|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Dec 18, 2020 22:44:06 GMT
As I was saying
|
|
|
Post by butlerstbob on Dec 18, 2020 22:45:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Dec 18, 2020 22:50:04 GMT
It’s noteworthy the narratives that the press run with just before tougher restrictions and lockdowns are being considered
Their data was starting to not stand up to scrutiny so if you were skeptical, you’d be forgiven for thinking the breaking news of a new strain makes it easier to “sell” tougher measures
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Dec 18, 2020 22:50:48 GMT
How convenient, just when there’s hope for some return to some normality there’s all of a sudden a “new strain” which plunges the zealots straight back into lock everything down everyones a murdering selfish scumbag mode. They’ve got them by the short and curlys, laughable.
|
|
|
Post by shakermaker on Dec 18, 2020 22:52:19 GMT
Shes already spoke about this. She has a condition that makes her faint from pain, sometimes delayed. But if she was known to have this reaction to even the slightest bit of pain, they wouldn’t have interviewed her would they? It doesn’t look good either way does it.
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Dec 18, 2020 22:52:49 GMT
How convenient, just when there’s hope for some return to some normality there’s all of a sudden a “new strain” which plunges the zealots straight back into lock everything down everyones a murdering selfish scumbag mode. They’ve got them by the short and curlys, laughable. Judging by your post a few days back it shouldn’t bother you anyway🙄
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Dec 18, 2020 22:54:09 GMT
How convenient, just when there’s hope for some return to some normality there’s all of a sudden a “new strain” which plunges the zealots straight back into lock everything down everyones a murdering selfish scumbag mode. They’ve got them by the short and curlys, laughable. Judging by your post a few days back it shouldn’t bother you anyway🙄 Correct, it doesn’t, just like it shouldn’t bother anyone else. Needless fearmongering once again, a recurring theme of 2020.
|
|
|
Post by chad on Dec 18, 2020 22:54:25 GMT
Some of the attitudes on this thread are unbelievable Some of the beliefs on this thread are unbelievable 😊
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Dec 18, 2020 22:56:18 GMT
Judging by your post a few days back it shouldn’t bother you anyway🙄 Correct, it doesn’t, just like it shouldn’t bother anyone else. Needless fearmongering once again, a recurring theme of 2020. Needless fearmongering my arse but each to their own
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Dec 18, 2020 22:58:22 GMT
How convenient, just when there’s hope for some return to some normality there’s all of a sudden a “new strain” which plunges the zealots straight back into lock everything down everyones a murdering selfish scumbag mode. They’ve got them by the short and curlys, laughable. Judging by your post a few days back it shouldn’t bother you anyway🙄 This thread has been a very good tool to find out who the wankers are on this site I must say.
|
|
|
Post by numpty40 on Dec 18, 2020 23:00:15 GMT
What if people who are really worried about Covid stayed indoors, had home deliveries and totally locked down whilst those who wanted to live their lives carried on normally, went to the pub and watched live sport etc . The ones who stayed indoors would be nice and safe and the rest would catch covid and die. Could that be a viable option going forward?
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Dec 18, 2020 23:00:24 GMT
Judging by your post a few days back it shouldn’t bother you anyway🙄 This thread has been a very good tool to find out who the wankers are on this site I must say. The irony.
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Dec 18, 2020 23:01:09 GMT
What if people who are really worried about Covid stayed indoors, had home deliveries and totally locked down whilst those who wanted to live their lives carried on normally, went to the pub and watched live sport etc . The ones who stayed indoors would be nice and safe and the rest would catch covid and die. Could that be a viable option going forward? Nope, that’s not allowed, everyone is a selfish arsehole and anyone who wants to return to normality is a complete turd.
|
|
|
Post by franklin on Dec 18, 2020 23:03:49 GMT
Judging by your post a few days back it shouldn’t bother you anyway🙄 Correct, it doesn’t, just like it shouldn’t bother anyone else. Needless fearmongering once again, a recurring theme of 2020. We'd still be living in caves if some of these people had their way. Don't go outside its scary.
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Dec 18, 2020 23:08:12 GMT
Correct, it doesn’t, just like it shouldn’t bother anyone else. Needless fearmongering once again, a recurring theme of 2020. We'd still be living in caves if some of these people had their way. Don't go outside its scary. Statistically a lot more likely to be killed or maimed on the drive to get a test you don’t need that’s not always accurate for an illness that if you did get you’d have a 99.2% chance of surviving perfectly fine. It’s baffling, truly.
|
|
|
Post by numpty40 on Dec 18, 2020 23:10:14 GMT
What if people who are really worried about Covid stayed indoors, had home deliveries and totally locked down whilst those who wanted to live their lives carried on normally, went to the pub and watched live sport etc . The ones who stayed indoors would be nice and safe and the rest would catch covid and die. Could that be a viable option going forward? Nope, that’s not allowed, everyone is a selfish arsehole and anyone who wants to return to normality is a complete turd. Maybe we could sign a disclaimer, 'I enter this pub/restaurant/sports arena fully aware of the consequences'
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Dec 18, 2020 23:14:06 GMT
We'd still be living in caves if some of these people had their way. Don't go outside its scary. Statistically a lot more likely to be killed or maimed on the drive to get a test you don’t need that’s not always accurate for an illness that if you did get you’d have a 99.2% chance of surviving perfectly fine. It’s baffling, truly. Yes but a 10% chance you’d need hospital treatment that requires test so if 50.000 a day get it you’d put the doctors in the position of having to choose who’s to save and who not too even for rent has the space it’s not that she’s to understand why no government cannot take any availabale action to try ans prevent that . The sick with other illness the economy neither can can be addressed preprtly until the virus is under control
|
|
|
Post by chad on Dec 18, 2020 23:16:02 GMT
We'd still be living in caves if some of these people had their way. Don't go outside its scary. Statistically a lot more likely to be killed or maimed on the drive to get a test you don’t need that’s not always accurate for an illness that if you did get you’d have a 99.2% chance of surviving perfectly fine. It’s baffling, truly. Approx 5 people a day killed on the roads Approx 400 a day by Covid Not sure about your maths
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Dec 18, 2020 23:16:16 GMT
Statistically a lot more likely to be killed or maimed on the drive to get a test you don’t need that’s not always accurate for an illness that if you did get you’d have a 99.2% chance of surviving perfectly fine. It’s baffling, truly. Yes but a 10% chance you’d need hospital treatment that requires test so if 50.000 a day get it you’d put the doctors in the position of having to choose who’s to save and who not too even for rent has the space it’s not that she’s to understand why no government cannot take any availabale action to try ans prevent that . The sick with other illness the economy neither can can be addressed preprtly until the virus is under control Even at the absolute worst point this year when we were losing 1,000 people per day the Nightingale hospitals were 90% unused and the “choosing who lives” narrative has never even come close to fruition, you’re looking for a reality that isn’t there.
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Dec 18, 2020 23:16:50 GMT
It’s noteworthy the narratives that the press run with just before tougher restrictions and lockdowns are being considered Their data was starting to not stand up to scrutiny so if you were skeptical, you’d be forgiven for thinking the breaking news of a new strain makes it easier to “sell” tougher measures Unfortunately the Government has lost so much credibility that if something comes from their 'sources' that happens to be true no-one will believe them anyway. This thread confirms 'Making it up as you go along' policies breeds 'Make it up as you go along' Conspiracy Theories
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Dec 18, 2020 23:16:58 GMT
Statistically a lot more likely to be killed or maimed on the drive to get a test you don’t need that’s not always accurate for an illness that if you did get you’d have a 99.2% chance of surviving perfectly fine. It’s baffling, truly. Approx 5 people a day killed on the roads Approx 400 a day by Covid Not sure about your maths With, not of. There’s the difference.
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Dec 18, 2020 23:17:55 GMT
What if people who are really worried about Covid stayed indoors, had home deliveries and totally locked down whilst those who wanted to live their lives carried on normally, went to the pub and watched live sport etc . The ones who stayed indoors would be nice and safe and the rest would catch covid and die. Could that be a viable option going forward? No because lock down is about NHS treatment capability not fear
|
|
|
Post by riverman on Dec 18, 2020 23:19:07 GMT
Statistically a lot more likely to be killed or maimed on the drive to get a test you don’t need that’s not always accurate for an illness that if you did get you’d have a 99.2% chance of surviving perfectly fine. It’s baffling, truly. Yes but a 10% chance you’d need hospital treatment that requires test so if 50.000 a day get it you’d put the doctors in the position of having to choose who’s to save and who not too even for rent has the space it’s not that she’s to understand why no government cannot take any availabale action to try ans prevent that . The sick with other illness the economy neither can can be addressed preprtly until the virus is under control In English please.
|
|
|
Post by chad on Dec 18, 2020 23:19:41 GMT
Approx 5 people a day killed on the roads Approx 400 a day by Covid Not sure about your maths With, not of. There’s the difference. 395 that’s the difference
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Dec 18, 2020 23:25:15 GMT
Yes but a 10% chance you’d need hospital treatment that requires test so if 50.000 a day get it you’d put the doctors in the position of having to choose who’s to save and who not too even for rent has the space it’s not that she’s to understand why no government cannot take any availabale action to try ans prevent that . The sick with other illness the economy neither can can be addressed preprtly until the virus is under control Even at the absolute worst point this year when we were losing 1,000 people per day the Nightingale hospitals were 90% unused and the “choosing who lives” narrative has never even come close to fruition, you’re looking for a reality that isn’t there. They can’t staff the nightingale hospitals and the current ones so that’s a false safety net the truth is no government wants to lockdown even one as incompetent as this one but even they know it’s not a choice it’s an inevitability
|
|
|
Post by franklin on Dec 18, 2020 23:25:28 GMT
With, not of. There’s the difference. 395 that’s the difference If the 5 who died on the roads had covid it'd be 400 still.
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Dec 18, 2020 23:27:02 GMT
Yes but a 10% chance you’d need hospital treatment that requires test so if 50.000 a day get it you’d put the doctors in the position of having to choose who’s to save and who not too even for rent has the space it’s not that she’s to understand why no government cannot take any availabale action to try ans prevent that . The sick with other illness the economy neither can can be addressed preprtly until the virus is under control In English please. I in 10 need hospital treatment . There are not enough beds at the current rate of infection and increase transmission. .
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Dec 18, 2020 23:40:34 GMT
Of course there is growing concern. Was it ever going to be any different? The minute Hancock pretty much dismissed it as something to be concerned about it was only a matter of time before it became the major concern.
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Dec 19, 2020 0:06:54 GMT
Of course there is growing concern. Was it ever going to be any different? The minute Hancock pretty much dismissed it as something to be concerned about it was only a matter of time before it became the major concern. Here we go. Christmas cancelled 😂 Isn't it funny how these things magically transpire at around exactly the same point the opposition and media pressurise the government into a decision they don't want to make.
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Dec 19, 2020 0:10:06 GMT
Of course there is growing concern. Was it ever going to be any different? The minute Hancock pretty much dismissed it as something to be concerned about it was only a matter of time before it became the major concern. Here we go. Christmas cancelled 😂 Isn't it funny how these things magically transpire at around exactly the same point the opposition and media pressurise the government into a decision they don't want to make. It's not just the media and the opposition, its the people on the front line : BBC News - Pressure on hospitals 'at a really dangerous point' www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55362681
|
|