|
Post by manmarking on Aug 31, 2017 21:41:59 GMT
You can't talk to your stalkers followers like that
Fuck him. He's not on here for the right reasons fel Go on then, fraise, let's hear it: what, pray tell, are the right reasons for posting on here? Ironically, you're remarkably like the EU, aren't you. God forbid anyone should express different opinions or challenge you in any way
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 31, 2017 19:53:42 GMT
Should we only be allowed to have one sided propaganda thrown at us? What a wonderful world We don't need news companies using the latest psychology tech to fool the masses We'd be better off with backyard ww2 gossip at least we'd know to filter out the shit Anyway, I don't mean to be rude but......I've not posted on here to converse with you you boring bastard Bye For someone who's not here to converse with me, you're doing a pretty good impression of someone who is, you stupid fuck
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 31, 2017 19:51:31 GMT
White Star is wank boys. Pick somewhere good and I'll be down to blow your minds. Otherwise, quite a poor quality circle jerk on the last page. Please up your game. It is wank deano, and you would blow their minds But they don't deserve you
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 31, 2017 13:03:43 GMT
You read The Express, you plum I was meaning its better to have views from either side as opposed to all one side. I read snippets from a few As I've said above......fuck'em all off.......not just one side And what would you replace the news with once you'd fucked it off, fraise? Should we all just use our imagination and read more twitter?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 31, 2017 11:49:22 GMT
Lol. As if I'd join you for a pint. The guy who went to the party island of Europe and sat on the fucking Oatie for a week. Bet the chat was enthralling yeah Who's "us" anyway, big un? You and the voices you hear? Aye up, says you who went to South East Asia and lived on his keyboard. I'll go 😀. One big happy family and all that. I was in there the other day buying some Plum Grand Reserve bottles actually. Seems to lack a bit of summat compared to other Titanic pubs. I'm amazed you find time for the pub todger, what with your 500 posts a month from this account alone
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 31, 2017 11:46:50 GMT
Much better now we have 4 or 5 liberal, large corp leaning, brainwashing news channels. Fox News is fucking crackers......the others are just as dangerous Fuck'em all off Real News is abused and crammed with propaganda You read The Express, you plum
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 25, 2017 12:44:22 GMT
I think manmarking should join us for a pint in the White Star if he's in town. The chat's racey but never oversteps the mark. Lol. As if I'd join you for a pint. The guy who went to the party island of Europe and sat on the fucking Oatie for a week. Bet the chat was enthralling yeah Who's "us" anyway, big un? You and the voices you hear?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 25, 2017 10:43:57 GMT
So you don't believe the NBC article when it notes "It is one of many that have been vandalized across the country in wake of the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia and the president's comments that followed."You don't believe that presently there is a movement from the Alt-Left demanding the removal of certain statues? Anyway talking about Trump fans here's a CNN focus group that didn't go quite to plan for the news channel.... The "One of many" statement is not quantified, what does "many" mean? I have no doubt that monuments are being vandalised, I have no doubt that monuments were being vandalised before Trunp's statement and that many more will be vandalised once the fuss has subsided. Another point, why are you and your Trump supporting friend automatically linking the defacing of the Lincoln monument with this "Alt-Left"? Should I create a tweet to denounce it as the "Alt-Right's" work (which makes more sense). You're meme use and unquestioning loyalty to the cause is beginning to make me wonder if you and Huddy are the same person. Todger certainly is the same person as another poster, but it's not huddy
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 23, 2017 17:59:18 GMT
Fair play to the Afua Hirsch - a really fantastic piece of trolling. 10/10. Got the alt-right snowflakes triggered up real good
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 19, 2017 7:21:02 GMT
I thought you'd blocked me, you thick fuck You haven't seen me for a while because I have a life away from this torpid, discarded old mattress of a place. But don't worry, I'm still going strong. I check in, and I come and go as I please, when I please. Laters, ballbag That's the spirit fella. Chin up and all that. A perma ban has obviously hurt the feelings what with that "higher clearance" and all. I haven't been permabanned though, have I? I'm still here, thicko Although I don't spend basically my whole life on here like you. Well over 1,000 posts since June, I see. 1,000! Imagine! . No, I prefer to get out more. See the world. As a result, I'm more permatanned than permabanned Enjoy the sun anyway, fella. Or yer bedroom. Whatevs. I'm offski again. Back in a while
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 18, 2017 23:04:33 GMT
Anyone seen Brilittle? Capto? RedWhiteAndBlue? RipRoaringPotter? Pablo? They were all swarming all over the forum for a few days but since halfway through yesterday every, single one of them have disappeared into thin air. Anyone know where they all went? Thailand with ******* not seen mad man barking for a while either. I thought you'd blocked me, you thick fuck You haven't seen me for a while because I have a life away from this torpid, discarded old mattress of a place. But don't worry, I'm still going strong. I check in, and I come and go as I please, when I please. Laters, ballbag
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 9, 2017 12:56:41 GMT
Well if mother natures not going to clean up this mess we've. Built the only other option is ourselves with nukes Remarkably brainless post even by your standards, fraise old boy
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 9, 2017 12:48:29 GMT
The knitters on here have always been especially sensitive (thick ) about folk giving as good as they get, mate. Northy, bish and fraise being the prime examples of the breed. They'll only be truly happy when their little safe space-cum-echo chamber is restored Still, an all-conquering drug lord who owns most of Colombia won't give a fuck about that I trust - and nor will I. Vive la revolución well, as he's been dead for over 20 years he can't own much now can he, only perhaps in the mind eh tog? I should start wearing ribbons like a military general, to denote all the other posters I've been called by eejits like you and fraise. Todge is a new one, but a very welcome addition to my bosom
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 8, 2017 11:52:06 GMT
At least 3 on here already exact number I came up with Maybe more It's not a tremendous surprise you both came up with the same number is it, lads? You're both equally trenchant, ill-informed and dim, and you only come on here to reinforce the opinions of other people of a similar outlook/ilk. And, in turn, to have your opinions validated by each other. It's an endless cycle, and you never learn anything You'd both decide the earth was flat if it was announced by enough internet nutters and fellow Oatie brains trust members
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 7, 2017 20:51:17 GMT
The knitters on here have always been especially sensitive (thick ) about folk giving as good as they get, mate. Northy, bish and fraise being the prime examples of the breed. They'll only be truly happy when their little safe space-cum-echo chamber is restored Still, an all-conquering drug lord who owns most of Colombia won't give a fuck about that I trust - and nor will I. Vive la revolución get ready to be accused of being Rat. Been hearing that jive talk from the thickos ever since I landed mate. It's beautiful on so many levels, not least because they waste their time looking in totally the wrong place
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 7, 2017 18:39:03 GMT
Friends is no one prepared or able to answer me?? I had another very poor weatherspoon's breakfast today. Has noone on here never worked in the kitchen?? Allow me, friend I know a lad who once went in a branch of Spoons darn sarf still absolutely steaming from the night before. The old kill or cure breakfast ploy. Had a pint of Tuborg or some such piss to wash it down with an all Anyhow, he starts getting stomach cramps somewhere around the third gulp of beer and the second fork full of beans. He realises it's an emergency. It's Defcon. Unfortunately, he made it just far enough to draw alongside a table with a family eating when all hell broke loose. (Loose being the operative word ) To cut a long story short, he shat himself, puked up a cubicle and had to flee, leaving most of his food/beer. The moral of the story is that - I'm guessing anyway - no matter how bad your Wetherspoons brekkie, there'll always be some poor sod having a worse experience, so chin up
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 7, 2017 18:17:11 GMT
especially dense ............. hhmmm it must be on my phone that I see the original name and not new ones Well maybe you shouldn't go throwing your alternative facts around. You seem very paranoid but then the right wing always has/will. All names appear the same on my phone and works pc. What phone are you using? What's up with especially? The knitters on here have always been especially sensitive (thick ) about folk giving as good as they get, mate. Northy, bish and fraise being the prime examples of the breed. They'll only be truly happy when their little safe space-cum-echo chamber is restored Still, an all-conquering drug lord who owns most of Colombia won't give a fuck about that I trust - and nor will I. Vive la revolución
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 4, 2017 11:04:52 GMT
Having watched Pat's rants a few times, I think someone is in need of some serious dumbing up. Watching his rants, you're immediately reminded of why he must've failed as a stand-up comic. Namely, that he has the delivery skill of a scrap of used bog paper, and the wit of a broken paving slab
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 3, 2017 8:30:50 GMT
You would find yourself agreeing with it because it's unchallenging lowest common denominator drivel Sad prick Truthful though
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Aug 2, 2017 20:49:48 GMT
I agree we should crack down on illegal immigration. But here is the big headline news (wait for it leave voters, because you have been lied to again by your precious Breitbart etc).......... illegal immigration has nothing to do with the EU. EU migration is legal. Illegal immigrants come from outside of the EU. Brexit will not have an impact on illegal immigration. If we want to cut legal immigration why don't we stop the people we can control right now and have always been able to control - the non EU migrants. Until 2016 every single year there were more non-EU migrants who moved here than EU migrants who came here under the free moment rules. So immigration will not go down unless our government decides to put controls in place. They clearly don't want to because it benefits our economy. Don't worry though, brexit will destroy our economy and there will be fewer jobs so fewer immigrants will want to come here. You are funny illegal immigrants benefit our economy yes of course they do why do they travel across the EU before they come here illegally Just out of interest, Carps, when will you be doing us all a tremendous favour by invoking your right to freely move to another country? (Preferably one that doesn't have Internet... )
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jul 26, 2017 21:16:48 GMT
like him or loath him I find myself agreeing with a large percentage You would find yourself agreeing with it because it's unchallenging lowest common denominator drivel
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jul 26, 2017 21:15:05 GMT
Most of which it seems you write. Which Uni did you go to... Real life. I went to the university of real life. These muppets obsessed with identity politics & other trivial shit should try to go there themselves sometime. It might help them to become worthwhile members of society when they graduate. Hasn't made you hugely employable outside the sphere of manual labour though, has it fella? Which is fine, but not everyone wants to do that
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jul 26, 2017 21:08:19 GMT
So this'll be Pat Connell, who has no experience of either university or hiring people, holding forth on universities and employability, ably supported on here by various people who've never been to university or been in charge of a recruitment drive either Brains trust in full flow
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jul 25, 2017 21:37:22 GMT
The problem is, you open the door to corruption? We all know how bent the police are. We all know they have been routinely linked with people randomly 'dying' who were previously healthy. Whistle blower about to open the lid on something.... Poof, dead from 'suicide'. Imagine giving them a legal way of doing it? Fuuuuck that. Yep. Cf. The Birmingham Six.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jul 25, 2017 18:48:17 GMT
Because one option is, at least, reversible to some extent? The other is a bit more final Agree - that is certainly a difference! But is that your main issue with capital punishment - the risk of killing an innocent person. If so - I'm guessing you'd support it where there is no question about the guilt of the individual concerned. Well as I said in a previous post to someone else, I've not even gone into abstract morality arguments here. I'm honestly not sure what I'd think if there were no questions about guilt. I'd suggest we go into that if and when we can ever prove that 100% of convictions are 100% safe. And even with the best will in the world, that may never happen.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jul 25, 2017 17:09:58 GMT
You could equally apply that logic the opposite way too, though. ie - we don't want to risk punishing innocent people for the crimes of a handful, so let's just let everyone in. Both stances are flawed because immigration and criminal justice are two completely different things. You have to apply different principles and different logic to them. For what it's worth, my stance on immigration would, I suspect, be tougher than you think, but that's off-topic It doesn't matter if it's mandatory or otherwise; innocent people would be executed, even with the best will in the world. That's too heavy a price to pay. Without even getting into the more abstract morality of the rights and wrongs of killing human beings We do apply that logic. As with the MEN bomber. But you're right that's for another thread. I really don't think innocent people would be killed. Take the earlier examples of the West's, Rigby killers, Brady, Hindley and Shipman. Surely you can't argue with those? My guess it's there would be one a decade. I wouldn't shed a tear for any of that lot no. My fear is a Birmingham Six or Guildford Four situation. If we'd had the death penalty back then, people would have been clamouring to kill the terrorist bastards. And they'd have been backed by strong "evidence". But of course the burden of evidence changes sometimes. I'd also fear that yes we may start with one evil maniac per decade, but that we'd steadily (ab)use the facility more and more.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jul 25, 2017 15:05:50 GMT
It's too open to abuse. People in authority, throughout history, have been corrupted and often corruptible under the right conditions. It is human nature. If any of you recently watched the TV drama Fearless, I thought that brilliantly represented how people in authority are corruptible. I'm aware that it was fictional piece of television (the director has said many of the side plots are actually true stories, but were glued together to make a separate single story), but ultimately, it was an excellent and very believable piece of work..... and the subsequent ending really hit the nail on the head. Now, for the Fred and Rose West's of this world, perhaps death would feel like an acceptable outcome.... but take the person who has been wrongly convicted of murdering, say.... his pregnant wife. Now, there's a surefire example of a guy who needs execution right? How could someone be so despicable.... www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/convicted-murderer-eddie-gilfoyle-a-11543241Like when the police Eddie Gilfoyle went to jail for 18 years for murder, despite evidence, diaries, documents pretty much proving that she committed suicide. Merseyside Police are now under investigation for corruption and I believe it's an ongoing case. Don't expect any police to be prosecuted though. They're a protected class. Let's be honest... Gilfoyle is just one of many people stitched up by our systemically corrupt police force. And you want to give them the right to effectively sentence people to death? To reiterate..... FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK THAT. What's your point? The point is my original one - if you are intending to lock someone up and throw away the key why not just kill them? Both have massive moral issues, both breach human rights. A living death vs an actual death. Why get all worked up about one but not the other. Because one option is, at least, reversible to some extent? The other is a bit more final
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jul 25, 2017 13:49:35 GMT
And on a purely logical level, some convicted criminals will be acquitted. Always happens, even with the best will in the world and a pretty good justice system. For me, the risk of executing the wrong person - however remote - is the main reason for avoiding the death penalty. No I think that's a reason for avoiding a mandatory death sentence. Another problem I have with this 'wrong person' logic is that if you were to follow that path then you would support the total closure of borders to refugees because "however remote" one might be an ISIS terrorist. Maybe you do support that? You could equally apply that logic the opposite way too, though. ie - we don't want to risk punishing innocent people for the crimes of a handful, so let's just let everyone in. Both stances are flawed because immigration and criminal justice are two completely different things. You have to apply different principles and different logic to them. For what it's worth, my stance on immigration would, I suspect, be tougher than you think, but that's off-topic It doesn't matter if it's mandatory or otherwise; innocent people would be executed, even with the best will in the world. That's too heavy a price to pay. Without even getting into the more abstract morality of the rights and wrongs of killing human beings
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jul 25, 2017 12:46:38 GMT
Capital punishment or life without parole. I wonder why we look on the latter as OK but not the former. The first is actual death, the latter a living one. Both have moral challenges, but then again both are punishments for (let's assume for the point of argument) appalling crimes. It's an old argument but would anyone much bother if Ian Brady had been executed rather than allowed to die after many years in prison? Who shed a tear when Fred West died? By avoiding capital punishment, murderers are at least given a basic level of human rights. And on a purely logical level, some convicted criminals will be acquitted. Always happens, even with the best will in the world and a pretty good justice system. For me, the risk of executing the wrong person - however remote - is the main reason for avoiding the death penalty.
|
|
|
Dunkirk
Jul 24, 2017 15:57:23 GMT
via mobile
Post by manmarking on Jul 24, 2017 15:57:23 GMT
Thankfully the wonderful French, who helped defend our men stranded at Dunkirk in 1940, once again came to our aid and defeated the TTIP threat. God Save the EU and the French. Merci! Maybe it was the French who chose not to guard the ardens as it was supposed to be impenetrable, leaving British and Belgian troops open and vulnerable? Fraise, if you're going to pretend to know anything about French military history, do at least learn to spell "the Ardennes" for fuck's sake. God you're an awful eejit
|
|