|
Post by gawa on Feb 9, 2024 20:14:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by adri2008 on Feb 9, 2024 20:45:22 GMT
If the Tories weren't in self destruct mode, there's no way Starmer's 'offering' would be getting enough votes is there. It's just so uninspiring - the bloke himself is a dull as ditch water which doesn't help, not that he's actually trying to sell anything.
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 10, 2024 10:57:17 GMT
If the Tories weren't in self destruct mode, there's no way Starmer's 'offering' would be getting enough votes is there. It's just so uninspiring - the bloke himself is a dull as ditch water which doesn't help, not that he's actually trying to sell anything. Aside from his painfully uninspiring, dull, hypocritical policies (if you can call them that), let's also not forgive or forget what this guy did to support the catastrophic lockdown scandals of 2020/21. And to those who happen to be on the left, you probably shouldn't forget what he did to Jeremy Corbyn.
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 10, 2024 10:58:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by OldStokie on Feb 10, 2024 11:27:19 GMT
I wouldn't read anything into this, gawa. This was down to a local issue where the electors agreed with the Tory position regarding a housing issue. OS.
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Feb 10, 2024 11:29:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by deeside2 on Feb 10, 2024 12:17:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Feb 10, 2024 18:43:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Feb 12, 2024 14:01:35 GMT
This is concerning considering every Labour idea I've heard so far was being financed by "scrapping non-Dom status"
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Feb 12, 2024 14:46:53 GMT
This is concerning considering every Labour idea I've heard so far was being financed by "scrapping non-Dom status"
Absolutely incredible.
And there we were a few days ago, thinking that he now had nothing left to ditch.
Scrapping non-dom status was supposed to pay for absolutely everything, where on earth are they going to find the money now?
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Feb 12, 2024 17:33:08 GMT
Remember folks, the wankers who rallied against the last leader around zero tolerance against anti Semitism didn't care one jot about actual anti Semitism, they just change the definition as and when it suits......
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Feb 12, 2024 19:05:00 GMT
Remember folks, the wankers who rallied against the last leader around zero tolerance against anti Semitism didn't care one jot about actual anti Semitism, they just change the definition as and when it suits...... I agree but I also don't think what he said is antisemetic either. If I criticise the Uks actions I'm not anti christian. If I criticise Saudia Arabia I'm not anti Muslim. This is the most watched border in the world with many sources showing they had many warnings. Allowed maybe isn't the right word but they were very aware of an impeding attack on the horizon.
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Feb 12, 2024 19:08:16 GMT
Starmer appears to be a racist . fact every advert on tv has black / ethnically challenged people in them in nearly every frame . Can you spot any in this labour ad fb.watch/q4Kq08ExpB/perhaps they are all transgender ? I don't even know why you're so critical of him. If he gets in he's gonna run a government very similar to the last 14 years. He's probably the best labour leader right leaning voters could ask for.
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Feb 12, 2024 19:16:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Feb 12, 2024 19:40:30 GMT
Remember folks, the wankers who rallied against the last leader around zero tolerance against anti Semitism didn't care one jot about actual anti Semitism, they just change the definition as and when it suits...... I agree but I also don't think what he said is antisemetic either. If I criticise the Uks actions I'm not anti christian. If I criticise Saudia Arabia I'm not anti Muslim. This is the most watched border in the world with many sources showing they had many warnings. Allowed maybe isn't the right word but they were very aware of an impeding attack on the horizon. Sorry mate the rules have been set re:antisemitism now, whether we like it or not……
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Feb 12, 2024 20:04:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Feb 12, 2024 20:05:24 GMT
I agree but I also don't think what he said is antisemetic either. If I criticise the Uks actions I'm not anti christian. If I criticise Saudia Arabia I'm not anti Muslim. This is the most watched border in the world with many sources showing they had many warnings. Allowed maybe isn't the right word but they were very aware of an impeding attack on the horizon. Sorry mate the rules have been set re:antisemitism now, whether we like it or not…… Gonna buy myself an island and form a unique religion on it so I can do whatever I want and if anyone criticises me it'll be antigawaism as its the only state practicing gawa.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Feb 12, 2024 20:07:47 GMT
Remember folks, the wankers who rallied against the last leader around zero tolerance against anti Semitism didn't care one jot about actual anti Semitism, they just change the definition as and when it suits...... What's that sound, not the sound of another screeching handbreak turn? 🤦♂️
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 12, 2024 20:14:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Feb 12, 2024 20:21:52 GMT
Sorry mate the rules have been set re:antisemitism now, whether we like it or not…… Gonna buy myself an island and form a unique religion on it so I can do whatever I want and if anyone criticises me it'll be antigawaism as its the only state practicing gawa. You don't need your own mate, just go to one of the Thai ones, legal weed, wonderful scenery/weather and they couldn't give a shit what religion you are 😄
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Feb 13, 2024 9:50:03 GMT
Starmer seems to be allowing the evil of antisemitism to infiltrate the party, why won't he simply apologise? I expect to see journalists doorstepping him at home every day for the next 6 months.......
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 13, 2024 9:54:17 GMT
Starmer seems to be allowing the evil of antisemitism to infiltrate the party, why won't he simply apologise? I expect to see journalists doorstepping him at home every day for the next 6 months....... Funny how when they backtracked and kicked him out the PR machine put out photos of him with Corbyn. You really couldn't make this shit up.
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Feb 13, 2024 10:12:18 GMT
Sorry mate the rules have been set re:antisemitism now, whether we like it or not…… Gonna buy myself an island and form a unique religion on it so I can do whatever I want and if anyone criticises me it'll be antigawaism as its the only state practicing gawa. What are the membership fees...?
|
|
|
Post by adri2008 on Feb 13, 2024 10:47:20 GMT
Remember folks, the wankers who rallied against the last leader around zero tolerance against anti Semitism didn't care one jot about actual anti Semitism, they just change the definition as and when it suits...... I agree but I also don't think what he said is antisemetic either. If I criticise the Uks actions I'm not anti christian. If I criticise Saudia Arabia I'm not anti Muslim. This is the most watched border in the world with many sources showing they had many warnings. Allowed maybe isn't the right word but they were very aware of an impeding attack on the horizon. Anything that isn't the official narrative is a conspiracy theory these days with those saying it demonised like some sort of lunatic. Personally I feel its more likely that Israel did allow it to occur than somehow a load of blokes in pick up trucks and hand gliders somehow managed to blindside Israel and go on a rampage for hours on end.
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Feb 13, 2024 11:40:47 GMT
Gonna buy myself an island and form a unique religion on it so I can do whatever I want and if anyone criticises me it'll be antigawaism as its the only state practicing gawa. What are the membership fees...? 5 oatcake likes a day for me and 5 reports of any of badgers posts a day too.
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Feb 13, 2024 11:42:41 GMT
I agree but I also don't think what he said is antisemetic either. If I criticise the Uks actions I'm not anti christian. If I criticise Saudia Arabia I'm not anti Muslim. This is the most watched border in the world with many sources showing they had many warnings. Allowed maybe isn't the right word but they were very aware of an impeding attack on the horizon. Anything that isn't the official narrative is a conspiracy theory these days with those saying it demonised like some sort of lunatic. Personally I feel its more likely that Israel did allow it to occur than somehow a load of blokes in pick up trucks and hand gliders somehow managed to blindside Israel and go on a rampage for hours on end. Just doesn't all add up for me but need to be careful how you word it or else you're antisemetic. Israel seems to be gaining alot from said attack so it does feel a bit premeditated to me. But what do I know. Good to be open minded anyway.
|
|
|
Post by adri2008 on Feb 13, 2024 12:42:33 GMT
Anything that isn't the official narrative is a conspiracy theory these days with those saying it demonised like some sort of lunatic. Personally I feel its more likely that Israel did allow it to occur than somehow a load of blokes in pick up trucks and hand gliders somehow managed to blindside Israel and go on a rampage for hours on end. Just doesn't all add up for me but need to be careful how you word it or else you're antisemetic. Israel seems to be gaining alot from said attack so it does feel a bit premeditated to me. But what do I know. Good to be open minded anyway. Very much so. Antisemitism seems to cover all criticism of anything Israel gets up to. Like a free pass to do whatever they like with our media/government seemingly well on board with the idea. From the Spectator: What Starmer’s appalling handling of an obviously open-and-shut case of indefensible bigotry does offer though is a troubling glimpse into the likely course of his looming premiership.
He stood by Ali for the best part of three days despite the candidate’s peddling of the disgusting and false conspiracy theory that Israel deliberately facilitated the October 7 pogrom against its own citizens. He even sent a series of senior frontbenchers out to bat for Ali, including Pat McFadden, Lisa Nandy and Nick Thomas-Symonds.There's absolutely nothing open and shut about it but of course any questioning of Israeli motives is an absolute taboo.
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Feb 13, 2024 13:14:53 GMT
George Galloway now favourite 4/6 from 3/1 Ashar gone from 1/3 to 6/4 Will be good to hear an oration from George again to stir things up. Unfortunately George also supports Putin besides the Palestinians
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Feb 13, 2024 15:09:29 GMT
What are the membership fees...? 5 oatcake likes a day for me and 5 reports of any of badgers posts a day too. Badgerist
|
|
|
Post by oggyoggy on Feb 13, 2024 15:38:25 GMT
Just doesn't all add up for me but need to be careful how you word it or else you're antisemetic. Israel seems to be gaining alot from said attack so it does feel a bit premeditated to me. But what do I know. Good to be open minded anyway. Very much so. Antisemitism seems to cover all criticism of anything Israel gets up to. Like a free pass to do whatever they like with our media/government seemingly well on board with the idea. From the Spectator: What Starmer’s appalling handling of an obviously open-and-shut case of indefensible bigotry does offer though is a troubling glimpse into the likely course of his looming premiership.
He stood by Ali for the best part of three days despite the candidate’s peddling of the disgusting and false conspiracy theory that Israel deliberately facilitated the October 7 pogrom against its own citizens. He even sent a series of senior frontbenchers out to bat for Ali, including Pat McFadden, Lisa Nandy and Nick Thomas-Symonds.There's absolutely nothing open and shut about it but of course any questioning of Israeli motives is an absolute taboo. Is there any credible evidence to back up Ali’s comments? Did he point to any? If not, it is pretty outrageous and Starmer should have binned him immediately, or asked Ali to produce hard evidence to back up his claims, else Labour drop him. Done stand for a political party if you are going to completely undermine the party’s position on a really contentious issue before you’re even elected. Labour shouldn’t have picked him as the candidate and he shouldn’t be trying to be a labour MP.
|
|