|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 14, 2019 11:59:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Jan 14, 2019 12:11:30 GMT
Is there any chance of anyone in the local media finding out whether this 20% sell on clause story is actually true or not?
|
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Jan 14, 2019 12:11:56 GMT
So long as we get our cut from any sale,I couldn't give a Donkeys Donger,where he goes,pity we can't have 2 sell on clauses,because he will want away from his new club inside 18months.
|
|
|
|
Post by steewee on Jan 14, 2019 12:13:09 GMT
Why wouldn't you want to earn as much as possible?! Human nature. Why don't millionaires stop working? Why do we have billionaires? Some of us aren't ruled by the God of money. I imagine because that particular God has never permitted you to dine with him. |
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Jan 14, 2019 12:19:05 GMT
So long as we get our cut from any sale,I couldn't give a Donkeys Donger,where he goes,pity we can't have 2 sell on clauses,because he will want away from his new club inside 18months. A sell on clause stays with a player for their career unless it is bought out by a club. So if this Chinese club do sell him on for profit we'll get a cut (If there is a sell on clause). Just like if there is a sell on clause whatever we get we'll have to give Bremen 20% for their clause. |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 14, 2019 12:41:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Jan 14, 2019 12:46:49 GMT
Why wouldn't you want to earn as much as possible?! Human nature. Why don't millionaires stop working? Why do we have billionaires? Some of us aren't ruled by the God of money. So you work for free then? |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Jan 14, 2019 12:49:57 GMT
Arnie is a mercenary. With no loyalty. Respect or Affinity with the club. Fans. Country that he plays in. He is everything that is wrong with the premier league Its not just the Prem, its nice to think that, but its far from it, the majority of players would do the same, if moving to another club gets them paid a higher wage they'd be off like a shot, personally I don't see it as a problem, it happens in everyday life, I don't see how football should be any different. |
|
|
|
Post by Absolution on Jan 14, 2019 13:02:38 GMT
So long as we get our cut from any sale,I couldn't give a Donkeys Donger,where he goes,pity we can't have 2 sell on clauses,because he will want away from his new club inside 18months. A sell on clause stays with a player for their career unless it is bought out by a club. So if this Chinese club do sell him on for profit we'll get a cut (If there is a sell on clause). Just like if there is a sell on clause whatever we get we'll have to give Bremen 20% for their clause. I've never heard of it working like that before. A sell on clause is just a clause between the buyer and the seller. |
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Jan 14, 2019 13:12:24 GMT
A sell on clause stays with a player for their career unless it is bought out by a club. So if this Chinese club do sell him on for profit we'll get a cut (If there is a sell on clause). Just like if there is a sell on clause whatever we get we'll have to give Bremen 20% for their clause. I've never heard of it working like that before. A sell on clause is just a clause between the buyer and the seller. I'll try and find the article, pretty sure it was swiss ramble. |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Jan 14, 2019 13:27:19 GMT
I've never heard of it working like that before. A sell on clause is just a clause between the buyer and the seller. I'll try and find the article, pretty sure it was swiss ramble. If that's true then I would've thought that a sell on would only apply if the fee was higher than we'd originally sold him to West Ham for, which will probably be highly unlikely. To back up your point though, Groningen got a 10% cut of Virgil Van Dijk's transfer fee from Southampton to Liverpool after originally getting a cut of the fee when Celtic sold him to Southampton. We got a cut when Ben Foster moved from Man Utd to Birmingham, but when they sold him to West Brom I don't think we received anything because they sold him for the same fee they bought him for. |
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Jan 14, 2019 13:34:22 GMT
I'll try and find the article, pretty sure it was swiss ramble. If that's true then I would've thought that a sell on would only apply if the fee was higher than we'd originally sold him to West Ham for, which will probably be highly unlikely. To back up your point though, Groningen got a 10% cut of Virgil Van Dijk's transfer fee from Southampton to Liverpool after originally getting a cut of the fee when Celtic sold him to Southampton. We got a cut when Ben Foster moved from Man Utd to Birmingham, but when they sold him to West Brom I don't think we received anything because they sold him for the same fee they bought him for. Yes It's only applicable to profits on sales. We'll get 20% of the profit that West Ham make, and that is 100% extra profit to us so we'll pay 20% of that over to Weder Bremen. I'm still looking for the article. I'm sure I haven't just imagines it. |
|
|
|
Post by RF10 on Jan 14, 2019 13:35:37 GMT
So long as we get our cut from any sale,I couldn't give a Donkeys Donger,where he goes,pity we can't have 2 sell on clauses,because he will want away from his new club inside 18months. A sell on clause stays with a player for their career unless it is bought out by a club. So if this Chinese club do sell him on for profit we'll get a cut (If there is a sell on clause). Just like if there is a sell on clause whatever we get we'll have to give Bremen 20% for their clause. Why would it be with the player if it doesn't affect them? It's a clause between the two clubs, mainly used in situation where the player has potential. |
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Jan 14, 2019 13:41:59 GMT
so he saw my answer on the previous page and then tweeted this ! Who is he on here I wonder, or just a lurker ? |
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 14, 2019 14:41:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by podolipotter on Jan 14, 2019 14:56:18 GMT
The sooner a pompous, idle, money-grabbing, part-time, disloyal footballer leaves this country, the better.
|
|
|
|
Post by heworksardtho on Jan 14, 2019 16:21:40 GMT
Greed knows now bounds. His stoke contract set him up for life. How much money do these fuckers need See Peter Coates , Denise and Jon , Arnie is on pin money compared to them |
|
|
|
Post by realstokebloke on Jan 14, 2019 16:33:22 GMT
Isn't snake a delicacy in China ?
Watch out brothers Arnautović.
|
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Jan 14, 2019 16:39:17 GMT
Fuck off out the country Arnie, you fat arsed moody git
|
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Jan 14, 2019 16:55:17 GMT
A sell on clause stays with a player for their career unless it is bought out by a club. So if this Chinese club do sell him on for profit we'll get a cut (If there is a sell on clause). Just like if there is a sell on clause whatever we get we'll have to give Bremen 20% for their clause. Why would it be with the player if it doesn't affect them? It's a clause between the two clubs, mainly used in situation where the player has potential. It reflects their progress and rewards a club for having a hand in their training if they continue to be successful. Here's another example www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3220376/Anthony-Martial-Manchester-United-nets-former-French-amateur-club-Les-Ulis-massive-270-000-windfall.htmlLes Ulis got 270,000 Euros when Martial signed for Man U even tho he left there at 14 years of age and signed for Lyon before moving to Monaco. Tbf it may only be early Sell on clauses that remain as some sort of Development Fee. |
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Jan 14, 2019 17:16:34 GMT
Maybe the wage cap should be introduced again before these greedy cunts bring the game to its knees.
|
|
|
|
Post by Goonie on Jan 14, 2019 17:20:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Linx on Jan 14, 2019 17:22:41 GMT
If the gambling stuff is true (quite poignant that Etherington came to us from West Ham as a way of curing his addiction) it’s bloody ironic that Arnie should consider a move to China - gambling is massive over there! Frying pan to fire with that one. |
|
|
|
Post by teenagefanclub on Jan 14, 2019 18:34:12 GMT
If the gambling stuff is true (quite poignant that Etherington came to us from West Ham as a way of curing his addiction) it’s bloody ironic that Arnie should consider a move to China - gambling is massive over there! Frying pan to fire with that one. Wok? |
|
|
|
Post by gonk on Jan 14, 2019 18:47:51 GMT
I’m sure when there was was a rumour on here at a Stoke player had gambling problems and most people thought it was Charlie,some one said it was Arnie and it was that bad was gambling right up to kick off. |
|
|
|
Post by Vadiation_Ribe on Jan 14, 2019 18:58:47 GMT
Arnie's bro' must've made that up if it's true! so he saw my answer on the previous page and then tweeted this ! Who is he on here I wonder, or just a lurker ? Sentinel staff are all over this board. Whether they're posters or lurkers or both, I don't know. |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 14, 2019 19:02:59 GMT
Is there any chance of anyone in the local media finding out whether this 20% sell on clause story is actually true or not? Somebody asked our local media if the clause claim had been verified |
|
|
|
Post by mattador78 on Jan 14, 2019 19:24:14 GMT
That’s developed players from a youth system |
|
|
|
Post by RF10 on Jan 14, 2019 19:35:59 GMT
Nice one, very interesting that. Does that apply to all players then? Surprised it also goes up to the age of 23. |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Jan 14, 2019 19:42:44 GMT
Is there any chance of anyone in the local media finding out whether this 20% sell on clause story is actually true or not? Somebody asked our local media if the clause claim had been verified Well blow me. All the shit they've had over the past couple of years about this and they've said nothing. It's almost as if they enjoy being abused. |
|
