|
Post by boskampsflaps on Feb 23, 2013 17:17:27 GMT
Do you think the percentage would be that much different if every season ticket holder was canvassed? Genuine question. Yeh I think so tbh, it would be close but I think there would be more to keep him as manager.
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Feb 23, 2013 17:18:03 GMT
I'm sure many of them would be frustrated with him but that's not the same thing. And then there's a small percentage that have an underwhelming love for the capped one. 39,800 vs 200. ;D ;D ;D And the biggest laugh is that the turgid 200 think that by shouting loud and often their nonsense will have some credence.
|
|
|
Post by johnsmithsupper on Feb 23, 2013 17:19:02 GMT
Get them cards back, hg was wrong at that time but its right now
|
|
|
Post by skip on Feb 23, 2013 17:19:21 GMT
His tactics baffle me, we may as well not have a midfield ^ +1
|
|
|
Post by johnsmithsupper on Feb 23, 2013 17:20:09 GMT
And then there's a small percentage that have an underwhelming love for the capped one. 39,800 vs 200. ;D ;D ;D And the biggest laugh is that the turgid 200 think that by shouting loud and often their nonsense will have some credence. March I was ashamed watching that today utterly ashamed, who takes responsibility?
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on Feb 23, 2013 17:21:00 GMT
It's only in here that I actually here positives about pulis, and that's from the obsessed rimtards above.
|
|
|
Post by jbstokie on Feb 23, 2013 17:23:20 GMT
And then there's a small percentage that have an underwhelming love for the capped one. 39,800 vs 200. ;D ;D ;D And the biggest laugh is that the turgid 200 think that by shouting loud and often their nonsense will have some credence. Unless you show the statistics for the 39,800 who have said they want Pulis to stay then be quiet.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Feb 23, 2013 17:23:41 GMT
Do you think the percentage would be that much different if every season ticket holder was canvassed? Genuine question. Yeh I think so tbh, it would be close but I think there would be more to keep him as manager. It'd be close you say, so somewhere around 50/50 then, maybe a bit more one way or a bit more the other way. Don't you find that absolutely incredible considering that we currently sit 10th in the Prem? Is it becasue 50% of Stoke City supporters are thick as fook, or might there actually be something about the manager that transcends our league position?
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Feb 23, 2013 17:26:36 GMT
39,800 vs 200. ;D ;D ;D And the biggest laugh is that the turgid 200 think that by shouting loud and often their nonsense will have some credence. Unless you show the statistics for the 39,800 who have said they want Pulis to stay then be quiet. 40,000 people were asked if they wanted TP out. 200 said they did. It's hard to take isn't it that you are in a minority so tiny your views are fun to debate but don't carry an ounce of credence.
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Feb 23, 2013 17:28:14 GMT
Unless you show the statistics for the 39,800 who have said they want Pulis to stay then be quiet. 40,000 people were asked if they wanted TP out. 200 said they did. It's hard to take isn't it that you are in a minority so tiny your views are fun to debate but don't carry an ounce of credence. Link? No thought not.
|
|
|
Post by philm87 on Feb 23, 2013 17:28:27 GMT
Honestly yes. I would be amazed if that many people wanted him out. I'm sure many of them would be frustrated with him but that's not the same thing. Honestly yes? What do you think the 'real' figure is likely to be? Of all Stoke fans? That would be tens of thousands of people... so I have no idea. If the question was do you want Pulis out now I would be genuinely surprised if more than say 25% said yes (just my opinion though). If the question was would you be happy with Pulis stepping aside at the end of the season for a manager with a proven track record at this level (not a Championship upstart) then it would be interesting to see. Either way we will probably never know and a poll on an internet message board in which about 200 odd people take part isn't going to make it any clearer.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 23, 2013 17:28:41 GMT
Unless you show the statistics for the 39,800 who have said they want Pulis to stay then be quiet. 40,000 people were asked if they wanted TP out. 200 said they did. It's hard to take isn't it that you are in a minority so tiny your views are fun to debate but don't carry an ounce of credence. Erm, this site has 13,667 members? And it's in a section no fooker bothers with.
|
|
|
Post by SCFC92 on Feb 23, 2013 17:29:13 GMT
Unless you show the statistics for the 39,800 who have said they want Pulis to stay then be quiet. 40,000 people were asked if they wanted TP out. 200 said they did. It's hard to take isn't it that you are in a minority so tiny your views are fun to debate but don't carry an ounce of credence. Such a WUM ;D There are about 200 regular posters on the forum, then the people who actually just look and not posts.. in no way was it asked to 40,000 people... 300 have voted.. 2 in 3 of those 300 have voted for Pulis out.
|
|
|
Post by jbstokie on Feb 23, 2013 17:29:27 GMT
Unless you show the statistics for the 39,800 who have said they want Pulis to stay then be quiet. 40,000 people were asked if they wanted TP out. 200 said they did. It's hard to take isn't it that you are in a minority so tiny your views are fun to debate but don't carry an ounce of credence. 40,000 people were asked if they wanted TP in. 101 said they did.
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Feb 23, 2013 17:30:47 GMT
40,000 people were asked if they wanted TP out. 200 said they did. It's hard to take isn't it that you are in a minority so tiny your views are fun to debate but don't carry an ounce of credence. Erm, this site has 13,667 members? And it's in a section no fooker bothers with. The poll was bounced to the top of the board repeatedly bayern. Even out of 13,667, 200 is a laughable number. And the biggest laugh is the 200 keep egging each other on.
|
|
|
Post by philm87 on Feb 23, 2013 17:31:52 GMT
40,000 people were asked if they wanted TP out. 200 said they did. It's hard to take isn't it that you are in a minority so tiny your views are fun to debate but don't carry an ounce of credence. Erm, this site has 13,667 members? And it's in a section no fooker bothers with. Hence it's pretty meaningless. It doesn't really strengthen anyone's point of view either way.
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Feb 23, 2013 17:33:25 GMT
Erm, this site has 13,667 members? And it's in a section no fooker bothers with. Hence it's pretty meaningless. It doesn't really strengthen anyone's point of view either way. Really You don't think 200 registering their point and the other 13,467 watching in amusement proves anything at all?
|
|
|
Post by poethebald on Feb 23, 2013 17:33:39 GMT
Another constructive post.We are all frustrated by the away performances....but must the same old tripe be posted over and over again :-\
|
|
|
Post by spongebobflathead on Feb 23, 2013 17:34:01 GMT
Unless you show the statistics for the 39,800 who have said they want Pulis to stay then be quiet. 40,000 people were asked if they wanted TP out. 200 said they did. It's hard to take isn't it that you are in a minority so tiny your views are fun to debate but don't carry an ounce of credence. ;D ;D So by this reasoning march, about 0.25 % of our supporters want to keep him , A massive backing
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 23, 2013 17:35:15 GMT
Erm, this site has 13,667 members? And it's in a section no fooker bothers with. Hence it's pretty meaningless. It doesn't really strengthen anyone's point of view either way. I don't see how if 5000 voted it'd be meaningless. Polls on matters such as government have smaller numbers! Are some MP's are voted in with less votes? ;D 300 people voting is a pretty bad indicator I agree. But I think even if it was 50-50 in real and I suspect it would be, that's more than enough for him to be sodded off imo. You can't have a football club with that much division in it.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Feb 23, 2013 17:35:47 GMT
Honestly yes? What do you think the 'real' figure is likely to be? Of all Stoke fans? That would be tens of thousands of people... so I have no idea. If the question was do you want Pulis out now I would be genuinely surprised if more than say 25% said yes (just my opinion though). If the question was would you be happy with Pulis stepping aside at the end of the season for a manager with a proven track record at this level (not a Championship upstart) then it would be interesting to see. Either way we will probably never know and a poll on an internet message board in which about 200 odd people take part isn't going to make it any clearer. Whatever the actual figure, I think there is no doubt that a very sizeable proportion of season ticket holders wouldn't be devastated if TP moved on at the end of the season. And I think that is quite incredible considering our current league position and where we've finished over the last four seasons. People from Stoke-on-Trent aren't unusually thicker than people from the rest of the country, so there is something else afoot here.
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Feb 23, 2013 17:36:55 GMT
40,000 people were asked if they wanted TP out. 200 said they did. It's hard to take isn't it that you are in a minority so tiny your views are fun to debate but don't carry an ounce of credence. ;D ;D So by this reasoning about march about 0.25 % of our supporters want to keep him , A massive backing Silence implies consent in law, bayern. Only the moaners respond in a protest vote. There are 200 of them - end of story.
|
|
|
Post by jbstokie on Feb 23, 2013 17:39:17 GMT
;D ;D So by this reasoning about march about 0.25 % of our supporters want to keep him , A massive backing Silence implies consent in law, bayern. Only the moaners respond in a protest vote. There are 200 of them - end of story. Good thing this a football forum and not law then.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 23, 2013 17:39:28 GMT
;D ;D So by this reasoning about march about 0.25 % of our supporters want to keep him , A massive backing Silence implies consent in law, bayern. Only the moaners respond in a protest vote. There are 200 of them - end of story. I'm sorry march that's clearly crap as 100 people have voted him in! And it's in the arse end of nowhere as this forum goes, it should be in this bit and I think it'd get 1000 votes easy. A lot of people also don't know. Until the Wigan I wasn't sure but that was it for me. He has to go.
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Feb 23, 2013 17:41:27 GMT
Silence implies consent in law, bayern. Only the moaners respond in a protest vote. There are 200 of them - end of story. I'm sorry march that's clearly crap as 100 people have voted him in! And it's in the arse end of nowhere as this forum goes, it should be in this bit and I think it'd get 1000 votes easy. A lot of people also don't know. Until the Wigan I wasn't sure but that was it for me. He has to go. We'll have to agree to disagree then, mate.
|
|
|
Post by philm87 on Feb 23, 2013 17:42:04 GMT
Hence it's pretty meaningless. It doesn't really strengthen anyone's point of view either way. Really You don't think 200 registering their point and the other 13,467 watching in amusement proves anything at all? I think the vast majority of those 13,000 probably didn't even notice. Plus there will be thousands who never come on here anyway.
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Feb 23, 2013 17:44:10 GMT
Really You don't think 200 registering their point and the other 13,467 watching in amusement proves anything at all? I think the vast majority of those 13,000 probably didn't even notice. Plus there will be thousands who never come on here anyway. Excuses, excuses. The turgid 200 !!
|
|
|
Post by philm87 on Feb 23, 2013 17:44:36 GMT
Hence it's pretty meaningless. It doesn't really strengthen anyone's point of view either way. I don't see how if 5000 voted it'd be meaningless. Polls on matters such as government have smaller numbers! Are some MP's are voted in with less votes? ;D 300 people voting is a pretty bad indicator I agree. But I think even if it was 50-50 in real and I suspect it would be, that's more than enough for him to be sodded off imo. You can't have a football club with that much division in it. You are joking right? A poll on an internet forum in which about 300 people participate showing a 50-50 split in support is sufficient evidence of supporter disunity to warrant sacking your manager when you are 10th in the Premier League? I know we we're shite today. I have no idea why Jones wasn't playing but come on...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2013 17:45:44 GMT
I think the vast majority of those 13,000 probably didn't even notice. Plus there will be thousands who never come on here anyway. Excuses, excuses. The turgid 200 !! I bet you a bourbon that there are more than 200 people wanting Pulis Out.
|
|
|
Post by philm87 on Feb 23, 2013 17:46:23 GMT
Of all Stoke fans? That would be tens of thousands of people... so I have no idea. If the question was do you want Pulis out now I would be genuinely surprised if more than say 25% said yes (just my opinion though). If the question was would you be happy with Pulis stepping aside at the end of the season for a manager with a proven track record at this level (not a Championship upstart) then it would be interesting to see. Either way we will probably never know and a poll on an internet message board in which about 200 odd people take part isn't going to make it any clearer. Whatever the actual figure, I think there is no doubt that a very sizeable proportion of season ticket holders wouldn't be devastated if TP moved on at the end of the season. And I think that is quite incredible considering our current league position and where we've finished over the last four seasons. People from Stoke-on-Trent aren't unusually thicker than people from the rest of the country, so there is something else afoot here. Yeah I would suspect that too. They wouldn't be devastated. Not the same thing as them wanting him out though. It would also depend on who the replacement was.
|
|