|
|
Post by stokie01 on Jan 17, 2009 16:59:18 GMT
7
|
|
|
|
Post by potters 22 on Jan 17, 2009 17:00:49 GMT
10
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Jan 17, 2009 17:01:35 GMT
Errrm...You're not me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rory's Towel Boy on Jan 17, 2009 17:02:09 GMT
10, couldnt have done much more could he?
|
|
|
|
Post by DannyStokie on Jan 17, 2009 17:02:42 GMT
relelgation place now, great.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stoke_FaN_DaN on Jan 17, 2009 17:02:50 GMT
8
|
|
|
|
Post by stokey-pokey pudding and pie on Jan 17, 2009 17:02:54 GMT
10 could not have done any better
|
|
|
|
Post by Rory's Towel Boy on Jan 17, 2009 17:03:14 GMT
relelgation place now, great. We deserved at least a point against chelsea, great |
|
|
|
Post by thisfootballclub on Jan 17, 2009 17:03:20 GMT
10
|
|
|
|
Post by dan999 on Jan 17, 2009 17:04:10 GMT
9
|
|
|
|
Post by 5ManBack4 on Jan 17, 2009 17:05:00 GMT
10 could do no more, just waiting for the pulis out goons to appear now....
|
|
|
|
Post by YarnfieldStokie on Jan 17, 2009 17:08:15 GMT
8 would have been higher but I thought at the time it was a mistake to take Ethers off. He was taking the heat off for us with his hold up play and forceful runs. prob knackered tho. So gutted!!
|
|
|
|
Post by boothenendboy on Jan 17, 2009 17:09:19 GMT
7 why did he put kitson on for ethers?
|
|
|
|
Post by offthewall on Jan 17, 2009 17:09:55 GMT
10 - anger turning into pride, we are getting better all the time
|
|
|
|
Post by Beebster on Jan 17, 2009 17:10:27 GMT
10....until he took Etherington off....7 now!!
|
|
|
|
Post by hutchstokie1 on Jan 17, 2009 17:11:22 GMT
beebster etherington was knackered, 9
|
|
|
|
Post by fromafar07 on Jan 17, 2009 17:11:35 GMT
9, he did have them sit back too much in last 15 mins
|
|
|
|
Post by griffoisalegend on Jan 17, 2009 17:12:06 GMT
10
Perfect, surely?
We switched off, the tactics were spot on, hence leading CHELSEA 1-0 up until the 88th minute.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Jan 17, 2009 17:13:04 GMT
Oh whatever, I'll just do all the averages and crap for this thread then. But don't do it again.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokie01 on Jan 17, 2009 17:13:08 GMT
10 Perfect, surely? We switched off, the tactics were spot on, hence leading CHELSEA 1-0 up until the 88th minute..... we were actually only leading for over 25 minutes though, but Pulis did his best! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2009 17:14:03 GMT
8, did the best we could really, maybe if we had mama we would have had more possession.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokie01 on Jan 17, 2009 17:16:54 GMT
8, did the best we could really, maybe if we had mama we would have had more possession. Definatley, with mama our squad would be so close to perfect! |
|
|
|
Post by stokie01 on Jan 17, 2009 17:25:32 GMT
6
|
|
|
|
Post by YarnfieldStokie on Jan 17, 2009 17:27:17 GMT
Any particular reason for that mark Andy?? ??? |
|
|
|
Post by patobanton on Jan 17, 2009 17:32:20 GMT
9
great and brave decision to take faye off to aviod a red card. can't do more than he did.
|
|
|
|
Post by luke45 on Jan 17, 2009 17:42:07 GMT
9.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokecity4life on Jan 17, 2009 17:43:22 GMT
relelgation place now, great. TWAT |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2009 17:44:29 GMT
10 - I dunna think there was that much more he could of done?
|
|
|
|
Post by kingdeano on Jan 17, 2009 17:45:16 GMT
10 Perfect, surely? We switched off, the tactics were spot on, hence leading CHELSEA 1-0 up until the 88th minute..... i wouldnt class perfect as a 2-1 loss!!!! 8 for me, great effort from everyone today, i just hope tp can pick the players up after that cus they must be heartbroken. |
|
|
|
Post by chebseystokie99 on Jan 17, 2009 17:46:17 GMT
10.... Brilliant Display but would have liked to seen vince on  |
|
"]
