|
Post by Hannibal on Aug 19, 2017 18:42:59 GMT
Lacazette was offside and the two say it was on-side because it was too close to call. So much keown bias and gerrard is just a scouse tool.
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Aug 19, 2017 18:47:53 GMT
Lacazette was offside and the two say it was on-side because it was too close to call. So much keown bias and gerrard is just a scouse tool. Dunner werrit, I hope it is shown to be onside and that the penalty shouts were legitimate and shown to be deliberate handball. I don't care because whichever way you look at them................. STOKE CITY 1 ARSENAL 0.
|
|
|
Post by stokienorthants on Aug 19, 2017 18:51:05 GMT
Keown clearly knows fuck all about the rules of the game that he is paid handsomely to comment on. He just wouldn't accept that the Arsenal player was offside even when Graham Poll explained that the Assistant Referee called it correctly.
|
|
Travis Bickle
Spectator
Let them hate us, so long as they fear us
Posts: 37
|
Post by Travis Bickle on Aug 19, 2017 18:53:27 GMT
Wondered who that scouser was, obviously hasn't forgiven us for when we shoved half a dozen past his lot on his last match
|
|
|
Post by rockthecity on Aug 19, 2017 18:53:44 GMT
Worst commentators / pundits ever!!!!
|
|
|
Post by chamberlain on Aug 19, 2017 18:53:46 GMT
Lacazette was offside and the two say it was on-side because it was too close to call. So much keown bias and gerrard is just a scouse tool. It just shows how thick they both are , it's just a good job for both of them they made a living out of football
|
|
|
Post by TheBra1n on Aug 19, 2017 18:53:55 GMT
i think in real life no lino in the world would ever have called it off, on that i agree with what they were trying to say, however as far as the rules of the game go it was off side
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2017 18:55:06 GMT
i think in real life no lino in the world would ever have called it off, on that i agree with what they were trying to say, however as far as the rules of the game go it was off side And that's that! Wankers the lot of em!
|
|
|
Post by PerCyfilth ....Captains Log on Aug 19, 2017 18:55:26 GMT
Its clearly offside..any part of the player that can legally score a goal that is beyond the last man is offside..thats the rule. Keown & Gerrard should know that.
|
|
|
Post by wuzza on Aug 19, 2017 18:55:29 GMT
He was unlucky because 9 times out of 10 it wouldn't have been picked up and it was a good finish. However has was also offside.
|
|
|
Post by cheekymatt71 on Aug 19, 2017 18:56:41 GMT
It was clearly offside. Looked tighter on replay but when he scored I didnt even get excited.
I would have gone mental if it had been allowed to be honest - Pieters was smart moving up at just the right time
|
|
|
Post by nzstokie on Aug 19, 2017 18:56:49 GMT
i think in real life no lino in the world would ever have called it off, on that i agree with what they were trying to say, however as far as the rules of the game go it was off side One would
|
|
|
Post by thisfootballclub on Aug 19, 2017 18:57:36 GMT
Offside is offside whether 1 inch or 2 meters.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2017 18:58:48 GMT
Video ref would have called it off so it's OFF.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_DaftBurger on Aug 19, 2017 19:01:46 GMT
Lacazette was offside and the two say it was on-side because it was too close to call. So much keown bias and gerrard is just a scouse tool. Gerrard looks like we just beat Liverpool 6 - 1. Oh and he hits like a girl!
|
|
|
Post by skemstokie on Aug 19, 2017 19:05:25 GMT
i think in real life no lino in the world would ever have called it off, on that i agree with what they were trying to say, however as far as the rules of the game go it was off side Today was real life not fantasy and it was called? correctly
|
|
|
Post by Vadiation_Ribe on Aug 19, 2017 19:10:20 GMT
Given his Arsenal bias, I thought Keown was surprisingly fair regarding Stoke today. At one point he started talking about Stoke after an Arsenal question, and Jake Humphrey said "we'll talk about Stoke in a minute."
|
|
|
Post by StatesideStokie on Aug 19, 2017 19:13:03 GMT
You can look st it a hundred different ways, but it was offside. Close, but offside. Any commentator or pundit suggesting otherwise should find another job.
And in the end, only one thing matters.
Stoke 1-0 Arsenal
100% home record intact, unsoiled sheet, back tonnusiness as usual against those odious cunts. Life is good
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on Aug 19, 2017 19:14:30 GMT
Its clearly offside..any part of the player that can legally score a goal that is beyond the last man is offside..thats the rule. Keown & Gerrard should know that. Graham Poll spelled it out for them in words of one syllable yet they still wouldn't accept it. Fucking hell, if it had been allowed the lino would have been crucified for getting it wrong!
|
|
sjb
Lads'n'Dads
Posts: 60
|
Post by sjb on Aug 19, 2017 19:15:32 GMT
The incident was offside. Unlucky for Lacazette, but the rule's the rules - whether it was by a mm or a yard. You did get the rub of the green with the penalty shouts.
|
|
|
Post by xchpotter on Aug 19, 2017 19:20:11 GMT
The incident was offside. Unlucky for Lacazette, but the rule's the rules - whether it was by a mm or a yard. You did get the rub of the green with the penalty shouts. Can't disagree with that.
|
|
|
Post by cozmick on Aug 19, 2017 19:21:30 GMT
I understand the Keown bias but fucking hell will someone please twat Gerrard in the face.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2017 19:25:58 GMT
They are making themselves look absolute clueless bellends, it was offside what the fuck is all this about the advantage going to the forward!
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on Aug 19, 2017 19:26:35 GMT
i think in real life no lino in the world would ever have called it off, on that i agree with what they were trying to say, however as far as the rules of the game go it was off side What they're trying to say is nonsense! There is a line which is deemed to be the offside line. The lino has to make a judgement call around that line. Sometimes it's a very close call, in which case the lino is more likely to get it wrong. I've always said it's wrong to to castigate the linesman for getting a close call wrong, as they're only human. Castigating the guy for getting a close call correct is just ridiculous!
|
|
|
Post by xchpotter on Aug 19, 2017 19:28:51 GMT
The result wasn't what the media wanted....tough shit. Are we back to dong what we do best and pissing the media off?.......I very much hope so.
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Aug 19, 2017 19:36:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by DodgyDino on Aug 19, 2017 19:39:31 GMT
Both of them talking absolute crap... even when it's pointed out to them the reason why he was offside they still try n argue the toss... conna do with either of em
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2017 20:14:26 GMT
They wouldn't have made as much of it the other way round. We ALL know it! Up your Arse Keown, especially!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2017 20:18:37 GMT
The incident was offside. Unlucky for Lacazette, but the rule's the rules - whether it was by a mm or a yard. You did get the rub of the green with the penalty shouts. Agreed, but thought there was a foul on Pieters at the end which went unpunished.
|
|
|
Post by euan ouzami on Aug 19, 2017 20:20:03 GMT
Don't need the middle 4 words in this thread title
|
|