|
Post by mattyd2 on Oct 6, 2020 15:31:30 GMT
Not copied from anywhere just showing some intelligence something you seem to be lacking in !! Get you- a legible paragraph at last and you're Will Self all of a sudden. More like The Oatcake's version of that room full of chimpanzees producing Shakespeare 😆 Not quite perfect...No comma between intelligence and something...
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Oct 6, 2020 15:40:00 GMT
So you would advocate say London turning tory despite what the electorate voted For Just because labour spent to much Hardly fair on the voters Yet again you are acting like an idiot and you know it there are rules governing spending on elections and it's not labour that has been found in breach of these rules time and time again from secret call centres to fabricating hotel expense to down right spending to much and fiddling the expenses. The election commission can only fine a part give them real power to disqualify individuals in constituency and if it's the national party get there candidates ruled null and void in there safest seats for each x thousands they go over you would then put and end to the buying of elections You can’t bring in a electoral law retrospectively Can you guarantee the labour party in the future will not break spending I would suggest no you can’t Instead of avoiding a answer and questioning someone’s intelligence Why not simply answer the question do you think it would be fair for the electorate to have a mp totally opposite to what they have voted for Just because the Conservatives Labour Liberals Snp Viet taff Assorted others were unable to keep there hands in their pockets
|
|
|
Post by RedandWhite90 on Oct 6, 2020 15:42:44 GMT
Must have been said in jest this, surely? I think my personal favourite is making us the Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦 of green energy. What a country to emulate. Anything about Test, Track and Trace?
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Oct 6, 2020 16:07:18 GMT
Get you- a legible paragraph at last and you're Will Self all of a sudden. More like The Oatcake's version of that room full of chimpanzees producing Shakespeare 😆 Not quite perfect...No comma between intelligence and something... Baby steps- Rome wasn't built in a day!
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Oct 6, 2020 16:29:24 GMT
Yet again you are acting like an idiot and you know it there are rules governing spending on elections and it's not labour that has been found in breach of these rules time and time again from secret call centres to fabricating hotel expense to down right spending to much and fiddling the expenses. The election commission can only fine a part give them real power to disqualify individuals in constituency and if it's the national party get there candidates ruled null and void in there safest seats for each x thousands they go over you would then put and end to the buying of elections You can’t bring in a electoral law retrospectively Can you guarantee the labour party in the future will not break spending I would suggest no you can’t Instead of avoiding a answer and questioning someone’s intelligence Why not simply answer the question do you think it would be fair for the electorate to have a mp totally opposite to what they have voted for Just because the Conservatives Labour Liberals Snp Viet taff Assorted others were unable to keep there hands in their pockets If a seat has been won by buying the vote or spending more than your opponent who has stuck to the rules then yes they should be retrospectively banned whichever the party And yes it would be fare as the political parties would make double sure it did not happen if these rules were in place also by hitting the national party in the safer seats you would undoubtedly hit the senior politicians and again this would focus them on strictly following the rules
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Oct 6, 2020 16:35:51 GMT
You can’t bring in a electoral law retrospectively Can you guarantee the labour party in the future will not break spending I would suggest no you can’t Instead of avoiding a answer and questioning someone’s intelligence Why not simply answer the question do you think it would be fair for the electorate to have a mp totally opposite to what they have voted for Just because the Conservatives Labour Liberals Snp Viet taff Assorted others were unable to keep there hands in their pockets If a seat has been won by buying the vote or spending more than your opponent who has stuck to the rules then yes they should be retrospectively banned whichever the party And yes it would be fare as the political parties would make double sure it did not happen if these rules were in place also by hitting the national party in the safer seats you would undoubtedly hit the senior politicians and again this would focus them on strictly following the rules Where do you stand on postal voting Joey ?
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Oct 6, 2020 16:43:15 GMT
If a seat has been won by buying the vote or spending more than your opponent who has stuck to the rules then yes they should be retrospectively banned whichever the party And yes it would be fare as the political parties would make double sure it did not happen if these rules were in place also by hitting the national party in the safer seats you would undoubtedly hit the senior politicians and again this would focus them on strictly following the rules Where do you stand on postal voting Joey ? As my mum had one and the way I know they work with 2 witnesses and the rigorous checks involved for validation totally for them
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Oct 6, 2020 16:45:46 GMT
If a seat has been won by buying the vote or spending more than your opponent who has stuck to the rules then yes they should be retrospectively banned whichever the party And yes it would be fare as the political parties would make double sure it did not happen if these rules were in place also by hitting the national party in the safer seats you would undoubtedly hit the senior politicians and again this would focus them on strictly following the rules Where do you stand on postal voting Joey ? What I'm not infavour of is people who don't pay taxes in this country or have left this country 10 years or more getting a vote do you
|
|
|
Post by mattyd2 on Oct 6, 2020 16:45:47 GMT
If a seat has been won by buying the vote or spending more than your opponent who has stuck to the rules then yes they should be retrospectively banned whichever the party And yes it would be fare as the political parties would make double sure it did not happen if these rules were in place also by hitting the national party in the safer seats you would undoubtedly hit the senior politicians and again this would focus them on strictly following the rules Where do you stand on postal voting Joey ? Fine. As long as someone else writes the envelope out for him.
|
|
|
Post by mattyd2 on Oct 6, 2020 16:46:32 GMT
Where do you stand on postal voting Joey ? As my mum had one and the way I know they work with 2 witnesses and the rigorous checks involved for validation totally for them Uh
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Oct 6, 2020 16:47:59 GMT
Where do you stand on postal voting Joey ? As my mum had one and the way I know they work with 2 witnesses and the rigorous checks involved for validation totally for them 🤯
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Oct 6, 2020 16:55:21 GMT
Get you- a legible paragraph at last and you're Will Self all of a sudden. More like The Oatcake's version of that room full of chimpanzees producing Shakespeare 😆 Not quite perfect...No comma between intelligence and something... A semi colon would be better there. A comma should go earlier, after anywhere.
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Oct 6, 2020 16:59:50 GMT
Not quite perfect...No comma between intelligence and something... A semi colon would be better there. A comma should go earlier, after anywhere. I thought a full stop after intelligence? Every day is a school day on here😀
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Oct 6, 2020 17:04:43 GMT
Not quite perfect...No comma between intelligence and something... A semi colon would be better there. A comma should go earlier, after anywhere. Don't force it. I've seen The Lawnmower Man, if Joey becomes more powerful he won't be contained.
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Oct 6, 2020 17:08:49 GMT
A semi colon would be better there. A comma should go earlier, after anywhere. I thought a full stop after intelligence? Every day is a school day on here😀 A semi colon is more elegant I think. Writing can be a thing of great beauty.
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Oct 6, 2020 17:14:36 GMT
I thought a full stop after intelligence? Every day is a school day on here😀 A semi colon is more elegant I think. Writing can be a thing of great beauty. Oh I agree, it’s a beautiful symbol which should be used more often. Although I still appreciated a good old fashioned, traditional full stop⚫️
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Oct 6, 2020 17:21:12 GMT
Where do you stand on postal voting Joey ? As my mum had one and the way I know they work with 2 witnesses and the rigorous checks involved for validation totally for them I take it she wasn't voting for Labour in Peterborough then could you possibly try posting using the English version of grammar it's very confusing for people who aren't in Essex in'it bro.
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Oct 6, 2020 17:22:29 GMT
Where do you stand on postal voting Joey ? Fine. As long as someone else writes the envelope out for him. Yep the electoral commission writes the envelope for all of them then a validation form 2 witnesses required then finally a sealed envelope with vote in and no I vote in person
|
|
|
Post by Kpsje on Oct 6, 2020 17:23:30 GMT
I thought a full stop after intelligence? Every day is a school day on here😀 A semi colon is more elegant I think. Writing can be a thing of great beauty.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Oct 6, 2020 17:23:42 GMT
A semi colon is more elegant I think. Writing can be a thing of great beauty. Oh I agree, it’s a beautiful symbol which should be used more often. Although I still appreciated a good old fashioned, traditional full stop⚫️ Joey hasn't grasped the use of a capital yet FFS, baby steps and all that.
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Oct 6, 2020 17:23:43 GMT
I thought a full stop after intelligence? Every day is a school day on here😀 A semi colon is more elegant I think. Writing can be a thing of great beauty. The thing is I'm texting and none of the rules apply 😁
|
|
|
Post by vokeswagen on Oct 6, 2020 17:38:01 GMT
Oh I agree, it’s a beautiful symbol which should be used more often. Although I still appreciated a good old fashioned, traditional full stop⚫️ Joey hasn't grasped the use of a capital yet FFS, baby steps and all that. Fucking hell, I’ve seen it all now. This utter imbecile lecturing others on grammar. Welcome to The Oatcake 2020, where the pot calls the kettle black (largely because the pot in this case absolutely hates blacks obvs) 😂
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Oct 6, 2020 18:08:44 GMT
A semi colon is more elegant I think. Writing can be a thing of great beauty. The thing is I'm texting and none of the rules apply 😁 Really !
|
|
|
Post by longdistancekiddie on Oct 6, 2020 18:38:04 GMT
Political donations should be made illegal, from all sides of the spectrum. It's too easy to buy influence and the likelihood of corruption is always there. Imagine if you were allowed to make donations to the Exam Board overseeing your kids' qualifications! It's so obviously not all above board, the Jenrick planning scandal being the most obvious recent abuse of power. It's just like advertising - if it wasn't effective, no-one would waste their time doing it. Any party receiving above, say, 5% of the vote in a general election should be funded equally from public money. No more no less. Including Trade Unions ? Typical, you benifitted greatly because of the unions.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Oct 6, 2020 18:52:30 GMT
Typical, you benifitted greatly because of the unions. WTF
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Oct 6, 2020 19:39:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by longdistancekiddie on Oct 6, 2020 20:03:28 GMT
Bluffer Johnski will say/do anything for a few quid
|
|
|
Post by mattyd2 on Oct 6, 2020 20:16:04 GMT
Fine. As long as someone else writes the envelope out for him. Yep the electoral commission writes the envelope for all of them then a validation form 2 witnesses required then finally a sealed envelope with vote in and no I vote in person Hey Joey... What's the difference between a cow's arse and a post box...?
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Oct 6, 2020 20:50:34 GMT
Yep the electoral commission writes the envelope for all of them then a validation form 2 witnesses required then finally a sealed envelope with vote in and no I vote in person Hey Joey... What's the difference between a cow's arse and a post box...? If you don't know that I'm not giving you a letter to post 😁 thought youd have learned that by now hope the question has not taxed you too much
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Oct 6, 2020 20:53:05 GMT
|
|