|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 20, 2023 18:46:12 GMT
Soke North's Labour candidate David Williams, A decent bloke.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 20, 2023 19:27:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 21, 2023 7:37:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by roylandstoke on Feb 21, 2023 8:09:53 GMT
Surely, every sentient being knows that this government is incapable of telling the truth on any issue.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Feb 21, 2023 13:07:51 GMT
The Tories simply don't care, yes we've been caught out lying on this before, "but so fuckin what, who gives a shit?" Thing is, Burley, as credible political interviewer really should be prepared for this type of answer and be in a position to nail the interviewee because she's armed herself with the facts. Until Caufield starts getting regularly called out for her lie, she will simply continue to do it.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Feb 21, 2023 14:19:11 GMT
Shittest episode of Homes Under the Hammer I’ve ever seen….. Scrotes, scumbags and savages. Could be a good legal firm name that. Poor language choice by the absolute fraud of a man.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Feb 21, 2023 15:04:56 GMT
The Tories putting us on notice, that they are diametrically opposed to us having clean air to breath in our cities? 🤦♂️
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Feb 21, 2023 15:24:56 GMT
So does this mean that the (PPE) money that they stole from us, they're now going to offer to lend it back to us, at rates of 92% APR, all whilst they are under investigation?
Absolute model Tories ...
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 21, 2023 16:56:21 GMT
So does this mean that the (PPE) money that they stole from us, they're now going to offer to lend it back to us, at rates of 92% APR, all whilst they are under investigation? Absolute model Tories ... Good grief!!
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 21, 2023 16:58:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Feb 21, 2023 23:10:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LL Cool Dave on Feb 22, 2023 7:12:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 22, 2023 8:40:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 22, 2023 9:39:27 GMT
Thick as mince....Gullis
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Feb 22, 2023 10:45:29 GMT
The only positive outcome of Gullis being an MP is that he is not teaching Children He had little interest in the answer, but achieved his objective by asking the Question which he can share with his fellow knuckle-draggers come GE time. It is one often posed by like minded Racists, frequently on QT or down the pub, with a smugness that underlines their ignorence, thinking they have asked the most profound question He/they are not asking the question in good faith, they are really saying they have no interest in the safety and welfare of Refugees , they just wish for the "problem" to go away and be dealt with by someone else, anyone else.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 22, 2023 10:58:40 GMT
Made me chuckle....
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Feb 22, 2023 12:27:46 GMT
Awaiting knype or bianca to tell us how if Starmer was in charge that there would be even more sex offenders in labour.
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Feb 22, 2023 12:40:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 22, 2023 13:05:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 22, 2023 13:06:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by slash on Feb 22, 2023 13:51:36 GMT
The Tories putting us on notice, that they are diametrically opposed to us having clean air to breath in our cities? 🤦♂️ if the British public gets to breathe clean air, that means immigrants and refugees can too, and we just can't have that.
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Feb 22, 2023 16:37:37 GMT
It's a shame Gullis didn't get a chance to respond.
I'd put money on that answer being "But why don't they just stay in France?" at which point the entire collection of people present roll their eyes and sigh...
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 23, 2023 6:47:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 23, 2023 8:10:32 GMT
There is certainly an argument to suggest Starmer is, (at least claiming) to be further to the right than the current PM.
Ignoring the fact they are both useless dopes, it's refreshing and somewhat bizarre (given who and what Starmer was championing in 2019) to see Labour place emphasis on "taking back control", dealing with immigration, defining a woman (something he'd struggled with for years) and focusing on driving private sector growth. He's even discussed reforming the sacred cow of the NHS.
This must be infuriating stuff for the left? For the first time in years they are set to get their Labour government, but unfortunately they will be further to the right than this painfully soft, weak, moderate Conservative government.
Where do the left go from here? There years of endless misery in election defeats looks set to continue, albeit with a so called "different party" taking over.
Of course it's all pretty shit news for us "conservatives" as well. The nation seems destined towards heading for decades of hapless centrist politics.
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Feb 23, 2023 8:13:22 GMT
Is that before or after Talking Pints with Big Nige mate?😀
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 23, 2023 8:13:35 GMT
There is certainly an argument to suggest Starmer is, (at least claiming) to be further to the right than the current PM. Ignoring the fact they are both useless dopes, it's refreshing and somewhat bizarre (given who and what Starmer was championing in 2019) to see Labour place emphasis on "taking back control", dealing with immigration, defining a woman (something he'd struggled with for years) and focusing on driving private sector growth. He's even discussed reforming the sacred cow of the NHS. This must be infuriating stuff for the left? For the first time in years they are set to get their Labour government, but unfortunately they will be further to the right than this painfully soft, weak, moderate Conservative government. Where do the left go from here? There years of endless misery in election defeats looks set to continue, albeit with a so called "different party" taking over. Of course it's all pretty shit news for us "conservatives" as well. The nation seems destined towards heading for decades of hapless centrist politics. Labour Government in name only. And I struggle to understand how you can call the current lot "centrist"?
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Feb 23, 2023 8:13:41 GMT
Hands up here, I didn't think it possible to have a worse person than the psycho as Home Secretary, looks like I got it wrong This one's just a Gullis in a dress. Sorry if that image ruins anyone's day
|
|
|
Post by elystokie on Feb 23, 2023 8:17:58 GMT
There is certainly an argument to suggest Starmer is, (at least claiming) to be further to the right than the current PM. Ignoring the fact they are both useless dopes, it's refreshing and somewhat bizarre (given who and what Starmer was championing in 2019) to see Labour place emphasis on "taking back control", dealing with immigration, defining a woman (something he'd struggled with for years) and focusing on driving private sector growth. He's even discussed reforming the sacred cow of the NHS. This must be infuriating stuff for the left? For the first time in years they are set to get their Labour government, but unfortunately they will be further to the right than this painfully soft, weak, moderate Conservative government. Where do the left go from here? There years of endless misery in election defeats looks set to continue, albeit with a so called "different party" taking over. Of course it's all pretty shit news for us "conservatives" as well. The nation seems destined towards heading for decades of hapless centrist politics. Any thoughts on the Home Secretary's plans to reduce the population of this country's Human Rights to the same standard that Russia and Belarus 'enjoy'?
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 23, 2023 8:33:11 GMT
There is certainly an argument to suggest Starmer is, (at least claiming) to be further to the right than the current PM. Ignoring the fact they are both useless dopes, it's refreshing and somewhat bizarre (given who and what Starmer was championing in 2019) to see Labour place emphasis on "taking back control", dealing with immigration, defining a woman (something he'd struggled with for years) and focusing on driving private sector growth. He's even discussed reforming the sacred cow of the NHS. This must be infuriating stuff for the left? For the first time in years they are set to get their Labour government, but unfortunately they will be further to the right than this painfully soft, weak, moderate Conservative government. Where do the left go from here? There years of endless misery in election defeats looks set to continue, albeit with a so called "different party" taking over. Of course it's all pretty shit news for us "conservatives" as well. The nation seems destined towards heading for decades of hapless centrist politics. Labour Government in name only. And I struggle to understand how you can call the current lot "centrist"? - Total apathy towards the private sector showing the utmost contempt for business. - Record levels of debt, predominately due to state intervention referenced below. - Total lack of interest in dealing with the record numbers of illegal migrants - More state intervention than any government of our lifetime including record number of hand outs, health and safety extremism and efforts to control/surpress just about every civil liberty going. - Total obsession with net zero and the green agenda which is costing the country billions. - Failure to use Brexit to our advantage and in many cases replacing senior cabinet ministers with staunch remain voters who actively tried to prevent Brexit happening. - Allowing wokery to flourish in all areas of society to the point that a Conservative PM (Boris) refused to define a woman. Only recently have they realised the dangers some of these laws pose in their rejection of Sturgeon's sickening Bill. - Refusal to reform the NHS despite wasting more money on it than any other sitting government. Just a few points.
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 23, 2023 8:33:49 GMT
There is certainly an argument to suggest Starmer is, (at least claiming) to be further to the right than the current PM. Ignoring the fact they are both useless dopes, it's refreshing and somewhat bizarre (given who and what Starmer was championing in 2019) to see Labour place emphasis on "taking back control", dealing with immigration, defining a woman (something he'd struggled with for years) and focusing on driving private sector growth. He's even discussed reforming the sacred cow of the NHS. This must be infuriating stuff for the left? For the first time in years they are set to get their Labour government, but unfortunately they will be further to the right than this painfully soft, weak, moderate Conservative government. Where do the left go from here? There years of endless misery in election defeats looks set to continue, albeit with a so called "different party" taking over. Of course it's all pretty shit news for us "conservatives" as well. The nation seems destined towards heading for decades of hapless centrist politics. Any thoughts on the Home Secretary's plans to reduce the population of this country's Human Rights to the same standard that Russia and Belarus 'enjoy'? It won't happen. If it did happen it would be worthy of praise.
|
|