|
Post by gb on Jan 5, 2014 1:01:37 GMT
Will Wallclott get a ban ? What sort of pansy is he , he gets carried off in his carry-cot then hes goading the Spurs fans with double fingers . Hope he gets a 3 match ban like others would .. Stupid little idiot . and thats an England Player .
|
|
|
Post by kingstokie on Jan 5, 2014 1:04:24 GMT
He seemed happy enough to be going off, despite needing six people to carry him off on a trolley.
Soft git. Wasn't he once out for two months for bruised thighs, the same week Huth played with 3000 stitches in his skull?
|
|
|
Post by gb on Jan 5, 2014 1:11:19 GMT
Seem to remember him falling over at the Brit and twinged his shoulder then blaming Stoke players ..
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Jan 5, 2014 1:15:07 GMT
I thought it was quite funny to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 1:21:51 GMT
I like Theo. seems a decent lad most of the time, but he was a bit stupid today.
If I'd been one of the stretcher bearers getting pelted with coins, I'd have dropped him and told him to crawl off under his own steam.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 1:25:14 GMT
Big time charlie provokes crowd shocker
the more important issue was the coin throwing - I hope they can identify -arrest and imprison the low lifes doing that - more importantly !
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Jan 5, 2014 1:46:05 GMT
I like Theo. seems a decent lad most of the time, but he was a bit stupid today. If I'd been one of the stretcher bearers getting pelted with coins, I'd have dropped him and told him to crawl off under his own steam. [/b] I was thinking this, if he didn't have them as a barrier I doubt he'd of done it. It was funny though but the letter of the law says he should get a ban.
|
|
|
Post by stokietomo on Jan 5, 2014 2:47:01 GMT
Even though he's Arsenal I don't think he should! Players must get that much shit throughout the game, so they should be able give a little bit of banter back! It was hardly abusive!
On a slightly different note, I think he's looking like a much improved player, making clever runs and been scoring goals. Hopefully good news for England!
|
|
|
Post by onionman on Jan 5, 2014 2:59:52 GMT
He should have been banned for life after that Dance Of The Gays "patta-cake" goal celebration he did with Kieran Gibbs a couple of years ago.
Then today's incident would never have happened.
|
|
|
Post by PenkPonther on Jan 5, 2014 5:05:27 GMT
Judging by this new storm in a teacup, and also the Southampton attempt to suppress ref Clattenberg's free speech, folk are losing all sight of what actually is and isn't an offence nowadays.
It is NOT an offence/crime to point out the score in a football match. It IS an offence/crime to throw projectiles with the intention of injuring someone.
The idea that violent & yobbish actions are in some way provoked by other people's completely legal & harmless actions is just scapegoating, pure and simple.
It is in effect saying you can do something totally legal, and then not only be on the receiving end of unwarranted intimidation, threats and violence, but also unwarranted retrospective punishment by authority figures too!
So much for our supposed fundamental human right to have freedom of expression without fear of persecution!
Unfortunately for Walcott, there is an FA precedent, in that his ex team-mate Adebayor once received a yellow card, a suspended two match ban and a £25000 fine for having the temerity to celebrate in front of some opposition fans, and clearly giving them no option but to start a riot(!) ... so yes Walcott can perhaps expect a similar semi-draconian punishment.
It's like the country's become a fascist police state, and it's rather unpleasant.
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jan 5, 2014 8:48:39 GMT
The spurs fans gave him the dogs so he to told them the score
If you can give it out you must be able to take it, most match going supporters know that
Unfortunately the cunts at the fa won't have it
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Jan 5, 2014 8:57:51 GMT
The way he was been carried,I was expecting Garlands to be put round his fooking neck.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Jan 5, 2014 8:58:39 GMT
Seem to remember him falling over at the Brit and twinged his shoulder then blaming Stoke players .. Didn't he come on as a sub that day, only to get carted off 5mins later with said injury...
|
|
|
Post by robboleek on Jan 5, 2014 9:00:48 GMT
Had quite a row with an Arsenal supporting mate about this last night. My point was couldn't give a fuck about Theo they can pelt him all they like (what did he think the spurs lot would do after that politely clap him off) however the 6 guys carrying him off could easily have been seriously injured. What would little Theo have done bought a new eye for one of them with his millions.... Oh no I forgot there is no cure for blindness. I think it was a very stupid move.....
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Jan 5, 2014 9:16:46 GMT
As he was being carried off I bet the Spurs fans weren't wishing him a speedy recovery. Typical. They abuse him chuck stuff at him then he holds the score up and they get all precious. Harden up princesses.
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Jan 5, 2014 9:17:56 GMT
Had quite a row with an Arsenal supporting mate about this last night. My point was couldn't give a fuck about Theo they can pelt him all they like (what did he think the spurs lot would do after that politely clap him off) however the 6 guys carrying him off could easily have been seriously injured. What would little Theo have done bought a new eye for one of them with his millions.... Oh no I forgot there is no cure for blindness. I think it was a very stupid move..... Arsenal fans are no better. They throw coins and shit all the time
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Jan 5, 2014 9:21:00 GMT
Hello
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jan 5, 2014 9:21:39 GMT
Sky are milking it giving Walcott made the gesture so the fans threw coins. Sherwood conveniently misses anything the spurs fans did, he must have caught cuntitus.
From what I saw the spurs fans just started giving the wanker piece as Walcott came round so he responded
Remember the abuse wolves fans gave Matty In the same circumstances
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 9:24:44 GMT
Spot on Salop.
Why shouldn't Walcott respond to the Spurs fans? Have it back, dickheads.
Hard fans who can dish it out and then cry to mummy when a nasty footballer dares to give it back.
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Jan 5, 2014 10:14:53 GMT
Seem to remember him falling over at the Brit and twinged his shoulder then blaming Stoke players .. Didn't he come on as a sub that day, only to get carted off 5mins later with said injury... Some players legs go,some players fitness goes,on this day, Walcotts bottle went.
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Jan 5, 2014 10:21:08 GMT
I hope not, it was funny. And even funnier were the pseudo hard men pretending to try to get to him through the stewards, but just not trying hard enough. ( you know the old, "Hold me back, hold me back" routine) Pathetic wankers, can give it out but can't take it.
H
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 10:22:44 GMT
Had quite a row with an Arsenal supporting mate about this last night. My point was couldn't give a fuck about Theo they can pelt him all they like (what did he think the spurs lot would do after that politely clap him off) however the 6 guys carrying him off could easily have been seriously injured. What would little Theo have done bought a new eye for one of them with his millions.... Oh no I forgot there is no cure for blindness. I think it was a very stupid move..... Arsenal fans are no better. They throw coins and shit all the time Didn't they throw coins at Carragher once so he picked it up and threw it back at them....cue moral outrage from the gunners.
|
|
|
Post by justlookin on Jan 5, 2014 10:29:28 GMT
Hope he doesn't get a ban. Players get abuse all game, he was just giving it back. Not enough characters in the game but Theo is one of them. To the stokies criticizing, how would you feel if huth or wilson did this. They would be heroes. Calm down. Sent from my GT-I9505 using proboards
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 5, 2014 10:41:15 GMT
If he had been walking behind the goal on his own then he almost certainly wouldn't have responded as he did and it was specifically because he had had a bunch of stewards around him, meant that he then felt 'big enough' to give it back.
Did Walcott consult with any of the people who were carrying him before he started making his gestures?
Yes his actions were in no way offensive but doesn't he have responsibility for his actions in terms of what effect they might have on the people carrying him on the stretcher?
Of course the Spurs fans shouldn't be chucking stuff as result of Walcott's provocation (and it most certainly was provocation) but nevertheless, somebody could have lost an eye quite easily.
Thankfully nobody did but how would his actions have been viewed if one of the stewards had have been seriously injured?
I thought he took a bit of a liberty with the fellas who were carrying him if I'm honest.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 10:42:37 GMT
If he had been walking behind the goal on his own then he almost certainly wouldn't have responded as he did and it was specifically because he had had a bunch of stewards around him, meant that he then felt 'big enough' to give it back. Did Walcott consult with any of the people who were carrying him before he started making his gestures? Yes his actions were in no way offensive but doesn't he have responsibility for his actions in terms of what effect they might have on the people carrying him on the stretcher? Of course the Spurs fans shouldn't be chucking stuff as result of Walcott's provocation (and it most certainly was provocation) but nevertheless, somebody could have lost an eye quite easily. Thankfully nobody did but how would his actions have been viewed if one of the stewards had have been seriously injured? I thought he took a bit of a liberty with the fellas who were carrying him if I'm honest. I can see the point re the stretcher bearers Paul but do you think Walcott just unprovoked told them the score? I don't.
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jan 5, 2014 10:45:35 GMT
If he had been walking behind the goal on his own then he almost certainly wouldn't have responded as he did and it was specifically because he had had a bunch of stewards around him, meant that he then felt 'big enough' to give it back. Did Walcott consult with any of the people who were carrying him before he started making his gestures? Yes his actions were in no way offensive but doesn't he have responsibility for his actions in terms of what effect they might have on the people carrying him on the stretcher? Of course the Spurs fans shouldn't be chucking stuff as result of Walcott's provocation (and it most certainly was provocation) but nevertheless, somebody could have lost an eye quite easily. Thankfully nobody did but how would his actions have been viewed if one of the stewards had have been seriously injured? I thought he took a bit of a liberty with the fellas who were carrying him if I'm honest. Paul I think you will find it was Walcott who was provoked
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 5, 2014 10:47:13 GMT
If he had been walking behind the goal on his own then he almost certainly wouldn't have responded as he did and it was specifically because he had had a bunch of stewards around him, meant that he then felt 'big enough' to give it back. Did Walcott consult with any of the people who were carrying him before he started making his gestures? Yes his actions were in no way offensive but doesn't he have responsibility for his actions in terms of what effect they might have on the people carrying him on the stretcher? Of course the Spurs fans shouldn't be chucking stuff as result of Walcott's provocation (and it most certainly was provocation) but nevertheless, somebody could have lost an eye quite easily. Thankfully nobody did but how would his actions have been viewed if one of the stewards had have been seriously injured? I thought he took a bit of a liberty with the fellas who were carrying him if I'm honest. I can see the point re the stretcher bearers Paul but do you think Walcott just unprovoked told them the score? I don't. Of course he was provoked but he earns more in a week than stretcher bearers probably do in three years, did he stop to think about them for a single second, whilst he was 'giving it back'- did he bollocks? And as I said, he wouldn't have been man enough to have given it back in the first place, if it wasn't for their presence.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 5, 2014 10:49:08 GMT
If he had been walking behind the goal on his own then he almost certainly wouldn't have responded as he did and it was specifically because he had had a bunch of stewards around him, meant that he then felt 'big enough' to give it back. Did Walcott consult with any of the people who were carrying him before he started making his gestures? Yes his actions were in no way offensive but doesn't he have responsibility for his actions in terms of what effect they might have on the people carrying him on the stretcher? Of course the Spurs fans shouldn't be chucking stuff as result of Walcott's provocation (and it most certainly was provocation) but nevertheless, somebody could have lost an eye quite easily. Thankfully nobody did but how would his actions have been viewed if one of the stewards had have been seriously injured? I thought he took a bit of a liberty with the fellas who were carrying him if I'm honest. Paul I think you will find it was Walcott who was provoked I know, that why I said 'give it back' in the opening sentence of my post chap.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 10:50:01 GMT
I can see the point re the stretcher bearers Paul but do you think Walcott just unprovoked told them the score? I don't. Of course he was provoked but he earns more in a week than stretcher bearers probably do in three years, did he stop to think about them for a single second, whilst he was 'giving it back'- did he bollocks? And as I said, he wouldn't have been man enough to have given it back in the first place, if it wasn't for their presence. I don't know if I agree with that Paul. And had anything happened to the stretcher bearers the people to blame would have been the scum who threw something in the first place. If you throw something at players or anyone else at a football match you really are a waste of oxygen.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2014 10:54:00 GMT
No chance hes from london plays for arsenal and england
|
|