|
|
Post by roro on Aug 19, 2012 9:37:19 GMT
Firstly I will admit TP has always frustrated me and most probably will continue to do so until the day he leaves. Many of the away trips me and my mates travel home and suggest suitable replacements and this morning after reading the Peter Crouch thread (4411 role), has got me thinking who would I replace him with? I asked myself would I be happy if we were to replace TP with Harry Rednapp? I hate to say this, but yes! I would very happy and I'm not Harry's biggest fan. Infact I was more than happy when Roy got the England job over Harry, but I just feel someone like Harry Rednapp would be a breath of fresh air, something we desperately need right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Aug 19, 2012 9:38:08 GMT
No. Next.
|
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Aug 19, 2012 9:38:38 GMT
No no no.
In other words NO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bick on Aug 19, 2012 9:39:12 GMT
For his management ability yes.
For his ability to financially ruin clubs no.
I'll settle on no.
|
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Aug 19, 2012 9:40:46 GMT
He has more respect in the game, he taught TP all he didn't know and even though he is a dodgy yoth, he's likeable.
The fact is though Redknapp would need 100 mill minimum to bring in the players he would need to play the football he plays.
No chance
H
|
|
|
|
Post by exiledstokie on Aug 19, 2012 9:41:40 GMT
Top manager, miles better than Pulis.
|
|
|
|
Post by spongebobflathead on Aug 19, 2012 9:43:35 GMT
No , would not entertain it !
|
|
|
|
Post by jonah77 on Aug 19, 2012 9:45:13 GMT
For his management ability yes. For his ability to financially ruin clubs no. I'll settle on no. It wasn't really Harry that ruined these clubs,he just asked for certain players.It was the chairmen and boards that sanctioned the deals that broke the clubs. |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Aug 19, 2012 9:45:16 GMT
Top manager, miles better than Pulis. RAF is right here mate. It would be a great ride with Harry for 2 or 3 years, but the fallout afterwards could be extremely scary. Uncle Peter did try to get Harry for manager before we appointed Lou, so who knows what might happen? |
|
|
|
Post by mattface on Aug 19, 2012 9:52:07 GMT
Not in this life time or the next - no one can waste money the way Harry can
|
|
|
|
Post by carnubarnagra on Aug 19, 2012 9:55:11 GMT
IF we had to have anyone else then I would consider it, but like other posters, he has a history of leaving deficit in his wake. However, as also posted, I think Coates would manage this.
Turn the question on its head, who would you have otherwise? Every other manager has their issues.
|
|
|
|
Post by dadofsam on Aug 19, 2012 9:57:23 GMT
Harry has already sowed the seeds of our downfall last transfer window
|
|
|
|
Post by howedy on Aug 19, 2012 9:57:34 GMT
I was thinking the same thing whilst at work this morning. It is obvious what pulis has done for the club has been nothing short of brilliant. But at the same time we can't forget how much Coates has thrown at the club to develop us and ultimately promote us. The question is, would other managers have been able to get us into the position we are in now with the same funding....
Putting my tin hat on now and saying that a fair few other managers could have done what pulis has done over the last 6 years. And, I think Harry rednapp would improve us......sorry if that pisses anyone off, just my opinion
|
|
|
|
Post by howedy on Aug 19, 2012 10:00:34 GMT
Also, did someone just say wasting money?
Tonge
Soares
Arismendi
Palacios (at the moment)
And many more...
|
|
|
|
Post by pretzel on Aug 19, 2012 10:01:43 GMT
no one can waste money the way Harry can I can think of someone |
|
|
|
Post by StokieBoy31 on Aug 19, 2012 10:02:14 GMT
Yes I would, I like Harry he's a good manager. But we have TP here at the moment (who has done a brilliant job at Stoke) and he isn't going to go anywhere soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by potterpaul on Aug 19, 2012 10:23:18 GMT
Not for me
|
|
|
|
Post by ragbone82 on Aug 19, 2012 10:24:34 GMT
You know i dont really like harry the crook ro ro but i would defo take him over TP. I would take Hope Powell over TP the money we spend to watch the rubbish he serves up is just stupid. I really hope coates gives him a kick up the backside its not good enough. Cap is crap  |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Aug 19, 2012 10:27:39 GMT
No
|
|
|
|
Post by roro on Aug 19, 2012 10:31:06 GMT
Hope Powell Barmy Army!! Could you imagine that.... surely things aren't that bad Ragbone! Haha....
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Aug 19, 2012 10:34:26 GMT
No, far to successful for Stoke City fans. Plucky Stoke need to be in their place - we know our expectations don't we Tony?
In other words, I'd have him in a flash.
|
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Aug 19, 2012 10:39:57 GMT
All Day long.
|
|
|
|
Post by Etain Tur-Mukan on Aug 19, 2012 10:41:35 GMT
No way.
Even with a new manager, the moaning bastards would soon be moaning again about something anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by hoofmagic on Aug 19, 2012 10:43:48 GMT
100% YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS please let it happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on Aug 19, 2012 10:45:23 GMT
No - Harry needs loads of money to be successful. At clubs similar to us, West Ham and Southampton he didn't do much. He needs a top 4 club. Conversely TP would be an absolute disaster at a big club. He can't spend big money, we have big transfer fees sitting on our bench week in and week out, money that could have strengthened the team as a whole.
|
|
|
|
Post by ragbone82 on Aug 19, 2012 10:48:07 GMT
Hope Powell Barmy Army!! Could you imagine that.... surely things aren't that bad Ragbone! Haha.... told you i would take steve kean over tp and his caveman style of play |
|
|
|
Post by jbstokie on Aug 19, 2012 10:52:22 GMT
Coates wants Stoke to become self sufficient, that certainly would not happen under Redknapp.
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Aug 19, 2012 10:56:50 GMT
No - Harry needs loads of money to be successful. At clubs similar to us, West Ham and Southampton he didn't do much. He needs a top 4 club. Conversely TP would be an absolute disaster at a big club. He can't spend big money, we have big transfer fees sitting on our bench week in and week out, money that could have strengthened the team as a whole. He did a lot at those two clubs. Look at what happened to them financially after he left  |
|
|
|
Post by Stokie Mcpot on Aug 19, 2012 10:56:54 GMT
No, not Harry. As much as I actually like him, he wouldn't do any good for us.
Were we to get another manager our entire squad and some of the management staff would have to have an entire overhaul. It would be quite an effort to correct our style of play.
|
|
|
|
Post by dieguito88 on Aug 19, 2012 11:12:05 GMT
I don't know sincerely. Good manager but he spend a lot in players. I think he will left us with big financial trouble (Pompeys).
|
|
