
I have called you a cunt once or twice and have never been banned, funny that That's because I am Contrary to mardarses claim I can't actually remember the last time I did anymore than suspend anyone for a day or two. Christ knows how long ago that was! I'm a serial thread merger though. Perhaps I've merged Sheikhs thread from the Guardian into the several versions already posted by others!!! How careless!
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Dec 10, 2015 3:32:08 GMT
I have called you a cunt once or twice and have never been banned, funny that That's because I am Contrary to mardarses claim I can't actually remember the last time I did anymore than suspend anyone for a day or two. Christ knows how long ago that was! I'm a serial thread merger though. Perhaps I've merged Sheikhs thread from the Guardian into the several versions already posted by others!!! How careless! I still haven't heard why my Costa-throwing-his-bib thread was consigned to the shit bin.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Dec 10, 2015 7:20:02 GMT
That's because I am Contrary to mardarses claim I can't actually remember the last time I did anymore than suspend anyone for a day or two. Christ knows how long ago that was! I'm a serial thread merger though. Perhaps I've merged Sheikhs thread from the Guardian into the several versions already posted by others!!! How careless! I still haven't heard why my Costa-throwing-his-bib thread was consigned to the shit bin. I'd imagine you once suggested Pulis wasn't infact the antichrist and Mark's fanny fell out.
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Dec 10, 2015 7:47:28 GMT
I still haven't heard why my Costa-throwing-his-bib thread was consigned to the shit bin. I'd imagine you once suggested Pulis wasn't infact the antichrist and Mark's fanny fell out. I imagine his view was fully supported by one of you other accounts that usually begin with a line such as " I think Sheikh has got this spot on ........" I do recall in fairness suspending you when one was used to abuse me and many others over a long period of time for not having the same opinion as Sheikh MoMo. You have a bloody cheek getting all indignant with me matey! As for the original question I assume one of the moderators felt that was where it belonged. I've no other idea as I've not seen the post.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Dec 10, 2015 7:50:30 GMT
I'd imagine you once suggested Pulis wasn't infact the antichrist and Mark's fanny fell out. I imagine his view was fully supported by one of you other accounts that usually begin with a line such as " I think Sheikh has got this spot on ........" I do recall in fairness suspending you when one was used to abuse me and many others over a long period of time for not having the same opinion as Sheikh MoMo. You have a bloody cheek getting all indignant with me matey! As for the original question I assume one of the moderators felt that was where it belonged. I've no other idea as I've not seen the post. YOU FUCKING LIAR.
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Dec 10, 2015 7:55:22 GMT
I think Sheikh has got this spot on.
|
|
|
Post by crownmeking on Dec 10, 2015 8:29:45 GMT
I think Sheikh has got this spot on. You're suspended, you cunt!!
|
|