|
|
Post by george2again on Oct 21, 2018 10:03:20 GMT
It doesn't work so Rowshit has to change it or be removed from his job. We can't carry on as it stands. A change of system is needed ASAP which allows us to attack. We don't really have the personnel for 3-5-2 unless Clucus plays wing back and then the other issue is the one who could play right wing back he doesn't speak to, the immature twat that he is. Looks like 4-4-2 is the only option. In doing so, two of Allen, Woods, Etebo and Clucus won't play which he doesn't seem to want to happen. I suppose Clucus could play left. McClean is only ever going to be a sub in my eyes he is so limited (nice one pizza boys). The other alternative and my favourite is bring in a manager who can motivate and organise a team to play the polar opposite to what Rowshit does. Well win one or two here and there but the default for Rowshitt is what we we saw yesterday and I think always will be . Its called foresight , and the owners of this club seem to have none. Hes a mistake now move on. No win in next three and he has to be gone ASAP. Hate his interviews I cringe.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Oct 21, 2018 10:11:09 GMT
His name is Rowett.
|
|
|
|
Post by george2again on Oct 21, 2018 10:11:57 GMT
Rowshit because he is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Oct 21, 2018 10:13:14 GMT
It's about as funny as Tiny Penis for Tony Pulis, actually thinking about it then its not!
|
|
|
|
Post by george2again on Oct 21, 2018 10:16:00 GMT
It's about as funny as Tiny Penis for Tony Pulis, actually thinking about it then its not! Its not supposed to be funny just a reflection of what we have, a shit manager who needs arms bands on hes so out of his depth. |
|
|
|
Post by berahinosgoals on Oct 21, 2018 10:17:02 GMT
It doesn't work so Rowshit has to change it or be removed from his job. We can't carry on as it stands. A change of system is needed ASAP which allows us to attack. We don't really have the personnel for 3-5-2 unless Clucus plays wing back and then the other issue is the one who could play right wing back he doesn't speak to, the immature twat that he is. Looks like 4-4-2 is the only option. In doing so, two of Allen, Woods, Etebo and Clucus won't play which he doesn't seem to want to happen. I suppose Clucus could play left. McClean is only ever going to be a sub in my eyes he is so limited (nice one pizza boys). The other alternative and my favourite is bring in a manager who can motivate and organise a team to play the polar opposite to what Rowshit does. Well win one or two here and there but the default for Rowshitt is what we we saw yesterday and I think always will be . Its called foresight , and the owners of this club seem to have none. Hes a mistake now move on. No win in next three and he has to be gone ASAP. Hate his interviews I cringe. Who is coming in to replace Rowett? |
|
|
|
Post by george2again on Oct 21, 2018 10:24:22 GMT
I would defo have gone for Dean Smith having watched Brentford at our place. At this point and listening to Rowetts excuse ridden interviews so far this season I settle for anyone. I think Moyes would be a decent fit but our stock has dropped so much now were going to be lucky to get a decent manager any more.
|
|
|
|
Post by madmickthe3rd on Oct 21, 2018 10:25:50 GMT
We need a new RB
Rafa B
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 10:26:25 GMT
It doesn't work so Rowshit has to change it or be removed from his job. We can't carry on as it stands. A change of system is needed ASAP which allows us to attack. We don't really have the personnel for 3-5-2 unless Clucus plays wing back and then the other issue is the one who could play right wing back he doesn't speak to, the immature twat that he is. Looks like 4-4-2 is the only option. In doing so, two of Allen, Woods, Etebo and Clucus won't play which he doesn't seem to want to happen. I suppose Clucus could play left. McClean is only ever going to be a sub in my eyes he is so limited (nice one pizza boys). The other alternative and my favourite is bring in a manager who can motivate and organise a team to play the polar opposite to what Rowshit does. Well win one or two here and there but the default for Rowshitt is what we we saw yesterday and I think always will be . Its called foresight , and the owners of this club seem to have none. Hes a mistake now move on. No win in next three and he has to be gone ASAP. Hate his interviews I cringe. If he does get sacked you should apply, some great tactical nous there..... |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 10:26:45 GMT
Rowshit? Are you 8 years old, christ that's cringeworthy just to read!
|
|
|
|
Post by george2again on Oct 21, 2018 10:33:34 GMT
I don't get the Bauer issue. He was the one breath of fresh air last season. Hes got energy and speed, the one thing this team hasn't got. Surely his attributes outweigh his faults for the good of the team. Yesterday shower Martina for what he is,very average,not great going forward and not great defending. But the face fits which is how Rowett manages. McClean being the other example.
|
|
|
|
Post by george2again on Oct 21, 2018 10:34:22 GMT
Rowshit? Are you 8 years old, christ that's cringeworthy just to read! Just a massive frustration of having him as our manager |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Oct 21, 2018 11:37:40 GMT
If the history of football teaches us anything, it's that changing managers every few weeks is a great idea. Give them a two year contract, tell them that they'll be judged on half a dozen results, then sack them. That's always worked.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 11:42:57 GMT
What I fail to understand is,
We went for Lambert and Rowett because they are similar to Pulis.
Why not go back for Pulis if that’s what they were looking for us to be again.
No one plays Pulis football better than Pulis, so why not get him.
|
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Oct 21, 2018 11:45:37 GMT
I would defo have gone for Dean Smith having watched Brentford at our place. At this point and listening to Rowetts excuse ridden interviews so far this season I settle for anyone. I think Moyes would be a decent fit but our stock has dropped so much now were going to be lucky to get a decent manager any more. Have you got an hilarious name lined up for Moyes yet? Rowshit is a superb one. |
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Oct 21, 2018 11:49:35 GMT
What I fail to understand is, We went for Lambert and Rowett because they are similar to Pulis. Why not go back for Pulis if that’s what they were looking for us to be again. No one plays Pulis football better than Pulis, so why not get him. Wasn't there a massive falling out and they sacked him? Weren't 99% of his signings through one agent which is a bit suss? Didn't he burn his remaining bridges with his antics v West Brom? Also, that turgid shit yesterday was definitely not Pulis-like. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 12:13:14 GMT
There needs to be a clear definition here. If you don't rate him and don't think he will get us promotion, fair enough. I'm in that camp.
Sacking him now could be suicide. One thing for certain is we won't go down. We won't go up either I don't think.
Keep him until the summer and reassess the situation would be my vote. If he shows more than he is currently, between now and then, then reconsider.
I think the board could get twitchy around December time though if things don't pick up.
|
|
|
|
Post by onefatcopper on Oct 21, 2018 12:13:40 GMT
Rowshit? Are you 8 years old, christ that's cringeworthy just to read! Just a massive frustration of having him as our manager You forgot your other massive frustration Bauer ! I don’t think that you have ever created a thread on this forum that has a positive opinion, it’s always Rowett out and bring back Bauer ? And now we have Moyes being rolled out again, Moyes in his magnificent career has won the grand total of fuck all. He has never gained a promotion, a title or a cup ! The only thing he’s ever achieved was to get Everton into Europe, and to send Sunderland down. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 12:23:01 GMT
What I fail to understand is, We went for Lambert and Rowett because they are similar to Pulis. Why not go back for Pulis if that’s what they were looking for us to be again. No one plays Pulis football better than Pulis, so why not get him. Wasn't there a massive falling out and they sacked him? Weren't 99% of his signings through one agent which is a bit suss? Didn't he burn his remaining bridges with his antics v West Brom? Also, that turgid shit yesterday was definitely not Pulis-like. Didn’t he walk because of Cartwright and Scholes were massively involved in the recruiting and he didn’t want be a part of that. Rowett and lambert are failed Pulis type managers. It’s not like we went from a defensive manager in Pulis to an all out attackig manager in Lambert / Rowett |
|
|
|
Post by werrington on Oct 21, 2018 12:25:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on Oct 21, 2018 13:18:50 GMT
What I fail to understand is, We went for Lambert and Rowett because they are similar to Pulis. Why not go back for Pulis if that’s what they were looking for us to be again. No one plays Pulis football better than Pulis, so why not get him. Rowett is nothing like Pulis. We lost yesterday having had 70% of the possession. You can argue we didn't use the possession we had that well but we had 70% possession because we tried to keep control of the ball. I can't recall a Pulis side ever having 70% possession - his sides simply don't put that much importance on it. Criticise Rowett by all means - but at least criticise him for what he is actually doing. |
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Oct 21, 2018 13:19:50 GMT
What I fail to understand is, We went for Lambert and Rowett because they are similar to Pulis. Why not go back for Pulis if that’s what they were looking for us to be again. No one plays Pulis football better than Pulis, so why not get him. Because it immediately divides the fans and he wouldn’t want to come when he’s doing fine where he is? |
|
|
|
Post by 19notbeaten72 on Oct 21, 2018 13:30:10 GMT
He Rowett has had long enough now to mould a team into the shape & formation that should see us in a far better place than we currently are.
Playing one up front at home to a very average Birmingham side tells you all you need to know about his tactics & the way he asks the team to play time to face up to reality we are far more likely to be lingering around the bottom half of the table than pushing for a play off place.
3 Very hard games coming up which could be crucial for Rowett & SCFC i hope Coates has a back up plan this time if he decides enough is enough.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 13:32:59 GMT
What I fail to understand is, We went for Lambert and Rowett because they are similar to Pulis. Why not go back for Pulis if that’s what they were looking for us to be again. No one plays Pulis football better than Pulis, so why not get him. Rowett is nothing like Pulis. We lost yesterday having had 70% of the possession. You can argue we didn't use the possession we had that well but we had 70% possession because we tried to keep control of the ball. I can't recall a Pulis side ever having 70% possession - his sides simply don't put that much importance on it. Criticise Rowett by all means - but at least criticise him for what he is actually doing. We had 70% possession playing defensive football though passing it between our cb and defensive midfielder |
|
|
|
Post by JurgenVandeurzen on Oct 21, 2018 13:38:01 GMT
Fuck me, please feel free to move on to another board and sprout your shit on there.
I suspect you were one of those who thought we'd walk this league?
One of the famed "Project 197" squad?
We were always going to struggle, GR is dealing with a handful of players who should have been moved on years ago - it takes time.
I still feel we'll be around the playoffs come the end of the season, this league is something else.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Oct 21, 2018 13:40:04 GMT
Rowett is nothing like Pulis. We lost yesterday having had 70% of the possession. You can argue we didn't use the possession we had that well but we had 70% possession because we tried to keep control of the ball. I can't recall a Pulis side ever having 70% possession - his sides simply don't put that much importance on it. Criticise Rowett by all means - but at least criticise him for what he is actually doing. We had 70% possession playing defensive football though passing it between our cb and defensive midfielder We weren’t playing defensive football. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 13:43:59 GMT
We had 70% possession playing defensive football though passing it between our cb and defensive midfielder We weren’t playing defensive football. Opinions hey |
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Oct 21, 2018 13:45:57 GMT
We weren’t playing defensive football. Opinions hey Defensive football is trying to hold what you have and rarely looking to attack. THEY played defensive football (and very well too). We were trying to get on the front foot constantly and trying to break down their wall. Our decision making in the final third cost us. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 13:46:15 GMT
What I fail to understand is, We went for Lambert and Rowett because they are similar to Pulis. Why not go back for Pulis if that’s what they were looking for us to be again. No one plays Pulis football better than Pulis, so why not get him. If you've watched literally any game we've played this season aside from Norwich away, you'll know that Rowett is literally nothing like Pulis. |
|
|
|
Post by 19notbeaten72 on Oct 21, 2018 13:49:51 GMT
We had 70% possession playing defensive football though passing it between our cb and defensive midfielder We weren’t playing defensive football. Woods was playing mostly as a sweeper i would call that defensive football. I am sure he would be better off playing further forward & linking the play to our lone striker. |
|
