|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Sept 27, 2019 22:35:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by stokeykez on Sept 27, 2019 22:37:23 GMT
Goes against the general consensus between fans that bad recruitment is down to him
|
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Sept 27, 2019 22:37:57 GMT
Interesting, that's come from Delap. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 22:40:30 GMT
One down, one to go.
I see operation bullshit has started.
|
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Sept 27, 2019 22:40:48 GMT
I couldn't believe what I'd heard, if I'd had a few beers I'd have sworn I’d mis-heard it but there it is. Gouranga.  |
|
|
|
Post by wuzza on Sept 27, 2019 22:41:35 GMT
Blimey that could stop a few people on here in their tracks if it’s right !
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 27, 2019 22:41:36 GMT
I didn't think it made a whole lot of sense if I'm honest. Why would they sack Hughes and then allow the manager's who followed him to continue with the same policy, if it had been such a failure? Wouldn't they simply have reverted to how it was in the beginning of Hughes' successful tenure? |
|
|
|
Post by chigstoke on Sept 27, 2019 22:43:01 GMT
Blimey that could stop a few people on here in their tracks if it’s right ! Bayern and momo will be having aneurysms as we speak  |
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Sept 27, 2019 22:43:30 GMT
Lawrence left the club a full three years before ‘the process’ was a thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Sept 27, 2019 22:43:38 GMT
I didn't think it made a whole lot of sense if I'm honest. Why would they sack Hughes and then allow the manager's who followed him to continue with the same policy, if it had been such a failure? Wouldn't they simply have reverted to how it was in the beginning of Hughes' successful tenure? In all fairness Paul, when has the board ever done anything that can be considered rational? |
|
|
|
Post by tejstokie on Sept 27, 2019 22:44:59 GMT
I didn't think it made a whole lot of sense if I'm honest. Why would they sack Hughes and then allow the manager's who followed him to continue with the same policy, if it had been such a failure? Wouldn't they simply have reverted to how it was in the beginning of Hughes' successful tenure? If that is the case, why haven't they taken control back after hughes and only allowed Rowett and NJ to spend more on worse? If that is the facts, they should be held accountable (ie. scholes as carts is gone) for negligence. |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 27, 2019 22:45:45 GMT
I didn't think it made a whole lot of sense if I'm honest. Why would they sack Hughes and then allow the manager's who followed him to continue with the same policy, if it had been such a failure? Wouldn't they simply have reverted to how it was in the beginning of Hughes' successful tenure? In all fairness Paul, when has the board ever done anything that can be considered rational? For sure but I didn't think that Liam's story actually stacked up, if you think it through. |
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Sept 27, 2019 22:45:56 GMT
Lawrence left the club a full three years before ‘the process’ was a thing. I think his point was he spoke to someone well within the club |
|
|
|
Post by wuzza on Sept 27, 2019 22:46:25 GMT
Lawrence left the club a full three years before ‘the process’ was a thing. But to be fair he wasn’t saying he was speaking from personal experience. |
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Sept 27, 2019 22:46:58 GMT
Lawrence left the club a full three years before ‘the process’ was a thing. I think his point was he spoke to someone well within the club Who would know though? There’s only really Ryan who’s been there all the way through? |
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Sept 27, 2019 22:47:39 GMT
Lawrence left the club a full three years before ‘the process’ was a thing. I think his point was he spoke to someone well within the club That's how I understood it. Gouranga. |
|
|
|
Post by supacoopa101 on Sept 27, 2019 22:48:22 GMT
I think his point was he spoke to someone well within the club Who would know though? There’s only really Ryan who’s been there all the way through? Delap perhaps? |
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Sept 27, 2019 22:49:01 GMT
Who would know though? There’s only really Ryan who’s been there all the way through? Delap perhaps? Delap left in 2013 and came back in 2018. |
|
|
|
Post by miggoscfc on Sept 27, 2019 22:49:13 GMT
Delap is the leak.
|
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Sept 27, 2019 22:49:14 GMT
It was also interesting to hear him ask how long he had as if he wanted to go into a lot more detail. Gouranga. |
|
|
|
Post by greenhoff on Sept 27, 2019 22:50:20 GMT
He said it came from within the club from someone he trusted. Terry Conroy has also said exactly the same thing. The fact of the matter is our last three managers if you exclude Paul Lambert have wasted a shed load of money on shit players.
|
|
|
|
Post by proudstokie on Sept 27, 2019 22:50:58 GMT
I couldn't believe what I'd heard, if I'd had a few beers I'd have sworn I’d mis-heard it but there it is. Gouranga. I’ve had a few beers and I’m not sure what his point was? When it was successful Hughes wanted more power? When what was more successful? Didn’t Hughes sign Wimmer? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 22:52:10 GMT
Goes against the general consensus between fans that bad recruitment is down to him I don’t think there’s been any doubt the managers have picked the players. Hughes lost it. Rowett signed who he wanted and Jones signed who he wanted. I always thought the issue was the lack of someone telling them they weren’t the best ideas and lack of a plan but if they’ve been told to let the managers do what they want then it’s a different story... We’re just a shit show. Does anyone know what they are doing in that place at all. It’s a mess. |
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Sept 27, 2019 22:54:44 GMT
What's he saying? That Weasel and Hoss were responsible for the good times, signing Bojan, Arnie, Shaq and Hughes and co are entirely culpable for the shit show that followed.
Bullshit.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenhoff on Sept 27, 2019 22:57:16 GMT
I couldn't believe what I'd heard, if I'd had a few beers I'd have sworn I’d mis-heard it but there it is. Gouranga. I’ve had a few beers and I’m not sure what his point was? When it was successful Hughes wanted more power? When what was more successful? Didn’t Hughes sign Wimmer? Hughes came when his stock was low. Therefore he accepted the process that was in place where the board had a big say in transfers. This was put in place when TP was in charge. Obviously Pulis hated it because he wanted sole power. After seemingly proving himself Hughes wanted more power to dictate transfers which was given. This has carried on. Terry Conroy said exactly the same thing. |
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Sept 27, 2019 23:01:14 GMT
I’ve had a few beers and I’m not sure what his point was? When it was successful Hughes wanted more power? When what was more successful? Didn’t Hughes sign Wimmer? Hughes came when his stock was low. Therefore he accepted the process that was in place where the board had a big say in transfers. This was put in place when TP was in charge. Obviously Pulis hated it because he wanted sole power. After seemingly proving himself Hughes wanted more power to dictate transfers which was given. This has carried on. Terry Conroy said exactly the same thing. But many of the early signings are players like Ireland and Guidetti that he’d worked with before. We had a great relationship with Chelsea and with Barca, two of his former clubs, and signed numerous players with Bundesliga links, which was a market Hughes had longed dabbled in since signing Samba and Santa Cruz for peanuts at Blackburn. |
|
|
|
Post by callas12 on Sept 27, 2019 23:18:00 GMT
When was it Scholes said mistakes had been made & lessons had been learnt?
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 27, 2019 23:36:25 GMT
What's he saying? That Weasel and Hoss were responsible for the good times, signing Bojan, Arnie, Shaq and Hughes and co are entirely culpable for the shit show that followed. Bullshit. Exactly. It doesn't stack up. |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Sept 27, 2019 23:40:14 GMT
I’ve had a few beers and I’m not sure what his point was? When it was successful Hughes wanted more power? When what was more successful? Didn’t Hughes sign Wimmer? Hughes came when his stock was low. Therefore he accepted the process that was in place where the board had a big say in transfers. This was put in place when TP was in charge. Obviously Pulis hated it because he wanted sole power. After seemingly proving himself Hughes wanted more power to dictate transfers which was given. This has carried on. Terry Conroy said exactly the same thing. The "carried on" bit, doesn't make sense though. If they sacked Hughes because the change hadn't worked, they wouldn't then carry on with that same change with the next bloke(s) would they? They'd revert back. |
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Sept 27, 2019 23:41:02 GMT
What's he saying? That Weasel and Hoss were responsible for the good times, signing Bojan, Arnie, Shaq and Hughes and co are entirely culpable for the shit show that followed. Bullshit. Exactly. It doesn't stack up. It doesn't make much sense but why would Liam tell us porkies? |
|
