|
|
Post by stokiemarc on May 10, 2010 19:47:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 10, 2010 19:49:46 GMT
I'd prefer Tom Cleverly.
|
|
|
|
Post by kevkj on May 10, 2010 19:51:16 GMT
I think Carroll would be perfect for us,young aggressive and scores.
Hes only going to get better.
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on May 10, 2010 19:51:36 GMT
A swap for Tuncay would make some sense Bayern.
|
|
|
|
Post by kevkj on May 10, 2010 19:52:24 GMT
Ill drive Kitson and Beattie there and bring Carroll back with me.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokiemarc on May 10, 2010 19:53:00 GMT
Rather a swap for Beattie and Kitson, would be a big step backwards though if it was for Tuncay  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2010 19:55:26 GMT
Rather a swap for Beattie and Kitson, would be a big step backwards though if it was for Tuncay Not necessarily. |
|
|
|
Post by keithy george on May 10, 2010 19:55:35 GMT
A swap for Tuncay would make some sense Bayern. Why not swap sidibe instead  |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 10, 2010 19:56:32 GMT
No, march, no! Beattie and some bugger else maybe but not Tunny. And Kitson would never move up there imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on May 10, 2010 19:58:36 GMT
Kits would certainly not go. BT and Lawrence might be a decent bet for the swap.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokiemarc on May 10, 2010 19:58:59 GMT
Rather a swap for Beattie and Kitson, would be a big step backwards though if it was for Tuncay Not necessarily. I think it was, if we can bring in better midfielders, who CAN pass the ball to feet, maybe a couple of passing full backs, Tuncay would be an good asset to us, especially against the poorer teams in the league. If he went in a swap, we'd be getting a very poor deal in my oppinion. |
|
|
|
Post by SneydGreenStokie on May 10, 2010 19:59:32 GMT
No, march, no! Beattie and some bugger else maybe but not Tunny. And Kitson would never move up there imo. He went to Boro on loan SGT |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on May 10, 2010 20:01:13 GMT
We can only swap a player they will actually want.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2010 20:02:07 GMT
I think it was, if we can bring in better midfielders, who CAN pass the ball to feet, maybe a couple of passing full backs, Tuncay would be an good asset to us, especially against the poorer teams in the league. If he went in a swap, we'd be getting a very poor deal in my oppinion. You can look at it two ways. On the one hand, assuming Tunny wants to stay and we want to keep him, he may yet, with a full pre-season, turn out to be an asset and part of the mythical "Plan B" to try and break away from us being so relentlessly one dimensional. On the other, do you really see Pulis doing that? There's every likelihood Tuncay won't fit in any better next season than he has this. We don't score enough goals, and Carroll arguably has the potential to be the goalscoring target man we're crying out for in our rigid system. I can see either argument to be honest. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 10, 2010 20:10:34 GMT
No, march, no! Beattie and some bugger else maybe but not Tunny. And Kitson would never move up there imo. He went to Boro on loan SGT He won't move up there. I'd be shocked if he doesn't end up at Bristol City come August. |
|
|
|
Post by roylandstoke on May 10, 2010 20:11:14 GMT
We can only swap a player they will actually want. Are you suggesting they wouldn't want Mama? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2010 20:12:35 GMT
regarding tunny would they want to pay his wage demands ??
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on May 10, 2010 20:23:29 GMT
regarding tunny would they want to pay his wage demands ?? Good point, but Tuncay might be reasonable if he still has links in the north East. |
|
|
|
Post by knowles on May 10, 2010 20:31:25 GMT
Weren't they supposed to be after Sonko in January?  |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on May 10, 2010 20:32:42 GMT
Weren't they supposed to be after Sonko in January? That was Newcastle Town ;D |
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on May 10, 2010 20:33:04 GMT
We can only swap a player they will actually want. Certainly rules Mama out then, but then we knew that already... |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 10, 2010 20:38:20 GMT
Weren't they supposed to be after Sonko in January? Beattie and Sonko for Carroll would be some deal! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by w15cfc on May 10, 2010 20:42:07 GMT
Carroll should be starting his holidays in Duram jail well before the season starts in August
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on May 10, 2010 20:43:29 GMT
Carroll should be starting his holidays in Duram jail well before the season starts in August That is no problem - we are experienced with jail birds! |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 10, 2010 20:46:40 GMT
I do love how TP is whinging about wankers in the squad and the 2 of our main targers appear to be Carroll and Pennant. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on May 10, 2010 21:02:48 GMT
Maybe we could do a double raid on the Geordies and sign Steven Taylor too. That would certainly put a cat amongst the pigeons.
Just imagine getting rid of Sonko and Beattie (arguably 'worth' about £60K a week in wages) for one of the hottest English strikers around?! Sounds good to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 10, 2010 21:06:09 GMT
I'm not a great fan of Taylor. His positioning is piss poor and gets him into a hell of a lot of trouble.
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on May 10, 2010 21:20:57 GMT
The reference to Taylor was very tongue in cheek Jamie. Wouldn't want him. I'm rapidly thinking that Carroll would be a superb acquisition though.
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 10, 2010 21:25:03 GMT
Good!  Carroll is an ideal Pulis striker. He wins everything in the air and I think if TP gets the opportunity he'll sign him. |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on May 11, 2010 0:27:03 GMT
A swap for Tuncay would make some sense Bayern. I'd certainly rather see Carroll starting for us with Mama on the bench than to see Mama starting for us with Tuncay on the bench. |
|
Carroll is an ideal Pulis striker. He wins everything in the air and I think if TP gets the opportunity he'll sign him. 
