|
|
Post by manmarking on May 14, 2017 18:39:08 GMT
Does the uniform policy of a private school in Highgate actually affect you in any way, mate?  Shit reply, mate. Just because something doesn't affect me directly at this very moment, doesn't mean that as it creeps every further into our way of life that it wont affect me, or you, in the future. What's that old saying your ilk like to use when talking about the Tories or The Don etc... Summat about first they came for the socialists, then they came for the trade unionists... Doesn't the same apply here? Slowly chipping away but ah it doesn't matter, it's just one University, it's just one school, it's just one city... Chill out, mate. Yours isn't such a great reply either There's a huge difference the Holocaust and boys wearing skirts ffs! I agree about chipping away and the need to speak out early about dangerous things. I just fail to see what dark and terrifying place the odd trannie might take us, that's all  In fact I'd be more concerned about the government imposing rules on what children are and aren't allowed to wear in a private institution. Very anti-libertarian |
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on May 14, 2017 18:48:30 GMT
Shit reply, mate. Just because something doesn't affect me directly at this very moment, doesn't mean that as it creeps every further into our way of life that it wont affect me, or you, in the future. What's that old saying your ilk like to use when talking about the Tories or The Don etc... Summat about first they came for the socialists, then they came for the trade unionists... Doesn't the same apply here? Slowly chipping away but ah it doesn't matter, it's just one University, it's just one school, it's just one city... Chill out, mate. Yours isn't such a great reply either There's a huge difference the Holocaust and boys wearing skirts ffs! I agree about chipping away and the need to speak out early about dangerous things. I just fail to see what dark and terrifying place the odd trannie might take us, that's all In fact I'd be more concerned about the government imposing rules on what children are and aren't allowed to wear in a private institution. Very anti-libertarian I've told you previously where I believe it's all heading, it's a race to the bottom of 'normalising' everything. Give it 20-odd years & you'd better be a fully paid-up member of the paedophilia train, otherwise you'll have the future versions of yourself telling you what a disgusting paedoist you are with your paedophobe outlook. ...Of course you wont believe it untill it's already happened though, and of course by then it'll be seen as the 'correct' opinion to have, so you'll happily defend it. |
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 14, 2017 19:03:24 GMT
Chill out, mate. Yours isn't such a great reply either There's a huge difference the Holocaust and boys wearing skirts ffs! I agree about chipping away and the need to speak out early about dangerous things. I just fail to see what dark and terrifying place the odd trannie might take us, that's all In fact I'd be more concerned about the government imposing rules on what children are and aren't allowed to wear in a private institution. Very anti-libertarian I've told you previously where I believe it's all heading, it's a race to the bottom of 'normalising' everything. Give it 20-odd years & you'd better be a fully paid-up member of the paedophilia train, otherwise you'll have the future versions of yourself telling you what a disgusting paedoist you are with your paedophobe outlook. ...Of course you wont believe it untill it's already happened though, and of course by then it'll be seen as the 'correct' opinion to have, so you'll happily defend it. I'm not sure you've ever told me that before, mate. It's pretty unfair to lump youngsters confused about their gender in with paedophiles. Just like it's unfair to lump them in with nazis. In fact I'll go one further; it's downright unpleasant. And I can categorically say that I won't ever defend paedophilia either - that's a pretty poor use of hyperbole to try to win an argument you know you're losing |
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on May 14, 2017 19:15:42 GMT
I'm not sure you've ever told me that before, mate. It's pretty unfair to lump youngsters confused about their gender in with paedophiles. Just like it's unfair to lump them in with nazis. In fact I'll go one further; it's downright unpleasant. And I can categorically say that I won't ever defend paedophilia either - that's a pretty poor use of hyperbole to try to win an argument you know you're losing I thought it was you I talked about this with before? It might have been Biblical And I'm not (Lets get some of those sexy italics in play) lumping youngsters in with paedophiles. I'm quite clearly saying how it's a race to the bottom for these SJW types, and as far as I can see paedophilia is the bottom rung of the ladder. Give it time & they'll be pushing for it to be normalised as just a 'sexual preference'... Infact, I'll chuck in shagging horses/goats/sheep/or whatever the fuck else these people with clear problems get upto. Give it time & they'll all become normalised, and it'll be 'you' (the un-believer) who is in the wrong... And the next generation of Manmarking's, RipRoaringPotters etc... will be on here shouting down anyone who doesn't agree as a paedoist/goatist/whatever the fuck they'd be called. |
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on May 14, 2017 19:47:09 GMT
I'm not sure you've ever told me that before, mate. It's pretty unfair to lump youngsters confused about their gender in with paedophiles. Just like it's unfair to lump them in with nazis. In fact I'll go one further; it's downright unpleasant. And I can categorically say that I won't ever defend paedophilia either - that's a pretty poor use of hyperbole to try to win an argument you know you're losing I thought it was you I talked about this with before? It might have been Biblical And I'm not (Lets get some of those sexy italics in play) lumping youngsters in with paedophiles. I'm quite clearly saying how it's a race to the bottom for these SJW types, and as far as I can see paedophilia is the bottom rung of the ladder. Give it time & they'll be pushing for it to be normalised as just a 'sexual preference'... Infact, I'll chuck in shagging horses/goats/sheep/or whatever the fuck else these people with clear problems get upto. Give it time & they'll all become normalised, and it'll be 'you' (the un-believer) who is in the wrong... And the next generation of Manmarking's, RipRoaringPotters etc... will be on here shouting down anyone who doesn't agree as a paedoist/goatist/whatever the fuck they'd be called. Yes, we're all trying to legalise goat-fucking - you've caught us all out. Fucking mentalist |
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on May 14, 2017 20:15:43 GMT
I'm not sure you've ever told me that before, mate. It's pretty unfair to lump youngsters confused about their gender in with paedophiles. Just like it's unfair to lump them in with nazis. In fact I'll go one further; it's downright unpleasant. And I can categorically say that I won't ever defend paedophilia either - that's a pretty poor use of hyperbole to try to win an argument you know you're losing I thought it was you I talked about this with before? It might have been Biblical And I'm not (Lets get some of those sexy italics in play) lumping youngsters in with paedophiles. I'm quite clearly saying how it's a race to the bottom for these SJW types, and as far as I can see paedophilia is the bottom rung of the ladder. Give it time & they'll be pushing for it to be normalised as just a 'sexual preference'... Infact, I'll chuck in shagging horses/goats/sheep/or whatever the fuck else these people with clear problems get upto. Give it time & they'll all become normalised, and it'll be 'you' (the un-believer) who is in the wrong... And the next generation of Manmarking's, RipRoaringPotters etc... will be on here shouting down anyone who doesn't agree as a paedoist/goatist/whatever the fuck they'd be called. You're making a logical error here, mate. You're assuming that we're on some sort of preordained linear path to hell in a handcart, the culmination of which will be the legalisation of paedophilia. In fact, sexual preferences have been criminalised and decriminalised throughout the ages. It ebbs and flows (so to speak ) Homosexuality, transsexualism, incest, paedophilia, bestiality, sex outside marriage, you name it. They've all been both legal and illegal at different times. So how do we arrive at what's right and what's wrong? Well, I think it's pretty obvious to anyone with an ounce of common sense that some of these preferences are harmless to others (homosexuality, transsexualism, sex outside marriage etc), while some are harmful (paedophilia, bestiality, incest etc). It's about taking each one on its own merits. That's why, broadly speaking, the harmful ones have remained illegal and the harmless ones haven't. It isn't some sort of grand SJW conspiracy - it's just about tolerating others if what they're doing isn't doing you any harm I'm confident when I say that there's literally no move afoot to legalise paedophilia - and nor will there be as part of some mad politically correct crusade. If you have any evidence that there is, please share. I'll do everything I can to oppose it |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on May 14, 2017 21:00:10 GMT
As this is the anti-PC thread I thought this tweet is quite refreshing.....
|
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on May 18, 2017 13:51:36 GMT
Race to the bottom...
|
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on May 18, 2017 13:54:43 GMT
It's on Twitter, so it must be an accurate reflection of what's actually going on in society. |
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on May 18, 2017 14:39:19 GMT
It's a picture hack account. They just go into someone's instagram and re-appropriate the photos. Nothing to see here. |
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on May 18, 2017 15:15:02 GMT
It's a picture hack account. They just go into someone's instagram and re-appropriate the photos. Nothing to see here. The Tweet has now been deleted, so it seems like it was someone just trolling. (Feel a bit sorry for the girl if it was indeed someone else as she was getting panned in the comments!) |
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on May 18, 2017 15:26:27 GMT
It's a picture hack account. They just go into someone's instagram and re-appropriate the photos. Nothing to see here. The Tweet has now been deleted, so it seems like it was someone just trolling. (Feel a bit sorry for the girl if it was indeed someone else as she was getting panned in the comments!) Aye you can have some pretty atrocious stuff done with your photos if you're not careful. There genuinely are some bloody weirdos out there. |
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on May 18, 2017 15:33:36 GMT
Aye you can have some pretty atrocious stuff done with your photos if you're not careful. There genuinely are some bloody weirdos out there. Oh ah agreed. Going a bit off-topic here but I don't get these people who have to post photos of everything they're doing all the time (And I mean everything!) Only the otherday I saw some women who'd put a photo of herself with her new born baby on the internet... Nothing wrong in that so far I hear you say... But she was a rather large lady, completely naked, laying in a filthy bath, with her naked child ontop of her brestfeeding. Why on fucking Earth would you put that on the internet?!?! The internet never forgets, so God help that little kid in 10 years time when they're in high school & someone digs up that photo! |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on May 21, 2017 0:29:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on May 22, 2017 10:14:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on May 22, 2017 14:24:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on May 26, 2017 20:02:46 GMT
Now I know it's infowars and I'm pretty sure the guy commentating is serious be he don't half make me laugh.... jazz hands  |
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on May 27, 2017 11:36:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Mendicant on May 27, 2017 20:39:15 GMT
Now I know it's infowars and I'm pretty sure the guy commentating is serious be he don't half make me laugh.... jazz hands Infowars is fucking ace |
|
|
|
Post by Mendicant on Jun 2, 2017 12:05:47 GMT
Some good'uns in here lads.
|
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 2, 2017 12:51:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by FbrgVaStkFan on Jun 4, 2017 10:56:42 GMT
Joe Rogan podcast with Prof. Bret Weinstein First hour discusses main issues, middle interview gets off track a bit. There's a real brain ache faculty meeting story starting around 2:01:00 |
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jun 4, 2017 18:17:15 GMT
Looking forward to being lectured by Chris Martin tonight
|
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jun 4, 2017 18:30:56 GMT
And a bonus Bono
|
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 4, 2017 18:53:58 GMT
And the Fat One out of Take That I wonder if he'll round at his Mum's later. |
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Jun 4, 2017 19:02:16 GMT
Have any of them talked about 'love beating hate' & 'diversity being our strength' yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jun 4, 2017 19:03:52 GMT
I know they are always a decent cause but I hate tribute concerts
|
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jun 4, 2017 20:07:16 GMT
Have any of them talked about 'love beating hate' & 'diversity being our strength' yet? All of em |
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jun 4, 2017 20:17:47 GMT
Apparently we may get the honour of being lectured by Liam
|
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Jun 11, 2017 13:51:20 GMT
|
|
In fact I'd be more concerned about the government imposing rules on what children are and aren't allowed to wear in a private institution. Very anti-libertarian 
