|
|
Post by metalhead on Nov 7, 2017 15:01:43 GMT
be careful sheikhmomo the tory boys will use the anti sematic card on you  remember the Tory's are those that should be obeyed not investigated, and not questioned for there dodgy government!! kim jun May wants it that way Funny how you pair keep calling all tories scum, but when stories appear about Labour MP's accused of rape and even topping themselves to avoid the backlash - you keep shtum.  |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 7, 2017 15:38:06 GMT
Easy, and I'll use your article. "The UK’s international development secretary asked officials from her department to examine whether public money could support humanitarian operations in occupied parts of the Golan Heights." "asked officials" "public money could" "humanitarian operations". So asked not told, could not should and humanitarian operation s speaks for itself. No 10 said: "The secretary of state did discuss potential ways to provide medical support for Syrian refugees who are wounded and who cross into the Golan for aid. The Israeli army runs field hospitals there to care for Syrians wounded in the civil war. But there is no change in policy in the area. The UK does not provide any financial support to the Israeli army.”It's her job as International Development Minister to examine the effects of our Foreign Aid budget. |
|
|
|
Post by Kilo on Nov 7, 2017 15:41:16 GMT
Funny how you pair keep calling all tories scum, but when stories appear about Labour MP's accused of rape and even topping themselves to avoid the backlash - you keep shtum. One the information you are referring too is not the same person and 2 if you look at what I said above I've said its not acceptable what I've also said is the tory government should be whiter than white as they are representing us and the fact that 6 ministers plus are being investigated shows Mays poor judgment of character. she also has ministers going off on there own bat doing stuff outside of there remit and doesn't sack them this shows she has no control. She has a foreign minister who is making diplomacy worse and is making constant gaffs and she is not again sacking him. She has a government in turmoil and not controlling it she is showing the leadership of a chocolate tea pot. Yes I condemn anyone that has done a sexual assault but the police should investigate each and every case however they probably won't because they are overstretched. I didn't say it was the same person (stories - plural) but that strengthens my point in that it is not just the Tories who are "scum" as you like to call them and some would argue that the current allegations are far worse on the labour side. I'm also in no way defending the tories, just bored of you peddling your hatred of a politcal party with sweeping generalisations. |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 7, 2017 15:42:43 GMT
Funny how you pair keep calling all tories scum, but when stories appear about Labour MP's accused of rape and even topping themselves to avoid the backlash - you keep shtum. One the information you are referring too is not the same person and 2 if you look at what I said above I've said its not acceptable what I've also said is the tory government should be whiter than white as they are representing us and the fact that 6 ministers plus are being investigated shows Mays poor judgment of character. she also has ministers going off on there own bat doing stuff outside of there remit and doesn't sack them this shows she has no control. She has a foreign minister who is making diplomacy worse and is making constant gaffs and she is not again sacking him. She has a government in turmoil and not controlling it she is showing the leadership of a chocolate tea pot. Yes I condemn anyone that has done a sexual assault but the police should investigate each and every case however they probably won't because they are overstretched. You do realise that you've just proved Kilo's point don't you? |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 7, 2017 15:45:58 GMT
Easy, and I'll use your article. "The UK’s international development secretary asked officials from her department to examine whether public money could support humanitarian operations in occupied parts of the Golan Heights." "asked officials" "public money could" "humanitarian operations". So asked not told, could not should and humanitarian operation s speaks for itself. No 10 said: "The secretary of state did discuss potential ways to provide medical support for Syrian refugees who are wounded and who cross into the Golan for aid. The Israeli army runs field hospitals there to care for Syrians wounded in the civil war. But there is no change in policy in the area. The UK does not provide any financial support to the Israeli army.”It's her job as International Development Minister to examine the effects of our Foreign Aid budget. You want to talk about humanitarianism and the Golan Heights. Fuck me, rog. |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 7, 2017 15:58:14 GMT
Easy, and I'll use your article. "The UK’s international development secretary asked officials from her department to examine whether public money could support humanitarian operations in occupied parts of the Golan Heights." "asked officials" "public money could" "humanitarian operations". So asked not told, could not should and humanitarian operation s speaks for itself. No 10 said: "The secretary of state did discuss potential ways to provide medical support for Syrian refugees who are wounded and who cross into the Golan for aid. The Israeli army runs field hospitals there to care for Syrians wounded in the civil war. But there is no change in policy in the area. The UK does not provide any financial support to the Israeli army.”It's her job as International Development Minister to examine the effects of our Foreign Aid budget. You want to talk about humanitarianism and the Golan Heights. Fuck me, rog. OK. Using your article again. "The UK does not recognise Israel’s permanent presence in the Golan Heights, which was seized from Syria in the 1967 war, and so providing aid to the Israeli army in this or other occupied territories would be likely to contravene UK policy."Lucky she was advocating aid to hospitals who are supporting Syrian refugees. Golan Heights |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 7, 2017 16:07:30 GMT
You want to talk about humanitarianism and the Golan Heights. Fuck me, rog. OK. Using your article again. "The UK does not recognise Israel’s permanent presence in the Golan Heights, which was seized from Syria in the 1967 war, and so providing aid to the Israeli army in this or other occupied territories would be likely to contravene UK policy."Lucky she was advocating aid to hospitals who are supporting Syrian refugees. Golan HeightsSo you are advocating an unauthorised person, having unauthorised talks about letting a militia distribute UK aid in a territory we don't recognise?!?!? Yeah righto, Rog. Nothing to see hear at all She's toast. |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 7, 2017 16:23:58 GMT
OK. Using your article again. "The UK does not recognise Israel’s permanent presence in the Golan Heights, which was seized from Syria in the 1967 war, and so providing aid to the Israeli army in this or other occupied territories would be likely to contravene UK policy."Lucky she was advocating aid to hospitals who are supporting Syrian refugees. Golan HeightsSo you are advocating an unauthorised person, having unauthorised talks about letting a militia distribute UK aid in a territory we don't recognise?!?!? Yeah righto, Rog. Nothing to see hear at all She's toast. She's the International Development Minister. Her meetings were with companies, charities and politicians from the Government and opposition. They weren't held in secret. Israel is not a hostile country. The Government did know about the meetings taking place whilst she was out there. It's not news that Patel is pro-Israeli. She's a former vice-chairman of Conservative Friends of Israel. She raised the possibility of aiding hospitals that helped Syrian refugees. But you're right, those hospitals are on disputed land so she should be sacked  Whatever. |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 7, 2017 16:36:42 GMT
So you are advocating an unauthorised person, having unauthorised talks about letting a militia distribute UK aid in a territory we don't recognise?!?!? Yeah righto, Rog. Nothing to see hear at all She's toast. She's the International Development Minister. Her meetings were with companies, charities and politicians from the Government and opposition. They weren't held in secret. Israel is not a hostile country. The Government did know about the meetings taking place whilst she was out there. It's not news that Patel is pro-Israeli. She's a former vice-chairman of Conservative Friends of Israel. She raised the possibility of aiding hospitals that helped Syrian refugees. But you're right, those hospitals are on disputed land so she should be sacked Whatever. Your glorious leader, the ludicrous Mrs May has already admitted she had no idea these meetings took place. Which is perhaps the biggest scandal of all! |
|
|
|
Post by LL Cool Dave on Nov 7, 2017 21:13:35 GMT
She's the International Development Minister. Her meetings were with companies, charities and politicians from the Government and opposition. They weren't held in secret. Israel is not a hostile country. The Government did know about the meetings taking place whilst she was out there. It's not news that Patel is pro-Israeli. She's a former vice-chairman of Conservative Friends of Israel. She raised the possibility of aiding hospitals that helped Syrian refugees. But you're right, those hospitals are on disputed land so she should be sacked Whatever. Your glorious leader, the ludicrous Mrs May has already admitted she had no idea these meetings took place. Which is perhaps the biggest scandal of all! Stonewall sackable offence. Both her and Johnson would have been sacked under any other circumstances for their conduct this week be it not for the absurdly weak position the PM is in. |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 7, 2017 21:26:10 GMT
Your glorious leader, the ludicrous Mrs May has already admitted she had no idea these meetings took place. Which is perhaps the biggest scandal of all! Stonewall sackable offence. Both her and Johnson would have been sacked under any other circumstances for their conduct this week be it not for the absurdly weak position the PM is in. Cobblers. May can sack them. In a way it would make her stronger. She lines up May-friendly replacements, stands outside No 10 making the announcement and no one can stop her. |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 7, 2017 21:29:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by LL Cool Dave on Nov 7, 2017 22:15:48 GMT
Stonewall sackable offence. Both her and Johnson would have been sacked under any other circumstances for their conduct this week be it not for the absurdly weak position the PM is in. Cobblers. May can sack them. In a way it would make her stronger. She lines up May-friendly replacements, stands outside No 10 making the announcement and no one can stop her. You may be right on one count. |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 7, 2017 22:15:50 GMT
Your glorious leader, the ludicrous Mrs May has already admitted she had no idea these meetings took place. Which is perhaps the biggest scandal of all! Stonewall sackable offence. Both her and Johnson would have been sacked under any other circumstances for their conduct this week be it not for the absurdly weak position the PM is in. In any decent Government they would have both been gone by tea time. This is in fact a monstrous Government, existing only to cling on to power. Patel will still go though I reckon. |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 7, 2017 22:44:45 GMT
Fucking hell softcock !! Have you sobered up now??
You and Momo et al all frothing. It's amusing.
Here's your 'new' news ...... openly posted back in August.....
|
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Nov 8, 2017 8:02:31 GMT
Theresa May under pressure to sack Priti Patel after details of more Israel meetings emerge link |
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Nov 8, 2017 9:03:37 GMT
Easy, and I'll use your article. "The UK’s international development secretary asked officials from her department to examine whether public money could support humanitarian operations in occupied parts of the Golan Heights." "asked officials" "public money could" "humanitarian operations". So asked not told, could not should and humanitarian operation s speaks for itself. No 10 said: "The secretary of state did discuss potential ways to provide medical support for Syrian refugees who are wounded and who cross into the Golan for aid. The Israeli army runs field hospitals there to care for Syrians wounded in the civil war. But there is no change in policy in the area. The UK does not provide any financial support to the Israeli army.”It's her job as International Development Minister to examine the effects of our Foreign Aid budget. You want to talk about humanitarianism and the Golan Heights. Fuck me, rog. The only rights effecting the golan heights worth discussion is when Israel will have the decency to return them to the sovereign government of Syria |
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Nov 8, 2017 10:12:28 GMT
"It's the end of the world as we know it..."
|
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 8, 2017 10:33:44 GMT
She's the International Development Minister. Her meetings were with companies, charities and politicians from the Government and opposition. They weren't held in secret. Israel is not a hostile country. The Government did know about the meetings taking place whilst she was out there. It's not news that Patel is pro-Israeli. She's a former vice-chairman of Conservative Friends of Israel. She raised the possibility of aiding hospitals that helped Syrian refugees. But you're right, those hospitals are on disputed land so she should be sacked Whatever. Your glorious leader, the ludicrous Mrs May has already admitted she had no idea these meetings took place. Which is perhaps the biggest scandal of all! Well she did know about them..... |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 8, 2017 11:08:52 GMT
Your glorious leader, the ludicrous Mrs May has already admitted she had no idea these meetings took place. Which is perhaps the biggest scandal of all! Well she did know about them..... Indeed and has been lying to Press and the Public all week. Goodbye Theresa and don't let the door hit you on your bony arse on the way out  |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 8, 2017 11:40:27 GMT
Well she did know about them..... Indeed and has been lying to Press and the Public all week. Goodbye Theresa and don't let the door hit you on your bony arse on the way out Great. Patel to Foreign Secretary, Johnson to PM and Leadsom to Chancellor |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 8, 2017 11:44:31 GMT
Indeed and has been lying to Press and the Public all week. Goodbye Theresa and don't let the door hit you on your bony arse on the way out Great. Patel to Foreign Secretary, Johnson to PM and Leadsom to Chancellor And Corbyn to an unprecedented landslide within 6 months  |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 8, 2017 11:52:44 GMT
Great. Patel to Foreign Secretary, Johnson to PM and Leadsom to Chancellor And Corbyn to an unprecedented landslide within 6 months Well a, we're not having a GE in 6 months time and b, he still wouldn't win. He hasn't moved an inch on the uncosted policies that he lost with 5 months ago. How is he convincing millions more to vote for him? |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 8, 2017 11:58:31 GMT
Here's more of those "secret" meetings......
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 8, 2017 12:24:58 GMT
And Corbyn to an unprecedented landslide within 6 months Well a, we're not having a GE in 6 months time and b, he still wouldn't win. He hasn't moved an inch on the uncosted policies that he lost with 5 months ago. How is he convincing millions more to vote for him? He wont have to do anything, this evil, bungling bunch of pricks clinging to power are doing it all for him |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 8, 2017 12:29:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 8, 2017 13:27:23 GMT
But it's not Momo. You and Labour and the Independent are calling them 'secret' meetings they weren't. You're calling them "wilfully deceitful" for what end? Aid to field hospitals? The truth is dull. The truth is she's pro-Israel she met certain people in Israel, No. 10 knew at the time but not in advance possibly because of the ad hoc arrangements by Lord Polak maybe down to the fact that there was no grand mischievous scheme in operation. 12 meetings in Israel, and two more, one in London as per the previous tweet and one at the UN... She was asked about her meetings in Israel she told them she asked about any other meetings she told them. ??? Why have her meetings with senior figures in Israel left her facing Cabinet axe? - Standard |
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Nov 8, 2017 13:41:32 GMT
I wish May would just fuck off, that's all I'm waiting for.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 8, 2017 13:50:03 GMT
But it's not Momo. You and Labour and the Independent are calling them 'secret' meetings they weren't. You're calling them "wilfully deceitful" for what end? Aid to field hospitals? The truth is dull. The truth is she's pro-Israel she met certain people in Israel, No. 10 knew at the time but not in advance possibly because of the ad hoc arrangements by Lord Polak maybe down to the fact that there was no grand mischievous scheme in operation. 12 meetings in Israel, and two more, one in London as per the previous tweet and one at the UN... She was asked about her meetings in Israel she told them she asked about any other meetings she told them. ??? Why have her meetings with senior figures in Israel left her facing Cabinet axe? - StandardGive it up, Rog. She's a goner. The whole story is riddled with lies from start to finish and her meetings break every convention going. If what the Jewish Chronicle is saying is correct, then May is in grave danger also. One thing she cannot survive now on top of her appaling leadership and corrupt Government is her own integrity being cast into doubt. www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/no-10-knew-about-priti-patel-israel-meetings-1.447605 |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 8, 2017 14:17:58 GMT
But it's not Momo. You and Labour and the Independent are calling them 'secret' meetings they weren't. You're calling them "wilfully deceitful" for what end? Aid to field hospitals? The truth is dull. The truth is she's pro-Israel she met certain people in Israel, No. 10 knew at the time but not in advance possibly because of the ad hoc arrangements by Lord Polak maybe down to the fact that there was no grand mischievous scheme in operation. 12 meetings in Israel, and two more, one in London as per the previous tweet and one at the UN... She was asked about her meetings in Israel she told them she asked about any other meetings she told them. ??? Why have her meetings with senior figures in Israel left her facing Cabinet axe? - StandardGive it up, Rog. She's a goner. The whole story is riddled with lies from start to finish and her meetings break every convention going. If what the Jewish Chronicle is saying is correct, then May is in grave danger also. One thing she cannot survive now on top of her appaling leadership and corrupt Government is her own integrity being cast into doubt. www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/no-10-knew-about-priti-patel-israel-meetings-1.447605You're myopic. What lies? Which conventions? Here's No. 10 denying the JC article.... But you're never going to believe this tweet are you? "Appaling leadership" "corrupt Government" "integrity being cast into doubt" ...... but only because they're Tories right? |
|
remember the Tory's are those that should be obeyed not investigated, and not questioned for there dodgy government!! kim jun May wants it that way 
Whatever.
