|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2019 19:43:16 GMT
Our CEO has been deathly quiet on his masterclass of putting a sell-on clause in.
Just shows the sheer class of the man.
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Jan 14, 2019 19:43:58 GMT
The sooner a pompous, idle, money-grabbing, part-time, disloyal footballer leaves this country, the better. So, Podoli, why don’t tell us what you really think.
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Jan 14, 2019 19:51:22 GMT
Some of us aren't ruled by the God of money. I imagine because that particular God has never permitted you to dine with him. That’s because they are nowhere to be found when the waiter comes round with the bill!
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Jan 14, 2019 19:52:45 GMT
Our CEO has been deathly quiet on his masterclass of putting a sell-on clause in.
Just shows the sheer class of the man.
He probably got his degree at the now bankrupt Trump University.
|
|
|
Post by theglove on Jan 14, 2019 21:50:35 GMT
Some of us aren't ruled by the God of money. I imagine because that particular God has never permitted you to dine with him. I'm sure you would relish the opportunity to dine on the cock of Satan
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jan 14, 2019 21:58:06 GMT
Sticks in the craw a bit that they will double their money after 18 months. What's our share if he sells for 45m? Loyalty is never a thing these days, but those who were sucked in by the arms crossed hammers wankery will be feeling a bit foolish I guess. We get 20% of any profit so if he goes for the new reported £45m, then £5million ?????? In rough numbers does that mean Stoke and West Ham have made roughly the same profit on him?
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Jan 14, 2019 22:03:24 GMT
We get 20% of any profit so if he goes for the new reported £45m, then £5million ?????? In rough numbers does that mean Stoke and West Ham have made roughly the same profit on him? No because Stoke paid him substantially less than West Ham do.
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jan 14, 2019 22:08:56 GMT
In rough numbers does that mean Stoke and West Ham have made roughly the same profit on him? No because Stoke paid him substantially less than West Ham do. In transfers then is what I meant. I think the point is we will have done alright On his registration. If you discount the £75m for staying in the PL of course
|
|
|
Post by Absolution on Jan 14, 2019 22:20:47 GMT
No because Stoke paid him substantially less than West Ham do. In transfers then is what I meant. I think the point is we will have done alright On his registration. If you discount the £75m for staying in the PL of course I reckon we'll make a profit of around £18.5m taking into account our sell-on clause (if there is one) and the 20% we paid to his previous club. This assumes we bought him for £3m and sold him for £20m. If West Ham sell him for £45m, they'll have made a profit of around £20m, assuming they paid us £20m initially, and assuming there's a 20% (£5m) sell-on clause payable to us. That's just fag-packet maths from me and doesn't take his wages into account.
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Jan 15, 2019 14:37:10 GMT
The media keep telling we have inserted a clause of 20% for any further sale of Arnie, true or not? Someone here seemed certain that we didn't have inserted such a clause, but they still keep printing this.
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Jan 15, 2019 14:55:01 GMT
The media keep telling we have inserted a clause of 20% for any further sale of Arnie, true or not? Someone here seemed certain that we didn't have inserted such a clause, but they still keep printing this. Stoke haven't confirmed it themselves yet. I guess we'll only truly know if and when Arnie is sold?
|
|
|
Post by Mr_DaftBurger on Jan 15, 2019 15:02:19 GMT
The media keep telling we have inserted a clause of 20% for any further sale of Arnie, true or not? Someone here seemed certain that we didn't have inserted such a clause, but they still keep printing this. The media assume there's nothing wrong with the process!
|
|
|
Post by Edward Tattsyrup on Jan 15, 2019 17:44:07 GMT
Come on Arnie, get that transfer request in
|
|
|
Post by questionable on Jan 15, 2019 17:58:21 GMT
I’d assume that WHU would have also pay what they still owe to us, if anything.
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Jan 15, 2019 18:04:20 GMT
We probably have inserted a 20% clause.
But knowing Scholes it’s probably us covering 20% of his wages should he move from West Ham.
The insufferable minge.
|
|
|
Post by stokeykez on Jan 15, 2019 18:16:39 GMT
The money is for the board to sort, I just feel happy that after only thumping the irons on his shirt a few months ago he again has his head turned by the wonga. Knew he wouldn't last long at west ham, when the ambition run out there he would get itchy feet. The mans a tosser end of.
|
|
|
Post by SneydGreenStokie on Jan 15, 2019 21:22:17 GMT
Our CEO has been deathly quiet on his masterclass of putting a sell-on clause in. Just shows the sheer class of the man.
If he hasn't which I dont think he will have, then he is totally incompetent SGS
|
|
|
Post by ceejays on Jan 17, 2019 17:20:43 GMT
Word is from my West Ham contact tha Arnie has massive gambling debts and I mean massive!!
|
|
|
Post by neddy on Jan 17, 2019 17:30:00 GMT
Word is from my West Ham contact tha Arnie has massive gambling debts and I mean massive!! Hope it’s with us!!!
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Jan 17, 2019 17:30:50 GMT
Word is from my West Ham contact tha Arnie has massive gambling debts and I mean massive!! It's always that or shagging the manager's daughter.
|
|
|
Post by stokeykez on Jan 17, 2019 23:23:46 GMT
Word is from my West Ham contact tha Arnie has massive gambling debts and I mean massive!! So trotting off to a monthly salary of 450,000 will help him get over this ! Matty came to us and was rehabilitated, arnie is going to a country where gambling is huge.
|
|
|
Post by macarisredarmy on Jan 18, 2019 13:41:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Clem Fandango on Jan 18, 2019 15:15:24 GMT
Well you knew that was coming.
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Jan 18, 2019 15:18:15 GMT
Word is from my West Ham contact tha Arnie has massive gambling debts and I mean massive!! I heard similar from a good source.
|
|
|
Post by nott1 on Jan 18, 2019 15:22:10 GMT
How about a cheeky bid to take him off their hands?
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jan 18, 2019 15:35:17 GMT
Word is from my West Ham contact tha Arnie has massive gambling debts and I mean massive!! Oh dear never mind
|
|
|
Post by SCFC92 on Jan 18, 2019 15:37:24 GMT
Word is from my West Ham contact tha Arnie has massive gambling debts and I mean massive!! Oh dear never mind
|
|
|
Post by stokeson on Jan 18, 2019 15:44:25 GMT
Well whatever we make letting him go ("because of our lack of ambition." has cost us 100 million.
|
|
|
Post by gonk on Jan 18, 2019 15:45:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Jan 18, 2019 15:46:47 GMT
Word is from my West Ham contact tha Arnie has massive gambling debts and I mean massive!! Maybe someone on here could send him the number of snake rescue
|
|