|
Post by manmarking on May 22, 2017 19:51:52 GMT
Weird because all the Tory spin and the MSM keep toeing the line and telling me she's a dead strong and stable leader... As opposed to a manipulative, lying, opportunist, hateful old bag who believes in literally nothing apart from how to get as much power as possible. Who also wouldn't know the best way to present a turd in a fucking bin liner Whatever happens in this election, she's been fucking wank. I mean, absolutely execrable. And that in itself is hilarious. She's really put the lie to this strong and stable shit, and she hasn't even needed any help doing it. Pathetic
It's especially funny given all the cheerleading on here and in the MSM. These shithouses are getting desperate The latest Yougov poll shows Tory support collapsing in Wales! Labour set to gain Gower from the Tories! Of course, this lot are panicking! The British people have finally seen through this cowardly, shallow, conning, lying, feeble Tory P.M.! Good riddance! I hope you're right, nick! I think the Tories will still win but it's nice to see them squirm a bit nonetheless. It'd be an absolute pisser to see this mob pretending to celebrate anything less than a massive landslide
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 22, 2017 19:14:44 GMT
Well well. They're all out tonight. Frothing at the mouth I tell ya. Huddy, Momo, Nicholas, ************** sorry Josh, Ciffy sorry Essextony, Ciffy sorry manmarking. And Bathstoke as the cherry on top .... "one of the greatest acts of terrorism on our country" Could say exactly the same about you, you tool Deflecting from your Glorious Leader's abortion earlier perchance?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 22, 2017 19:10:48 GMT
Notice the Tory flag wavers are very quiet after that Kick May Out !! I don't care who you vote for but not the Tories!! May weak inept leadership bet she has problems running a bath bet she has someone do it for her Weird because all the Tory spin and the MSM keep toeing the line and telling me she's a dead strong and stable leader... As opposed to a manipulative, lying, opportunist, hateful old bag who believes in literally nothing apart from how to get as much power as possible. Who also wouldn't know the best way to present a turd in a fucking bin liner Whatever happens in this election, she's been fucking wank. I mean, absolutely execrable. And that in itself is hilarious. She's really put the lie to this strong and stable shit, and she hasn't even needed any help doing it. Pathetic It's especially funny given all the cheerleading on here and in the MSM. These shithouses are getting desperate
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 22, 2017 18:51:53 GMT
So Corbyn announces he will bring forward the abolition of tutition fees to next term In order to secure the young vote If the tories did that they would be accused of buying votes. People moan about the tories buying the elderly vote. As soon as they try and balance it out by making the wealthier pensioners pay they get slated for so called dementia tax Diddums mate. Enjoy your own medicine
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 22, 2017 10:10:09 GMT
"I condemn all the bombing by both the loyalists and the IRA." As I said, lies He didn't condemn the guns, crime, other violence. If he'd condemned those things, you'd be moaning that he didn't condemn the cut of their uniforms, the feng shui of their hideouts, the breakfast cereal they ate or the fact they sometimes bought non-organic fucking bog roll. He was as clear as most rational people would expect, but then you hate Corbyn viscerally and irrationally, and you defend parties like the National Front so it was never going to be enough
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 22, 2017 9:30:02 GMT
Can't wait for the election AL maybe these boring repetitive, nasty fuckers will disappear for another 5 years Catching up from over the weeknd I've seen ************** call someone a fucking prick, Essex tell somebody to get a life, Nicholasjock say somebody is usual grovelling, snivelling, slandering behaviour (when all they did was post a fact about Abbott). It looks like some people from one side of the political persuasion cannot just debate, they have to go personal with it. Yeah cuz carps and void and david70 and todgerjones are dead mature aren't they
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 22, 2017 6:37:56 GMT
Nonsensical really, sloppy. Double standards. And the end sentence is an outright lie. I was going to say "you can do better than that, fella " but thinking about it, you probably can't The last sentence is the absoloute truth ...spot on Salop "I condemn all the bombing by both the loyalists and the IRA." As I said, lies
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 21, 2017 22:52:07 GMT
All governments have to or choose to deal with unsavoury regimes for what ever reason. Tories and labour no different Corbyn's support for terrorists and all the stuff that goes with it IN HIS OWN COUNTRY is disgraceful when you think of the innocent people killed in his country over it. That is why it is bad. That is why it is worse. That is one reason why he will not be the next prime minister Today on tv he still refuses to condemn the terrorists Nonsensical really, sloppy. Double standards. And the end sentence is an outright lie. I was going to say "you can do better than that, fella " but thinking about it, you probably can't
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 21, 2017 11:28:39 GMT
Students are a good deal better informed than you fraise - on account of, like, actually studying and thinking about stuff So you don't see the fault in what she says? Europe is a fantastic continent The referendum decision to leave wasn't to leave Europe, it was to leave the corrupt un-democratic led European Union Common sense is all that is needed not a degree She's an idiot mate. What I'm picking up on is your inference that all students are gullible and naive when that plainly isn't the case
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 21, 2017 11:23:14 GMT
And the right will ignore the Tories' historic support of a frankly vast array of terrorist causes from IS to apartheid, Saudi Arabia, the IRA, the UDF, Saddam Hussein, the Khymer Rouge, the Afghan mujahideen....
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 21, 2017 10:50:57 GMT
As I've said elsewhere on this thread: Tories don't like dissent, do they? For what it's worth, I wasn't necessarily aiming the previous post at you. Although it's very kind of you to prove it true by not debating the actual issue of the discussion Anyone would think you don't understand it.... I'm happy to help you out perhaps you could return the compliment and explain the issue that is under discussion as I'm clearly out of my depth here ? Try reading the thread title and the post I was responding to. Not rocket science is it, owd?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 21, 2017 10:49:55 GMT
Blair has far too much baggage for any sort of come back , what labour need is a radical constitutional change that favours the PLP when choosing the leadership . Students can be swayed with a well worded sentence Students are a good deal better informed than you fraise - on account of, like, actually studying and thinking about stuff
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 21, 2017 8:09:10 GMT
You're dealing with the lowest common denominator here, mate. It's fine for Thatcher to talk to the IRA through back channels and sanction British spies helping to assassinate British police people. And do precisely nothing to alleviate the Northern Ireland troubles. And sponsor apartheid South Africa. And support Islamic fundamentalism in Pakistan in the 80s. And help the Khymer Rouge. And arm Saddam Hussein. To name but a few examples of one Tory leader As soon as Jeremy so much as tries to share some yoghurt with anyone unsavoury, he's public enemy number one. These are people who don't understand the issues. Who swallow everything they're fed We do understand the issues ......you should be shot at dawn ....without the option of a blindfold As I've said elsewhere on this thread: Tories don't like dissent, do they? For what it's worth, I wasn't necessarily aiming the previous post at you. Although it's very kind of you to prove it true by not debating the actual issue of the discussion Anyone would think you don't understand it....
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 20, 2017 23:11:41 GMT
holding talks? he invited sinn fein into the house of commons just weeks after the Brighton bombing, he was arrested for joining pro ira demos, mi5 had a file on him Load of bollocks aren't they, these talks...Should just bomb them and attack them brainlessly. Its what the Tories would do. Its not like every war that has reached a peaceful solution, hasn't been reached by talks. In fact I find bombing the living daylights out of people, and refusing to try and negotiate or find political solutions, the silver bullet to most issues. You're dealing with the lowest common denominator here, mate. It's fine for Thatcher to talk to the IRA through back channels and sanction British spies helping to assassinate British police people. And do precisely nothing to alleviate the Northern Ireland troubles. And sponsor apartheid South Africa. And support Islamic fundamentalism in Pakistan in the 80s. And help the Khymer Rouge. And arm Saddam Hussein. To name but a few examples of one Tory leader As soon as Jeremy so much as tries to share some yoghurt with anyone unsavoury, he's public enemy number one. These are people who don't understand the issues. Who swallow everything they're fed
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 20, 2017 16:10:22 GMT
My name isn't mark and my opinions are someone else's I'm mentally 7 yrs old and posted shite on here for a lot longer (for those who question who I am) all of this matters because I'm a first rate poser!!
No Roger you are an arrogant tosser who only thinks about himself and not those more vulnerable in society like most conservatives you are up your own arse and only out for number one Unlike you I have a free mind and don't follow aimlessly like a sheep unlike you, you must be of so low intellect that you believe anything that the manipulated tory press tell you. Roger there are only a few posers on here and you seem to be the biggest of the lot go back and crawl under whichever stone you crawled from under. I also agree with you that your mental age is that of a 7 year olds and you post a load of crap The Tories don't like dissent, mate. At a national level you can see it in today's Internet manifesto (amongst myriad other policies), and at a local level you can see it in old Todger, bless him He only comes on here so he can bask in a right-wing echo chamber. A safe place where other people will lap up his intolerance, flashes of racism and general ill-thought-out dogmatic claptrap. When someone comes along and disturbs that serenity, he responds in the only way he knows how. By making up a load of nonsense about multiple accounts. As sad as it is, he's not clued-up or thick-skinned enough to accept that more than one person in the entire world disagrees with him. And he's not bright enough to debate anyone on the issues. Your profile of him is about right though (And do keep up the dissent - it's much needed )
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 20, 2017 13:43:14 GMT
To be fair, if I looked as fucking bosted as she does, I'd hate nature too
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 19, 2017 22:59:34 GMT
For someone who's attacked the disabled! Defended the bent Cameron family! Defended the buying of the last general election! And so much more! Stay corrupt 'followyoudown'. Totally out of order to call a fellow poster corrupt .....you should be ashamed of yourself ....bang out of order . It's hardly the worst accusation that's been bandied about on here is it, mate. Calm down Carps for one has said far worse to people, yet I note you never sanction him. Odd. At least try to apply the same rules to everyone
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 19, 2017 9:43:14 GMT
Why a guilty pleasure mate? Skin colour or summat else? Ha. No mate, unlike you I'm happily married. You presume to know a great deal, señor
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 18, 2017 22:39:18 GMT
Great point on QT about Corbyn A great man at preaching to the converted but not to the rest Considering you're not remotely worried about Jezza winning the election, you don't half devote a lot of your time to attacking him, sloppy. Why the visceral hatred of him? Why not just kick back and enjoy the victory parade? Life's too short, mate
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 18, 2017 22:34:50 GMT
Question Time on now. Priti Patel A long time guilty pleasure of mine. Nice. Why a guilty pleasure mate? Skin colour or summat else?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 18, 2017 19:58:57 GMT
You're in absolutely no position to critique other people's news sources you daft widger. Your links only ever lead to yer man Staines. His name is accurate at least MM were you not aware that FYD the Dodger and Al are the intellectual and moral compass on the Oatcake? Well they need to get out of their little metal boxes then - the needle is just spinning round aimlessly
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 18, 2017 19:33:36 GMT
You're just upset because the Tories have shot themselves in the foot today. Awww diddums... Are you one of these heartless bastards earning over £80k a year by the way? Bless did you get that from the Canary just like all you information on election fraud. Politics of envy there I see, people are heartless bastards because of the money they earn in you world, I always thought people getting off on rioting and people getting killed was heartless myself but that's just me. You're in absolutely no position to critique other people's news sources you daft widger. Your links only ever lead to yer man Staines. His name is accurate at least
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 18, 2017 18:53:46 GMT
Drives the wrong way up Broadway !! Have you ever driven around NYC ? Kills one and injures 20, so far. "Known" DUI enthusiast. Nothing to see here. Move along. 2 previous convictions for drunk driving and police are now saying that's what it was. Well done for jumping in with 2 feet and making presumptions though rog no let's presume it's just fake news covering up and he wasn't really a drunk twat based on your evidence (and by that i mean absolutely nothing other than you desperately digging yourself out of a hole) Rogerjonesisnotverybright mate This is the umpteenth time recently he's 'called' violent incidents prematurely because of his own prejudices. He needs a good old mickmills waterboarding
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 15, 2017 12:37:39 GMT
Okay, Wavey Davey When you want to abuse someone, I find it’s best to do so from a position of strength. As it stands, you’re calling me thick when you can’t even spell ‘Corbyn’, let alone debate his policies. (And of course we weren’t talking about Jezza anyway – shangs and I were discussing Thatcher when you came crashing in and started frothing and ranting ). You’re also calling me thick when you can’t structure a sentence or a paragraph correctly. Stop using commas to break up whole sentences. Break them up with full stops. It’s easier to read and gives you at least an illusion of literacy Car-crashing five sentences into one is what carps does, mate, and it doesn’t give your argument (such as it is) any credence. In fact it weakens it further It’s also a good idea to read people’s posts before deciding what you imagine they’ve said. shangs’ OP stated ‘our status as a global power (in the 90s was) never higher’. Nowhere in either that post or your two bizarre attacks on me does it mention that the statement referred to post-WW2 only. shangs is a decent bloke and has already had the good grace to hold his hands up and accept that this was a bit misleading. He’s now clarified his statement and although I don’t agree with his opinion, I totally respect his right to hold it. Given that he wrote the post in the first place, you’d do well to accept his interpretation of what he said Finally, please read about history before posting about it. Wikipedia is okay for a basic understanding – you can always add depth of knowledge later Read up on the British Empire. Read up on World War 2. Read up on Thatcher’s legacy. Read up on the history of the Labour Party (its first rise was pre-war, not post). Then come back to me and we’ll talk again The corbin thing is intentional (not surprised it went over your head, have you also noticed I never capitalise his name?) I've been doing it ever since the intellectual elite of your party elected him to deliver us a Tory landslide and I've even pointed it out to other posters, and as for the rest of your post I've been reading the rubbish you write for some years and as I said, no credibility ffs you seriously think corbin (sic) would make a good leader. Two sentences, Wavey Still room for improvement but well done. Decent effort. It can be difficult to admit you're wrong in online arguments. I get that. But do it a couple of times and it gets easier, I promise For future reference, trying to shift a thread about Margaret Thatcher onto Jeremy Corbyn won't work. It's a very obvious strawman argument, and doesn't affect the material fact that you're wrong in any way
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 15, 2017 11:51:16 GMT
So our "status as a global superpower" was not higher when, say, the British empire was in full swing? When we controlled nearly a quarter of the world's surface and had over 450 million subjects? Or when we helped defeat the Nazis in WW2? To choose but two examples. If I'm astoundingly ignorant and clueless, that basically makes you a single-celled organism Seriously mate, go back to school. Read about history. Anything. You haven't got a fucking clue what you're on about Any credibility you thought you had disappeared with that comment, the post was referring to our recent history, post WW2, coincidently a period of time which has seen the rise of labour party and it's wrecking of this country during every single one of its periods in office, only the congenitally stupid wouldn't have made that assumption, but wait look who I'm talking to. Okay, Wavey Davey When you want to abuse someone, I find it’s best to do so from a position of strength. As it stands, you’re calling me thick when you can’t even spell ‘Corbyn’, let alone debate his policies. (And of course we weren’t talking about Jezza anyway – shangs and I were discussing Thatcher when you came crashing in and started frothing and ranting ). You’re also calling me thick when you can’t structure a sentence or a paragraph correctly. Stop using commas to break up whole sentences. Break them up with full stops. It’s easier to read and gives you at least an illusion of literacy Car-crashing five sentences into one is what carps does, mate, and it doesn’t give your argument (such as it is) any credence. In fact it weakens it further It’s also a good idea to read people’s posts before deciding what you imagine they’ve said. shangs’ OP stated ‘our status as a global power (in the 90s was) never higher’. Nowhere in either that post or your two bizarre attacks on me does it mention that the statement referred to post-WW2 only. shangs is a decent bloke and has already had the good grace to hold his hands up and accept that this was a bit misleading. He’s now clarified his statement and although I don’t agree with his opinion, I totally respect his right to hold it. Given that he wrote the post in the first place, you’d do well to accept his interpretation of what he said Finally, please read about history before posting about it. Wikipedia is okay for a basic understanding – you can always add depth of knowledge later Read up on the British Empire. Read up on World War 2. Read up on Thatcher’s legacy. Read up on the history of the Labour Party (its first rise was pre-war, not post). Then come back to me and we’ll talk again
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 15, 2017 9:13:22 GMT
Without even getting into the economics/trade unions bits, the highlighted section is simply untrue, mate. And quite clearly hype When Maggie came to power we were the sick man of Europe, when she left, and even when Major got defeated we were an industrial, economic and influential powerhouse. That is her legacy...END OF. See above response to david70, albeit without the quips about intelligence (since you didn't insult me ). Quite simply, your initial statement was untrue. As in, our status as a global superpower has been higher. Simple as
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 15, 2017 9:09:07 GMT
Without even getting into the economics/trade unions bits, the highlighted section is simply untrue, mate. And quite clearly hype And the astounding ignorance of that comment goes a long way to explain just why the Labour Party’s leader is corbin, clueless ignorant’s blindly following a serial failure. Mrs May will decimate your party on June 8th and the Iron Lady Mk 2 will restore pride and independence to this Great Nation. The futures bright, the futures Tory. So our "status as a global superpower" was not higher when, say, the British empire was in full swing? When we controlled nearly a quarter of the world's surface and had over 450 million subjects? Or when we helped defeat the Nazis in WW2? To choose but two examples. If I'm astoundingly ignorant and clueless, that basically makes you a single-celled organism Seriously mate, go back to school. Read about history. Anything. You haven't got a fucking clue what you're on about
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 15, 2017 2:47:46 GMT
Turned it round? Do you really believe the hype? God help us. No Hype. When she came to power the Country was on it's knees. The Unions had virtually destroyed our industry, with their Marxist extreme left wing ideologies. As a Country we were the laughing stock of the world. Countries like Germany, France, USA, Japan etc etc etc were all forging ahead with new technology and new practices, but we were in a time warp. Now...For the record, I am not Anti Union, in any way shape or form, but under Labour the Unions grew to such a beast they simply could not be contained, we all remember the likes of British Leyland, and Red Robbo, daft things like a non member of The Electricians Union changed a light bulb at Cowley, right, everyone out...Bosses were afraid of the shop floor, there were stories of night shifts blatantly turning up for work with their sleeping bags for a nights kip, and under the likes of Robbo, Scargill etc etc they were untouchable.. Our economy was in freefall, inflation was out of control, unemployment soaring, but under 18 years of Tory rule, 12 of which were Maggie's the Country was turned around. Inflation...Under control Unemployment...Dropping. GDP...Rising. Our status as a true global power...Never higher.Now yes, she made mistakes, huge mistakes, and a lot of what she and her government did was a bitter pill to swallow, but without that pill we'd have continued to decline to an un rescuable level. So yes,,,I do believe the hype...God Bless Ya Baroness Thatcher... Without even getting into the economics/trade unions bits, the highlighted section is simply untrue, mate. And quite clearly hype
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 14, 2017 21:57:40 GMT
When I am curling one out I like to read Paul Nuttalls CV. Do you have time for reading while you're shitting, Pablo? I'd have thought that life as a fugitive narco gang lord fleeing from one hideout to another would necessitate some pretty hurried bog sessions
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 14, 2017 21:40:53 GMT
Oh, that You shouldn't believe everything you read online, haemorrvoid Oh don't worry, I don't. But I know you're not ************** anyway.
|
|