|
|
Post by cousindupree on May 12, 2018 20:29:00 GMT
emailed to him yesterday. I also contacted Spinksy who said he would look at it. Let's see if he thinks it's newsworthy. I also contacted Smudge to see if he would get some comment in his column for the sentinel....he can't be arsed to respond that's a shame.
Can someone on Twitter post something so maybe Sandoz at radio stoke might give it a mention.
Just think it needs to be out there in the wider media.
|
|
|
|
Post by alster on May 12, 2018 20:34:53 GMT
92 fucking percent. I don't think even our most unpopular managers have ever achieved that sort of disapproval and he's not even unpopular, just fucking useless.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokeson on May 12, 2018 20:39:45 GMT
Do you imagine this lot give a dam what we think...Let them eat cake....
|
|
|
|
Post by owdestokie2 on May 12, 2018 20:45:46 GMT
emailed to him yesterday. I also contacted Spinksy who said he would look at it. Let's see if he thinks it's newsworthy. I also contacted Smudge to see if he would get some comment in his column for the sentinel....he can't be arsed to respond that's a shame. Can someone on Twitter post something so maybe Sandoz at radio stoke might give it a mention. Just think it needs to be out there in the wider media. Just for clarity your poll represents who? (1) Those that have chosen to vote on the Oatcake or (2) SCFC’s supporter base as a whole? As an additional question how many individual members voted in in relation to the total membership of the Oatcake. I’m simply trying to understand the strength of the outcome of the poll Many thanks in anticipation of a detailed simple simple answers Apologies if I’m thick |
|
|
|
Post by citynickscfc on May 12, 2018 20:47:04 GMT
Can only hope they can be arsed to take note. I doubt it but with the try
|
|
|
|
Post by alster on May 12, 2018 20:50:05 GMT
emailed to him yesterday. I also contacted Spinksy who said he would look at it. Let's see if he thinks it's newsworthy. I also contacted Smudge to see if he would get some comment in his column for the sentinel....he can't be arsed to respond that's a shame. Can someone on Twitter post something so maybe Sandoz at radio stoke might give it a mention. Just think it needs to be out there in the wider media. Just for clarity your poll represents who? (1) Those that have chosen to vote on the Oatcake or (2) SCFC’s supporter base as a whole? As an additional question how many individual members voted in in relation to the total membership of the Oatcake. I’m simply trying to understand the strength of the outcome of the poll Many thanks in anticipation of a detailed simple simple answers Apologies if I’m thick Its a sample it will be accurate to +/- so many percent. 92% is fairly indicative that the majority of Stoke fans don't want Lambert to stay however you try to twist it. |
|
|
|
Post by Absolution on May 12, 2018 20:50:38 GMT
92 fucking percent. I don't think even our most unpopular managers have ever achieved that sort of disapproval and he's not even unpopular, just fucking useless. That’s a good point. Imagine if people didn’t like him.  |
|
|
|
Post by xchpotter on May 12, 2018 20:51:27 GMT
Noble effort, but the club really doesn’t give a shit. At least you have done something though,so fair play.
|
|
|
|
Post by owdestokie2 on May 12, 2018 20:58:45 GMT
Just for clarity your poll represents who? (1) Those that have chosen to vote on the Oatcake or (2) SCFC’s supporter base as a whole? As an additional question how many individual members voted in in relation to the total membership of the Oatcake. I’m simply trying to understand the strength of the outcome of the poll Many thanks in anticipation of a detailed simple simple answers Apologies if I’m thick Its a sample it will be accurate to +/- so many percent. 92% is fairly indicative that the majority of Stoke fans don't want Lambert to stay however you try to twist it. It’s a sample from where, the Oatcake? A sample of the Oatcake Membership? “Majority” of Stoke fans? I can’t remember seeing notice of a public ballot. I’m neither here or nor there in respect of Lambert, if people wish to post “outcomes” at least have a robust and transparent % of stakeholders |
|
|
|
Post by alster on May 12, 2018 21:00:00 GMT
92 fucking percent. I don't think even our most unpopular managers have ever achieved that sort of disapproval and he's not even unpopular, just fucking useless. That’s a good point. Imagine if people didn’t like him. If he needs a job give him a fucking hippo suit. just don't let him have anything to do with football. We need to score goals to win games, this bloke shits himself given a lead, he can't win a game to save his life. We'll never see a convincing win again in a meaningful game as long as he is here. Fuck him off! |
|
|
|
Post by alster on May 12, 2018 21:05:44 GMT
Its a sample it will be accurate to +/- so many percent. 92% is fairly indicative that the majority of Stoke fans don't want Lambert to stay however you try to twist it. It’s a sample from where, the Oatcake? A sample of the Oatcake Membership? “Majority” of Stoke fans? I can’t remember seeing notice of a public ballot. I’m neither here or nor there in respect of Lambert, if people wish to post “outcomes” at least have a robust and transparent % of stakeholders You're full of shit. Even if the poll was accurate to +/-20% which would be astounding in a poll of several hundred where no one is barred or forced to take part, he is not wanted by an overwhelmng majority. Just admit you're one of the 8% who actually like what he's doing. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 12, 2018 21:06:00 GMT
emailed to him yesterday. I also contacted Spinksy who said he would look at it. Let's see if he thinks it's newsworthy. I also contacted Smudge to see if he would get some comment in his column for the sentinel....he can't be arsed to respond that's a shame. Can someone on Twitter post something so maybe Sandoz at radio stoke might give it a mention. Just think it needs to be out there in the wider media. Fair play mate, you would have hoped the editor of the Oatcake would have shown some reaction !, maybe they are afraid of reprisals from the club's hierarchy, the Sentinel and Radio Stoke appear to give the club a very easy ride  |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on May 12, 2018 21:11:21 GMT
emailed to him yesterday. I also contacted Spinksy who said he would look at it. Let's see if he thinks it's newsworthy. I also contacted Smudge to see if he would get some comment in his column for the sentinel....he can't be arsed to respond that's a shame. Can someone on Twitter post something so maybe Sandoz at radio stoke might give it a mention. Just think it needs to be out there in the wider media. Fair play mate, you would have hoped the editor of the Oatcake would have shown some reaction !, maybe they are afraid of reprisals from the club's hierarchy, the Sentinel and Radio Stoke appear to give the club a very easy ride What are you wittering on about? The poll is hosted on our website for crying out loud. If we were afraid of reprisals it would have been taken down! |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 12, 2018 21:12:07 GMT
92 fucking percent. I don't think even our most unpopular managers have ever achieved that sort of disapproval and he's not even unpopular, just fucking useless. That’s a good point. Imagine if people didn’t like him. Lambert is a paupers Tony Pulis, he hasn't spilt the support though apart from 10% of happy clappers the rest want him gone, united in a wish to see this buffoon leaving as soon as possible or sooner. Paul Lamberts barmy morons  |
|
|
|
Post by alster on May 12, 2018 21:12:13 GMT
emailed to him yesterday. I also contacted Spinksy who said he would look at it. Let's see if he thinks it's newsworthy. I also contacted Smudge to see if he would get some comment in his column for the sentinel....he can't be arsed to respond that's a shame. Can someone on Twitter post something so maybe Sandoz at radio stoke might give it a mention. Just think it needs to be out there in the wider media. Fair play mate, you would have hoped the editor of the Oatcake would have shown some reaction !, maybe they are afraid of reprisals from the club's hierarchy, the Sentinel and Radio Stoke appear to give the club a very easy ride The club abuse their position to exclude the media if they have the temerity to ask probing questions or make critical comment, stuck in the past. |
|
|
|
Post by expectedtoulouse on May 12, 2018 21:13:25 GMT
emailed to him yesterday. I also contacted Spinksy who said he would look at it. Let's see if he thinks it's newsworthy. I also contacted Smudge to see if he would get some comment in his column for the sentinel....he can't be arsed to respond that's a shame. Can someone on Twitter post something so maybe Sandoz at radio stoke might give it a mention. Just think it needs to be out there in the wider media. Fair play mate, you would have hoped the editor of the Oatcake would have shown some reaction !, maybe they are afraid of reprisals from the club's hierarchy, the Sentinel and Radio Stoke appear to give the club a very easy ride Quite indicative of the apathy riddled through the club. Why should he care anyway? He’s already pretty much said he’s winding the Oatcake up in the very near future. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 12, 2018 21:14:34 GMT
Fair play mate, you would have hoped the editor of the Oatcake would have shown some reaction !, maybe they are afraid of reprisals from the club's hierarchy, the Sentinel and Radio Stoke appear to give the club a very easy ride What are you wittering on about? The poll is hosted on our website for crying out loud. If we were afraid of reprisals it would have been taken down! Apologies I thought the poster was referring to a column in the Sentinel written by the editor of the oatcake, my mistake obviously  |
|
|
|
Post by Billy the kid on May 12, 2018 21:15:05 GMT
For what it is worth, a few % swing either way would be classed as a normal opinion. However this poll is not worth the air time in my opinion, as a lot of people who want Paul Lambert out are highly motivated and therefore will go out of their way to vote. For what it is worth my personal belief is that he is not the right man for the job and as soon as this shitstorm of a season over then so should his employment. But to say a few hundred people across the whole of the oatcake membership let alone the club's supporter database is representative is completely distorted, and I would imagine the powers that be will take the same view.
|
|
|
|
Post by Davef on May 12, 2018 21:17:37 GMT
What are you wittering on about? The poll is hosted on our website for crying out loud. If we were afraid of reprisals it would have been taken down! Apologies I thought the poster was referring to a column in the Sentinel written by the editor of the oatcake, my mistake obviously And who do you think owns this message board? |
|
|
|
Post by owdestokie2 on May 12, 2018 21:18:12 GMT
It’s a sample from where, the Oatcake? A sample of the Oatcake Membership? “Majority” of Stoke fans? I can’t remember seeing notice of a public ballot. I’m neither here or nor there in respect of Lambert, if people wish to post “outcomes” at least have a robust and transparent % of stakeholders You're full of shit. Even if the poll was accurate to +/-20% which would be astounding in a poll of several hundred where no one is barred or forced to take part, he is not wanted by an overwhelmng majority. Just admit you're one of the 8% who actually like what he's doing. As you’ve been personally abusive I’ll recipricate: If possible “read” my post. I’m not supporting nor decrying Lambert, there are arguments for and against which “logical” argument can support either way You fucking halfwit To produce and promote a so called “poll” you need a base line to measure from. Pleas explain your term “majority”. Have you canvassed for example all season ticket holders So either you or the original OP answer the questions or fuck off (you not the OP) Hopefully you wont need further clarity on any aspect of my previous posts on this subject or this one in particular |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 12, 2018 21:20:28 GMT
Fair play mate, you would have hoped the editor of the Oatcake would have shown some reaction !, maybe they are afraid of reprisals from the club's hierarchy, the Sentinel and Radio Stoke appear to give the club a very easy ride The club abuse their position to exclude the media if they have the temerity to ask probing questions or make critical comment, stuck in the past. If true it smacks of censorship, why would the club do such a thing after all we are a well run club with committed owners, they have nothing to hide or be evasive about as stated this shit storm has nothing to do with complacency, lack of investment, Scholes, Cartwright, the board or Lambert, mistakes have been made but the process is fine and dandy  really FFS wake up and own up. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 12, 2018 21:21:15 GMT
Apologies I thought the poster was referring to a column in the Sentinel written by the editor of the oatcake, my mistake obviously And who do you think owns this message board? Pro Boards ? |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on May 12, 2018 21:24:10 GMT
Fair play mate, you would have hoped the editor of the Oatcake would have shown some reaction !, maybe they are afraid of reprisals from the club's hierarchy, the Sentinel and Radio Stoke appear to give the club a very easy ride What are you wittering on about? The poll is hosted on our website for crying out loud. If we were afraid of reprisals it would have been taken down! I don't think anyone could ever accuse you of kowtowing to the club, Dave. |
|
|
|
Post by stokeykez on May 12, 2018 21:24:53 GMT
The club are aware of the oatcake as a valid way of discussing the club. One of the first questions on the recent online survey from the club was how do we find out about club information, the oatcake was a choice on there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on May 12, 2018 21:26:19 GMT
emailed to him yesterday. I also contacted Spinksy who said he would look at it. Let's see if he thinks it's newsworthy. I also contacted Smudge to see if he would get some comment in his column for the sentinel....he can't be arsed to respond that's a shame. Can someone on Twitter post something so maybe Sandoz at radio stoke might give it a mention. Just think it needs to be out there in the wider media. Spinks and the Sentinel are Coates's mouthpiece. They are Stoke City's Pravda. |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on May 12, 2018 21:28:23 GMT
And who do you think owns this message board? Pro Boards ? Wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 12, 2018 21:34:17 GMT
Apologies who does ? is it profit making ? |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 12, 2018 21:35:14 GMT
emailed to him yesterday. I also contacted Spinksy who said he would look at it. Let's see if he thinks it's newsworthy. I also contacted Smudge to see if he would get some comment in his column for the sentinel....he can't be arsed to respond that's a shame. Can someone on Twitter post something so maybe Sandoz at radio stoke might give it a mention. Just think it needs to be out there in the wider media. Spinks and the Sentinel are Coates's mouthpiece. They are Stoke City's Pravda. The devil wears Pravda. |
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on May 12, 2018 21:41:03 GMT
Great. Have you also told them the peoples favourite to take over and thereby guarantee supporter unity and undying support? No? Why's that then?
The only candidate to unite us all for all time is so obvious...Anybody Butt!
After every pathetic failure the only name on everyone's lips is Anybody Butt. Why oh why doesn't anybody listen? English gravelly voiced boy genius with local connections currently 5th in the Finish second division. It's so obvious you'd have to be a moron not to see it.
It even satisfies the continuity lunatics. In the ludicrously unlikely event that the mighty Anybody Butt should fail who's waiting in the wings? Of course...Anybody Butt Anybody Butt! So by re-appointing Anybody Butt to replace Anybody Butt we address disappointment by appointing the permanent fans favourite. Pointless change and endless continuity in one fell swoop.
So lets unite behind Butt. We need Butt. We crave Butt. Coates - give us Butt. Butt is the answer. Only an arsehole would disagree,
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2018 21:48:16 GMT
Do you imagine this lot give a dam what we think...Let them eat cake.... Let them eat Oatcake Shirley... |
|
really FFS wake up and own up. 
