|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2014 9:31:01 GMT
No that isn't the fact of the matter. It's a bollocks oversimplification, just like "you're only as good as your last game' which is also a load of shit. He's a good manager up to a certain level. Like Hodgson and Hughes. He has had 9 months worth of last games, during this time he has got consistently worse after 9 months in a job you would expect to get better surely, that's why I alluded to your last job it's not as if he has only struggled lately is it, should have stayed within his comfort zone where he was not expected to be competing for honours, he deserved the sack and he got it end of to suggest otherwise is quite frankly bollocks. I'm not saying he didn't deserve the sack. He patently did. He was clearly the wrong man from the job from the start. My point is that he can't be blamed for taking it because if everyone stayed in their 'comfort zone' nobody would achieve anything and if you can't back yourself, even in the face of probable failure and doubters, you shouldn't be managing a lads and dads side never mind a Premier League one. As far as 9 months of last games goes, one bad job doesn't make you unemployable as all the examples I stated makes more than clear.
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Apr 26, 2014 9:34:27 GMT
Peter Schmeichel suggesting that Steve Bruce would be an ideal manager to succeed David Moyes?
|
|
|
Post by lastoftheldk on Apr 26, 2014 11:01:17 GMT
First thing he should do would be to get rid of the 92 gang
and come on Norwich, beat the shit today
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Apr 26, 2014 11:02:34 GMT
(The) Shit bin?
|
|