|
Post by Pugsley on Aug 19, 2012 11:16:03 GMT
No, far to successful for Stoke City fans. Plucky Stoke need to be in their place - we know our expectations don't we Tony? In other words, I'd have him in a flash. Why do you think you can speak for all Stoke fans. For me Yes I'd take him here provided we could tightly regulate his spending as Coates is doing this season. I don't, just like TP doesn't (although he thinks he does) Imagine what Redknapp would have done with the 84million.
|
|
StokieWill
Academy Starlet
Huth, there it is!
Posts: 241
|
Post by StokieWill on Aug 19, 2012 11:19:48 GMT
Im sure Harry wouldnt spend a lot of money if the chairman wasnt offering a lot to him?? just a thought
|
|
|
Post by fishlovesoatcakes on Aug 19, 2012 11:20:44 GMT
I have just howled with laughter. Anyone who would seriously really prefer TP to HR needs their head looking at. That, or you don't enjoy watching fast flowing, entertaining football. We played well for 30 minutes yesterday and threw 2 points away to a very poor side. The footy last season was also dreadful. But hey, what do I know...
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Aug 19, 2012 11:20:54 GMT
No, not Harry. As much as I actually like him, he wouldn't do any good for us. Were we to get another manager our entire squad and some of the management staff would have to have an entire overhaul. It would be quite an effort to correct our style of play. We will bring in Megson. Nothing will change.
|
|
|
Post by yogibear78 on Aug 19, 2012 11:33:37 GMT
Firstly I will admit TP has always frustrated me and most probably will continue to do so until the day he leaves. Many of the away trips me and my mates travel home and suggest suitable replacements and this morning after reading the Peter Crouch thread (4411 role), has got me thinking who would I replace him with? I asked myself would I be happy if we were to replace TP with Harry Rednapp? I hate to say this, but yes! I would very happy and I'm not Harry's biggest fan. Infact I was more than happy when Roy got the England job over Harry, but I just feel someone like Harry Rednapp would be a breath of fresh air, something we desperately need right now. We should of done it at the end of last season with a load of players out of contract. Pulis has done a fine job but his flaws are undeniable.
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Aug 19, 2012 11:45:32 GMT
I have just howled with laughter. Anyone who would seriously really prefer TP to HR needs their head looking at. That, or you don't enjoy watching fast flowing, entertaining football. We played well for 30 minutes yesterday and threw 2 points away to a very poor side. The footy last season was also dreadful. But hey, what do I know... Not much. If Redknapp is so good, why did Spurs sack him?
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Aug 19, 2012 11:47:08 GMT
I have just howled with laughter. Anyone who would seriously really prefer TP to HR needs their head looking at. That, or you don't enjoy watching fast flowing, entertaining football. We played well for 30 minutes yesterday and threw 2 points away to a very poor side. The footy last season was also dreadful. But hey, what do I know... Not much. If Redknapp is so good, why did Spurs sack him? Why did Soton, Pompey and Wham go into financial meltdown when he left. Spurs aren't looking too clever either.
|
|
|
Post by yogibear78 on Aug 19, 2012 11:49:45 GMT
Fulham made an inspired managerial signing in Martin Jol. We really should attempt to temp David Moyes with a big wod of money to spend!
|
|
|
Post by jbstokie on Aug 19, 2012 11:51:25 GMT
Not much. If Redknapp is so good, why did Spurs sack him? Why did Soton, Pompey and Wham go into financial meltdown when he left. Spurs aren't looking too clever either. Spurs will be fine under Levy.
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Aug 19, 2012 11:53:44 GMT
Not much. If Redknapp is so good, why did Spurs sack him? Why did Soton, Pompey and Wham go into financial meltdown when he left. Spurs aren't looking too clever either. Maybe the dodgy tw*t fleeced them to build up his dog's bank account.
|
|
|
Post by yogibear78 on Aug 19, 2012 11:58:18 GMT
It's only a matter of time before West Ham ditch Allardyce for Redknapp because of their love of the beautiful game. This is when we should strike for Allardyce imoif Moyes really is out of the equation. He may be simalar to TP but more tactically aware and does buy technically good players.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2012 12:07:00 GMT
Id swap him for Harry Henderson right now!!
|
|
|
Post by borat on Aug 19, 2012 12:08:49 GMT
I have just howled with laughter. Anyone who would seriously really prefer TP to HR needs their head looking at. That, or you don't enjoy watching fast flowing, entertaining football. We played well for 30 minutes yesterday and threw 2 points away to a very poor side. The footy last season was also dreadful. But hey, what do I know... This, this and fucking this.
|
|
|
Post by wingy11 on Aug 19, 2012 12:24:39 GMT
Maybe as a number 2!! Give pulis some fresh ideas
|
|
|
Post by stokeramblers on Aug 19, 2012 12:27:53 GMT
It's only a matter of time before West Ham ditch Allardyce for Redknapp because of their love of the beautiful game. This is when we should strike for Allardyce imoif Moyes really is out of the equation. He may be simalar to TP but more tactically aware and does buy technically good players. Think you're right about Allardyce. He could work with the type of players we have. Slight advantage in that he is better in the transfer market and he gives youngsters a chance. Underrated in my opinion and he'll 'unfairly' get the boot from West Ham at some point. Must go for a lie down, agreeing with Yogi is a little strange!
|
|
|
Post by fishlovesoatcakes on Aug 19, 2012 12:30:05 GMT
I have just howled with laughter. Anyone who would seriously really prefer TP to HR needs their head looking at. That, or you don't enjoy watching fast flowing, entertaining football. We played well for 30 minutes yesterday and threw 2 points away to a very poor side. The footy last season was also dreadful. But hey, what do I know... Not much. If Redknapp is so good, why did Spurs sack him? You tell me. Point taken, I would much rather watch football under TP - it's so exciting.
|
|
|
Post by jarvinski on Aug 19, 2012 12:32:45 GMT
no brainer
|
|
|
Post by banburypotter on Aug 19, 2012 12:38:13 GMT
Absofuckinglutely
|
|
|
Post by Trouserdog on Aug 19, 2012 13:08:14 GMT
What the fuck is this bollocks about Redknapp being responsible for a club's financial plight?
It's not his job to work out an entire club's finances is it?!!! He'll have been given a transfer budget to work to, and may have then spent that money. (usually very effectively in terms of improving the team)
If the budget was wrong, or the board just gave him a free hand to spend what he wants to, then whose fucking fault is that?
Jesus Christ.
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Aug 19, 2012 13:29:05 GMT
Surely Harry is off to Southampton some time around fireworks night?
Southampton were by my reckoning about the 9th best club in the Championship last season, lumberingly unconvincing in fact.
Nice easy commute from Sandbanks, familiar surroundings, decent budget...
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Aug 19, 2012 13:31:46 GMT
What the fuck is this bollocks about Redknapp being responsible for a club's financial plight? It's not his job to work out an entire club's finances is it?!!! He'll have been given a transfer budget to work to, and may have then spent that money. (usually very effectively in terms of improving the team) If the budget was wrong, or the board just gave him a free hand to spend what he wants to, then whose fucking fault is that? Jesus Christ. No Trousers, it's because he's such a crook , he will have hacked into the chairmans bank account and stolen it for his dog! according to some geniuses on here. H
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 19, 2012 13:44:46 GMT
If Pulis was to go I'd be more than happy if we got Harry in, great manager.
|
|
|
Post by slother on Aug 19, 2012 13:53:40 GMT
I wonder if it isn't time for a change. TP needs a statue and a stand naming after him but for me he's failing to take this opportunity, innovate and prove that he has any more to give.
I'm not a hater. I realise that change is inherently risky. But a long life isn't worth a damn if it wasn't worth living.
Sent from my HTC One S using proboards
|
|
|
Post by bloodtypered on Aug 19, 2012 13:55:46 GMT
BIN
|
|
|
Post by slother on Aug 19, 2012 14:03:22 GMT
Bloody hell can we not discuss things in a rational, measured way without the stasi getting upset? The club is separate from the team, the manager and even the board, and it is the club which I support. Sent from my HTC One S using proboards
|
|
|
Post by gearoid1 on Aug 19, 2012 14:17:08 GMT
Take one look at Portsmouth now. Harry ran that club into the ground by signing players on massive wages like utaka and kanu and it wasn't sustainable. They are now paying for his recklessness. He can stay well away IMO
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Aug 19, 2012 14:19:00 GMT
Take one look at Portsmouth now. Harry ran that club into the ground by signing players on massive wages like utaka and kanu and it wasn't sustainable. They are now paying for his recklessness. He can stay well away IMO And who gave him the money? Like it has already been said, he didn't have a gun to the chairmans head to give him the money. They could have said no. H
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 19, 2012 14:20:19 GMT
Take one look at Portsmouth now. Harry ran that club into the ground by signing players on massive wages like utaka and kanu and it wasn't sustainable. They are now paying for his recklessness. He can stay well away IMO The owners gave him the money, he just spent what he was given, why can't people get this.
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Aug 19, 2012 14:21:35 GMT
Take one look at Portsmouth now. Harry ran that club into the ground by signing players on massive wages like utaka and kanu and it wasn't sustainable. They are now paying for his recklessness. He can stay well away IMO I'll tell you something, you get your money's worth with Harry. Not only does he Manage and coach the team, he's the Chairman, the CE and the FD.
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Aug 19, 2012 14:24:11 GMT
What the fuck is this bollocks about Redknapp being responsible for a club's financial plight? It's not his job to work out an entire club's finances is it?!!! He'll have been given a transfer budget to work to, and may have then spent that money. (usually very effectively in terms of improving the team) If the budget was wrong, or the board just gave him a free hand to spend what he wants to, then whose fucking fault is that? Jesus Christ. No Trousers, it's because he's such a crook , he will have hacked into the chairmans bank account and stolen it for his dog! according to some geniuses on here. H If you took my comment seriously, you're a bigger dick than your posts suggest.
|
|