|
Post by RAF on Aug 20, 2017 16:32:07 GMT
This is exactly what happens when you employ two people missing a dozen chromosomes a piece.
Pair of fucking window lickers.
H
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Aug 20, 2017 16:38:21 GMT
This is exactly what happens when you employ two people missing a dozen chromosomes a piece. Pair of fucking window lickers. H But surely they must be top pundits they were professional footballers.
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Aug 20, 2017 16:49:54 GMT
This is exactly what happens when you employ two people missing a dozen chromosomes a piece. Pair of fucking window lickers. H But surely they must be top pundits they were professional footballers. If that is the criteria I give you Andy Townsend. There is a reason they are pundits and that is because they would be wank managers. H
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Aug 20, 2017 16:53:19 GMT
But surely they must be top pundits they were professional footballers. If that is the criteria I give you Andy Townsend. There is a reason they are pundits and that is because they would be wank managers. H Like I said professional footballer = top pundit 😃
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Aug 20, 2017 16:55:48 GMT
Those who can, do. Those who can't, talk.
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Aug 20, 2017 17:07:23 GMT
If that is the criteria I give you Andy Townsend. There is a reason they are pundits and that is because they would be wank managers. H Like I said professional footballer = top pundit 😃 Exactly, I was elaborating whilst agreeing. H
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Aug 20, 2017 20:49:59 GMT
How can any self respecting Stoke supporter claim that we won a football match fair and square yesterday? Firstly Arsenal (they're a top 6 side you know) were denied a stone wall penalty, it doesn't matter that Bellerin was off balance stumbling forward and had lost control of the ball then Diouf stumbled into him when he had zero chance of making another contact with the ball, it was a stone wall penalty as clear as the sky is blue. Secondly the offside goal, come on for fucks sake only Lacazettes leg was offside not even the leg he scored with, the goal should have been given and the FA should look at giving the goal retrospectively. Thirdly the foul on Wellbeck even though he didn't appeal and he got his shot off it's plainly clear to anyone with instant freeze frame and super zoom telescopic digitalised lenses that there just might well have been the slightest contact from a Stoke players leg (although I'm not sure if it was Diouf or Zouma) causing Wellbeck to toe poke his shot into Butland, if there hadn't almost been contact - Wellbeck would have rifled his shot into the top corner ripping the net to fucking shreds. Fourthly Bellerin again gets the slightest of touches in the penalty box and stutters his run, surely ANY contact against an Arsenal (Manure, Liverpool, Man City, Chelsea or Spurs) player in the penalty box is a penalty, even if you would have no intention of giving a free kick had it happened outside the penalty area. Lastly a perfectly fair tackle from Mustafi on Eric Pieters and he goes down like he'd been shot rolling about acting like it was hurting, there's a new rule out now - retrospective bans for diving and Eric Pieters should be made an example of and have a 6 match ban, triple the punishment for diving against a top 6 side. Are you ashamed? You should be - I am. Gouranga.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2017 21:14:09 GMT
I respectfully disagree completely with your analysis, totally and utterly.And sometimes you got to 'play the game' to win -and we did. so- fuck em! Ahhhhhh sarcasm!
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Aug 20, 2017 21:16:37 GMT
I respectfully disagree completely with your analysis, totally and utterly.And sometimes you got to 'play the game' to win -and we did. so- fuck em! Who's analysis is that you refer to Tony? Gouranga.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2017 21:17:53 GMT
Yours mate!
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Aug 20, 2017 21:26:55 GMT
AHHHH sarcasm Gouranga.
|
|
|
Post by TexasPotter on Aug 21, 2017 1:09:12 GMT
I just watched it, seems Gerrard still has a hard spot after that sending off we gave him and everyone knows Keown is a huge arse biased douce.
|
|
|
Post by onionman on Aug 21, 2017 2:27:41 GMT
Going by the logic of Keown, Crooks and anyone else claiming the goal should have been given because it was only just offside, if a 100m sprint goes to a photo finish, the winner is the person who narrowly comes second, especially if the person in first place only got his foot to the line ahead of the person in second place. Feet don't really count.
I'm going to find Martin Keown's local pub and wait until he goes for a beer, then I'll follow him and stand slightly behind him, but insist on being served ahead of him. I'll acknowledge technically I'm behind Keown in the queue but say surely I should be served first because part of my body is nearer to the bar. See how he likes that.
|
|
|
Post by tuum on Aug 21, 2017 3:09:57 GMT
Did Monkey Man explain why his lovely team failed to put the the ball out of play when Pieters (our fullback) was lying injured in their penalty area having been the victim of what was (despite all the bitch whining about penalties) by far the worst challenge of the day? Did he fuck. Still the spirit of the game, like the laws of the game are and always were alien to that dirty scrote. I don't see why any team should put the ball out of play just because a player is injured...unless, of course, it is clearly a very serious one. If I was a Ref I would book any player who gives the ball back to the opposition at the restart in such situations. That might help to stop such nonsense. Fair play to the crowd for shaming the Arsenal player to knock the ball out in the 1st half but it certainly wasn't necessary & I think the practice of kicking the ball out so that an injured player can receive treatment should be actively discouraged. If you want to ensure a player gets prompt treatment then have the same rule as Rugby League where the injured player gets treated in situ while the game continues. I apologize for wandering off topic. I don't want to open up a debate about this on this thread. Maybe it can be discussed separately on its own thread.
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Aug 21, 2017 5:22:25 GMT
Did Monkey Man explain why his lovely team failed to put the the ball out of play when Pieters (our fullback) was lying injured in their penalty area having been the victim of what was (despite all the bitch whining about penalties) by far the worst challenge of the day? Did he fuck. Still the spirit of the game, like the laws of the game are and always were alien to that dirty scrote. I don't see why any team should put the ball out of play just because a player is injured...unless, of course, it is clearly a very serious one. If I was a Ref I would book any player who gives the ball back to the opposition at the restart in such situations. That might help to stop such nonsense. Fair play to the crowd for shaming the Arsenal player to knock the ball out in the 1st half but it certainly wasn't necessary & I think the practice of kicking the ball out so that an injured player can receive treatment should be actively discouraged. If you want to ensure a player gets prompt treatment then have the same rule as Rugby League where the injured player gets treated in situ while the game continues. I apologize for wandering off topic. I don't want to open up a debate about this on this thread. Maybe it can be discussed separately on its own thread. It's not a problem there's nothing to discuss. You're wrong. (Said in a Bayern stylee)
|
|