|
Post by miltonpotterfan on Dec 18, 2017 13:09:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Dec 18, 2017 13:12:49 GMT
That really helps us and our manager doesn't it?
Is Scott being charged for ineptitude?
|
|
|
Post by pez75 on Dec 18, 2017 13:12:57 GMT
Whatever - the damage is done...
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Dec 18, 2017 13:13:21 GMT
Fuck all good that is to us now
|
|
|
Post by iamcliveclarke on Dec 18, 2017 13:15:09 GMT
I don't really see how it damaged us really. We'd most likely have lost the game if you're honest
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 13:15:15 GMT
Saturday's game was a microcosm of everthing that is wrong with football today. This just about sums it up.
It's shit.
|
|
|
Post by skip on Dec 18, 2017 13:22:36 GMT
I don't really see how it damaged us really. We'd most likely have lost the game if you're honest Of course it damaged us, it gave the opposition the impetus. They scored a goal as a direct consequence of the players cheating and the referees incompetence.
|
|
|
Post by liamo on Dec 18, 2017 13:23:50 GMT
Without sounding like i'm defending Hughes too much, we're incredibly fragile at the moment, the first goal always kills us off
It probably did have an affect on the game and how it turned out
I think there should be a ref review at half time and then fulltime, all four officials should come together and look at the major events of each half and retrospectively dish out reds/yellows/remove goals that should never have been
Lanzini will be banned but it does fuck all for us, if anything it screws us over even more, they've got Bournemouth and Newcastle next 2 fixtures, fellow strugglers that we could do with losing..
|
|
|
Post by scfc75 on Dec 18, 2017 13:24:21 GMT
2 games is wank. Make it 10 and it might start to have an effect. All it does is benefit their next 2 opponents.
They should also have points deducted for Moyes' disgusting defence afterwards.
|
|
|
Post by robrigo on Dec 18, 2017 13:25:54 GMT
I must say I’m chuffed to bits as it’s good news for Newcastle a team that’s right up our arses.
Ffs
|
|
|
Post by dirtygary69 on Dec 18, 2017 13:25:56 GMT
So can we have a goal back on our GD please?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 13:26:31 GMT
I don't really see how it damaged us really. We'd most likely have lost the game if you're honest I don't care if Arnautovic missed a thousand chances second half, it was on an absolute knife edge at the time and goals change games. So of course it damaged us.....
|
|
|
Post by skip on Dec 18, 2017 13:30:25 GMT
2 games is wank. Make it 10 and it might start to have an effect. All it does is benefit their next 2 opponents. They should also have points deducted for Moyes' disgusting defence afterwards. Receiving a two game ban will be viewed at 'Upton Park'* as little more than 'taking one for the team'. It gave them the upper hand in a six pointer. *The publicly funded Olympic Park Stadium. Shower of cunts the lot of 'em.
|
|
|
Post by Pedropotter on Dec 18, 2017 13:32:15 GMT
Until we have on the spot video replays and immediate action taken against cheats, I'm afraid the game is fucked.
|
|
|
Post by jezzascfc on Dec 18, 2017 13:32:27 GMT
No help to us now, is it? Ref should have spotted it, give him a yellow and the game may have panned out a bit differently.
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Dec 18, 2017 13:34:21 GMT
A 2-match ban cushioned by 3 absolutely vital points for West Ham, to quote the Sentinel.
It's absolutely shit really. Lanzini will enjoy a merry christmas with his feat up, his team will probably pick up more points as they're on a role, and the effect will be non-existent.
As for Graham Scott, he'll be back, don't you worry. He's not going away.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Dec 18, 2017 13:37:11 GMT
5 game ban, 3 point club deduction and 2 weeks wages fine to a charity would hopefully start to stop these fookin cheats who are ruining the game
|
|
|
Post by skip on Dec 18, 2017 13:39:59 GMT
5 game ban, 3 point club deduction and 2 weeks wages fine to a charity would hopefully start to stop these fookin cheats who are ruining the game Exactly. Heavy manners dished out or it is absolutely pointless.
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Dec 18, 2017 13:40:54 GMT
5 game ban, 3 point club deduction and 2 weeks wages fine to a charity would hopefully start to stop these fookin cheats who are ruining the game Problem is when they have to impose such action on Arsenal. Imagine the reaction? Petitions, cancelled TV subscriptions (97% from India), Twitter spamming... Last thing the FA want is to alienate half of Bangalore.
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Dec 18, 2017 13:52:13 GMT
I don't really see how it damaged us really. We'd most likely have lost the game if you're honest On the contrary. We were competing up to that point and probably had the upper hand. That act of cheating resulted in us having to change our approach in chasing the game with the ensuing result. These imbeciles who perpetually cheat their way in the game need eradicating quickly. That result could be the difference between PL survival or relegation and many other teams suffer similarly throughout the season. The FA either introduce video technology pronto in which case Lanzini would have been shown a red card and the right team would have benefitted from his punishment. Or the retrospective panel must be able to award the points to the victims and deduct three points from the miscreants team regardless of the final result. Cheating like this would be eradicated overnight imo.
|
|
|
Post by FbrgVaStkFan on Dec 18, 2017 13:57:31 GMT
Worst part of the game or "system" if you like. It's a sad joke with no real deterrent, let alone punishment, being meted out. But what do you do after a game has already been played? Have the diving team play a man down next week? Take a point from them? I'm saying if you want to see real change, then substantially punish the team somehow as well, because it's obvious a player being suspended alone isn't enough.
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Dec 18, 2017 13:58:01 GMT
As I understand it, a panel of 3 will sit in judgement and it only takes 1 to say not guilty for him to be found not guilty.
Correct?
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Dec 18, 2017 13:59:03 GMT
As I understand it, a panel of 3 will sit in judgement and it only takes 1 to say not guilty for him to be found not guilty. Correct? Correct
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Dec 18, 2017 14:00:14 GMT
I don't really see how it damaged us really. We'd most likely have lost the game if you're honest i think personally at 0-0 its a different story.. against west ham anyway
|
|
|
Post by Parkhall Wanderer on Dec 18, 2017 14:00:30 GMT
Pity that tosser Anriearsehole snake face wankstain and spunkbubble can’t be charged with impersonating being a decent and absolutily spiffing fellow. Footballer yes low life yes would I wish the utmost that Karma could deliver to him in life? Oh yes yes yes yes.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Dec 18, 2017 14:00:55 GMT
As I understand it, a panel of 3 will sit in judgement and it only takes 1 to say not guilty for him to be found not guilty. Correct? Correct Surely it should be the majority
|
|
|
Post by wrighter on Dec 18, 2017 14:01:33 GMT
As I understand it, a panel of 3 will sit in judgement and it only takes 1 to say not guilty for him to be found not guilty. Correct? Yes, correct, all 3 judges look at it independtely, and ALL have to agree
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Dec 18, 2017 14:02:52 GMT
Surely it should be the majority don't forget we are talking about the FA here
|
|
|
Post by Veritas on Dec 18, 2017 14:03:09 GMT
All 3 have to agree and that is what has happened with Lanzini he is now formally charged.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Dec 18, 2017 14:05:55 GMT
Surely it should be the majority don't forget we are talking about the FA here The whole thing is fucking ridiculous, being an ex league 2 referee even our 'assessors' aren't this backwards
|
|