|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Jan 20, 2023 12:20:35 GMT
I take it we won't have any new faces playing on Sat then, unless a few of our youngsters get a start.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2023 12:21:51 GMT
15M, add ons to 20M plus a sell on and Iversen in exchange works for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by ravey123 on Jan 20, 2023 12:22:58 GMT
Another player we would have to pay money for but will be towards the end of his career after 3 years so no resale value. I thought we were after younger players to develop and sell on |
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Jan 20, 2023 12:25:09 GMT
Another player we would have to pay money for but will be towards the end of his career after 3 years so no resale value. I thought we were after younger players to develop and sell on We've got stacks of younger players though haven't we, and precious little in the way of experienced professionals in their prime. We need a mix and people who can hit the ground running. |
|
|
|
Post by etebojan on Jan 20, 2023 12:27:33 GMT
I take it we won't have any new faces playing on Sat then, unless a few of our youngsters get a start. Looking that way, but they could still have signed the paper work before 12:00, and then be revealed later this afternoon. Who knows |
|
|
|
Post by chiswickpotter on Jan 20, 2023 12:27:54 GMT
We know the rules. We only have ourselves to blame. Yes we do However it’s the rules that are the problem. It’s one rule for one and one for another It’s totally inept The rules may be poor but they are the same for every club in a division. Chelsea have been able to spend because they have sold so many players in recent years. Challenges have been made to City about the value of sponsorships from their owners and related parties but equally the bet365 deal is definitely on the generous side. It could be argued our problem is that we didn't spend enough between 2014 and 2016, we were well within the FFP rules and made profits. Even so we were relegated with enough financial headroom to do well but Rowett and Jones were allowed to blow the budget. |
|
|
|
Post by Vermelho20312505 on Jan 20, 2023 12:30:52 GMT
We know the rules. We only have ourselves to blame. Yes we do However it’s the rules that are the problem. It’s one rule for one and one for another It’s totally inept FFP does exactly what it was designed for. It prevents any new clubs challenging the elite like Blackburn did back in the day. They just need to be honest with what they call it! |
|
|
|
Post by wakefieldstokie on Jan 20, 2023 12:32:29 GMT
Another player we would have to pay money for but will be towards the end of his career after 3 years so no resale value. I thought we were after younger players to develop and sell on Exciting 🤣 |
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Jan 20, 2023 12:37:51 GMT
Well I'm sorry but you're wrong. So your telling me if Harry souttar gets offered a contract at Crystal Palace, he’s gonna turn around and say, “No thanks Mr Viera, I love my home here around the stoke Cheshire areas and will keep my wages at Half what you’re offering, and enjoy the depths of the championship and maybe league one because trentham gardens is beautiful.” Come off it. I’ve seen it in football and I’ll see it again. Marko was a classic example. I’ll give you Leicester is commutable maybe. He's not in a rush to leave, he's happy and settled in the area and is confident he can find a move whether it be now or in 12 months without sacrificing it. |
|
|
|
Post by jimmygscfc1234 on Jan 20, 2023 12:48:07 GMT
If Harry stays for now then surely we just need to replace the loanees that have left/are leaving with new loans? Easier said than done but it's still a plan. We can't wait until the last day of the window so any deal for Souttar has to happen a few days before the deadline.
|
|
|
|
Post by datguy on Jan 20, 2023 12:50:40 GMT
Learn our lessons from previously and sell Soutts when his stock is high. So sell now.
Looking back, should’ve done the same with Tymon, Campbell, Brown etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Jan 20, 2023 12:52:23 GMT
If Harry stays for now then surely we just need to replace the loanees that have left/are leaving with new loans? Easier said than done but it's still a plan. We can't wait until the last day of the window so any deal for Souttar has to happen a few days before the deadline. Which loanees do we really need to replace? I can't think of one that we can't get an existing player to do what they did for us equally badly. |
|
|
|
Post by clarkeda on Jan 20, 2023 12:55:37 GMT
Don't want to tempt fate, but feels like we're for once negotiating with a bit more b*llocks. In an ideal world we'd get 25Million + but i'd be pretty happy with 15 Mill + Iverson on top, seems like we're not a million miles from that This is the deal for me £15m + add on + Iverson. |
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Jan 20, 2023 12:55:55 GMT
Learn our lessons from previously and sell Soutts when his stock is high. So sell now. Looking back, should’ve done the same with Tymon, Campbell, Brown etc. If it's a case of now or in the Summer I can't see why it's even in question. January prices are notoriously higher. The only question should be would Harry be willing to commit to giving us next season and can we afford to do that and stay within FFP limits. |
|
|
|
Post by southcoaststokie on Jan 20, 2023 12:58:46 GMT
Learn our lessons from previously and sell Soutts when his stock is high. So sell now. Looking back, should’ve done the same with Tymon, Campbell, Brown etc. Imagine the comments on here if we sold all our better players when they are in form and playing well |
|
tony10
Youth Player
Posts: 427
|
Post by tony10 on Jan 20, 2023 13:02:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by LGH87 on Jan 20, 2023 13:03:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Roger Everyone on Jan 20, 2023 13:04:34 GMT
Learn our lessons from previously and sell Soutts when his stock is high. So sell now. Looking back, should’ve done the same with Tymon, Campbell, Brown etc. Totally agree, sell and find the next great player. It's the way to do it. |
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Jan 20, 2023 13:06:43 GMT
So we've turned down over 14m? We either don't need the money desperately then, or were confident someone will beat that bid |
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 20, 2023 13:08:49 GMT
So we've turned down over 14m? We either don't need the money desperately then, or were confident someone will beat that bid Aussie dollars I think - so it's just referring to the reported £10m bid by the looks of it |
|
|
|
Post by badger on Jan 20, 2023 13:12:09 GMT
So we've turned down over 14m? We either don't need the money desperately then, or were confident someone will beat that bid The article is for Daily Mail Australia, $17.8m AUS is the £10m we rejected yesterday seemingly. |
|
|
|
Post by southcoaststokie on Jan 20, 2023 13:14:40 GMT
So we've turned down over 14m? We either don't need the money desperately then, or were confident someone will beat that bid Think that is just under £10 million in Aus dollars |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2023 13:22:57 GMT
Another player we would have to pay money for but will be towards the end of his career after 3 years so no resale value. I thought we were after younger players to develop and sell on We've got stacks of younger players though haven't we, and precious little in the way of experienced professionals in their prime. We need a mix and people who can hit the ground running. We also need players who can get the most out of the current crop, rather than just shipping them all out and starting again. Dykes could keep us up the pitch more. |
|
|
|
Post by s7oke on Jan 20, 2023 13:32:46 GMT
Don't want to tempt fate, but feels like we're for once negotiating with a bit more b*llocks. In an ideal world we'd get 25Million + but i'd be pretty happy with 15 Mill + Iverson on top, seems like we're not a million miles from that And a couple of fringe players too |
|
|
|
Post by Maccasbarmyarmy on Jan 20, 2023 13:37:13 GMT
Don't want to tempt fate, but feels like we're for once negotiating with a bit more b*llocks. In an ideal world we'd get 25Million + but i'd be pretty happy with 15 Mill + Iverson on top, seems like we're not a million miles from that And a couple of fringe players too Which fringe players sir?? |
|
|
|
Post by Maccasbarmyarmy on Jan 20, 2023 13:40:27 GMT
15 plus iversen an choudury sell on fee jobs a good un
|
|
|
|
Post by s7oke on Jan 20, 2023 13:40:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by independent on Jan 20, 2023 13:42:50 GMT
If we do nothing in this window, we will be relegated. No doubt about it. We’re an injury away from having Fielding or Simkin in goal. We haven’t got a fit right back. We don’t own a left back that’s to standard. We have one good centre half who is being misused. We don’t own a midfield.We don’t have any wingers the manager likes. And we have no one that can lead the line. Other than that it’s great. bayernoatcake Jul 23, 2022 at 1:48pm via mobile The Toxic Avenger, likelyladgalizmo, and 3 more like this
I think the midfield looks a lot stronger.
Past that I’m not convinced. But still plenty of time yet. Which one should we believe? |
|
|
|
Post by s7oke on Jan 20, 2023 13:44:00 GMT
And a couple of fringe players too Which fringe players sir?? Daka Perez or any of there right backs are better than the ones we don’t have |
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Jan 20, 2023 13:46:38 GMT
Levy getting desperate  |
|
.
.
.
.
