|
Post by knype on Mar 2, 2008 20:10:29 GMT
All of this talk about the ref being poor is detracting us from what was a piss poor performance, yes refs can influence matches but we were 2-0 down and not tackling or pressing QPR before the sending off so we can have no complaints....
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2008 20:11:51 GMT
Agreed. Was still an appalling decision though.
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Mar 2, 2008 20:12:12 GMT
@ 2-0 down with 11, I still thought we could win, but not after the sending off
yes we were 2-0 down, but we have been there before and won
|
|
|
Post by knype on Mar 2, 2008 20:12:43 GMT
@ 2-0 down with 11, I still thought we could win, but not after the sending off yes we were 2-0 down, but we have been there before and won Not playing wank we havent!
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Mar 2, 2008 20:13:09 GMT
True Knype. But, we have seen plenty of games where we have been poor first half, and have turned on a decent performance in the second.
Without the sending off, and the clearly off-side goal, maybe we'd have turned it around? At least the pattern of substituations would have been different. We'd have kept our most creative player of the season in Lawrence on for longer.
|
|
|
Post by kinnell on Mar 2, 2008 20:13:18 GMT
Ref also missed two clear pens for them!
|
|
|
Post by knype on Mar 2, 2008 20:15:55 GMT
Why dont we wake up to the fact that we were beaten and soundly by a better team! QPR worked their socks off 1st half especially! It wasnt even individual mistakes that cost us it was team mistakes, surely the players realize that to get the ball back you have to tackle and also the best place to tackle and do that is as soon as the opposition have the ball, you press them to force them onto the back foot and try and rush them into a mistake! We did none of the above!
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Mar 2, 2008 20:17:55 GMT
Ref also missed two clear pens for them! for them !!!!!!!!! news to me, what about the clear pen to us he missed first half
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Mar 2, 2008 20:19:27 GMT
It's not about that though is it knype? I agree with your points, but I do not accept the fact that as at the point of the sending off we would never have turned the game around with a full side of 11 men.
Yes - we were beaten by the better team, but it was made a lot easier for them by the poor officiating.
|
|
|
Post by knype on Mar 2, 2008 20:20:59 GMT
No mate I disagree, we lost today not because of the ref but because we played the wrong team with possibly the wrong tactics!
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Mar 2, 2008 20:22:00 GMT
We'll never know, will we?
What we do know, definitively, is that we were shite in the 1st half.
How the 2nd would have unfolded wit 11, we never got the chance to find out - although at least we didn't fold and came away with a small degree of credit.
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Mar 2, 2008 20:22:33 GMT
The referee was responsible for how the match played out, he has to answer to all of those Stoke fans who made the trip down to London to see a game which was ruined thanks to his incompetence, they are the ones I feel sorry for, this facking wankstain shouldn't be let anywhere near a football ground again.
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Mar 2, 2008 20:23:21 GMT
this facking wankstain shouldn't be let anywhere near a football ground again. Amen to that.
|
|
|
Post by knype on Mar 2, 2008 20:23:36 GMT
But he wasnt because we would never have score 2 let alone 3!
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Mar 2, 2008 20:24:55 GMT
So we didn't hit the post, bar, had a penalty denied, man sent off, no we were never near scoring were we???!!!! We are well aware of your ongoing campaign against Pulis but when it stretches to defending the worst sending off in living memory you really need to take a lie-down.
|
|
|
Post by knype on Mar 2, 2008 20:26:04 GMT
No we werent as hitting the post/bar having a penalty denied(so did they) are not scoring or even near to it!
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Mar 2, 2008 20:27:01 GMT
It's another Preston really, isn't it? Only ourselves to blame for being in that position, but the referee did his best to keep us there.
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Mar 2, 2008 20:28:18 GMT
No we werent as hitting the post/bar having a penalty denied(so did they) are not scoring or even near to it! Alright mate, whatever you say.
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Mar 2, 2008 20:29:15 GMT
Because even at 2-0 down with 11 men were well capable of scoring 2 goals (or more) in the 2nd half , after a proper rollicking from Pulis ... we hit the bar, the post had a penalty turned down , we were getting chances
|
|
|
Post by knype on Mar 2, 2008 20:30:36 GMT
But so did they! ID we were fooking awful today and probably would still be on nil if we were playing still!
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Mar 2, 2008 20:34:53 GMT
We were poor in the first half but probably no poorer than we were in the first half against Scunthorpe. We probably would not have gone on to win the game even if Griff had not been sent off - but that is no reason for us not to point out that the ref didn't do his job properly.
If he fails to see something, that can happen to anyone - but this fool claims to have seen something which clearly did not happen. So, he gave a red card when he cannot possibly have seen a foul because there wasn't one. In other words he gave a dishonest decision he thought there MIGHT have been a foul which he hadn't seen but he gave a red card anyway. The fact that Stoke were playing badly doesn't alter that simple fact.
|
|
dman
Academy Starlet
Posts: 153
|
Post by dman on Mar 2, 2008 20:36:11 GMT
Whelon, fuller and then the v nearly og, add on the penalty thats 4 chances to score and 2 of them were with 10 sodding men. Im amazed the players didnt give up after the 3rd goal, i certainly would have done. Im sure had we pulled it back, and then got a 4th that toss rag would have found one of our players guilty of fouling the garss or something
|
|
|
Post by knype on Mar 2, 2008 20:36:24 GMT
I am not saying that the ref wasnt poor, what I am saying is dont let it cloud over a poor peformance, the ref didnt help but he also didnt cost us the game!
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Mar 2, 2008 20:39:52 GMT
Wrong Knype, he might have cost us the game or he might not have done - nobody knows. If he had been refereeing the game against Scunthorpe and had sent a player off before half time the result MIGHT have been different or it might not - no one knows, not even you.
What he did do was lessen our chances of getting back into the game - and then, to make sure, he allowed them an offside goal!
|
|
|
Post by TheDee51 on Mar 2, 2008 20:43:32 GMT
knype - can't see anybody on this board agreeing with you so we must all be wrong
|
|
|
Post by knype on Mar 2, 2008 20:43:49 GMT
I respect your opinion ID....Each to their own!
|
|
dman
Academy Starlet
Posts: 153
|
Post by dman on Mar 2, 2008 20:44:33 GMT
i dont see how what he said is abuseful. I think your mistaking it for truthful
|
|
|
Post by knype on Mar 2, 2008 20:45:14 GMT
:-*Dman!
|
|
|
Post by kinnell on Mar 2, 2008 20:46:41 GMT
Yes. Two clear shoves in the back. It's sometimes easier to see these things on TV, Dave.
|
|
dman
Academy Starlet
Posts: 153
|
Post by dman on Mar 2, 2008 20:48:57 GMT
i recall seeing one possible penalty for their team, but i think you are psuhing it to find a second.
|
|