|
Post by oggyoggy on Feb 5, 2023 15:30:55 GMT
Did juvinile name calling in Politics begin with Trump or was it always a thing? Maybe I'm a little old to "get down with the kids" but are "piss pants" "Circuit Breaker" and "Dictator" common phrases that are now used in lieu of normal conversion? For a politician who demanded endless circuit breakers (another word for locking up society, shutting down businesses and schools) for a straight 6 months and a nutjob who banned toys in the name of a virus that children were immune to - I think such "name calling" is merely descriptive of their oppressive actions. If you're offended by this then that's a bonus. My children weren’t immune to covid.
|
|
|
Post by oggyoggy on Feb 5, 2023 15:35:11 GMT
Did juvinile name calling in Politics begin with Trump or was it always a thing? Maybe I'm a little old to "get down with the kids" but are "piss pants" "Circuit Breaker" and "Dictator" common phrases that are now used in lieu of normal conversion? For a politician who demanded endless circuit breakers (another word for locking up society, shutting down businesses and schools) for a straight 6 months and a nutjob who banned toys in the name of a virus that children were immune to - I think such "name calling" is merely descriptive of their oppressive actions. If you're offended by this then that's a bonus. You also don’t understand exponential spread of a virus. Early lockdowns mean shorter lockdowns.
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 5, 2023 15:47:04 GMT
For a politician who demanded endless circuit breakers (another word for locking up society, shutting down businesses and schools) for a straight 6 months and a nutjob who banned toys in the name of a virus that children were immune to - I think such "name calling" is merely descriptive of their oppressive actions. If you're offended by this then that's a bonus. You also don’t understand exponential spread of a virus. Early lockdowns mean shorter lockdowns. You still can't admit that lockdowns were a disaster can you oggy?
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 5, 2023 16:09:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by oggyoggy on Feb 5, 2023 16:47:54 GMT
You also don’t understand exponential spread of a virus. Early lockdowns mean shorter lockdowns. You still can't admit that lockdowns were a disaster can you oggy? They were a disaster. Not having them at all would have been worse. Interesting you haven’t addressed what I said.
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Feb 5, 2023 17:00:03 GMT
You still can't admit that lockdowns were a disaster can you oggy? They were a disaster. Not having them at all would have been worse. Interesting you haven’t addressed what I said. To be honest I don’t think what ever actions re lockdowns were taken the results would be great. I think if the lockdowns weren’t put in place there would have been many more deaths. However without doubt lockdowns have had a huge impact on mental health which I’ve witnessed first hand particularly amongst the young. Those figures I’m sure will be very different to ever measure. Ultimately it was an awful time. I don’t think it’ll ever be a case of right or wrong but we’ll be living with the effects of it for many years to come.
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Feb 5, 2023 17:06:49 GMT
So 36 die as a result of RTA in 2021 whereas 20 die over the course of covid? Mr Superior, looks like you're wrong Do you have a general problem with reading or just when what you read isn't to your liking 181 Children died directly or Indirectly from Covid in the 21 months measured, 36 Children as a result of Road Accidents in 2021 of which 17 as pedestrians Both events are tragic and shouldn't be treated as "Statistics" but you insist Children were in no danger from Covid which is of course nonsense Displaying your usual Juvinile behaviour you couldn't resist adding a Sobriquet
|
|
|
Post by knype on Feb 5, 2023 17:09:56 GMT
So 36 die as a result of RTA in 2021 whereas 20 die over the course of covid? Mr Superior, looks like you're wrong Do you have a general problem with reading or just when what you read isn't to your liking 181 Children died directly or Indirectly from Covid in the 21 months measured, 36 Children as a result of Road Accidents in 2021 of which 17 as pedestrians Both events are tragic and shouldn't be treated as "Statistics" but you insist Children were in no danger from Covid which is of course nonsense Displaying your usual Juvinile behaviour you couldn't resist adding a Sobriquet 20 healthy ones ?
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Feb 5, 2023 17:20:37 GMT
Do you have a general problem with reading or just when what you read isn't to your liking 181 Children died directly or Indirectly from Covid in the 21 months measured, 36 Children as a result of Road Accidents in 2021 of which 17 as pedestrians Both events are tragic and shouldn't be treated as "Statistics" but you insist Children were in no danger from Covid which is of course nonsense Displaying your usual Juvinile behaviour you couldn't resist adding a Sobriquet 20 healthy ones ? Are you advocating Euthanasia for Children with Medical Problems? Is 20 Children's Deaths an OK number for Collateral Damage The remaining 161 had underlying health problems half died within a week of contracting Covid the remainder within a month The bottom line is that without contracting Covid they may well be alive today I'll invite you to answer the same question I posed to your fellow contrarian What would you say to the Parents of these 181 Children about your theory that Covid is not harmful to children?
|
|
|
Post by knype on Feb 5, 2023 17:21:03 GMT
Are you advocating Euthanasia for Children with Medical Problems? Is 20 Children's Deaths an OK number for Collateral Damage The remaining 161 had underlying health problems half died within a week of contracting Covid the remainder within a month The bottom line is that without contracting Covid they may well be alive today I'll invite you to answer the same question I posed to your fellow contrarian What would you say to the Parents of these 181 Children about your theory that Covid is not harmful to children? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
|
|
|
Post by knype on Feb 5, 2023 17:21:41 GMT
Are you advocating Euthanasia for Children with Medical Problems? Is 20 Children's Deaths an OK number for Collateral Damage The remaining 161 had underlying health problems half died within a week of contracting Covid the remainder within a month The bottom line is that without contracting Covid they may well be alive today I'll invite you to answer the same question I posed to your fellow contrarian What would you say to the Parents of these 181 Children about your theory that Covid is not harmful to children? So the percentage of a child dying of Covid was 0.004 ? Or thereabouts ?
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 5, 2023 17:21:46 GMT
You still can't admit that lockdowns were a disaster can you oggy? They were a disaster. Not having them at all would have been worse. Interesting you haven’t addressed what I said. Because what you're saying isn't worthy of a response. Lockdown faster? Is that seriously the best you can do?
|
|
|
Post by knype on Feb 5, 2023 17:22:24 GMT
Are you advocating Euthanasia for Children with Medical Problems? Is 20 Children's Deaths an OK number for Collateral Damage The remaining 161 had underlying health problems half died within a week of contracting Covid the remainder within a month The bottom line is that without contracting Covid they may well be alive today I'll invite you to answer the same question I posed to your fellow contrarian What would you say to the Parents of these 181 Children about your theory that Covid is not harmful to children? And I wouldn't wish any child to die of anything by the way, either newborn or upto the adult age.
|
|
|
Post by wannabee on Feb 5, 2023 17:25:23 GMT
Are you advocating Euthanasia for Children with Medical Problems? Is 20 Children's Deaths an OK number for Collateral Damage The remaining 161 had underlying health problems half died within a week of contracting Covid the remainder within a month The bottom line is that without contracting Covid they may well be alive today I'll invite you to answer the same question I posed to your fellow contrarian What would you say to the Parents of these 181 Children about your theory that Covid is not harmful to children? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Somebody who thinks the Death of Children is a laughing matter is beneath contempt I have nothing more to say
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 5, 2023 17:30:23 GMT
Somebody who thinks the Death of Children is a laughing matter is beneath contempt I have nothing more to say Utterly despicable but true to form. I remember his responses to the asylum seekers.
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 5, 2023 17:31:22 GMT
Seeing a couple of posters still trying to defend lockdowns and banning toys from children is quite something. Painfully cringe worthy stuff.
Oggy (when he's not busy linking all of the planet's failings to Brexit) has always been a lockdown fanatic who has been cheering on the shutting down of society since March 2020 while gagging for more state intervention at every opportunity. To see him refusing to accept he was horribly wrong is no surprise but the other guy should know better.
|
|
|
Post by knype on Feb 5, 2023 17:31:45 GMT
Somebody who thinks the Death of Children is a laughing matter is beneath contempt I have nothing more to say I'm laughing at your ill fated attempt to put words into my mouth...
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Feb 5, 2023 17:35:36 GMT
Somebody who thinks the Death of Children is a laughing matter is beneath contempt I have nothing more to say I don’t think he was for a minute laughing at the deaths of children mate
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 5, 2023 17:35:38 GMT
Are you advocating Euthanasia for Children with Medical Problems? Is 20 Children's Deaths an OK number for Collateral Damage The remaining 161 had underlying health problems half died within a week of contracting Covid the remainder within a month The bottom line is that without contracting Covid they may well be alive today I'll invite you to answer the same question I posed to your fellow contrarian What would you say to the Parents of these 181 Children about your theory that Covid is not harmful to children? What an idiotic post. What about the millions of children who were banned from getting an education and leaving their homes because of people like you? All in the name of a largely non fatal virus. If only these anoraks would do us all a favour and continue to keep themselves at home and let children (and the rest of society) enjoy their lives, free from obsessive state intervention and snitching turds 😊
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Feb 5, 2023 17:36:14 GMT
Are you advocating Euthanasia for Children with Medical Problems? Is 20 Children's Deaths an OK number for Collateral Damage The remaining 161 had underlying health problems half died within a week of contracting Covid the remainder within a month The bottom line is that without contracting Covid they may well be alive today I'll invite you to answer the same question I posed to your fellow contrarian What would you say to the Parents of these 181 Children about your theory that Covid is not harmful to children? What an idiotic post. What about the millions of children who were banned from getting an education and leaving their homes because of people like you? All in the name of a largely non fatal virus. If only these anoraks would do us all a favour and continue to keep themselves at home 😊 Now that would be a result!
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 5, 2023 17:37:25 GMT
What an idiotic post. What about the millions of children who were banned from getting an education and leaving their homes because of people like you? All in the name of a largely non fatal virus. If only these anoraks would do us all a favour and continue to keep themselves at home 😊 Now that would be a result! I decided to add a bit ☺️
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 5, 2023 17:42:44 GMT
Seeing a couple of posters still trying to defend lockdowns and banning toys from children is quite something. Painfully cringe worthy stuff. Oggy (when he's not busy linking all of the planet's failings to Brexit) has always been a lockdown fanatic who has been cheering on the shutting down of society since March 2020 while gagging for more state intervention at every opportunity. To see him refusing to accept he was horribly wrong is no surprise but the other guy should know better. I don't recall anyone banning toys. We are now, thanks to recent legislation, in a far more authoritative state than we have ever been. Has this all passed you by?
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 5, 2023 17:45:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 5, 2023 17:47:06 GMT
Seeing a couple of posters still trying to defend lockdowns and banning toys from children is quite something. Painfully cringe worthy stuff. Oggy (when he's not busy linking all of the planet's failings to Brexit) has always been a lockdown fanatic who has been cheering on the shutting down of society since March 2020 while gagging for more state intervention at every opportunity. To see him refusing to accept he was horribly wrong is no surprise but the other guy should know better. I don't recall anyone banning toys. We are now, thanks to recent legislation, in a far more authoritative state than we have ever been. Has this all passed you by? Dictator Drakeford literally banned toys. There is an infamous image from the morning after he implemented this absurd legislation whereby supermarket toys were bordered up. In terms of your other point I absolutely agree. Thanks to the obliteration of civil liberties over the past few years, we are now in a more authoritarian and perilous position than we've been in for many decades.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Feb 5, 2023 17:49:29 GMT
I don't recall anyone banning toys. We are now, thanks to recent legislation, in a far more authoritative state than we have ever been. Has this all passed you by? Dictator Drakeford literally banned toys. There is an infamous image from the morning after he implemented this absurd legislation whereby supermarket toys were bordered up. In terms of your other point I absolutely agree. Thanks to the obliteration of civil liberties over the past few years, we are now in a more authoritarian and perilous position than we've been in for many decades. Again that's incorrect. He didn't "literally ban toys"
|
|
|
Post by knype on Feb 5, 2023 18:06:13 GMT
Dictator Drakeford literally banned toys. There is an infamous image from the morning after he implemented this absurd legislation whereby supermarket toys were bordered up. In terms of your other point I absolutely agree. Thanks to the obliteration of civil liberties over the past few years, we are now in a more authoritarian and perilous position than we've been in for many decades. Again that's incorrect. He didn't "literally ban toys" He locked off items in supermarkets including toys and clothes.
|
|
|
Post by knype on Feb 5, 2023 18:12:46 GMT
Somebody who thinks the Death of Children is a laughing matter is beneath contempt I have nothing more to say Utterly despicable but true to form. I remember his responses to the asylum seekers. Do you really ? You're the pathetic one, name calling, insinuating and having no bollocks
|
|
|
Post by knype on Feb 5, 2023 18:13:32 GMT
Somebody who thinks the Death of Children is a laughing matter is beneath contempt I have nothing more to say I don’t think he was for a minute laughing at the deaths of children mate Thanks badger, he knows that but likes to tell people what they think and say
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Feb 5, 2023 18:24:28 GMT
Are you advocating Euthanasia for Children with Medical Problems? Is 20 Children's Deaths an OK number for Collateral Damage The remaining 161 had underlying health problems half died within a week of contracting Covid the remainder within a month The bottom line is that without contracting Covid they may well be alive today I'll invite you to answer the same question I posed to your fellow contrarian What would you say to the Parents of these 181 Children about your theory that Covid is not harmful to children? I think you know that Rossi didn’t mean it in the way that you were suggesting it re advocating euthanasia. I was in favour of lockdowns at the time and still am however have seen since they’ve been lifted the impact they’ve had on youngsters is huge in the slowing down of development through not being in School and engaging with other young people. It would be naive to think otherwise. There are a lot of hidden victims that will never be recorded due to it being a lot more difficult to identify the true figures but I do believe that tragically there will be an increase in suicides in young people in the next 10 years because of the damage lockdown had. Whether or not there’d have been more or less deaths we’ll never know.
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Feb 5, 2023 18:27:08 GMT
|
|