|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2015 18:44:34 GMT
MVG is more defensive than N'Zonzi, though? Dutch journo I follow says he can play as a #10! The games I have seen he's more attacking than Fonzy.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Aug 6, 2015 18:47:14 GMT
Dutch journo I follow says he can play as a #10! The games I have seen he's more attacking than Fonzy. Everything I've read has said the exact same thing.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2015 18:49:48 GMT
The games I have seen he's more attacking than Fonzy. Everything I've read has said the exact same thing. My understanding was that Chelsea think he's more lampard than Fonzy.
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Aug 6, 2015 18:51:55 GMT
Should we change formation to give our makeshift defence a bit more cover
|
|
|
Post by wearepremierleague on Aug 6, 2015 18:54:15 GMT
Just seen that Vlaar still hasn't signed for anyone yet. Would you have him?
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Aug 6, 2015 18:55:46 GMT
Just seen that Vlaar still hasn't signed for anyone yet. Would you have him? Why? He may be out injured longer than Ryan!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2015 18:55:35 GMT
Just seen that Vlaar still hasn't signed for anyone yet. Would you have him? Injured mate.
|
|
|
Post by wearepremierleague on Aug 6, 2015 19:18:14 GMT
That'll be why then.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Aug 6, 2015 19:23:26 GMT
Dutch journo I follow says he can play as a #10! The games I have seen he's more attacking than Fonzy. Yep, you can't base everything on pre-season but I saw nothing that would suggest that the defensive side of his game was his main attribute.
|
|
|
Post by Old School Stokie on Aug 6, 2015 19:40:33 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks.
We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone.
Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2
|
|
|
Post by AlanHansen on Aug 6, 2015 19:42:30 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks. We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone. Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2 Are you on a wind up?
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Aug 6, 2015 19:43:08 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks. We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone. Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2 Worst post ever. Utter, utter crap.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2015 19:46:05 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks. We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone. Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2 You have made three points and I agree with none of them Not honest = nonsense Money for nothing = nonsense Can't pass = nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by stokiejoe on Aug 6, 2015 19:46:00 GMT
I wish Ryan was fully fit and playing, but he isn't. At least this forces the issue and will have to be addressed, not the best of circumstances for it to happen but over-reliance on one player is a formula for trouble.
Fortunately we are in a transfer window so all options are available.
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Aug 6, 2015 19:52:12 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks. We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone. Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2 5 months off on full pay
|
|
|
Post by ti on Aug 6, 2015 19:53:11 GMT
Absolutely terrible news. Let's hope our attacking players do the business while he's outbecause we haven't got much hope of defending well without Ryan.
|
|
|
Post by pedro23 on Aug 6, 2015 19:58:27 GMT
You win games by scoring more than the opposition, if these two key signings go our way, along with Bojan back I can see us scoring goals, 4 3 wins will do for me.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2015 20:01:20 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks. We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone. Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2 5 months off on full pay we know that's not right he would only get SSP surely
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Aug 6, 2015 20:02:54 GMT
5 months off on full pay we know that's not right he would only get SSP surely Does he need to bring sick notes in
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2015 20:05:10 GMT
we know that's not right he would only get SSP surely Does he need to bring sick notes in I swear I saw him in the Haymarket Health centre Tunstall picking it up so yes he does.
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Aug 6, 2015 20:07:43 GMT
For Ryan's sake and his long term career I'm just delighted he's getting the treatment he needs, and for SCFC, if this has to be then I'm glad it's at the start of the season not the business end, when chances are we'll need him most. Above all wishing Ryan a full (and speedy!) recovery, there's no single player we owe so much to.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2015 20:09:31 GMT
For Ryan's sake and his long term career I'm just delighted he's getting the treatment he needs, and for SCFC, if this has to be then I'm glad it's at the start of the season not the business end, when chances are we'll need him most. Above all wishing Ryan a full (and speedy!) recovery, there's no single player we owe so much to. Well said Sal, he's a top fella and I hope he get's well soon
|
|
|
Post by hartzchoco on Aug 6, 2015 20:15:02 GMT
I can't tell if this is an omen and surely means yet another season of being brutally bent over by the injury bug......... or it's not an omen because this is more of a pre-existing condition. Can I get a ruling on this?
|
|
|
Post by AlanHansen on Aug 6, 2015 20:20:03 GMT
I can't tell if this is an omen and surely means yet another season of being brutally bent over by the injury bug......... or it's not an omen because this is more of a pre-existing condition. Can I get a ruling on this? Isn't Bardsley injured too?
|
|
|
Post by slpmarc on Aug 6, 2015 20:25:25 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks. We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone. Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2 WOW Ryan has not had a week off, he has been in Claytonwood all off season working on trying to get fit. There is being cynical and there is being a knob
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Aug 6, 2015 20:27:14 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks. We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone. Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2 WOW Ryan has not had a week off, he has been in Claytonwood all off season working on trying to get fit. There is being cynical and there is being a knob Any plans for a new defender?
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Aug 6, 2015 20:28:12 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks. We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone. Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2 Possibly the biggest pile of shite I've ever seen on here and that's saying something.
|
|
|
Post by st4scfc on Aug 6, 2015 20:30:23 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks. We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone. Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2 agree with benteke getting a couple against our backline but the shawcross stuff is bollocks, hes club captain and a model professional
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2015 20:37:23 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks. We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone. Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2 You should be ashamed of that post.
|
|
|
Post by slother on Aug 6, 2015 20:41:50 GMT
I know it's been said in this post but just catching up. Unbelievable that on 6 August a decision like that made. Has shawcross not been completely honest so he could have a summer off then another couple of months. So while getting mega bucks he has or will be off for four to five months on full pay. Maybe synical thinking but to me it stinks. We might be better off without him anyway. Can't pass a ball to save his life. Not scoring from set pieces but has let in more since Pulis has gone. Stoke 1 Liverpool 3 - Benteke 2 "That's OUT of order", says Dickie.
|
|